Skip to main content

Full text of "Jewish Supremacism by David Duke"

See other formats


Jewish Supremacism 

MY AWAKENING ON THE JEWISH QUESTION 



Jewish Supremacism 3 



Jewish Supremacism 5 



Jewish Supremacism 

My Awakening on the Jewish Question 

David Duke 



Anti-Semitism and Jewish chauvinism 
can only be fought simultaneously." 

—Israel Shahak, holocaust survivor and 
Israeli Peace Activist 



Free Speech Press 



Free Speech Press 
Covington, LA 70434 

© 2002 by David Duke. All Rights Reserved. Printed and published in 
the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or 
transmitted by any means, electronic or mechanical, without permission 
from the publisher. For information: 
Free Speech Press P.O. Box 188 Mandeville, LA 70470. (504) 626-7714 

Representative Duke : Internet address: www.davidduke.com 

copyright 2001 

Printed in the United States of America 

Ebook published in the United States of America 

Duke, David 



ISBN #1-892796-00-8 



Jewish Supremacism 7 



I dedicate this work to Dr. Israel Shahak, a Jewish holocaust survivor and 
Israeli citizen who showed the moral and intellectual courage to challenge the 
Jewish Supremacism that endangers both Jews and Gentiles. 



Jewish Supremacism 9 



Table of contents 



Arthur's Preface 

1 The Jewish Question 

2 Jewish Supremacism 

3 Judaism and Christianity 

4 Jews, Communism and Civil rights 

5 Jewish Media Supremacy 

6 Jewish Political Supremacy 

7 The Origins of Anti-Semitism I 

8 The Origins of Anti-Semitism 2 

9 Israel: A Supremacist State 

1 Israel: Supremacy through Terrorism 

1 1 Israeli Treachery against America 

12 A Holocaust Inquiry 

13 Jewish Led Invasion 

1 4 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 
Endnotes 



Preface 



Author's Preface 



I promise tliat this book will cliallenge you. Its amazing documentary evidence 
will confront some of your most cherished beliefs. 

If you can put aside as best you can the prejudices you may luwe on this subject 
and even preconceptions you might have about me personally — you can more fairly 
evaluate the ideas and evidence in this book. Tint is all an author can ask of his 
reader; and I ask it of you. It is my earnest belief tliat if you endeavor to keep an open 
mind, what you read will surprise you. 

The real power of this book comes from its documentation from major sources. In 
fact, you will quickly discover tliat most of my documents about Jewish Suprema- 
cism are from Jewish sources. They argue more convincingly for my point of view 
tlian anything I could write. I encourage you to go to the sources that I quote and 
check them out for yourself. In this book I take you along with me on a fascinating 
journey of discovery in a forbidden subject. I urge you to courageously keep an open 
mind while you explore the topics ahead, for tliat is the only way any of us can find 
the truth. 

Some will defame this book by calling it anti-Semitic. Yet, it is not 
considered anti- American to examine historical mistreatment of Indi- 
ans. No one calls it anti-Christian to talk about the excesses of the In- 
quisition. No one says that it is anti-Muslim to examine extreme ele- 
ments within Muslim fundamentalism. Is one considered anti- White 
for documenting the history of Jim Crow in the South? 

This book is not anti-Semitic; it simply examines and documents 
elements of ethnic supremacism that have existed in the Jewish com- 
munity from historical to modern times. 

Any criticism of Jewish Supremacism is immediately condemned 
as "anti-Semitism." The chronic media recital of the horrors of the 
Holocaust has made the term "anti-Semitic" morally equivalent to the 
endorsement of mass murder. The word itself shuts down reason and 
evokes heat rather than light. The word is flagrantly overused; it is 
even used against those who simply protest Israeli human rights vio- 
lations against Palestinians. 

I am reluctant to begin my book by saying what it is not. The me- 
dia climate, however, forces me to do so. 



Jewish Supremacism 13 

Due to the overwhelming power of the media to distort what I say 
and write, I will state emphatically here and now that I do not oppose 
all Jews, any more than an author examining the excesses of the Inqui- 
sition opposes all Christians. Specifically, Jewish Supremacism exam- 
ines a long record of Jewish supremacist ideology and history that 
have had a powerful and damaging effect on both the Jewish and 
Gentile world. 

I will be the first to acknowledge that not all Jews support or share 
in this supremacism. In fact, a number of courageous Jews suffer 
greatly for opposing it. This book is dedicated to the memory of one 
of them: an Israeli Professor, Dr. Israel Shahak, who recently passed 
away. Dr. Shahak believed that Jewish Supremacism has greatly 
harmed the Palestinian people as well as the non-Jewish community 
the world over. He offered strong evidence that Jewish radicals have 
waged an unrelenting ethnic war against Gentiles since the days of 
their sojourn in Egypt. Dr. Shahak believed that this extreme 
chauvinism has helped bring about centuries of repeated anti-Semitic 
reactions, ranging from the pogroms of Pharaoh to the horrors of 
what is now called the Holocaust. He persuasively argued that unless 
both Jews and Gentiles courageously stand up against this 
supremacist agenda and its power, it will continue to pose a severe 
danger to Jews and Gentiles alike. 1 

This book is ultimately about lessening both the dangers and the 
hatreds between our peoples. This cannot happen until both Jews and 
Gentiles hear the other side of the Jewish Question, a point of view 
currently forbidden in the modern world. 



As I write these lines, I sit on a mountain in the Colorado Rockies 
named after the Aspen tree, whose shade I now enjoy. Its cylindrical 
leaves turn easily in the cool breeze, reflecting the sunlight and af- 
fording me a magical image. Through those glittering leaves I can see 
snow capped peaks on the horizon. The sight pleases both my eyes 
and my soul. From this mystic place, I cannot see a single human be- 
ing; only the magnificence of Nature fills my eyes. Questions of poli- 
tics, culture, religion, nationalities, ethnicity and race seem far away 
from here. From this vantage point the world and even Nature herself 
appear serene. Yet, when I look closely at the scenic beauty of Nature, 
I can see conflict and war that far eclipses even the worst turmoil 
found in mankind. 

Here on this mountain a never-ending struggle rages of element 
against element and species against species. The wind, rain and snow 
will someday level these great mountains of rock. Even the flowing 
stream, the ultimate symbol of serenity for many people, violently 



Preface 

fights for its life of movement against the mountain. Indeed, in time 
this great mountain will eventually succumb to even the tiniest rivu- 
lets of water and the other erosions of Nature. 

As I write in my notebook, two ants approach a peach pit on the 
rock beside me. One ant is larger and very differently equipped than 
the other. He has his way over the smaller one, but the vanquished 
creature runs back to his kingdom to report the great store of sweet 
food. His relatives will seek to return to the treasure before their com- 
petitors. The two tiny breeds might even go to war over the morsel. 
My eyes open to the war waged all around me. 

On this mountain, the trees, bushes and grasses compete for the 
sunlight and life itself. Smaller birds keep wary eyes out for hawks. 
The flora and fauna face the danger of death from the insects and 
parasites seeking to consume them. Even within every life form, a mi- 
croscopic war rages. The more closely one looks, the more intense the 
battle. In one cubic meter of life, there are more living creatures in- 
jured, killed, eaten or even exploited and enslaved than all the num- 
bers of human beings on earth who have faced a similar fate. Biolo- 
gists could offer endless examples of the never-ending battle for life 
and dominance between life forms, enough to fill a million books the 
size of this one. 

Yet, oddly, it is this brutal struggle of survival waged over a bil- 
lion years that produced the serene beauty that so touches my heart as 
I look out from this high place. So, perhaps this mountain is not so 
unlike the eternal battles among humankind. The historical struggle 
between human races has played a powerful role in our human evo- 
lution just as it has for all life forms throughout the Natural World. Its 
result for humanity is no less breathtaking than the view from this 
mountain. It produced a higher humanity that has given us the art of 
DaVinci's Madonna and Child, the ultimate expressions of sublime love 
found in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet or Keats' Ode On a Grecian 
Urn. 

The eternal struggle created the evolutionary advances that en- 
abled our kind to put our footprints on the moon. It is still hard to 
grasp that human beings have walked on another world and actually 
traveled to the golden orb of light that mankind has gazed up at with 
wonder for millennia. Could these things have been achieved without 
the evolutionary struggle for life and dominance that has driven us 
upward? An argument can surely be made that it is this life and death 
struggle for evolutionary fitness that produced the beautiful and ul- 
timate forms of love and achievement that in turn give us meaning. 



Jewish Supremacism 15 

This struggle created the beauty in mankind and the glory of its crea- 
tions, just as a seemingly cruel Nature created the stark splendor seen 
on this mountain I love. 

So perhaps, up here surrounded by a magnificent portrait of Na- 
ture, I am not in a world very far removed from the human conflicts 
down below. Most people see the seemingly serene vistas of Nature 
and never guess the war that rages underneath its aesthetic canopy. 
There are also those who are unaware of the racial and ethnic wars 
boiling both on and under the surface of humanity. 

Although we fantasize about the peace-loving nature of human 
beings, most of human history is a record of tribal, ethnic, or racial 
war of one kind or another. For instance, the most read book on earth, 
the Bible, records the bloody history of the conflict between the Israel- 
ites and the other peoples of the Middle Eastern region. It tells glori- 
ous stories of war and shocking accounts of genocide. Anyone who 
reads the Old Testament with unbiased eyes will readily discern its 
dominant theme of racial and ethnic supremacism. There are many 
blatant expressions of ethnic supremacism: 

• Israelites are a "chosen people," chosen by God above all the 
other peoples of the world. 2 

• Israelites have a right to rule over all other people and are prom- 
ised that they will someday own and rule over the whole world. 3 

• Israelites boast of genocide against whole peoples and king- 
doms. 4 

• Israelites are commanded to murder all the people of the lands 
where they intend to live and to kill all the people of foreign na- 
tions that do not submit themselves in slavery. 5 

• Israelites are forbidden to make slaves of their own people, but 
are encouraged to enslave non-Israelites whom they may pass 
down as slaves to their descendants forever. 6 

• Israelites are forbidden to intermarry or "mix their seed" with 
other peoples. 7 

Few people dare to even acknowledge the blatant racial suprema- 
cism of the Bible. And those who become aware of the extreme Jewish 
Supremacism in the Old Testament tend to believe that such senti- 
ments are relegated to ancient times and have no influence on the 
present. Jewish Supremacism, however, shows that the powerful ethno- 
centrism of ancient Judaism has continued to thrive to the modern 
day. I will offer compelling evidence that Jewish Supremacism has a 
dramatic and increasing effect on world events. 

It can be said that I as a Christian also revere the same Old Testa- 
ment books of supremacy. The difference, of course, is that the Chris- 
tian New Testament represents a profound shift from the Old. In 
place of an "eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth," Jesus Christ 



Preface 

taught "turn the other cheek." In contrast to Jewish Supremacism, 
Christianity offers universal salvation. 

Judaism bitterly rejected Jesus Christ and has never enjoyed his 
teachings of love and toleration. In fact, not only did the Jewish high 
priests pursue the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, these leaders guided 
their faith in the opposite ideological direction. It can be said that in 
addition to the crucifixion of Christ's body, they killed his spirit in 
their own hearts. 

It would be wrong to hate or persecute present day Jews because 
of the role of Jewish leaders in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, but it is 
important to understand the ideological, religious and ethnic war 
born during those times. 

From the earliest days of Christianity, Jewry became its chief per- 
secutor, for they saw the Christian salvation of both "Jew and Greek" 
as a threat to their ethnic purity and supremacism. It should be said 
that Judaism is also diametrically opposed to the Muslim faith, which 
like Christianity also has been interpreted as a universal message. Not 
only did they oppose Jesus when he walked among them, they merci- 
lessly persecuted his followers, the early Christians. 

Yet for fear of the Jews no one spoke openly of him (John 7:13) 8 

. . .for you suffered like things of your own countrymen as they 
did from the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the proph- 
ets, and drove us out and displease God, and oppose all men (1 
Thessalonians 2:14-16) 9 

Over the next few centuries, they codified Jewish oral tradition 
and adopted the Babylonian Talmud as their most important religious 
text. According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, it even supercedes 
the Torah in authority. 10 As Jesus Christ represents an evolution of 
greater love and tolerance, the Talmud only intensified the Torah' s 
chauvinism. I will thoroughly document this fact from Jewish texts 
themselves and through quotes from major Jewish scholars who dis- 
cuss the Talmud's meaning. The Talmud's unashamed and frequent 
references to non-Jews as animals and "supernal refuse," 11 as well as 
accounts of boiling their enemies in semen and excrement 12 might 
even have made Hitler blush. 

I will prove this controversial statement in this book and even 
show how mainstream Judaic authorities, such as uncensored editions 
of another major Jewish resource, the Jewish Encyclopedia, confirm the 
Talmud's hateful anti-Gentile teachings. I will also show that rabid 
anti-Gentile teachings are still promoted in modern times by many of 
the largest Jewish publications, such as the most popular Jewish 



Jewish Supremacism 17 

newspaper in the United States, The Jewish Press. It sets the tone of 
Jewish religious and cultural attitudes more than any other 
newspaper. 

One of its primary religious authorities is Rabbi Simcha Cohen, 
who has an instructional Dear Abby type of column called Halachic 
Questions. Not long ago, Rabbi Cohen instructed his readers that the 
Talmud denotes Gentiles as "animals" (as outlined by Talmudic writ- 
ings from Gemara Kiddushin 68a and Metzia 114b). 13 In another sec- 
tion he discusses how a Jewish woman is not designated as a prosti- 
tute if she has premarital sex with a Jew, but she is a whore if she has 
any sexual relations with a Gentile, even if she is married. 

Marriage to a Gentile can never be sanctified or condoned, such a 
liaison classifies the woman as a zona. ..common parlance inter- 
prets the term zona to refer to a prostitute.... 14 

Another major Jewish publication, the Jewish Chronicle, in an arti- 
cle called "Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words," reveals 
that the Jewish word for Gentile woman is the offensive Yiddish word 
shiksa — meaning "whore," from the Hebrew root, sheigetz ("abomina- 
tion"). It also pointed out that a little Gentile girl is called shikselke, 
meaning "little female abomination." 15 

Shiksa - the Jewish term for a Gentile woman, from the root word sheigetz 

meaning "abomination" or "whore." 
Shikselke - a Gentile little girl, meaning "little female abomination." 

How would Jews and the media react if Gentiles casually referred 
to Jewish women and little girls as "Jewish whores" and "little Jewish 
whores"? What would happen to any politician or entertainer in the 
world who referred to Jewish women and little girls as Jewish 
whores? Am I now supposed to be called an anti-Semite because I 
simply dare to expose such hateful anti-Gentilism proven in the two 
most influential Jewish newspapers in America? 

The Talmud's extreme supremacist teachings have certainly been 
a powerful factor in preventing assimilation of the Jewish people with 
the Christian and Muslim communities. Even though Jews have lived 
as only a small minority in Gentile nations for more than 3000 years, 
major Jewish geneticists and anthropologists proudly assert that Jews 
have preserved their distinctive genetic identity. 16 I will show how 
supremacist doctrines of fear and hatred of Gentiles, along with no- 
tions of Jewish superiority, are carefully instilled in every generation. 
Every young Jew learns of the perfidious nature of the Gentiles from 
Pharaoh to Hitler. They are taught - and many believe - that they are 
the "chosen of God," which may be the ultimate expression of ethnic 
superiority. 



Preface 

For, those who still want to think Jewish Supremacism is a phe- 
nomenon of ancient Biblical times, read the following words of Dr. 
Stephen Steinlight, one of the leading Jews in America, who wrote 
these comments in October of 2001. Steinlight is no minor Jewish fig- 
ure. He served for five years as the Director of National Affairs (do- 
mestic policy) in the most powerful and respected Jewish organiza- 
tion in the United States, the American Jewish Committee. Steinlight 
confesses the rampant Jewish supremacism and disloyalty to America 
that permeates the American Jewish community. 

I'll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids 
of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a 
quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative 
years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish 
summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, 
dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national 
anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and 
dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigra- 
tion to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many 
other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working 
in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. 
More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my 
people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to 
view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom 
sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, 
intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the 
lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one. 17 

If any Gentile politician dared to say that "typical Jewish kids" are 
deliberately taught that their real loyalty is not to America but to Is- 
rael and the Jewish people rather than to America; and that Jews are 
superior to Gentiles in intelligence and morals, he would be merci- 
lessly condemned by the media and hounded out of politics as an 
anti-Semite. Yet, this is the stark admission by the former head of the 
National Affairs of the American Jewish Committee. It should be em- 
phasized that his words are not from an off-handed or careless con- 
versation, but are the carefully chosen words of a major article he 
wrote for Jewish consumption, called "The Jewish Stake in America's 
Changing Demographics." 

This volume will show that the official policies of modern Israel 
and many of the leading elements of World Jewry still embody 
radically supremacist sentiments and policies. Organized Jewish 
elements around the world doggedly pursue their own supremacist 
agendas. Those agendas frequently conflict with the interests of the 
host nations in which they live. 



Jewish Supremacism 19 

My assertion that there exists a powerful, cohesive, world-wide 
Jewish Supremacism finds confirmation in evidence mostly provided 
by the Jewish Supremacists themselves. Their supremacist ideology 
finds clear enunciation in the foundation, structure and conduct of Is- 
rael, a nation unabashedly based on an ethnic supremacism. It is a 
state that has dispossessed, terrorized and grossly violated the human 
and civil rights of the Palestinian people. 

What is Jewish Supremacism? 

The definition of White supremacism from the Random House un- 
abridged Webster's Dictionary denotes it as "belief in superiority over 
other races and retaining of control in all relationships." Let's take the 
definition and apply it specifically to the term Jewish Supremacism. 

Jewish Supremacism - The belief, theory, or doctrine that the Jewish 
people are superior to all others and should retain control in all relation- 
ships. 

As to the first part of the definition, this book assembles powerful 
evidence that the leading Jews of the world have a belief, theory or 
doctrine that they are superior to all other peoples. I will also clearly 
demonstrate and that they seek control in all relationships with other 
peoples. 

David Ben Gurion, Israel's first Prime Minister, often called the 
"George Washington of Israel," said specifically that he believed in the 
"moral and intellectual superiority" of the Jewish people. 18 That sen- 
timent is commonly found in the writings of Jewish leaders through- 
out the world. Imagine the outcry if the President of the United States 
or head of state of any modern European nation pronounced that he 
believes in the moral and intellectual superiority of the White race! 
The Jewish dominated world media have so shielded Jewish Su- 
premacists from criticism that their most famous leaders can say such 
things without fear of repercussion. 

There was no outrage expressed by the world press when Ben 
Gurion made his remark, nor did any protest ensue from his su- 
premacist prophecy quoted in Look magazine in 1962; a prediction 
that Israel would one day sit atop a one world government. 

"In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will 
build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all 
continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Man- 
kind.' 19 

It also seemed cruelly ironic to his Palestinian victims that there 
was little outcry when the admitted terrorist Menachem Begin was 
awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Begin brags in his book, The Revolt, 
about the massacre of over two hundred men, women, and children 
at Dier Yassin. 20 The world hunts down suspected Nazi war criminals 



Preface 

but gives a blood-stained Jewish one... the Nobel Peace Prize! That 
one event should tell us a great deal about who is really supreme in 
the modern world. 

The other necessary part of the definition of supremacism denotes 
having control over other races. I will argue that Jewish Supremacists 
seek to control the nations in which they dwell. They make concerted 
efforts to dominate the two critical factors of control in the modern 
world, mass media and government. This book provides documented 
evidence of their incredible power in these sectors. This extreme con- 
centration of power exists not only in the United States, but in most of 
the major nations of the world including Canada, Britain, Russia, 
France, Brazil and many more. It is a universal pattern suggesting that 
it is by design rather than accident. 

Israel: A Jewish Supremacist State 

Of course, Israel itself came into being by massive ethnic cleansing 
and displacement of Palestine's indigenous population. At the time of 
the Balfour Declaration in 1917, Jews made up only 10 percent of the 
population of what today is Israel. After most of the Palestinian popu- 
lation had been driven out by terrorism in 1947 and 1948, Jewish Su- 
premacists established Israel. The Zionist state still scrupulously pre- 
serves the cultural and genetic identity of the Jewish people. 

Israel protects its Jewish control over their ethnic enclave by care- 
fully guarding its ethnic makeup. It bases its immigration on a genetic 
standard and limits immigration almost exclusively to those of bio- 
logical Jewish descent. An atheist Jew from New York City who has 
never stepped foot inside Israel is financially encouraged to immi- 
grate, while hundreds of thousands of Palestinians whose families 
have lived there for thousands of years are forbidden to return to the 
place of their birth. 

Israel is not a "multicultural nation." It is unashamedly a Jewish 
state devoted exclusively to the interests of the Jewish people. A na- 
tion with a sizable Palestinian minority, it is certainly the most rigidly 
segregated society in the world. Separate schools exist for Jews and 
Arabs, separate apartment complexes, separate neighborhoods and 
separate settlements. Many laws and regulations adversely affect Pal- 
estinians as compared to Jews. For instance, Palestinians are forbid- 
den by law from joining the military. In spite of their 22 percent of the 
population, (close to double that of African Americans in America) 
there has never been a Palestinian member of the Israeli cabinet. A 
former member of Israel's Supreme Court, Haim Cohen, described the 



Jewish Supremacism 21 

system that applies to Jews and Palestinians in Israel as similar to 
"Nuremberg laws" of Nazi Germany: 

...the bitter irony of fate which has led the same biological and 
racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infa- 
mous Nuremberg laws, to serve as a basis for the definition of Ju- 
daism within the State of Israel. 21 

I will go deeply into the subject of Israel in the body of this book, 
but I should not leave the subject now without pointing out that the 
Jewish Supremacism that dominates Israel receives little negative 
press around the world. Consider the positive press that Israel re- 
ceives as compared to the unanimous and universal media condem- 
nation that was heaped upon the former Apartheid regime in South 
Africa. Condemnation of South Africa was hypocritically led by an 
American media thoroughly dominated by Israeli partisans. 

I slowly became aware of a dual morality permeating Jewish- 
Gentile relations. Jews preach one morality for themselves and preach 
another for the non-Jewish world. Their highest morality is one of ra- 
cial pride, solidarity, tradition and self-interest. But they preached di- 
versity and liberalism for their perceived competitors. If such dualism 
did not exist, how could the Jewish-dominated American media: 

• Support the nation of Israel, which promotes Judaism in its 
schools, while opposing even the singing of Christmas carols 
in American public schools? 

• Support the nation of Israel, which has strictly segregated 
schools, communities, and facilities for Jews and Arabs — 
while condemning segregated schools and housing in Amer- 
ica and South Africa? 

• Support the nation of Israel, with its restrictive "Jews Only" 
immigration laws, while subverting American attempts to 
curtail even illegal immigration? 

• Support the nation of Israel, which allows every Jewish citi- 
zen to carry a machine gun if desired, while advocating gun 
control for American citizens? 

• Support the nation of Israel, which openly states its mission 
to preserve the Jewish people and heritage, while condemn- 
ing Palestinians who desire their own state, and scourging 
European Americans who dare to advocate the preservation 
of the Western heritage and culture in America? 

• Always depict the historical relations between Jews and Gen- 
tiles with the Gentiles as evildoers and the Jews as innocent 
victims, while condemning Gentiles as "anti-Semites" if they 
dare defend themselves from such ethnic slanders? 

Perfect examples of the gaping double standard can be found in 
the writings of the most important editor of the most important 
newspaper in America, A.M. Rosenthal of the New York Times. 



Preface 

Rosenthal is an enthusiastic, open-borders multiculturalist for 
America, but a rabid closed-border, Jewish Supremacist for Israel. 

Such double standards in the mass media raise other questions. 
Why is the world press so myopic in regard to Israel's ethnic suppres- 
sion? Is it reasonable to suspect that the bias in the press could be a 
result of a preponderance of Jewish power? Regarding subjects such 
as Jewish Supremacism, this domination certainly affords a reason 
why the term Jewish Supremacism, unlike White Supremacism, is never 
used by the press. Nor is the concept even explored. Even when Meir 
Kahane called Palestinians "dogs" and advocated forcibly expelling 
all Palestinians from Israeli occupied territory, he was never referred 
to as a Jewish Supremacist. 

On February 25, 1994, an American Jew, Baruch Goldstein, en- 
tered a mosque in Hebron and machine-gunned Palestinians at 
prayer, killing 29 of them. Some Jewish groups in both America and 
Israel have since made Goldstein a saint, building shrines for him 
both in America and in Israel. Neither Goldstein nor those who have 
built shrines to him are ever referred to as Jewish Supremacists or even 
as "anti-Gentiles." 22 On the opposite hand, if a Gentile even dares to 
quote the statement by Haim Cohen comparing Israel's laws to Nazi 
Nuremburg Laws, he will certainly find himself labeled an "anti- 
Semite" by the media. 

The double standard of world governments and the press is often 
quite amazing. As I write these words, the American President, 
George Bush, in the aftermath of the World Trade Center bombings of 
September 11, is busily trying to stamp out terrorism as well as wipe 
out "all the evil in the world." He does not see that goal as even the 
slightest bit too ambitious. Bush announced that any nation that har- 
bors terrorists will feel the wrath of American bombs. 

Not long after this pronouncement, Mr. Bush dined with one of 
the world's worst terrorists, the Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon. 
As the world knows, Sharon has a long record of terrorism and mur- 
der, including responsibility for the massacre of 1500 men and women 
children in the Sabra and Chatila refugee camps in Lebanon. During 
dinner, Mr. Bush did not so much as drop an olive on Mr. Sharon. 
Unlike hapless Afghanistan, no American bombs have fallen on Tel 
Aviv for harboring terrorists. In fact, Israel not only harbors terrorists, 
it has elevated many to be their supreme leaders. Sharon is not the 
first terrorist who made it to Prime Minister; some of the worst terror- 
ists who achieved that position are Begin, Shamir and Barak. 



Jewish Supremacism 23 

The double standards never seem to end. When an Israeli cabinet 
official, Rechavam Zeevi, was assassinated by Palestinians, Sharon 
and some U.S. officials denounced it as "terrorism." But, if the 
shooting down of Zeevi is indeed terrorism, what do we call many 
years of Israeli "targeted assassinations" of hundreds of Palestinian 
political figures, philosophers, clerics and poets? Why doesn't the 
press point out as well that Zeevi was himself a Jewish Supremacist 
who called Palestinians "lice" and has advocated their forced 
expulsion the occupied territories? 

One might argue that the existence of a supremacist Israeli state 
does not necessarily mean that the Diaspora (Jews outside of Israel) 
has the same supremacist agenda. However, one should consider the 
fact that organized Jewry all over the world devotedly supports the su- 
premacist state of Israel. Secondly, there is ample evidence that poli- 
cies of Jewish Supremacy extend far beyond the boundaries of Israel. 
Powerful Jews in media and government around the world frequently 
act to exert control over the peoples among whom they live. 

A World Wide Agenda 

Jewish groups formulate strategic agendas and act in ways that 
they think will serve specific Jewish interests. I think you will be 
amazed by the evidence I present of the media and political power 
exercised by Jewish Supremacists around the world. 

Organized Jewry can be clearly shown to have had world-wide 
strategic objectives since the beginning of the last century. For in- 
stance, an early 20 th Century goal of Russian and World Jewry was the 
overthrow of what they considered to be the anti-Semitic, Czarist 
government of Imperial Russia. Jewish communities around the 
world supported the establishment of a proto-Jewish Communist re- 
gime in Russia. They provided most of the leadership and financing 23 
for the "Russian Revolution," a revolution that was actually more Jew- 
ish led than Russian led. Its chief financier was in fact the New York 
Jewish Capitalist, and extreme Jewish supremacist Jacob Schiff . 24 

One of the many startling documents I cite comes from the 
National Archives of the United States. It reveals that in the first 
government of Communist Russia there were only 13 ethnic Russians 
and more than 300 Jews out of a total of 384 Commissars. 25 Let that 
startling fact sink in: there were only 13 ethnic Russians in the first 
Bolshevik government of the "Russian Revolution." The chief 
correspondent of the London Times in Russia at the time described it as 
nothing short of an "alien invasion" and takeover of Russia by Jews. 26 
The same was said by our American ambassador to Russia, David 

27 

Francis, and by American intelligence officers in Russia. Even 
Winston Churchill described the Russian Revolution as a takeover by 



Preface 

Bolshevik Jews that had "...seized the Russian people by the hair of 
their heads and become the masters of this enormous empire." 28 This 
is just a small preview of the many startling documents you will find 
in this book. 

The successful overthrow of a major national Government (and 
murder of its ruling family) as part of a world Jewish agenda shows 
that even in the early days of the 20th Century they had considerable 
world-wide economic, political and media power. In the years since, 
their power has grown exponentially. Most people are still completely 
unaware of the paramount role of Jewry in the origins of Bolshevism 
in Russia and the spreading of Communism throughout the world. 

The public's lack of knowledge in this area is a manifestation of 
Jewry's influential role in academia and media. Otherwise, how could 
such important and easily verifiable facts of history be kept from 
common knowledge? 

It also reveals the incredible cohesion and coordination of Jewish 
power around the world that can be mobilized for specific Jewish ob- 
jectives. Another example of the power they wield in the highest 
councils of major nations was their successful effort for the establish- 
ment of Israel. From the issuance of the Balfour Declaration (only very 
recently did the world learn that Balfour was actually a secret Jew) 29 
to the founding and continuing support for Israel, they have shown 
the ability to get what they want. 

Jewish supremacy has a hypocritical and a jealous nature. If the 
people among whom the Jewish Supremacists reside would adopt 
programs of ethnic loyalty and solidarity similar to the Jewish Su- 
premacists, Jews could obviously not exercise power and control, for 
they are only a small percentage of the population. Only where the 
ethnic and nationalist feelings of the host people are diminished can 
Jewish Supremacists accumulate enough power to achieve their 
agenda. This book will show a clear pattern of Jewish influence in 
academia, government and media aimed at weakening all ethnic soli- 
darity and loyalty among their host peoples, while purposefully en- 
couraging ethnic pride and solidarity among Jews. This is true 
whether one speaks of Palestinians or Britons, Frenchmen or Euro- 
pean Americans, or African Americans, or among Muslims in the 
Arab world. This pattern is present in all nations wherever there are 
significant numbers of Jews. 

Hypocritically, the same forces who support Jewish Supremacism 
have accused me of being a "White supremacist." I reject that epithet, 
for unlike Jewish Supremacists I don't seek to rule over or control any 



Jewish Supremacism 25 

other race; I simply want to preserve my own heritage. Recognizing 
that there are intrinsic differences in culture, behavior, tradition, and 
even genetics among the different races does not make one a su- 
premacist. The truth be told, most people naturally prefer the associa- 
tion of their own racial or ethnic group, and frankly, most people 
think of their group as the best. What constitutes supremacism is 
when one group tries to control or be supreme over another. 

Divide and Conquer 

Supremacist Jews fear and oppose all ethnic solidarity other than 
their own. In the Western nations they consistently oppose all organi- 
zations seeking to preserve the interests and heritage of Europeans. 
Likewise, in non-European nations, they consistently work to break 
down the solidarity and homogeneity of the prominent ethnic group. 

It is part of the Jewish supremacist modus operandi to foment di- 
verse immigration and multiculturalism in every nation they reside in 
(except of course for Israel), as they see a squabbling disunited society 
as easy prey to their intense and well-organized efforts at control. Dr. 
Stephen Steinlight, the former officer of the American Jewish Com- 
mittee whom I quoted earlier, puts it in amazingly blunt terms: 

For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jew- 
ish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide 
and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our 
agenda. 30 

In America, not only have they worked to weaken the solidarity of 
European Americans, they actively opposed African American 
Nationalist movements such as Marcus Garvey's movement and the 
Nation of Islam. Those Black organizations simply desired to preserve 
their own heritage rather than assimilate into a multicultural society. 
Jewish Supremacists hypocritically want no one other than 
themselves to be conscious of their own heritage and common 
interests. They try to make other groups feel guilty for even having 
pride in their own culture. They paint ethnic pride and cohesion in 
other peoples as supremacist or hateful. 

A pertinent example of this divide and conquer method can be 
seen in Palestine and Lebanon. Most Palestinians and Lebanese are 
Muslim, but significant numbers are Christian. Israel has actively 
promoted hatred and civil war between Christians and Muslims in 
Mideast. One of the reasons that Ariel Sharon arranged for the 
slaughter of Muslim refugees by the Lebanese Phalangist militia 
forces in 1982 was to promote bitter hatred and war among Israel's 
Arab enemies. The diaries of one of Israel's former Prime Ministers, 
Moshe Sharett, exposed the fact that this was one of Israel's main 



Preface 

tactics. 31 The destabilization of nations by encouraging massive 
multiracial and multi-religious immigration, as well as promotion of 
existing ethnic and religious divisions within nations — has been a 
long-practiced strategy of Jewish Supremacists. 

This attempt to breakdown their enemy's ethnic solidarity can be 
explained in the context of the Palestinian people. If Israel's displaced 
Palestinians fully assimilate in foreign lands with their host popula- 
tions and thus lose their identity as Palestinians, they are certainly not 
as likely to support the Palestinian cause. 

While they attempt to break down other peoples' ethnic loyalty, 
Jewish supremacist forces in the media sponsor a chronic recital of 
historical anti-Semitism. Such a focus has two objectives. First, it 
heightens Jewish solidarity and worldwide support for Israel, and 
secondly, stimulates collective Jewish hatred for the Gentile world 
and thus lessens assimilation. The recital of Gentile perfidy against 
Jews also protects them from Gentile criticism, for if anyone dares to 
criticize Jewish Supremacism, he is painted as morally equivalent to 
the purveyors of the Holocaust. 

Another example of the great hypocrisy of the Jewish Suprema- 
cists can be seen in the intermarriage issue. During his campaign for 
President, George Bush found himself excoriated by the press for 
speaking at Bob Jones University, an institution that opposes interra- 
cial dating and marriage. Of course, during the campaign both 
George Bush and Al Gore made many obligatory speeches for many 
Jewish organizations. The irony is that every Synagogue in America 
and every major Jewish organization vigorously opposes intermar- 
riage of Jews with non-Jews. Of course, this blatant double standard 
finds no mention in America's supposedly fair and free press. Such 
exposure would not be good for Jewish public relations. 

There are thousands of books and movies, many written, pro- 
duced and marketed by Supremacist Jews that condemn doctrines 
and movements of racial or ethnic supremacy among non-Jews. Few 
books, however, dare to examine the world's oldest, most powerful 
and virulent form of ethnic supremacism: Jewish Supremacism. It 
seems that if these supremacist Jews were honest, they could better 
write about the supremacy they know the most about: their own. 

Of course, not all Jews are supremacist anymore than all Germans 
were Nazis during the Hitler era, but the fact remains that organized 
Jewry has pursued a successful agenda that has amassed incredible 
power in modern times. With the creation of Israel, they have estab- 
lished the most ethnically supremacist nation on earth. Even more 



Jewish Supremacism 27 

mportantly, they have managed to acquire enormous power in many 
of the major governments of the world (especially the United States) 
and today they thoroughly dominate the world news and entertain- 
ment media. When you read my well-documented chapter about the 
media, you will find their power is far greater than you might sus- 
pect. 

Those at the centers of political influence in the United States and 
other nations are aware of the intense power of the Israeli lobby. The 
Jewish Lobby is the one lobby in Washington that no American politi- 
cian dares to forthrightly oppose. It should disturb any patriotic 
American to think that the most powerful lobby in America's congress 
is in the service of a foreign nation. 

Silencing Their Critics 

The extent of Jewish power is precisely why the general public is 
unaware of it, for those who know it also know the high price they 
would pay for openly discussing it. In America, doing so can result in 
damage of one's reputation, or even the loss of business or employ- 
ment. Such truth telling can result in threats, intimidation and even 
physical attacks by groups such as the Jewish Defense League. The 
Anti-Defamation League, a group that supposedly opposes racial and 
religious supremacism, is always busy accusing their critics of racial, 
religious, or ethnic intolerance, while they ardently defend and deny 
Israel's blatant supremacism. This Jewish supremacist group can ruin 
the business or the political career of almost anyone they choose. 

Even more dangerously, Jewish Supremacists have now been suc- 
cessful in imprisoning their critics in many European nations. They 
cannot as of yet freely assassinate their critics in Western countries as 
they have hundreds of Palestinian writers, poets and clerics across the 
Arab world. In today's Europe, however, simply quoting the su- 
premacist statements of Jewish leaders can land one in prison. 

There are hundreds of dissidents in prison at this moment who 
dared to simply speak or write openly about Jewish ethnic intoler- 
ance. Although the media constantly tells us that unlike the Nazis or 
the Communists, we have free speech; there are citizens of European 
nations right now in prison for simply contesting the politically cor- 
rect Jewish versions of historical events such as the Holocaust. 

Jewish Supremacists have made an intense effort to weaken the 
sense of ethnic awareness and loyalty among Europeans. In our 
modern media's political correctness, it is considered "hate speech" for 
Europeans to speak about their love for their heritage and express 
their desire to preserve it. As a European American, I do believe that 
my people have a right to preserve their way of life. At the same time 
I recognize that natural right for all the different peoples and 



Preface 

nationalities of the Earth. For instance, how odd it is that the 
Palestinians, who have been ethnically cleansed from their own 
nation and denied their most basic human rights, are so often 
characterized as "anti-Semites" and "terrorists," while the "anti- 
Gentile," Jewish Supremacists who have terrorized them and stolen 
their entire country are little criticized by the world press. 

Palestinians and those in the Arab world need to understand that 
the source of their own plight comes from the fact that European 
Americans have been prevented from defending their own national 
interests and heritage just as Palestinians have been so prevented. 
Palestinians will never find liberation in their nation until European 
Americans find liberation in America from Jewish Supremacism. 

Although I am certainly an activist for European Americans, I re- 
spect and applaud every people who desire to preserve their own 
way of life and even more vitally, their very existence as an ethnic en- 
tity. To me, ethnic survival is the most basic of human rights. It also is 
a fundamental human right for people to live under a government 
and also a news and entertainment media that reflect their own basic 
values, traditions, social and economic interests. A nation under the 
power of an alien and destructive mass media is equally oppressed as 
one under the power of a foreign, occupying government. The in- 
creasing globalism of the 21 st Century, driven on by Jewish Suprema- 
cists, will continue to decrease the choices and freedoms of all people. 
Moreover, it will endanger the preservation of individual cultures, 
traditions, values, religious beliefs, and ethnic identities. The end re- 
sult of globalism will be an enormous world government, one that 
will crush freedom and diversity as a steamroller would a flower. 

The idea that government should represent its own people and 
not any foreign power is the driving principle of the Declaration of 
Independence and America's nationhood: the right of a people to 
have a government of their own and for their own interests. The 
preamble to the Constitution of the United States puts it succinctly 
when it talks of a government "for ourselves and our posterity." 

In America, the Jewish domination of key United States Govern- 
ment positions is amazing. During President Clinton's Administra- 
tion, the leading Israeli newspaper, Maariv, described "warm Jews," 
meaning Jews loyal to the interests of Israel, as holding critically im- 
portant positions on the United States' National Security Council. 
Maariv stated that 7 of its 11 members are "warm Jews." 32 

The beginning of the 21st Century saw Madeline Albright as head 
of the State Department, George Tenet leading the CIA, William 



Jewish Supremacism 29 

Cohen as the Secretary of Defense, and Sandy Berger as chairman of 
the National Security Council. All are Jewish. Although the George 
Bush administration has fewer Jews in the most visible positions, the 
underlying government bureaucracy that spans different administra- 
tions is as Jewish as it has ever been. A good example is Alan Green- 
span who has served as chairman of the powerful Federal Reserve for 
many administrations. Jewish Supremacism will show specifically how 
Jewish Supremacists have used their political and media power to 
impose their agenda on other nations even when it opposes the true 
interests of those nations. 

I see the value of all people preserving their cultural, national, and 
even genetic heritage. All peoples have the right to preserve their 
unique identities, including Jews. This book is about the fact that or- 
ganized Jewish leadership pursues those goals of self-preservation 
and self-advancement tenaciously, while consistently disallowing 
other nationalities and races to act similarly in their own interests. 

Their ultimate victory would cause not only the loss of freedom, 
but also the destruction of the heritage of all peoples on the earth. It is 
my hope that all of us, all nations and every people, while acknowl- 
edging our respective differences of religion, race, culture, and na- 
tionality, will work together to defend ourselves from the one in- 
credibly powerful supremacism that threatens us all. 

Much of this book is taken from my autobiography, My Awaken- 
ing. This book is structured in the same fashion. It is an account of my 
personal journey of awakening to the reality of Jewish Supremacism: 
the ultimate supremacism. You will find its real power in the many di- 
rect quotations from important Jewish sources, all of which I carefully 
document with hundreds of source notes for your reference. 

Jewish Supremacism is a thesis in autobiographical form. It is the 
story of my awakening on the Jewish Question that began when I was 
a young man beginning in the late 1960s. Most of my fundamental 
understanding was in place by the end of that decade, but my knowl- 
edge has grown much deeper over the last 30 years. Since the 1960s, 
much new scientific and political material has become available. In 
recounting my awakening, I am not trying to give the reader the im- 
pression that all the materials or studies I cite were available in the 
1960s. I weave into this narrative contemporary data and documenta- 
tion so the reader has the benefit of the latest information. Also, for 
reasons of coherence and organization, I focus on one primary area of 
discovery at a time, while in life the acquisition of knowledge is not so 
neatly compartmentalized. The reader may find some repetition in 
some Jewish quotes that I find particularly revealing. They are re- 
peated when especially pertinent to more than one topic. 



Preface 

Also, I would be remiss not to add that when I write "I learned" 
or "I discovered/' I take no credit for original research, for my educa- 
tion on these subjects came from innumerable authors and their books 
and articles. I am in debt to them as well as to my many supporters 
and friends who have educated me with the insights and knowledge 
acquired in their own awakening. I assemble, organize, analyze and 
comment on materials collected by scholars and writers from ancient 
times to the present. 

My introduction finished, I must close my notebook and come 
down from Aspen Mountain. In doing so, I realize that I am not leav- 
ing the Natural World, for its laws continue in the world of human 
conflict below. The struggle for life and freedom exists among the dif- 
ferent varieties of mankind as certainly as it does for every form of life 
and energy on this mountain. 

Taking part in the struggle for my people's life and freedom is as 
natural as the flow of the crystal stream running beside me. It is my 
hope that the European people, the Palestinian people, and indeed, all 
peoples of the world, are permitted the most basic human right to 
preserve their own unique cultures, freedom and identity. To do so, 
they must resist the power of the earth's ultimate supremacism: Jewish 
Supremacism. 

I would be a fool not to realize the danger to my own life, reputa- 
tion and freedom that I face by exposing Jewish Supremacism. But, as 
a loyal European American; as a patriotic citizen of the United States 
and also as one who sincerely wishes for justice for all people of the 
world - my duty is clear. 

The stream beside me will follow its course. 

So will I. 

David Duke 

Former Member of the House of Representatives 
State of Louisiana, United States of America 

Updated text — January, 2001 



Chapter 1 

The Jewish Question 

In the first years of the 21st Century, any serious criticism of the 
Jewish people, their religion or the nation of Israel is considered the 
worst of moral crimes. Jews are the most sacred of sacred cows, and 
anyone with a negative word about them inevitably finds himself la- 
beled an "anti-Semite." Once a man acquires that label, true or not, 
nothing can redeem him from what the mass media views as the ul- 
timate sin. So, irredeemable as I am — I have the freedom to write 
and speak openly about a taboo that few dare to broach. You see, I am 
not an anti-Semite and I reject that epithet. However, I must address 
what Henry Ford called the "world's foremost problem," 33 a problem 
not only vital to the Palestinian people, but also to every other nation 
of the world. 

It is almost impossible in our Holocaust-saturated world to even 
say the word "Jew" without arousing emotion. The mass media of the 
Western world have made that so with their unrelenting packaging 
and repackaging of the "Holocaust." As British historian David Irving 
says, "It's spelled 'Holocaust' with a capital 'H — trademark applied 
for." 34 The Holocaust has gone from being a sidebar of the Second 
World War to the point where the war has become a historical foot- 
note to the Holocaust. During the one year before the publication of 
my autobiography, My Awakening, which is well over 50 years after 
the end of the war, my local ("local" is a misnomer, for New Yorkers 
own it) daily newspaper, The Times-Picayune, had dozens of news and 
feature articles exploring varying aspects of the Holocaust. In that 
year, the same paper had barely mentioned the Soviet Gulags where 
between 10 and 30 million people died, and had only one story that 
mentioned the Cambodian murder of three million. Not a single arti- 
cle appeared about the slaughter of 30 to 40 million in Red China. 



Jewish Supremacism 33 

Looking through old newspaper microfiche, I discovered that dur- 
ing the late 1990s there are at least 10 times more news articles about 
the Holocaust than there were in the late 1940s or 1950s. Rarely does 
an event become more talked and written about as it recedes in time. 
For instance, the subject of the Second World War took up a far 
greater proportion of movies, TV programs, documentaries, books 
and magazine articles in the late 1950s than in the early days of the 
21 st Century. Not so for the Holocaust: the further in time we seem to 
get away from the event, the more it bludgeons us as the Holocaust 
industry expands. 

It would be a Herculean task to even count all the Holocaust- 
oriented television news stories and specials, the documentaries and 
"docudramas," the books (both fiction and nonfiction), the magazine 
articles, movies and plays. Tales of Holocaust victims, relatives, sur- 
vivors, war crimes, criminals, reparations, Holocaust-related art and 
literature, remembrances and memorials bombard us almost daily. 
The sheer weight of this onslaught has prompted a number of Jews to 
call it "Shoah business." 35 

The Holocaust Museum is right on the most sacred soil in the 
American Pantheon, the Mall near the Smithsonian Institution, fi- 
nanced in no small part by our tax dollars. Interestingly, it was built 
long before there was any real effort to build a memorial to the Sec- 
ond World War. It is a massive, modern version of the Chamber of 
Horrors at Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum. 

The Holocaust is not the only Jewish trauma for which we all 
must grieve, for we see many painful historical accounts and dramatic 
Hollywood productions about other historical persecutions of the 
Jews. Jews are victimized by Arab terrorists in the Mideast, by fascists 
in Europe, and even by Klansmen in the United States. A seemingly 
inexhaustible supply of books, articles, movies and plays concern in- 
dividual Jews who have suffered from evil anti-Semites. 

Each year, tens of thousands of stories about intelligent, compas- 
sionate, unselfish, creative, moral and courageous Jews fill two-foot 
TV screens and 30-foot movie screens; our newspapers, magazines, 
and books; our playhouses, pulpits and podiums; our radio waves 
and satellite transmissions. There are thousands of portrayals of per- 
secuted Jews as innocent, noble and heroic; while their opponents are 
portrayed as the embodiment of evil. No group on Earth has better 
public relations than do the Jewish people. 

Whether it is Pharaoh's army with swords unsheathed, chasing 
the Hebrews, or the Czar with his anti-Semitic Cossacks, Hitler with 
his SS minions dressed in black, an unnamed Palestinian terrorist try- 
ing to kidnap Israeli schoolchildren, or the more intimate story of a 
sensitive Jew mistreated by an anti-Semitic businessman — we have 



34 The Jewish Question 

all seen the anti-Semitic stereotype, seen the skeletal bodies, and 
shared the Jewish pain. I know of this firsthand, for it was true for me 
as a young man. 

At age 12, reading Anne Frank: Diary of a Young Girl in the school 
library, I recoiled from the inhumanity of Anti-Semitism. By the time I 
had finished the book, I felt as if I had lost members of my own fam- 
ily. With my shirtsleeves, I covertly wiped away the moisture that 
had welled up in my eyes. 

Only a few times did I have any discussion with my father about 
Jews, for whom he had only praise. He spoke about my great-uncle 
Nathan, a Methodist minister who had converted from the Jewish 
faith and married my grandfather's sister, my great-aunt Gussie. Fa- 
ther had enormous respect for Nathan and carried it over to the rest 
of the people he called the "Hebrews," thinking that his term carried 
more dignity than the word "Jews." At various times he described the 
"Hebrews" as hardworking, smart, thrifty, and accomplished. 
"Thrifty" was an accolade that made a distinct impression on me, be- 
cause I knew that Father looked upon that particular trait as one of 
the most important. He hated waste of any kind. I learned that lesson 
at the dinner table a hundred times, having to eat every bite of my 
food before being excused. I thought thriftiness was as Scottish as the 
Duke family, but hearing that it was Jewish impressed me. 

Recitals of the Holocaust and Bible stories formed my primary 
impressions of the Jewish people. Cecil B. DeMille's movie classics, as 
typified by The Ten Commandments, led me to identify contemporary 
Jews with the heroic "Israelites" of the Old Testament. I formed a 
deep admiration for the "Chosen People." 

How, then, did I go from my early fawning opinion of the Jews to 
being eventually described as a dangerous "anti-Semite" by the pow- 
erful Jewish advocacy organization, the ADL (the oddly-named Anti- 
Defamation League of B'nai B'rith)? No Jew had ever overtly wronged 
me; I wasn't taught Anti-Semitism by my parents or friends, nor did I 
blame them for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Although I categori- 
cally reject being labeled anti-Semitic, I certainly believe that — as any 
other people — Jews deserve praise for their accomplishments and, 
conversely, they should not be immune from criticism for their fail- 
ings. The only problem is that in post-World War II, Holocaust- 
saturated America, any criticism of Jews as a group is viewed as the 
moral equivalent of condoning mass murder. 

If one criticizes any part of Jewish history or conduct, or intolerant 
aspects of their religion, or even Israel's Zionist policies, he inevitably 



Jewish Supremacism 35 

acquires the label "anti-Semitic," a term that could not be more dam- 
aging or prejudicial. If one speaks, however, about the routine mis- 
treatment of Indians in American history, he is not described as "anti- 
American." Those who express horror about the excesses of the Span- 
ish Inquisition are not labeled "anti-Christian" or "anti-Spanish." 

The same media that prohibits even the slightest criticism of Jews 
has no reluctance to demean other groups. White Southerners, Pales- 
tinians, Germans and Fundamentalist Christians and Fundamentalist 
Muslims — these groups get more than their share of ridicule and de- 
basement. The portrayal of the slack-jawed, green-toothed, ignorant, 
racist, hateful, murderous, rural White Southerner has become a 
stereotype in Hollywood films. White Southerners are not alone. One 
of the best-selling books of the late 1990s is the media-promoted Hit- 
ler's Willing Executioners, 36 a book that says the German people have 
something dark and evil within them, an inherent defect that makes 
them all guilty for the atrocities of the Holocaust. 

In Europe today, there are so-called hate laws that can land one in 
jail for saying anything critical of the Jews. In fact, there are hundreds 
of men who have been jailed for simply raising historical questions 
about the Jewish version of the Holocaust. These scholars do not al- 
lege that Jews are evil; they simply use scientific and historical evi- 
dence to dispute prevailing historical interpretations of the persecu- 
tion of Jews during the Second World War. 

For simply offering a different historical analysis and opinion, 
many European scholars such as David Irving, Dr. Robert Faurrison 
and Juergen Graf have been prosecuted. On the other hand, Daniel 
Goldhagen, the writer of Hitler's Willing Executioners, a man who ar- 
gues that Germans are inherently evil, is not prosecuted for racial 
defamation, he is celebrated! Of course, the Arab terrorist is now a 
staple of Hollywood movies. In stark contrast, whenever Jews are 
mentioned as a group, it is always with a sort of hushed reverence. 
What is it about the Jewish people that evokes such unrestrained adu- 
lation and visceral hatred? 

Once I became convinced that people of European descent, and 
truly all people, have the right to protect and preserve their heritage 
and culture, I became a young member of the Citizens Council. Often, 
after class and on rainy summer days, I would go down to the office 
on Carondolet Street in New Orleans to do volunteer work. 

Many fascinating publications streamed into the office from hun- 
dreds of right-wing groups all over America. One day, as I finished 
helping with a Council mailing, I came across some tabloid newspa- 
pers called Common Sense. It was a conservative, right-wing paper 
modeled after Thomas Paine's classic broadside; but the message was 
sharply different from Paine's. One issue's headline read 



36 The Jewish Question 

"Communism Is Jewish!" and another trumpeted, "NAACP Part of 
Red MASTER Plan!" I also found some old issues. The huge headline 
in one of them predicted, "RED DICTATORSHIP BY 1954!" However, 
such a warning did not seem too credible when looked at in 1965! I 
found the National Enquirer-type headlines ludicrous, but it was hard 
to resist reading something that scandalous, even if just to laugh at it. 

The Sharp Words of Mattie Smith 

One of the regular volunteers, Mattie Smith, an elderly lady in a 
flower-print dress and outlandish hat, saw me snickering at the lurid 
headlines and simply said, "You know, it's true." 

"Red Dictatorship by 1954?" I replied with a smile. 

"No," she said, "Communism is Jewish. They are the ones behind 
it." 

I thought I would humor the little old lady by politely arguing a 
bit with her. "Ma'am. How could that be?" I asked. "Communists are 
atheists; they don't believe in God. Jews believe in God, so how could 
they be Communists?" 

"Do you know who Herbert Aptheker is?" she said, answering 
my question with one of her own. 

"No," I replied, affecting nonchalance. 

She was like a tightly coiled spring waiting for release. "He has 
the official role of chief theoretician of the Communist Party, USA, 
and he's listed in the Who's Who in World Jewry. 37 Leon Trotsky, the 
Communist who took over Russia with Lenin, was in Who's Who in 
American Jewry. 38 His real name is Lev Bronstein. Both are atheist 
Communists, and both are proudly listed as great Jews in these books 
published by the leading rabbinical organizations in the world." 

Meekly, I offered, "Maybe they were listed because they were once 
Jews." 

"You have so much to learn," she said with a sigh. "Under Israel's 
Law of Return, you can be an atheist Communist and still immigrate 
to Israel. There are plenty of them too. You only qualify to immigrate 
if you are a Jew, and a Jew is described simply as being of Jewish de- 
scent. So, you see, you can be Jewish and still be an atheist and still be 
a Communist — and I tell you, Communism is Jewish!" 

"All Jews are Communists?" I retorted sarcastically. 

"No, no, no," she emphatically replied, with much patience in the 
way she paced her words. "All Jews are not Communists, any more 
than all snakes are poisonous. But most leading Communists in 
America are Jews, as well as most of the convicted Russian spies in 



Jewish Supremacism 37 

America, as well as the leaders of the New Left. And historically, most 
of the Commie revolutionaries in Russia were Jewish as well!" 

What Mrs. Smith said made me very uncomfortable. Although it 
was not yet time to leave, I claimed that I had to catch my bus back 
home. I left the office hurriedly. Mrs. Smith had to be wrong, but I just 
did not have the information I needed to refute her statements. I re- 
solved to research the issue so that I could show her why she was 
wrong. Something else bothered me as well, for I felt a little guilty for 
even talking with someone who said such things about Jews. I was 
staunchly anti-Communist, and to suggest that Jews were behind the 
horrors of Communism was to me such a terrible allegation that my 
heart told me that it just could not be true. It was the first time I had 
been face to face with a person I presumed was an anti-Semite. I was 
soon running to catch my streetcar. 

During the next couple of days I avoided even thinking about the 
issue, and I stayed away from the Citizens Council office. Finally I 
picked up and read the two copies of Common Sense I had taken home. 
One copy maintained that the NAACP was a Communist front 
organization dedicated to the eventual overthrow of our way of life. It 
purported that 12 Jews and one African American had founded the 
NAACP, and that all of the founders were dedicated Marxists with 
decades of documented Communist affiliations. The article asserted 
that the only major Black founder of the NAACP, W. E. B. Dubois, 
was an avowed member of the Communist Party who emigrated to 
Communist Ghana (where he eventually was buried). Furthermore, 
the scandalous publication purported that the NAACP was financed 
by Jewish money and always had a Jewish president. It said that a 
Jew, Kivie Kaplan, was the current NAACP president and that he was 
the real leader of the organization rather than its African American 
"front man," Roy Wilkins. Although the public perceived Wilkins as 
the NAACP leader, the paper asserted that he actually had the lower 
rank of national secretary. 

The argument of Common Sense was that the Jews led and 
supported the integrationist NAACP because they were opposed to 
powerful African American nationalist leaders such as Marcus 
Garvey and later those who led the Nation of Islam. They had no 
interest in African Americans becoming self-reliant or self-supportive. 
It maintained that the Jewish leadership had an interest in racial 
pluralism only because it would offer certain advantages to the Jews 
as a group. 

The other copy of Common Sense was no less startling. It had a 
long article asserting that international Communism was a Jewish 
creation and that the Russian Revolution had not really been Russian 
at all. Jews had supposedly financed and led Communism since its 



38 The Jewish Question 

inception, and that they still thoroughly dominated the Communist 
movement in the United States and around the world. 

This National Enquirer of the right quoted many names, dates, and 
sources to support its incredible allegations. I was very skeptical of its 
assertions, but the information was too compelling to ignore. I had 
learned early on not to easily dismiss unpopular opinions. 

Despite the articles' strong documentation, the allegations just 
seemed too bizarre to be true. How could it be that the largest and 
most powerful African American organization in America had been 
founded, financed, and run by Jews and Marxist Jews at that — in- 
stead of African Americans? How could something so incredible be 
kept so quiet that most people would not know about it? If the Rus- 
sian Revolution was truly a revolution led by Jews rather than Marx- 
ist Russians, why was such an enormous historical fact ignored in our 
history books and in our popular media? Furthermore, I could not 
understand why wealthy and powerful capitalist Jews would foster 
race-mixing and Communism. 

Father had often talked to me about the evils of Communism, and 
I had been thoroughly anti-Communist since reading books such as 
The Conscience of a Conservative by Barry Goldwater, 39 None Dare Call It 
Treason by John A. Stormer, 40 and You Can Trust the Communists (To Be 
Communists) 41 by Frederick Charles Schwarz. These books and others 
impressed upon me the penetration of Communist ideology through- 
out our society, media and government. 

The Cuban Missile Crisis had occurred just three years before, and 
Father's plans to build a fallout shelter were still fresh in my mind. He 
had even purchased food and other survival supplies for it. During 
that period, the idea of nuclear war grew from an abstract idea to con- 
crete anticipation. In the early 1960s, most communities tested the 
working order of air-raid sirens by sounding them daily at noon. 
Sometimes, when we lost track of time in school and the noon air-raid 
sirens went off, we wondered for a moment if the war was actually 
upon us. 

During the Cuban crisis, most adults rationalized that 
thermonuclear war would not happen because it must not happen — 
because the very thought was too monstrous to contemplate. An 11- 
year-old is much more prone to believe that someone might pull the 
switch. Years later, the world discovered that we had actually teetered 
much closer to nuclear war than most Americans had known at the 
time. The fact that I viewed Communists as putting my family in real 



Jewish Supremacism 39 

danger of nuclear incineration contributed greatly to my visceral anti- 
Communist stance. 

One of the Common Sense issues mentioned a full-page newspaper 




article written by Winston Churchill called "Zionism versus Bolshe- 
vism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." The article had 
originally appeared in the Illustrated Sunday Herald on February 8, 
1920. Churchill had maintained that the world's Jews were being torn 
between an allegiance to Communism on the one hand and Zionism 
on the other. Churchill hoped the Jews would adopt Zionism as an al- 
ternative to what he called "diabolical" and "sinister" Bolshevism. In 
his well-written article, contemporary with the early years of the 
Russian Revolution, Churchill described Communism as a "sinister 
confederacy" of "International Jews" who "have gripped the Russian 
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the un- 
disputed masters of that enormous empire." 42 

The article shocked me enough that I had to check its authenticity. 
It turned out to be genuine. In fact, I found some Jewish references to 
it bewailing the fact that Churchill's article gave fodder to the anti- 
Semites of the world. The following is an excerpt from his amazing ar- 
ticle. 

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the 
schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister 
confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy popula- 
tions of countries where the Jews are persecuted on account of 
their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their 
forefathers and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the 
next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the 
days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to 
Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Ger- 
many), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide con- 
spiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution 
of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevo- 
lence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing... and 
now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the un- 



40 The Jewish Question 

derworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped 
the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become 
practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. 

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of 
Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolu- 
tion by these international and for the most part atheistical 
Jews. 



43 



As important an historical figure as Churchill was, he was still 
only one voice. I rationalized that he could be wrong about the nature 
of the Russian Revolution. One of the Common Sense articles I read 






■^■T j, 



-^__*^m 



J*_l 



ZIONISM versus BOLSHEVISM 

A STRUGGLE FOR THE SOUL OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE. 



WltttfTYJN ^ CHURCHILL 



i iff. I. I llW |h*P — ■ ^T— ^ 



bU, rrJ I Jr^J <* I it L^rfmhl [Vtl. 
ik. in i^.^i W -4 M" ™t i-iJ p*M 

"Hi Lb* ■#> -^ i" «»*" "i *• 
-.-... J ... J .^.j — ■■ i.irfh .VI 

nUtfir fc-,.J* -.■" -= L#_i 

■ r-i il- vd ihli IrT-F* —* m^H 1 ' 
Mnriil ^— I ,kj ■ ■** K'*" " J ,ta/ ~ 

i™-,. ., _H t>H |i— .-iirtf iLh. ka< 
1,-r-^u .1.4-* j ls-.-1-i .^*- 11*^ 



fcif.-l. wm^h n II. Mi-* •( M>| 




H<m.L_a,m,ip4 



fen. i laj #i'ik^ i#7 iii~'t1| rairtai 



14 Bfcir b-'l-| J |k| u.l_,u vaf 

, J — n. t| L, j— -K, r 7 r Mj t- 

P.. '-§,■■ hi <VJ 
r--i -t ■ — m i i. h .. n Iter I I IU-^r 




nrt ri ri i-hf IH*P' "fl^tti It— . -fc» 
minted. a^iJ ir> i-«"^"«tei li. 

■ Ihi -h. Inrii rJ J *K#Y »-r*v« ■** i 
hm. L p. Infubrr Qtj ■■.■ I-Hlrt fHl 9 



I - ■ ■■-''- * -. — ' m- rw •*.*• pti" " ~p 
..i --^. .,— , <j y/ htf - —•¥ 

jhi^l ■ «^r *i iffBlaai Ihntiiti 

■ 4rEHk4 ifcr ptek^ -r '-f'tM t*AML TWj 

.hi'incnda "' I t*±^*r_ 

hk4vJ hi Hhi -/ IW ik— ^' ■ ' fl 

jkWd fc. V —I -^^1— »j ^ 1^ 

U «.fcv»' ^ l*^ ^P i ^|L ^^ Il #^.h# H 

«i >Tnt <^, .h.t'ib, htii *J<fl ™«^J — >fcj bwt N t^>*;^t-|".I»"-i; rid -Jpd'k H ■ t fc-^> 

1.II ^Blllrf fcl ^ll| ■ teMM III lllll "' X-^W-tt. &fl 



u ibfcr^in tM #Mk 



lkrVu^^ I^.]j^ki. ^iprjTih IM |UkHi v '.I .■■■.■ 

,.r. _ .h, ^-— ^| Ul. — . - F 



I HB» #^ K rVvfl*^ *t 04 



&-Hdl*f -^ +■ ■»¥,' 
X'-U^l jrFlltfllfl AT rJ K'i— * *" 
IHtekA — d Jr.. I. Iff. hnd tUr ' 

« J IU liTlk*-™- J >— * Ite- | I J jr.-. r. rn.- ! .. rW 4. |Lf H I, l r J 1 

i,i_jl_lrt__r^^J«ll«««lte-~W A-J.t" FT— J." —'h,. .r*r.pi»r-t. H *■ - -I -* 

„fcJ^^_,lZTJ^lX-5w'"I»*'"-r^. .H ».K— f | IteTT—— ^^l K ,lH l r^- J .^^ J1 I.',— |Lkn_te, .^.fc-t.^^t-Tte. r ^r-.J 

L.>.I.IU.I^.IIr«lrini| t -^^ 111 II •-niTlU'llll-T" i IT H|- !■ ■ I*" Tl »■*■ l*Tr^™«. •( flH fc^: - . 

referred to a series of explosive documents (complete with file 
numbers) from the National Archives of the United States. I wrote to 
my local Congressman, F. Edward Hebert, and asked if his office 
could obtain copies of the files for me. A couple of weeks later, on 
returning home from school, I found waiting for me a large manila 
envelope from the Congressman. 

Certified by the seal of the United States of America, the 
documents were from the National Archives. They concerned 
intelligence reports from foreign governments and extensive reports 
from our chief intelligence officers in Russia during the time of the 
Russian Civil War in the early days of the Communist revolution. The 
early 1920s were long before the establishment of the OSS and the 
CIA. The U.S. Army ran our international intelligence work at that 
time. One of our military intelligence officers in Russia during its 



Jewish Supremacism 41 




revolutionary period was Captain Montgomery Schuyler. He sent 
back regular reports to the chief of staff of U.S. Army Intelligence, 
who then relayed them to the Secretary of War and the President of 
the United States. 

Reading through the lengthy reports gave me a glimpse into a his- 
torical period of which few Americans are 
aware. They reported horrible massacres of 
thousands of Russian aristocrats and intelli- 
gentsia, murdered simply because they could 
provide effective leadership in opposition to 
the Communists. Many Americans are at 
least somewhat aware of Stalin's murder of 
millions. However, many millions also died 
in the early days of Bolshevism under Lenin 
and Trotsky, for it was these men who initi- 
ated the first mass killings and the Gulags. 

The reports also stated, without equivoca- 
tion, the Jewish nature of the revolution. In 

one of Schuyler's official reports, declassified in 1958, almost 50 years 
after he wrote and dispatched them, he states: 44 

In quoting the 
graphic language 
of this official re- 
port, my intention 
is not to offend; 
but Schuyler's re- 
port says what it 
says, whether we 
like it or not. In 
another report, written four months later, Captain Schuyler goes on to 
quote the evidence of Robert Wilton, who was then the chief Russian 
correspondent of the authoritative London Times. Wilton later went on 
to pen a number of best-selling books about the revolution, including 
the widely acclaimed Russia's Agony and Last Days of the Romanovs.' 15 
On June 9, 1919, Schuyler cites Wilton as follows: 

A table made up in 1918, by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the 
London Times in Russia, shows at that time there were 384 commis- 
sars including 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians 
and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number 264 had come from 
the United States since the downfall of the Imperial Government. 46 

There was, of course, no reason to impugn the reporting of the 
Times or of Captain Schuyler. I couldn't believe my eyes as I scanned 
the papers dispersed across the plastic tablecloth on my dining room 
table. I wondered how it could possibly be true that the "Russian 



'it is probably unwise to say this loudly in the 
United States, but the Bolshevik movement is 
and has been since its beginning, guided and 
controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest 
type..." 

Captain Schuyler, American army intelligence officer in 
Russia during the revolution, (in his official report) 



42 The Jewish Question 



Revolution" had had only 13 ethnic Russians out of the 384 members 
of its top governing body. Churchill's description of "gripping the 
Russian people by the hair of their heads" came to life in the pages I 
received from our own National Archives. Once I started checking out 
the leads I would glean from my reading, the National Archives kept 
providing me with the most incredible documents. Not only did our 
chief intelligence officer write to the President of the United States 
about the Jewish nature of Communism, so did our U.S. ambassador 
to Russia, David R. Francis. In a January 1918 cable to our govern- 
ment, he reported: 

The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 per- 
cent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other 
country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a 
world-wide social revolution. — David Francis, American Ambassador 
to Russia at the time of the Revolution 47 

Fhe National Archives also sent me copies from its files of com- 
munications from Scotland Yard and British Intelligence. Fhe direc- 
torate of British Intelligence sent to America and other nations a 
lengthy report dated July 16, 1919, on Bolshevism abroad. It was 



"There is now definite 
evidence that Bolshevism is an 
international movement 
controlled by Jews." 

— The Director of British Intelligence 
to the U.S. Secretary of State 



> If HjlP >k N* . *™ — 

n .. ,■ ■. i • 'in ■' — 
■ -- . - , ... _ ... I J. 



■■■ 



called "A Monthly Review of the Pro- 
gress of Revolutionary Movements 
Abroad." Fhis lengthy report lists the 
Communist movements in the major 
nations of the world. Fhe first sentence 
in the first paragraph on the first page 
of this British government report 
bluntly states that Jews control inter- 
national Communism. 48 

There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international 
movement controlled by Jews. 

Years later, as a student at Fouisiana State University, I took a 
course entirely devoted to the Russian Revolution. Neither my profes- 
sor in his lectures, nor my textbook (The Soviet Achievement)' 19 made 



uiiHiL riiiniLi hi m :■■■■ imn 





n ■] i |i vtmt "fT- J - 



Jewish Supremacism 43 



any mention of the historical Jewish-Russian conflict and the Jewish 
domination of the Communist Party. 

The Jewish role in the Communist revolution was, however, men- 
tioned in many major Jewish publications such as the Jewish Encyclo- 
pedia and the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. It astounded me to find 
them actually boasting about the pivotal role of Jews in the Russian 
Revolution. They even pointed out the effort of the Communist Jews 
to disguise the Jewish role — 
a successful effort — for most 
Gentiles in America and 
Europe are still unaware of it. 

The Communist move- 
ment and ideology played an 
important part in Jewish life, 
particularly in the 1920s, 
1930s and during and after 
World War II.... Individual 
Jews played an important 
role in the early stages of 
Bolshevism and the Soviet 
Regime.... The great attrac- 
tion of Communism among 
Russian, and later also, 
Western Jewry, emerged 
only with the establishment 
of the Soviet Regime in Rus- 
sia... 

Many Jews the world 
over therefore regarded the 
Soviet concept of the solu- 
tion to the "Jewish ques- 
tion" as an intrinsically posi- 
tive approach.... Commu- 
nism became widespread in 
virtually all Jewish commu- 
nities. In some countries 
Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal Communist 
parties and in some cases were even instructed by the Communist 
International to change their Jewish-sounding names and pose as 
non-Jews, in order not to confirm right wing propaganda that pre- 
sented Communism an alien, Jewish conspiracy. 50 

Trotsky's book, Stalin, written in exile, attempted to show that Sta- 
lin had played only an insignificant role in the early days of the 
Communist takeover. Trotsky attempted to illustrate this point by re- 
producing a postcard widely circulated in the months following the 
revolution. The postcard depicted the six leaders of the revolution. 
Shown are Lenin (who was at least one-quarter Jewish, spoke Yiddish 
in his home, and was married to a Jewess); Trotsky (real Jewish name: 




44 The Jewish Question 




JEWISH CHRONICLE JULY ^ iggi 



Lev Bronstein); Zinoviev (real Jewish name: Hirsch Apfelbaum); 

Lunacharsky (a Gentile); Kamenov (real Jewish name: Rosenfeld); and 

Sverdlov (Jewish). 51 Not only does the postcard show the Jewish 

domination of the revolution; it also 

illustrates the fact that the Jewish 

Communist leaders shown had 

changed their names, presumably to 

disguise the fact that they were Jews, 

just as reported in the Encyclopedia Ju- 

daica. 

Although the fact of Lenin's Jew- 
ish ancestry was kept quiet for many 
years, Jewish writers are now taking 
note of it. David Shub, author of 
Lenin: A Biography, stated in a letter to 
the Russian emigre paper Novyi 
Zhurnal 52 that Lenin's mother was 
Jewish at least on her father's side and 
probably so on her mother's side as 
well. 53 In addition, a French Jewish 
periodical, Review de Fonds Social 
Juif, 5 * reported that a Soviet novelist, 
Marietta Shaguinian, was prevented 
by Soviet censorship from publishing 
evidence of Lenin's Jewish ancestry. 
A number of Jewish publications in 
recent years have disclosed Lenin's 
Jewish heritage, including the Jewish 
Chronicle. 55 

The Cheka, or secret police, had a 
Jew, Moses Uritzky, as its first chief. 
Most of the other subsequent leaders 
were also Jews, including Sverdlov 
and Genrikh Yagoda (which is Rus- 
sian for "Yehuda" - "the Jew") who 
presided over the pogroms that killed 
millions of Christians. The Soviet 
propaganda minister during the war 
was a Jew, Ilya Ehrenburg, who notoriously distinguished himself by 
his Second World War exhortations of Soviet troops to rape and mur- 
der the women and children of Germany. 56 Anatol Goldberg quoted 



Moscow 
magazine on 
Lenin's 
Jewish roots 



tU /.I.H lit VlSJII.f >1,U> 

VfacJiitiir llyich Lenin, ihc Creator 
vi I he Suvier Union. often urTieijilly 
pr,li*pd jv [he cmhodimem of ihe 
Russian national genius lud s Jewish 
BraiKlfjther. jn,\xii\liei£ io ihc Muvtru 1 * 
nuss fiffithnion uuefcly. Ogumynfc. 

There have htcn numutirs lo this 



Jewish Supremacism 45 



Ehrenburg in his book, Ilxja Ehrenburg as saying, "...the Germans are 
not human beings... nothing gives us so much joy as German 
corpses." 57 

The Communist secret police, which underwent many name 
changes, including Cheka, OGPU, GPU, NKVD, NKGB, MGB, and 
KGB, was the most feared police agency in the history of the world. 

They imprisoned, tortured, 
or murdered more than 30 
million Russians and East- 
ern Europeans. Even the 
more conservative Soviet 
historians of the 1960s were 
placing the number of 
murdered at about 20 to 40 
million — figures that do 
not include the millions 
more who were dispos- 
sessed, imprisoned, exiled, 
tortured, and displaced. 
Nobel Prizewinner Alek- 
sandr Solzhenitsyn in his 
opus, The Gulag Archipelago, 
using the research of a So- 
viet statistician who had 
access to secret government 
files, I. A. Kurganov, esti- 
mated that between 1918 
and 1959, at least 66 million 
died at the hands of the 
Communist rulers of Rus- 
sia. Although that number 
may be far too high, in Gu- 
lag Archipelago II, Solzhenit- 
syn affirms that Jews cre- 
ated and administered the 




H ilSK Pjf HI 



n c***h tj 



organized Soviet concentration camp system in which tens of millions 
of Christians died. Pictured on page 79 of the Gulag Archipelago II are 
the leading administrators of the greatest killing machine in the his- 
tory of the world. 58 They are Aron Solts, Yakov Rappoport, Lazar Ko- 
gan, Matvei Berman, Genrikh Yagoda, and Naftaly Frenkel. All six are 
Jews. 

Interestingly, though, during this period of murder and mayhem, 
Jews were a protected class, so much so that the Communist Party 



46 The Jewish Question 

took the unprecedented step of making expressions of Anti-Semitism 
a counter-revolutionary offense, and thus punishable by death. 59 

The Jewish Voice in January, 1942, stated: "The Jewish people will 
never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country — and as yet 
the only country in the world — in which Anti-Semitism is a crime." 60 
The Congress Bulletin (Publication of the American Jewish Congress) 
stated: 61 62 63 

Anti-Semitism was classed as counter-revolution and the severe 
punishments meted out for acts of Anti-Semitism were the means 
by which the existing order protected its own safety. 

The Russian Penal Codes of 1922 and 1927 even went so far as to 
make Anti-Semitism punishable by death. The book Soviet Russia and 
the Jews by Gregor Aronson and published by the American Jewish 
League Against Communism (1949 NY) quotes Stalin remarking on 
the policy in an interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency: 

...Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of 
Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in 
the Soviet Union. Active Anti-Semites are punished by death under 
law. 64 

The Beginning of an Ethnic War 

In school, I brought up these fascinating facts with some of my 
teachers. They in turn were as incredulous as I had been. One 
suggested that the Jewish involvement in the Communist revolution 
might have been a result of the long running historical persecution of 
Jews by the Czars and, indeed, by much of the Russian intelligentsia. 
For instance, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, and many other prominent 



The Jewish 

Communal Register 

of New York Cily 



1917.1918 



jrtnsn Dpi* 



Jacob Schiff and Leon Trotsky, 
two key players in the Russian 
Revolution, both found their base 
of support in New York City. 



JtrhilUh 4J<wUh ComuhIiv;, «T H±h Y*rt Cit, 
m newt avehui 




Jewish Supremacism 47 

Russian writers had criticized Jewish machinations in their books and 
articles. Russians didn't like the fact that the Jews used the Russian 
language for doing business among Gentiles but spoke Yiddish 
among themselves. Jews were also accused of having an "us versus 
them" mentality rather than assimilating with the Christian majority. 

There had been a running feud between the Russians and the Jews 
for centuries and from these conflicts arose "pogroms" to suppress 
the Jews. This war without borders can be illustrated by the Jewish 
reaction in the 1880s to the anti-Semitic Russian May Laws. The May 
Laws of 1882 attempted to restrict Jews from some professions and 
mandate resettlement of most Jews to their original area of the em- 
pire, the Pale of Settlement (a huge area, originally set up in 1772, en- 
compassing an area about half the size of Western Europe, extending 
from the Crimea to the Baltic Sea, to which the Jews had been re- 
stricted). 

In retaliation, Jewish international financiers did their best to de- 
stroy the Russian economy. Encyclopaedia Britannica describes what 
happened: 

The Russian May Laws were the most conspicuous legislative 
monument achieved by modern Anti-Semitism.... Their immediate 
result was a ruinous commercial depression which was felt all over 
the empire and which profoundly affected the national credit. The 
Russian minister was at his wits end for money. Negotiations for a 
large loan were entered upon with the house of Rothschild and a 
preliminary contract was signed, when.. .the finance minister was 
informed that unless the persecutions of the Jews were stopped 
the great banking house would be compelled to withdraw from the 
operation.... 65 

In response to the economic and other pressures put upon Russia, 
the Czar issued an edict on September 3, 1882. In it he stated: 

For some time the government has given its attention to the 
Jews and to their relations to the rest of the inhabitants of the em- 
pire, with a view of ascertaining the sad condition of the Christian 
inhabitants brought about by the conduct of Jews in business mat- 
ters.... 

With few exceptions, they have as a body devoted their attention, 
not to enriching or benefiting the country, but to defrauding by 
their wiles its inhabitants, and particularly its poor inhabitants. 
This conduct of theirs has called forth protests on the part of the 
people,... thought it a matter of urgency and justice to adopt strin- 
gent measures in order to put an end to the oppression practiced 
by the Jews on the inhabitants, and to free the country from their 
malpractices, which were, as is known, the cause of the agita- 
tions. 66 

So, Jews had ample reason to attempt to overturn the Czarist gov- 
ernment of Russia, and there is direct evidence they did just that. The 



48 The Jewish Question 



Inside Judaica 



Jewish Communal Register of New York City of 1917-1918, edited and 
published by the Jewish community, profiles Jacob Schiff, who at that 
time was one of the wealthiest men in the world as head of the huge 
banking house of Kuhn, Loeb & Company. In the article it states how 
the firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Company "floated the large Japanese War 
Loans of 1904-1905, thus making possible the Japanese victory over 
Russia." It also goes on to say, 

Mr. Schiff has 
always used his 
wealth and his in- 
fluence in the best 
interests of his 
people. He fi- 
nanced the ene- 
mies of autocratic 
Russia and used 
his financial influ- 
ence to keep Rus- 
sia away from the 
money market of 
the United 

States. 67 

Jacob Schiff 
actually gave 

somewhere be- 




1 n->qjl)l» H, fl qut^'KiBt (if Jew ufa interest bv Dr. I rnJrrick l.*<(lHlin, 
1'.ik ulnc- Kdili>r, I! n-n ckipicdii Jtaftkfl 

Q W« k.,i I Min A Jz+1 

A. Bom i«1 lh* Rhiofland Lowr of [ricr Iflicrt 
Weit PhiisialL M*r\ »»* dw «fi cfkvthh par- 
enii, HuuiriLhi and ] Irftf ktla Mar\ I fcinrich Mmra 
h*j Jinc a Mrtrasful li* J er.. ind t* h*n an odtrt 
pC^'h jh-iro-i Jcvk->, from hcin^ jdlO^aCfi be CkXl- 
seHcd h> rt-UEMafllisrn in l£l : . In. l|i2J, when 
Kvl V.U in JCtTS old, hi* faLhcr ounh crtrd hii 
tight children. Uic juihofiiMrve Eipw^t l^pcJii 
JTnJ-jiiv-1 reports- Ileinriclk, whiw wlgirtal nan* 
wjk I FiforfKl (ill *vi, ihu 1he «*i ufa rabbi ml 
the dcitcnJaiL u<i latnutdW «hn*im f«- man> p:n. 
eiaiionn. IlinchcIV tnvtk-f uis -chief roMii of 
Trkf- ilc-Lnrich Marx mawed Htnrklia 
PfCiiburig. w ho wif iniledl in Hungary ml *htn<r 
■IViilwr hn'-dtm^ * nhbi kn Viimeuon. Holland. 

tween $17 million 
and $24 million to finance the Jewish-Communist revolutionaries in 
Russia, a sum that would be the equivalent of many hundreds of mil- 
lions of dollars by today's dollar value. Rabbi Marvin S. Andelman, in 
his book To Eliminate the Opiate, cites two sources documenting 
Schiff's financial support of the Communist revolution and ultimate 
repayment by them. 

Jacob Schiff is credited with giving twenty million dollars to the 
Bolshevik revolution. A year after his death the Bolsheviks depos- 
ited over six hundred million rubles to Schiff s banking firm Kuhn 
& Loeb. 68 69 

It puzzled me that the violently anticapitalist Communist Party 
would be supported by some of the most prominent capitalists in the 
world. But I finally realized that the Russian Revolution was not ulti- 
mately about the triumph of an economic ideology, it was about the 
culmination of an age-old struggle between two powerful peoples — 
the Jews and the Russians — in an ethnic war that tragically ended in 
the totalitarian tyranny of the Communist dictatorship. Even worse, 



Jewish Supremacism 49 

the score was ultimately settled in the terror of the blood-washed cel- 
lars of the Cheka and the frozen death of the Gulags. 

The fact that supercapitalists such as Jacob Schiff could support a 
nakedly socialist regime such as Communism made me question 
whether there was something more to Communism than met the eye. 
What was it about Communism that made it so attractive to Jews, 
who were largely well-educated non-proletarians, when Communism 
was supposed to be, in Lenin's words, "a dictatorship of the proletar- 
iat"? Obviously, by and large, Jews were nothing like Marx's "work- 
ers of the world," for no group was more involved in capitalism or the 
manipulation and use of capital than the Jewish community. 

I checked out the Communist personalities that Mattie Smith told 
me were in the Jewish Who's Who in World Jewry. Atheist Leon Trotsky 
as well as atheist Maxim Litvinov, the Soviet Minister of Foreign Af- 
fairs, are proudly listed in the directory of famous Jews compiled by 
the leading Jewish rabbinical groups of the world. 

Winston Churchill, in his eloquent article "Zionism Versus Bol- 
shevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People," had argued 
that Communism and Zionism were distinct ideologies that were 
competing, as he put it, "for the soul of the Jewish people." But some- 
thing didn't seem quite kosher in this supposed titanic struggle, for it 
appeared that many Zionists also supported Communism and, at 
least in the early years, many Communists were sympathetic to Zion- 
ists. Millions of Jews, even supercapitalists such as Jacob Schiff, sup- 
ported the Communist revolution in Russia. The struggle seemed to 
be like that of two brothers who might sometimes argue between 
themselves but who always stand together against their common 
enemies. 

In 1975, 1 read a book called Trotsky and the Jews, written by Joseph 
Nedava and published by the Jewish Publication Society 
(Philadelphia, 1971). The book points out that before the Russian 
Revolution, Leon Trotsky (born Lev Bronstein) used to play chess 
with Baron Rothschild of the famous Rothschild banking family. 

A Jewish journalist (M. Waldman) who knew Trotsky from the pe- 
riod of his stay in Vienna ("when he used to play chess with Baron 
Rothschild in Cafe Central and frequent Cafe Daily to read the 
press there"). 70 

What could the Rothschilds, the biggest banking house in Europe, 
possibly have in common with a leader who wanted to destroy capi- 
talism and private property? Conversely, why would a dedicated 
Communist be a close friend of the most powerful "capitalist oppres- 
sor" in the world? Could it be that they saw Communism and Zion- 



50 The Jewish Question 

ism as two very different avenues to a similar goal of power and re- 
venge against the Czars? 

A number of questions arose: 1) Could Communism simply have 
been a tool they adapted to defeat and rule their Russian antagonists? 
2) Were there other peoples with whom the Jews believed they were 
in conflict? 3) Was Communism originally part of a strategic impera- 
tive that reached far beyond the confines of Soviet Russia? These were 
important questions. I thought that I might find their answers in the 
philosophical origins of Communism. 

I resolved to investigate the ideological roots of Communism. I 
found Das Kapital 71 and the Communist Manifesto 72 in my public li- 
brary. Karl Marx's books were obtuse, especially the parts describing 
the Hegelian dialectic, but they made some sense if one believed that 
mankind had a machine-like nature that Marx described. One of my 
teachers made the often-repeated, poorly-thought-out comment that 
Communism was great in theory but faulty in practice. To my way of 
thinking, to be a great idea it must work in practice, and Communism 
obviously doesn't. There has never been a theory that has promised 
more human happiness yet delivered more poverty, mental and 
physical oppression, and more human misery and death. 

Until I looked into the foundations of Communism, I had always 
thought Karl Marx was a German. In fact, I had read that Marx's 
father was a Christian. It turns out that his father, a successful lawyer, 
was a Jew who had converted to Christianity after an edict prohibited 
Jews from practicing law. Much later, in 1977, I read an article from 
the Chicago Jewish Sentinel boasting that Marx was the grandson of a 
rabbi and "the descendant of Talmudic scholars for many 
generations/" 73 An excellent article in the Barnes Review points out the 
"Racism of Marx and Engels." 74 

Not only was Karl Marx from a long line of Talmudic scholars, he 
also hated Russians with a passion that could be described as patho- 
logical. I looked up Karl Marx in the Jewish encyclopedias, and I 
found to my amazement that the man who taught him many of the 
principles of Communism was Moses Hess. As incredible as it might 
seem, contemporary Zionist leaders venerate Moses Hess as the "fore- 
runner" of modern Zionism. In The Encyclopedia of Zionism in Israel, 
under the entry for Moses Hess, is the following: 

Pioneer of modern socialism, social philosopher, and forerunner 
of Zionism.... Hess was thus a forerunner of political and cultural 
Zionism and of socialist Zionism in particular. He became deeply 
involved in the rising socialist movement. Karl Marx and Frederick 
Engels acknowledged that they had learned much from him during 



Jewish Supremacism 51 



the formative years of the movement. 
onism in Israel 1 * 



— The Encyclopedia ofZi- 




After months of reading from many major, first hand sources / I 
realized that the elderly lady in the offices 
of the Citizens Council had been essen- 
tially right, at least about the origins of 
the Communist revolution. I felt as if I 
were sitting on the edge of a volcano. 
Every new piece of information seemed to 
both confirm and clarify the issue ever 
further. 

In The Last Days of the Romanovs, 
Robert Wilton, on assignment for The 
London Times in Russia for 17 years, 
summed up the "Russian Revolution" in 
these words: 

The whole record of the Bolshevism 
in Russia is indelibly impressed with 
the stamp of alien invasion. The mur- 
der of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov and car- 
ried out by the Jews Goloshekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov, 
and Yurovsky, is the act, not of the Russian people, but of this hos- 
tile invader. 76 

In 1990, a major New York publisher, the Free Press, a division of 
Simon & Schuster, published a book by Israeli historian Louis 
Rapoport called Stalin's War Against the Jews. In it the author casually 
admits what we Gentiles are not supposed to know: 

Many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the 
new government. Lenin's first Politburo was dominated by men of 
Jewish origins... 

Under Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolu- 
tion, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists' vows to 
eradicate Anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the revolution — 
partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet 
administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization 
drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an im- 
mensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Soviet 
secret police, the Cheka.... And many of those who fell afoul of the 
Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators. 

The Collective leadership that emerged in Lenin's dying days was 
headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, curly-haired... 77 

I began to realize that there was once widespread knowledge of 
the Jewish leadership of the "Russian Revolution," — an example can 
be found in the National Geographic Magazine's May 1907 edition. An 



52 The Jewish Question 



SQ£ 



article entitled "The Revolution in Russia" describes the Jewish lead- 
ership of the terroristic Communist revolution. 

The Vengeance Of The Jews 

...the revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race 
and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish 
Bund,... The government has suffered more from that race than 
from all of its other subjects combined. Whenever a desperate deed 
is committed it is always done by a Jew and there is scarcely one 
loyal member of that race in the entire Empire. 78 

The facts were indisputable. An enormous fact of history has been 
wiped away from the intellectual consciousness of the West as thor- 
oughly as a file can be erased from the hard disk of a desktop com- 
puter. In his classic novel 1984, 79 George Orwell wrote about historical 
truth "going down the Memory Hole." This had been the fate of the 

truth regarding the real perpe- 
trators of the "Russian Revolu- 
tion." 

I asked myself two ques- 
tions: "Why was the historical 
truth about the Communist 
revolution suppressed?" and 
"How, in a free world, could 
that suppression have been ac- 
complished?" The first ques- 
tion had an obvious answer in 
the fact that the forces of 
international Jewry would not 
want it generally known that 
they were the primary authors 
of the most repressive and 
murderous evil in the history 
of mankind: Communism. 
Obviously, knowledge of that 
fact does not create good 
public relations for Jews. 

The answer to the second 
question of "how" was more elusive. I realized that only very power- 
ful forces could suppress important parts of the historical record and 
create a false impression of a "Russian Revolution" when there were 
only 13 ethnic Russians in the highest levels of the first Bolshevik gov- 
ernment. Obviously the Jews historically did have a lot of power — as 
evidenced by Jacob Schiff, the Rothschilds, and others — but the 



©fa NATIONAL 

CEOCRAPHIC 
MAGAZINE 



=EE 



VYi ■ ■■-. 



■■ J EH 



THE ROCK CITT OF PETRI 

hr H-. ?■ m.vuti.n c hghim. »— < 
MP uira In it it LiStA Of IKE I3B BUD 

■rlUOJIE H "1AP>t-t > C »■ )h-r 1 ■ ■' 

[ft HtOUIW ft fettit 

hlllliil 1.4-LHIB 

yiii n -h i i ■. vjimj 

m ■.£#• d a bo 4 i,hJtaB 

muiLi en UPL LWUi 

u, vthjutv iaw>w>*j n V-ri nil 

n oiMii « ^iciuul *tit)i miwi 

IV WHTl*,fL * IWLWflf. 

*- ■ !■ I I kf T^ HKMIlJ C^M"|* 

H-'W. IIinLMl Kill 

L&.C- 




Jewish Supremacism 53 

power to change the perception of history — that seemed preposter- 
ous. Yet only a few months before, when Mattie Smith had told me at 
the Citizens Council that the Russian Revolution was Jewish, I had 
thought the idea was ridiculous. Now I knew differently, and I knew I 
was just beginning to discover a different reality in the world that was 
not mentioned by the NY Times. 

The facts I then knew led me to some interesting new questions: 

• Does it make me an anti-Semite to accept the historical fact 
that the "Russian Revolution" was not actually Russian but a 
takeover of Czarist Russia by an antagonistic, non-Russian na- 
tionality? 

• Is there a historically proven nationalism among the Jews hos- 
tile toward other peoples? 

• Do Jewish interests and the interests of the Christian West syn- 
chronize or conflict? 

• If those interests sometimes conflict, did the well-coordinated, 
world-wide Jewish effort to fiercely fight for their perceived eth- 
nic interests in Russia have negative ramifications for Russia, 
Western Europe and America? 

• How did Jewish organized power create our "special relation- 
ship" with Israel in modern times? 

• And, finally: Did asking these questions have anything to do 
with "hate"? 

When I saw programs on television about Anti-Semitism, hate was 
almost always the word used to describe any negative opinion about 
Jews. I felt no hatred toward Jews. My investigation had been purely 
an intellectual exercise. I was an interloper looking into a world 
where I did not belong, but it was a world that intrigued me. Ponder- 
ing the "hate" question, I asked a teacher at school why the word hate 
wasn't ever used by the media to describe the motivation of the mass 
murder of millions of Russian Christians in the Soviet Union. Cer- 
tainly, it would have taken a great deal of hate to have committed 
such monstrous crimes. She had no answer, and yet I had many more 
questions. In later years, I learned that labeling such inquiries "hate" 
was itself part of an organized effort to demonize anyone who would 
dare to oppose Jewish Supremacist hatred of the Gentile World. 

Once I discovered the shared roots of both Communism and Zion- 
ism, I decided to examine the history of the Jewish people, both his- 
torical Judaism and the development of modern Zionism. I felt that I 
had access to the best sources in the world for my investigation. I 
started with three excellent and exhaustive Jewish encyclopedias. 



Chapter 2 

Jewish Scipremacism 

Powerful and enigmatic, intelligent and creative, idealistic on the 
one hand and materialistic on the other, the Jewish people have al- 
ways fascinated me. Few teenagers growing up in the middle 1960s, 
as I did, could have avoided acquiring a positive image of Israel and 
the Jewish people. Because of my years of Sunday school, my percep- 
tion of the Jews was even more idealized than most. I was 11 years 
old when I saw the classic movie, Exodus. 80 It made such an enduring 
impression on me that for a few months its beautiful theme song be- 
came my favorite, one that I would often hum or sing. 

I remember an episode of embarrassment when my sister and her 
teenage friends stumbled upon me loudly singing the stirring words, 
"This land is mine, God gave this land to me." Heroic Israel inspired 
me. It was as if the Israelites of the Bible had transported themselves 
to modern times to live out their Old Testament adventures again. 
The televised image of Israel strongly reinforced my acceptance of the 
idea that Gentile intolerance had caused every historical conflict with 
Jews. 

After I had discovered the extensive Jewish leadership of early 
Communism, which I had hoped was an uncharacteristic blight on 
Jewish history, I began to ask questions one dared not ask in polite 
society about this interesting people and religion. I had read about the 
many persecutions of the Jews throughout history, including their 
great suffering now called the Holocaust (in the mid-60s that term 
had not yet been appropriated by the Jews to apply exclusively to 
their sufferings during the Second World War — holocaust merely 
means, as it always has, large scale destruction, especially by fire). 

Mark Twain wrote, "Every nation hates each other, but they all 
hate the Jew." Somehow I found the impertinence to ask why. In a his- 
torical context, almost every major nation of Europe had expelled 
them in the past, some repeatedly, after renewed waves of Jewish 
immigration. What was it, I wondered, about the Jewish people, that 
inspired such hatred? 

Normally, when we study historical conflicts between nations or 
peoples, we do it dispassionately. For instance, in examining any war 
from long ago, we list as objectively as possible, the grievances and 
rationales of the opposing sides. When studying the War for Southern 
Independence, every American school child learns the Southern ar- 
guments for secession and the Northern arguments for forced union. 
In contrast, when studying the many historical disputes between the 
Jewish people and others, only the Jewish point of view is acceptable. 



56 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

In early 1995, Congressman Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the House, 
fired his newly appointed congressional librarian, Christina Jeffrey. 81 
He fired her for having once suggested that history students, when 
studying the Holocaust, should also study the German point of view 
on the subject. She was fired in spite of her high standing in her pro- 
fession and notwithstanding her long and cozy relations with the 
powerful Jewish ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith). The 
very suggestion that there could be another side to any issue affecting 
Jews is decried as "anti-Semitic." In both the entertainment and news 
media, the only permissible opinion is that Jews are always innocent 
victims persecuted by intolerant Christians and other "anti-Semites." 
Maybe they were always innocent, and all the other peoples of the world were 
always unjust, I thought. But they weren't so innocent in the Russian 
Revolution. I realized I could not evaluate the issue fairly until I had 
read about both sides. 

Are Jews a Race?... They Certainly Think So! 

One of the first things I discovered that is that while Gentiles who 
call the Jews a "race" are condemned, Jewish leaders have for centu- 
ries routinely called themselves a race. The leader of American Jewry 
in the 1930s, Rabbi Stephen F. Wise, said it succinctly in this dramatic 
statement, "Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the Jewish people a 
race and we are a race." 82 Right up to the present day, there are many 
statements illustrating how Jewish leaders matter-of-factly view 
themselves not just as a religion, but as an identifiable race, geneti- 
cally distinguishable from other peoples. 

The former Israeli Prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking 
to Jewish group in southern California said: "If Israel had not come 
into existence after World War II then I am certain the Jewish race 
wouldn't have survived... I stand before you and say you must 
strengthen your commitment to Israel." 83 

An editorial entitled "Some Other Race" in the New York weekly 
Forward (A very prestigious Jewish publication) urges Jews to list 
themselves on the U.S. Government census form as a race. It goes on 
to suggest: "... On question eight [of the form, which asks about race], 
you might consider doing what more than one member of our redak- 
tzia [editorial staff] has done: checking the box 'some other race' and 
writing in the word 'Jew'." 84 

Charles Bronfman, a main sponsor of the $210 million "Birthright 
Israel," an organization specifically committed to preventing inter- 
marriage between Jews and Gentiles, expressed the need to preserve 



Jewish Supremacism 57 

the Jewish genetic character as expressed in the Jewish DNA. 
Bronfman is brother of Edgar Bronfman, Sr., president of the World 
Jewish Congress. He said, "...you're losing a lot — losing the kind of 
feeling you have when you know [that] throughout the world there 
are people who somehow or other have the same kind of DNA that 
you have." 85 

Imagine for a moment if President George Bush would speak to a 
group of White college students and tell them how great it is for them 
know that others in the world share their White DNA, and that they 
should not lose it by intermarrying with other races. Bush could live 
to 100 years old and still never live down a remark like that! 

During his campaign for President in 2000, Bush spoke before 
dozens of Jewish organizations and Synagogues that oppose inter- 
marriage between Jews and non-Jews. The media only had praise for 
those appearances. In contrast, Bush faced universal criticism by the 
Jewish media by simply speaking at a conservative Christian univer- 
sity (Bob Jones University) that quietly opposes racial intermarriage. 
After the media unleashed a storm of criticism, Bush had to quickly 
apologize and then passionately condemn Bob Jones University for its 
position. Of course, within a few days, Bush was again speaking be- 
fore many Jewish groups that stridently oppose intermarriage, yet no 
one in the media dared object to these appearances, or to even point 
out this blatant double standard. 

Judaism Views the Bible as Racial Supremacism 

Looking for answers to the Jewish view on race, I returned to 
where I had first learned my respect for the Jews: in the Holy Bible. I 
went back and reread the Old Testament, paying close attention to the 
relationships between Jews and non-Jews. In contrast to the universal- 
ism of the New Testament, the Old Testament is extremely ethnocen- 
tric. It repeatedly identifies the Israelites as a "special people," or a 
"Chosen People," and it painstakingly traces the genealogical descent 
of the Children of Israel. Many thought-provoking passages forbid 
the intermarriage of Jews and other tribes. In the book of Exodus, 
Moses responds to Israelites who had sexual relations with Moabite 
women by ordering that the Moabites be executed. In Ezra, God 
commanded those who married non-Israelites to cast off their wives 
and even the children of such unions. 86 Some of the bloodiest writings 
I have ever read detailed the Jewish people's annihilation of their 
tribal enemies. 

The massacres of Canaanites, Jacobites, Philistines, Egyptians, and 
dozens of other peoples are gruesomely recorded in the Bible. In to- 
day's terminology, we describe the slaughter of entire peoples as 
genocide. Old Testament Jews spared neither men, women, children 



58 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

or even the animals and pets of their enemies. 87 The following are just 
a few among dozens of similar passages found in the Old Testament: 

And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and 
woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge 
of the sword . . . (Joshua 6:2 1) 88 

Then Horam, king of Gezer, came to help Lachish; and Joshua 
smote him and all his people, until he had left him none remaining. 

And they took Eglon, and smote it with the edge of the sword, 
and all the souls that were therein. (Joshua 1 0:32-34) 89 

And they took Hebron, and smote it with the edge of the sword, 
and the king thereof, and all the cities thereof, and the souls that 
were therein; he left none remaining. (Joshua 10:37) 90 

For the indignation of the Lord is upon all nations, and His fury 
upon all their armies: he hath utterly destroyed them, He hath de- 
livered them to the slaughter. 

Their slain also shall be cast out, and their stink shall come up 
out of their carcasses, and the mountains shall be melted in their 
blood. (Isaiah 34:2-3) 91 

But in the cities of these peoples that the Lord your God gives 
you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes, 
(Deuteronomy 20: 16) 92 

As a Christian, I could not explain what appeared to be celebra- 
tions of genocide. I acknowledged that God is unfathomable and un- 
knowable. However, I could not help but have sympathy for those 
who where massacred, including thousands of innocent men, women 
and children. It is easy to imagine how the few who survived those 
bloody, merciless massacres felt about the "Jews." Of course, the Jews 
were not unique in their pursuit of ethnic cleansing; many other early 
peoples had committed genocide on their enemies. 

With the coming of Jesus Christ and his advocacy of love and 
kindness as recorded in the New Testament, the Old Testament advo- 
cacy and record of genocide is little recollected by modern churches. 
When a modern Christian stumbles across passages of the Old Testa- 
ment condoning genocide, he usually dismisses them as the sad hap- 
penings of a remote biblical era, one now mitigated with the New 
Covenant of love that Christ brings to those who accept his message. 

The Israelite record on racial integrity and supremacy is quite 
clear: 

Neither shall thou make marriages with them; their daughter thou 
shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto 
thy son. (Deuteronomy 7:2-3) 93 



Jewish Supremacism 59 

. . .For thou art a holy people unto the Lord Thy God: the Lord 
Thy God has chosen thee to a special people unto himself, above 
all people that are on the face of the earth. (Deuteronomy 7:6) 94 

Now therefore give not your daughters unto their sons, neither 
take their daughters unto your sons, nor seek their peace or their 
wealth for ever, that ye may be strong and eat of the good of the 
land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children for ever. (Ezra 
9:12) 95 

Members of racial groups might argue about their comparative 
history, or abilities, or spirituality. But to suggest that God favors one 
people over all others — even to the point of advocating and condon- 
ing genocide to make way for the "Chosen"? Certainly, that must be 
the apex of racial supremacy. 

Modern Christianity deals with the ethnocentric and genocidal 
parts of the Old Testament by focusing on the loving aspects of the 
New Testament. One example is the way that Jesus Christ reversed 
Old Testament law such as "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a 
tooth," to "turn the other cheek." The Jewish religion, however, had 
no comparable figure in its history to moderate the extreme ethnocen- 
trism of the Old Testament. Perhaps the Jewish teacher who offered 
the greatest moderation toward Gentiles was Maimonides, considered 
by most Jews as the foremost figure of European Judaism. Even Mai- 
monides decreed that Jewish physicians should not save the life of a 
Christian unless not saving him would "cause the spread of hostility 
against the Jews." % 

The early spread of Christianity by the Apostle Paul encouraged 
Christians to become more tolerant of different ethnic groups. Paul 
himself was a Jewish Pharisee who converted to Christianity and 
preached much of his life to Gentiles of diverse nationalities. The 
Christian faith had intolerance for other beliefs and other Gods, but 
no bias against other tribes. Evangelists of the ancient world them- 
selves came from assorted peoples and preached across the known 
world. Of course, Christians could and often did harbor xenophobic 
tendencies, but their nationalistic or ethnocentric attitudes found their 
origins in their own cultures, not in the teachings of the New Testa- 
ment. The book of Galatians makes the point quite well that the cho- 
sen people, "neither Jew or Greek," are now those who accept the sal- 
vation of Jesus Christ. 97 Salvation in the ancient world became based 
upon acceptance of faith, not simply on blood. 

The Jewish religion had an evolution quite different from that of 
early Christianity. The Jewish people and their religion were 
entwined. Belief in God was necessary to preserve the tribe as much 
as preserving the tribe was important to safeguarding the religion. 
However, according to the Zionist State of Israel, race is far more 



60 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

important than religious belief. A prospective immigrant does not 
have to practice or believe in Judaism to immigrate to Israel; in fact he 
can be an outspoken atheist and Communist. He must only prove 
Jewish descent. Protection of the ethnic identity of the Jewish people 
became the main reason for Judaism's existence. 

In the Middle East (and later throughout the world) the Jews min- 
gled with many peoples, and yet they preserved their heritage and 
their essential customs. They are the only ethnic minority in Western 
nations that has not assimilated after thousands of years. In Babylon, 
they lived under slavery and then under domination for hundreds of 
years and developed a code that enabled them not only to survive, 
but to prosper while living as a minority in an alien society. When 
they emerged from their Babylonian sojourn, they were stronger, 
more organized, and more ethnocentric than ever before. 

The Talmud: A Jewish-Supremacist Doctrine 

In rejecting Jesus Christ and the love and tolerance he preached, 
Judaism proceeded on its path of chauvinism. It culminated in the 
pages of the Talmud, an encyclopedic exposition of Jewish law and 
custom, compiled by hundreds of rabbis over the centuries. The 
American Heritage Dictionary describes it as "constituting the basis of 
religious authority for traditional Judaism." The Talmud was first 
transcribed in Babylonian times, and the oral tradition is many centu- 
ries older. By the Sixth Century AD it was written down, becoming 
the most important religious work of the Jewish people and the chief 
canon of their religion. In it they finally codified their most chauvinis- 
tic tendencies. 

Herman Wouk, the very popular Jewish writer, 98 describes the in- 
fluence of the Talmud as follows: 

The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart's blood of the Jew- 
ish religion. Whatever laws, customs, or ceremonies we observe — 
whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spas- 
modic sentimentalists — we follow the Talmud. It is our common 
law." 

As a 16-year-old, during one of my visits to the Citizens Council 
offices, I had found a book called The Jewish Religion: Its Influence To- 
day by Elizabeth Dilling. 100 It interested me because the large format of 
the book contained complete photocopied pages from parts of the 
Talmud officially compiled by Jewish scholars. I remember skipping 
Dilling's commentary and going right to the translations. One of the 
first passages I read really surprised me. It said, 



Jewish Supremacism 61 

A heathen [Gentile] who pries into the Torah [and other Jewish 
Scriptures] is condemned to death, for it is written, it is our inheri- 
tance, not theirs. (Sanhedrin 59a) 101 

If a 16-year-old boy reads something forbidden like that, he is cer- 
tain to read on. The passage was completely alien to everything I had 
always understood about religion. Why would they not want all men 
to read their holy words the same way Christians want to "spread the 
good news?" Just what is in these scriptures that would oblige the 
Jews to kill a Gentile that read them? Why would public knowledge 
of Jewish scriptures be dangerous to Jews? I went to the library and 
found some old translations of parts of the Talmud. It was not long 
before I came across other, even more amazing passages such as: 

Balaam [Jesus] is raised from the dead and being punished in 
boiling hot semen. Those who mock the words of the Jewish sages 
and sin against Israel are boiled in hot excrement. (57a Gittin) 102 

When I asked my Jewish friend's rabbi about the passage, he told 
me that Balaam was not Jesus. He sounded very convincing, but that 
very evening, I looked up Balaam in the Jewish Encyclopedia and was 
shocked to read that Balaam was a pseudonym for Jesus. Because 
Christian scholars periodically obtained copies of the Talmud, Tal- 
mudic scribes hoped to deceive them by using the name Balaam to 

denote Jesus. In The 
Jewish Encyclopedia, un- 
der the heading "Ba- 
laam," it says, "...the 
pseudonym 'Balaam' 
given to Jesus in San- 
hedrin 106b and Gittin 
57a." 103 The Talmud 
repeatedly uses ob- 
scure words to denote 
Gentiles with an assortment of names such as Egyptian, heathen, 
Cuthean, and idolater. In the most popular English-language transla- 
tion of the Talmud, called the Soncino edition, the practice is illus- 
trated by the fifth footnote of the book of Sanhedrin. It reads, 
"Cuthean (Samaritan) was here substituted for the original goy..." 104 
Christians are sometimes referred to by the code word "Min" or 
"Minim." 105 The footnotes of the Soncino edition of the Talmud as well 
as passages in the Jewish Encyclopedia blatantly mention this 
intentional artifice. 

The Encyclopedia Judaica also notes that, 



The Jewish Encyclopedia, 
under the heading " Balaam, 
it says, " . . .the pseudonym 
'Balaam 7 given to Jesus in 
Sanhedrin 106b and Gittin 
57a. " 



// 



62 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

In rabbinical literature the distinction between gentile (goy, ak- 
kum) and Christian (Nazerh has frequently been obscured by tex- 
tual alterations necessitated by the vigilance of censors. Thus 
'Egyptian, 'Amalekite,' 'Zadokite (Sadducee),' and 'Kuti' (Samari- 
tan) often stands in place of the original Nazeri, as well as goy, 
akkum, etc. Probably when Resh Lakish stated that a gentile (ak- 
kum, etc. in existing texts) who observed the Sabbath [Saturday 
rites] is punishable by death (Sanhedrin, 58b), he had in mind 
Christians ... Numerous anti -Christian polemic passages only 
make real sense after Nazeri has been restored in place of the spu- 
rious Kuti or Zadokite." 106 

In other passages in the Talmud I discovered a possible reason 
why some of the Talmud's writers had forbidden Gentiles to read it. 
The Talmud's words are vitriolic: 

Only Jews are human. [Gentiles] are animals. (Baba Mezia 114a- 
114b.) 107 

For murder, whether of a Cuthean [Gentile] by a Cuthean, or of 
an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a 
Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty. {Sanhedrin 

57a) 108 

Even the best of the [Gentiles] should be killed. ( Babylonian 
Talmud) 109 

If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is 
not known and do the evil there. (Moed Kattan 17a.) 110 

Gentiles' flesh is as the flesh of asses and whose issue is like the 
issue of horses. 111 

If a heathen [Gentile] hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hit- 
ting a Jew is hitting God. (Sanhedrin 58b.) 112 

If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no li- 
ability; but if an ox of a Canaanite [Gentile] gores an ox of an Is- 
raelite. ..the payment is to be in full. (Baba Kamma 37b.) 113 

If a Jew finds an object lost by a heathen [Gentile] it does not 
have to be returned. (Baba Mezia 24a; Affirmed also in Baba 
Kamma 113b.) 114 

God will not spare a Jew who 'marries his daughter to an old 
man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a 
Cuthean [Gentile]... (Sanhedrin 76a.) 115 

What a Jew obtains by theft from a Cuthean [Gentile] he may 
keep. (Sanhedrin 57a.) 116 

[Gentiles] are outside the protection of the law and God has 'ex- 
posed their money to Israel.' (Baba Kamma 37b.) 117 

Jews may use lies ('subterfuges') to circumvent a [Gentile]. 
(Baba Kamma 113a.) 118 

All [Gentile] children are animals. (Yebamoth 98a.) 119 

[Gentiles] prefer sex with cows. (Abodah Zarah 22a-22b.) 120 



Jewish Supremacism 63 

• The vessels of [Gentiles], do they not impart a worsened flavor 
to the food cooked in them? (Abodah Zarah 67b.) 121 

It astonished me to read such unmitigated hatred from the chief 
writings of the Jewish religion. It was obvious that these quotations 
were all authentic, because the copies I read were published by Jewish 
organizations. I could not find any rational explanation for such writ- 
ings being in the Jewish sacred books. In fact, it became clear to me 
that most Americans do not even know that such writings even exist. 

These quotes were hard for me to believe, as they will be for many 
readers. However, if anyone doubts their authenticity, an easy way to 
verify the Talmud's extreme hatred against Gentiles is by reading the 
Jewish Encyclopedia. In the article "Gentiles," it makes very clear the 
Talmud's hatred toward non-Jews. Under the subtitle "Discrimination 
against Gentiles," on pages 617-621, it clearly shows the Talmud's 
attitude toward non-Jews. Here are some excerpts: 

. . .they held that only Israelites are men, . . . Gentiles they 
classed not as men but as barbarians. (B.M. 108b). . . Another rea- 
son for discrimination was the vile and vicious character of the 
Gentiles. . . . "whose flesh is like the flesh of asses and issue is like 
the issue of horses ..." The Gentiles were so strongly suspected of 
unnatural crimes that it was necessary to prohibit the stabling of a 
cow in their stalls (Ab. Zarah ii. 
."The Torah outlawed the 



1). 

issue of a Gentile as that of a 
beast.. . . " The almighty offered 
the Torah to the Gentiles na- 
tions also, but since they re- 
fused to accept it, He withdrew 
his shining legal protection from 
them, and transferred their 
property rights to Israel. . . the 
presumption is that the Gentile 
obtained possession by seizure, 
. . . The property is considered 
public property, like the un- 
claimed land of the Desert. 122 



volume x 
ntlLIPSOW— ±\*\W.V. 



The 1907 edition of the Funk & 
Wagnall's Jewish Encyclopedia men- 
tions a quotation of Rabbi Simon 
Ben Yohai (a giant of Talmudic lit- 
erature) that is "often quoted by 
anti-Semites." The quotation reads: 
"Tob shebe-goyim harog" — "The 
best of the Goyim is to be killed." It 
says that the rabbi's utterance re- 
sults from persecution, describing this anti-Gentile statement as a re- 
action of a rabbi "whose life experiences may furnish an explanation 



nit: 



Jewish Encyclopedia 



THE Hixronr,. *KLICI0N, LmtATUEh, DM cm 

7TJMS Of rH£ Jr.WlHI PKDrtK FROM THE 

EAftLlrirTiMKS ¥TJ TIIH HtESENT La!f 



r«TTWiJ h Mm rtu* Ik l i lH f fcbhn ... 
for * — . f-"> i*v— if tt* >w lnn u 

TitM,! K-I-I-. r- " 



-" * ■ ■ "Vii i « * > 'T i * f~ ! 






Mw-m * *^- m i i y jw I ^ ■ ■"",« ■■ :rw— t— - *■ i 



»"H ■ -■ - mi L i r»» ifi T : 



■"■■ ■■ ■ ". nui ii i 

■*■•». i^™^. « i. Pi* 

■**^» *»-^ *!•«. I W *■*- Ft-rv* t" ^ 

■MB if UmHOT it* ntllW nun cr « 



■ EI TD1Z iED L03IE-E-lf 

FUNK AHI) WA<SfC A Llrt COMPANY 



UDULLl'V 



64 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

for his animosity." Yet the passage continues revealingly, "In the con- 
nection in which it stands, the import of this observation is similar to 
that of the two others: 'The most pious woman is addicted to sorcery'; 
'The best of snakes ought to have its head crushed.' " 123 

The Talmudic quotations I reproduce here are by no means taken 
out of context. It is true that the Talmud is comprised of many writ- 
ings and has many "commentaries" throughout. It also sometimes ac- 
tually has disputes on certain issues. However, there is no mistaking 
the decidedly anti-Gentile tone that dominates it throughout. The ex- 
hortation that "the best of Gentiles should be killed," for instance, is 
located in at least three different sections. 

Imagine the reaction if a prominent Christian pronounced that 
"the best of the Jews should be killed." Would not such a statement be 
forcefully condemned? Imagine the media opprobrium that would be 
heaped on the offending words and its author. Perversely, if one ex- 
poses the intolerance in the Talmud, he is the only one likely to face 
accusations of religious prejudice and intolerance. 

When I first sought to read the Talmud, I noticed a strange thing. I 
had a hard time finding a copy. It is not sold in bookstores, and most 
libraries don't have copies. Admittedly, the Talmud is a few times the 
size of the Bible, but certainly, in mass quantities, the Talmud could 
be printed for a nominal cost, much like the Bible is, on thin paper 
and in inexpensively bound volumes. As the most holy writ of one of 
the world's major religions, there must be significant human interest 
in it. Why then must one usually go to a synagogue or pay hundreds 
of dollars for an original Soncino edition? One must ask why it is not 
readily available for the public to read. The answer is probably found 
in the fact that the Jewish organizations that oversee the distribution 
rights to such writings don't want them widely read. When one reads 
the Talmudic books, one can understand their reasoning. 

As an idealistic teenager, I was totally unprepared for this dark 
side of a faith that I had always respected. My impression had been 
that the Jewish faith had no animosity toward Jesus Christ. I was al- 
ways told that they had much respect for Him as a prophet or at least 
as a great teacher but simply did not accept Him as the Messiah. It 
disturbed me to have come across violently obscene descriptions of 
the Savior and of Christians in the Talmud. Among other things, 
Christ is described as a charlatan, a seducer and an evil-doer. It ac- 
cuses Christ of having sexual intercourse with his donkey 124 and it de- 
scribes the Virgin Mary as a whore. 125 



Jewish Supremacism 65 

When I first read extensive sections of the Talmud, even with the 
Jewish published translations in front of me, I did not want to believe 
they were authentic. I approached another Jewish acquaintance, Mark 
Cohen, and gave him a page of these quotations. He seemed equally 
upset by them. By the look on his face, I knew instantly that he was 
completely unfamiliar (and unsympathetic) with this Talmudic writ. 
He offered to ask his rabbi about their authenticity. The rabbi con- 
firmed that the quotations were genuine but claimed that those views 
were not currently held by most Jews of today. 

I willingly believed this, and I still believe it is true of the average 
Jew. At the same time, however, knowing that such passages existed 
helped me to understand why there has been so much anti-Jewish 
sentiment over the centuries. It also offered insight into the anti- 
Gentile animus that dominated Judaism. It should be noted that all 
rabbis study the Talmud. How would Jews react if Christian preach- 
ers studied Mein Kampf as part of their holy writ, but excused it by 
saying that the book has no effect on their current attitudes? It may 
sound shocking to the uninformed, but any open-minded reader who 
reads both Mein Kampf and the Talmud would find the Talmud to be 
the more wrathful of the two, for despite Hitler's vitriolic language 
against the Jews, few of his statements approach the hatred reflected 
by Talmudic quotes such as "The best of the Gentiles should be killed. 
In Mein Kampf Hitler asks the question of whether or not Jews are 
"Germans," whereas the Talmud states that Gentiles are not even hu- 
man beings but animals. 

I looked up Anti-Semitism in the major encyclopedias. All of them 
attempted to explain historical Anti-Semitism purely as Christian in- 
tolerance toward Jews. Sometimes, they even suggested that Chris- 
tians persecuted Jews simply because the Gospels blame the Jews for 
the crucifixion of Christ. They never even suggested that one of the 
sources of Anti-Semitism could have been the hateful and ethnocen- 
tric attitudes of the Jews themselves as expressed toward Gentiles in 
their own religious laws. 

Even during the life of Jesus Christ, the forces of organized Jewry 
opposed the kindhearted teacher who spoke of the power of love and 
reconciliation, rather than of the militant anti-Roman measures hoped 
for by the Pharisees. The New Testament records faithfully the intense 
Jewish terror used to suppress the early Christian faith. In one of the 
Gospels' most chilling verses it is written: 

Howbeit that no man spake openly of him [Christ] for fear of the 
Jews." (John 8:1 3) 126 

From the early centuries of Christianity, some Gentile scholars be- 
came fluent in Hebrew. They developed bitterness toward Jews based 



66 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

on the contents of the Talmudic writings. Down through the interven- 
ing centuries, dozens of popes issued edicts and encyclicals condemn- 
ing Judaism. They expressed outrage, not because the Jews crucified 
Christ, but because of the Talmud's vicious anti-Gentile and anti- 
Christian passages. Here is short selection of some Popes' views about 
the Jews: 

Gregory IX. Condemned the Talmud as containing "every kind of 
vileness and blasphemy against Christian doctrine." 

Benedict XIII. His Bull on the Jews (1450) declared, "The here- 
sies, vanities and errors of the Talmud prevent the Jews from 
knowing the truth." 

Innocent IV. Burned the Talmud in 1233 as a book of evil. 

John XXII. Banned the Talmud in 1322 

Julius III. Papal Bull Contra Hebreos retinentes Libros (1554) or- 
dered the Talmud burnt "everywhere." 

Paul IV. Bull Cum Nimis Absurdum (1555) powerfully condemned 
Jewish usury and anti -Christian activities. 

Pius IV. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings. 

Pius V. Expelled all Jews from papal states. (1569) 

Gregory XIII. Said in a Papal Bull of 1581, "Moved by an intense 
hatred of the members of Christ, they continue to plan horrible 
crimes against the Christian religion with daily increasing audac- 
ity." 

Clement VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings. 

Not only did the founders of the Catholic Church take this dim 
view of the Jews, I was amazed to find that the great reformer and 
founder of Protestantism, Martin Luther, shared the same passionate 
opposition toward them. 

As a teenager, I had a great admiration for Martin Luther, and I 
was keen to find out what the founder of Protestant Christianity had 
to say about Jews. A mail-order catalogue of books on the Jewish 
question at the Citizens Council office listed a translation of a book by 
Martin Luther with the abrasive title The Jews and Their Lies. 127 The 
great Martin Luther was a biblical scholar who read Hebrew. He had 
thoroughly researched the books of the Talmud in their original lan- 
guage, and he had reacted to them with revulsion. Going on to read 
compilations of Luther's sermons and writings, I was astonished at 
his passionate anti-Jewish tone. 

They have been taught so much deadly hatred against the Gen- 
tiles by their parents and Rabbis since their earliest youth and con- 
tinue to feed their hate during all the years of their lives, and this 
hatred has saturated their very blood and flesh, fills the very mar- 
row of their bones and has become inseparable from their whole 
being. (Weimar 53, pgs. 482-483) 



Jewish Supremacism 67 

Their Talmud and their Rabbis teach them that a murder shall not 
be regarded as a sin whenever a Jew kills a Gentile, but only if a 
Jew murders a brother in Israel. Neither is it a sin to break an oath 
sworn to a Gentile. . .The Jews of our days still keep to these doc- 
trines and follow the example of their fathers, taking every oppor- 
tunity to practice their deliberately false interpretation of the 
Lord's Word, their avariciousness, their usury, their thefts, their 
murders, and teaching their children to do likewise. (W. 53, 489- 
490-91) 

Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe I am too 
rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that 
I ridicule them and treat them with such sarcasm. By my word, I 
am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a Satanic breed. (W. 32, 
pg. 286) 

You should know that the Jews blaspheme and violate the name 
of our Savior day for day... they are our public enemies and 
incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our Blessed 
Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they give 
the epithet of Changelings and abortions. If they could kill us all 
they would gladly do so, in fact, many murder Christians. . . 
(Luther's last sermon, a few days before his death in February 
1546) (Erlanger 62, pg. 189) 

There were many tribes, nationalities and conflicting religious 
sects that migrated to the great cities of the Roman Empire. Yet, of all 
these groups, only the Jewish tribe has elicited such relentless hostility 
throughout the centuries. Only the Jewish tribe never assimilated into 
the Roman population. Could their own Talmudic practices and their 
disdain for non-Jews have had something to do with the enmity they 
generated? It seemed logical to me that these things contributed to 
anti-Jewish sentiments in the West. 

The Contrast of Christian and Jewish Holy Days 

The contrasting holidays of Christianity and Judaism illustrate the 
dichotomy between the two religions. Christmas and Easter celebrate 
universal themes offering hope and salvation for all mankind. 
Christmas officially commemorates the birth of the Savior and cele- 
brates the desire for "peace on Earth and goodwill toward men." 
Easter, a more somber occasion, represents the promise of universal 
salvation through the Resurrection of Christ. While Christians cele- 
brate universal goodwill on their holy days, Jews celebrate historic 
military victories against their despised Gentile enemies. 

Near the time of Christmas, the Jews celebrate Hanukkah, a cele- 
bration of their military victory in 165 BC over their hated enemy, the 
Greek-descended King Antiochus IV of Syria. The victory finds its 
remembrance by the miracle of the long-burning oil lamps in their re- 
captured temple. As Christians enter the Lenten Season and prepare 
for the celebrations of Christ's offer of salvation, the Jews celebrate 



68 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

Passover, a holiday that is, again, based on an ancient conflict be- 
tween Jew and Gentile. Passover is an unambiguous reference to the 
night when the spirit of death harmlessly "passed over" Jewish 
homes and descended into the homes of their hated Egyptian ene- 
mies, killing every firstborn male from newborn to elderly in all of 
Egypt. It may shock one to realize it, but this is a joyous celebration of 
mass infanticide and murder of the strong among the non-Jews. 

Another important Jewish holiday is the Feast of Lots, called Pu- 
rim. The Random House Dictionary of the English Language describes it 
as follows: 

Purim A Jewish festival marked chiefly by the reading of the book of Esther and 
eating of hamantaschen, that is celebrated on the 14th day of Adar in com- 
memoration of the deliverance of the Jews in Persia from destruction by 
Haman. 128 



The festival celebrates the Jewish massacre of thousands of 
Persians along with their Prime Minister Haman and his 10 sons. It 
even includes the symbolic eating of the supposed anti-Semite's ears 
(Hainan's ears — hamantaschen) in the form of three-sided cookies. 
Another of the favored Purim foods is Kreplach, which are dough 
pockets again shaped in a triangle to denote Hainan's ears, but these 
snacks are filled with chopped meat, symbolizing the beaten flesh of 
Haman. Another Purim celebration has Jews beating willow branches 
in the synagogues as they imagine themselves flogging Haman. The 
following description of these practices comes from a Jewish culture 
organization called Jewish Art in Context, but is found in numerous 
books about Jewish culture and religious holy days. The second 
description is from a Jewish cooking guide called "Bon Appetit." 

c. Special Delicacies 

1. "Haman Taschen" (Oznei Haman = Hainan's Ears). 

2. "Kreplach": chopped meat covered with dough, also triangular 
in shape. The name has received a popular etymology: "Kreplach 
are eaten only on days on which there is both hitting and eating: 
Yom Kippur eve — the custom of Kaparot, Hoshanna Rabba — the 
beating the willow branches, Purim — the (symbolical) beating of 
Haman." 129 

The reason Kreplach are eaten on Purim is interesting (if a bit of a 
stretch). Kreplach is also traditional for Yom Kippur ... and for Ho- 
shannah Rabah (the seventh day of Sukkot). 

On these days it was traditional for there to be some sort of beat- 
ing. On Yom Kippur in ancient times, men would be flogged before 
Yom Kippur and we beat the willow branches on Hoshannah Rabah. 



Jewish Supremacism 69 

On Purim, we beat out the name of Haman. So Kreplach became 
traditional for Purim. (Phillip Goldwasser from "Bon Appetit") 130 



Upon learning these things, I realized that if any group other than 
Jews had similar ceremonies; Jews would label them hateful and bar- 
baric. Imagine if White Christians were to yearly observe a ritual in 
which they made and ate cookies shaped to represent the ears of Mar- 
tin Luther King and held a holy ceremony in which they symbolically 
whipped him! Purim has been celebrated annually since long before 
the time of Christ and has certainly been important in the fomenting 
of hatred and suspicion of Gentiles in the hearts and minds of Jewish 
children. This repulsive ceremony is analogous to Christian churches 
teaching our children to symbolically beat the Jewish Pharisees who 
condemned Jesus and then eating foods symbolizing the pulverized 
body parts of the Jewish priests. Of course, such activities would be 
completely antithetical to the spirit of Christianity, yet such revenge- 
ful attitudes form the very core of Jewish tradition. 

Zionism as Racism 

After 2,000 years of conflict, the Jewish prayer "Next Year in Jeru- 
salem" finally became expressed in an open political movement called 
Zionism. In 1862, Moses Hess, teacher of Karl Marx and the spiritual 
father of both Zionism and Communism, wrote Rome and Jerusalem. In 
it, he expressed the familiar Talmudic values. 

We Jews shall always remain strangers among the Goyim [Gen- 
tiles]. ... It is a fact the Jewish religion is above all Jewish nation- 
alism. . . . Each and every Jew, whether or not he wishes it, is 
automatically, by virtue of his birth, bound in solidarity with his en- 
tire nation. . . . One must be a Jew first and human being second. 

131 

If Adolf Hitler had ever said the words "One must be a German 
first and a human being second," would not those words be repeated 
often as proof of his depravity? For some compelling reason, no one 
dares to condemn such words when they come from the important 
Jewish leader who laid the foundations of both Zionism and Commu- 
nism. 

I began to survey Zionist literature, from the writings of Moses 
Hess to the present day, and repeatedly I encountered the same su- 
premacism expressed in the Talmud. 

A prominent Zionist historian, Simon Dubnow, wrote the Founda- 
tion of National Judaism in 1906. In it, he expressed sentiments that 
would certainly be described as anti-Semitic had they come from a 
Gentile. 



70 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

Assimilation is common treason against the banner and ideals of 
the Jewish people. . . . But one can never 'become' a member of a 
natural group, such as a family, a tribe, or a nation... A Jew, on the 
other hand, even if he happened to be born in France and still lives 
there, in spite of all this, he remains a member of the Jewish na- 
tion, and whether he likes it or not, whether he is aware or unaware 
of it, he bears the seal of the historic evolution of the Jewish na- 
tion. 132 

In 1965, Moshe Menuhin, an Israeli who was born into an ex- 
tremely prominent Hasidic family, dared to write an expose of the 
Jewish hypocrisy. He wrote a fascinating book called The Decadence of 
Judaism. 133 He was a graduate of a yeshiva in Jerusalem and was the 
father of the prominent Israeli musical performer Yehudi Menuhin. 

Menuhin documents the influential modern Zionist writer Jakob 
Klatzkin addressing the world at large in his 1921 German-language 
book Krisis und Entscheidung (Crisis and Decision). Klatzkin writes 

We are not hyphenated Jews; we are Jews with no qualifications 
or reservations. We are simply aliens; we are a foreign people in 
your midst, and, we emphasize, we wish to stay that way. There is 
a wide gap between you and us, so wide that no bridge can be laid 
across. Your spirit is alien to us; your myths, legends, habits, cus- 
toms, traditions and national heritage, your religious and national 
shrines [Christianity], your Sundays and holidays. . . they are all 
alien to us. The history of your triumphs and defeats, your war 
songs and battle hymns, your heroes and their mighty deeds, your 
national ambitions and aspirations, they are all alien to us. The 
boundaries of your lands cannot restrict our movements, and your 
border clashes are not of our concern. Far over and above the fron- 
tiers and boundaries of your land stand our Jewish unity. . . . Who- 
soever calls the foreign [Gentile] land a fatherland is a traitor to 
the Jewish people. ... A loyal Jew can never be other than a Jew- 
ish patriot.... We recognize a national unity of Diaspora Jews, no 
matter in which country they may reside. Therefore, no boundaries 
can restrain us in pursuing our own Jewish Policy. 134 

Before the Second World War Nahum Goldmann, president of the 
World Zionist Organization, urged German Jews to immigrate to Pal- 
estine, using the following blunt words: 

Judaism can have nothing in common with Germanism. If we go 
by the standards of race, history, and culture, and the Germans do 
have the right to prevent the Jews from intruding on the affairs of 
their volk. . . The same demand I raise for the Jewish volk as 
against the German. . . . The Jews are divided into two categories, 
those who admit they belong to a race distinguished by a history 
thousands of years old, and those who don't. The latter are open to 
the charge of dishonesty. 135 



Jewish Supremacism 71 

Even Judge Louis Brandeis, the Zionist who sat on the American 
Supreme Court, said it succinctly: "Jews are a distinct nationality, 
whatever his country, his station, or his shade of belief, he is necessar- 
ily a member." 136 

Theodor Herzl, the father of modern Zionism, expresses the true 
causes of what he calls the Jewish Question: 

The Jewish Question exists wherever Jews are to be found in 
large numbers. Every nation in whose midst Jews live is, either 
covertly or openly, anti-Semitic. . . Anti-Semitism increases day by 
day and hour by hour among the nations; indeed it is bound to in- 
crease because the causes of its growth continue to exist and can- 
not be removed. ... Its immediate cause is our excessive produc- 
tion of mediocre intellects, who cannot find an outlet downwards 
or upwards — that is to say, no wholesome outlet in either direc- 
tion. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the 
subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; at the same time, 
when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse. 137 

The Jews' exclusivity, their resistance to assimilation, their alien 
traditions and customs, their often questionable economic practices, 
and their carefully nurtured hateful attitude toward other peoples 
and religions, - all these factors have contributed to a reaction from 
the Christian world that at times became extreme. With each persecu- 
tion the Jews suffered, their own distrust and antipathy toward Gen- 
tiles became intensified in their own writings and in patterns of be- 
havior that engendered still more persecution. A cycle of recrimina- 
tion began that still continues as we embark on the early years of the 
21st Century. 

A whole generation of Jews is now growing up inundated with 
stories of Gentile perfidy. Not only are the Germans and Eastern 
Europeans blamed for the Holocaust, but now there are many Jewish- 
authored books arguing that all the Western nations share in the guilt, 
as well as President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Catholic Church, and, 
indeed, the entire Christian world. 138 

I discovered that to draw attention to the writings of the Talmud 
and to quote the very words used by modern Jewish leaders and 
writers, invites the charge of Anti-Semitism. It seemed to me that if 
repeating the words of Jewish leaders is Anti-Semitism, then there 
must be distasteful elements in the words themselves. Maybe one 
should consider the historical Jewish attitude toward Gentiles perti- 
nent to assessing the causes of Anti-Semitism. 

Bernard, a popular Jewish intellectual in France in the 19th Cen- 
tury, investigated his people's role in age-old conflict with other peo- 
ples. In the widely circulated book L'Antisemitisme, he wrote: 



72 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

If this hostility, this repugnance had been shown towards the 
Jews at one time or in one country only, it would be easy to ac- 
count for the local causes of this sentiment. But this race has been 
the object of hatred with all the nations amidst whom it ever set- 
tled. Inasmuch as the enemies of the Jews belonged to diverse 
races ... it must be that the general causes of Anti-Semitism have 
always resided in Israel itself, and not in those who antagonized it. 

139 



Some might argue that the anti-Gentile tone of the Talmud and 
the founding Zionists has little relevance to the Jews of today. The 
evidence, however, is that the core of Judaism, orthodoxy, is steadily 
becoming more, rather than less extreme against Gentiles than in pre- 
vious generations. The Encyclopedia Judaica uo says as much in its arti- 
cles on the subject. 

Perhaps this development could have been predicted with the ad- 
vent of modern film. Cinema and television wield an enormous influ- 
ence on human emotions. Jewish producers create endless accounts of 
the persecutions of Jews, all the way from the Torah to the Holocaust. 
Thousands of well-crafted films, from The Ten Commandments 141 to 
Schindler's List, 142 graphically remind Jews of Gentile perfidy, while 
softening Gentiles to Jewish causes. The incessantly repeated horrific 
stories of the Holocaust can only serve to heighten the suspicions of 
the average Jew toward Gentiles while underscoring the need for Jew- 
ish solidarity. 

Modern Jewish Supremacism 

As I read more and more of the historical accounts of Jewish eth- 
nocentrism, I wondered how much of this applied to modern day 
Jews. I began to devour modern Jewish books and publications. I 
chose their most popular and respected newspapers, books, and 
magazines. Because I was now beginning to see a double standard, I 
began to look for corroborating evidence, and what I found fascinated 
me. In fact, finding it was easy, and it still is. Prominent Jews still 
proudly write and publish articles about their suspicion and condem- 
nation of Gentiles. They boast of Jewish moral, spiritual and genetic 
superiority. Even admissions of control over key positions in media 
and government in Gentile nations are in their contemporary litera- 
ture. Any reader of publications meant for Jewish consumption will 
find material no less anti-Gentile than the 1500-year-old Talmudic 
writ I quoted. It is seldom as brazen as the old material, but the un- 
derlying themes are inevitably present and sometimes even unvar- 
nished hatred just spills out. 



Jewish Supremacism 73 

Many examples of what I am talking about can be found in the 
largest Jewish newspaper outside of Israel, The Jewish Press, 143 which 
sets the tone of Jewish religious and cultural attitudes more than any 
other newspaper. One of its primary religious authorities is Rabbi 
Simcha Cohen, who has an instructional Dear Abby-type of column 
called "Halachic Questions." Not long ago, Rabbi Cohen instructed 
his readers that the Talmud denotes Gentiles as "animals" (as out- 
lined by Talmudic writings from Gemara Kiddushin 68a and Metzia 
114b). 144 In another section he discusses how a Jewish woman is not 
designated as a prostitute if she has premarital sex with a Jew, but she 
is a whore if she has any sexual relations with a Gentile, even if she is 
married. 

Marriage to a Gentile can never be sanctified or condoned, such a 
liaison classifies the woman as a zona. ..common parlance inter- 
prets the term zona to refer to a prostitute.... 

Indeed, premarital sex of a Jewish woman to a Jewish man does 
not automatically brand the woman a zona.... A Jewish woman be- 
comes a prostitute or zona in the eyes of the Talmud only when she 
marries or otherwise has sexual relations with a non-Jew. 145 

Another major Jewish publication, the Jewish Chronicle, in an arti- 
cle called "Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words," revealed 
that the Jewish term for Gentile woman is the offensive Yiddish word 
shiksa — meaning "whore," from the Hebrew root, sheigetz ("abomina- 
tion"). It also pointed out that a little Gentile girl is called shikselke, 
meaning "little female abomination." 146 How would Jews react if Gen- 
tiles casually referred to Jewish women and little girls as "whores" 
and "little whores"? 

Moreover, not only Christians but also non-Christians of all races 
are regarded as "supernal refuse" (garbage) by Talmud teachers such 
as the founder of Habad-Lubavitch, Rabbi Shneur Zalman. The Ha- 
bad is a powerful movement within Hassidim. The New Republic 
magazine, which has a mostly Jewish staff, had some revealing ad- 
missions in a May, 1992 edition. 

...there are some powerful ironies in Habad's new messianic uni- 
versalism, in its mission to the gentiles; and surely the most un- 
pleasant of them concerns Habad's otherwise undisguised and 
even racial contempt for the goyim. 

As for the goyim... Zalman's attitude (was): 'Gentile souls are of a 
completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with 
no redeeming qualities whatsoever.' 

...Consequently, references to gentiles in Rabbi Shneur Zalman's 
teachings are invariably invidious. Their (non-Jews) material abun- 
dance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive 
from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews, 



74 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

as the pieces of chaff outnumber the kernels. ..All Jews were in- 
nately good, all gentiles innately evil. 

...Moreover, this characterization of gentiles as being inherently 
evil, as being spiritually as well as biologically inferior to Jews, has 
not in any way been revised in later Habad writing. (The New 
Republic) 147 

It is true that all Jews do not have the extreme views of the Habad, 
who are an integral part of the Jewish Orthodox Religion. However, 
imagine if a movement existed within the Catholic or Methodist 
church claiming that Jews or Blacks are pieces of garbage who are "to- 
tally evil" and have "no redeeming qualities." Would there not be a 
great outcry? The Jews have demanded that the Catholic Church take 
out of their liturgy anything the Jews deem as offensive, and the 
Catholics as well as other Christian denominations have done so. Yet, 
no one dares to insist that the Jewish faith should expunge references 
to Gentiles as "innately evil with inferior souls." 

As I began to look at these issues from a new perspective, I saw 
that Judaism is centered in the preservation of Jewish heritage and the 
advancement of Jewish interests. 

In examining some of the encyclopedias and biographical refer- 
ence works compiled by rabbinical authorities, I found prominent 
Jews listed who were self-proclaimed atheists and Communists — as 
mentioned in the last chapter. Leon Trotsky, one of the main atheist 
perpetrators of the Russian Revolution, and Herbert Aptheker, the 
"atheist" chief theoretician of the Communist Party USA, are proudly 
listed in Jewish directories such as Who's Who in World Jewry 148 and 
Who's Who in American Jewry. 149 These books are compiled by the lead- 
ing rabbinical organizations of America. 

The Jewish religion, as codified by the Talmud, is less concerned 
with an afterlife than with the survival and power of the Jewish peo- 
ple. Driven by the belief that Jews are the "Chosen People," Judaism 
is held together by chronic recitals of past persecutions. In a world 
that renounces racism, Judaism is the only creed on Earth being 
praised for fostering genetic exclusion, elitism, ethnocentrism, and 
supremacism. Modern Israel is the only Western state that is openly 
theocratic, unashamedly proclaiming itself to be a nation whose pur- 
pose is to advance one religion and one unique people. Israel defines 
Judaism as the state religion, with little separation of church and state 
in its civil and religious laws. In spite of their religious state, most 
Jews in Israel identify themselves as "secular." But, even the nonreli- 
gious Jews of Israel and America support the Orthodox-run state of 
Israel, and they support numerous organizations run by Orthodox 



Jewish Supremacism 75 

Jews around the world, as a mechanism for preserving their cultural 
and racial heritage. 

Most of us never see the reality of Jewish chauvinism and power 
because we have not organized the scattered facts into a coherent 
whole. Like a child's connect-the-dot puzzle, most of us have not yet 
connected the dots and completed the picture. The media erase as 
many dots as they can from our awareness, and anyone who succeeds 
in connecting all the dots is bludgeoned back with the ultimate moral 
weapon: accusations of Anti-Semitism. 

Given the Jewish influences that have so much power in this na- 
tion's media and finance, it is amazing that any Gentiles would dare 
oppose them. One accused of being an anti-Semite faces an intractable 
enemy organized around the world — one that will do whatever it 
takes to discredit, intimidate, jail and destroy him. 

After I completed a survey of readings in the Talmud and of the 
modern Zionist writers, I realized that the Europeans were not the 
only historical practitioners of racial and religious intolerance. Actu- 
ally, the Jews have been quite proficient at it themselves. Once I ac- 
cepted that Jewish ethnocentrism existed, again I asked the question 
that had arisen after my enlightenment on the "Russian Revolution:" 
Why were we forbidden to know this? 

A Jew can rightly object to slanderous criticism from Christians. 
Why should I, as a Christian, not be upset by slanderous criticism of 
my heritage by Jews? If Christians are wrong to voice hateful senti- 
ments against Jews, why are Jews not just as reprehensible for voicing 
hateful sentiments against Christians? Are the media right in suggest- 
ing that Christians have a monopoly on hate, while Jews have a mo- 
nopoly on charity? Which religion, as judged by the evidence of its 
own writings, is more motivated by hatred? 

Even as I write these provocative words, I harbor no hatred 
toward the Jewish people. There are intolerant Jews just as there are 
intolerant Gentiles. It is also true that there are many Jews who 
respect our Christian heritage. But unless the nonchauvinist Jews are 
willing to work hard to bring to their own faith and community the 
same kind of love and reconciliation that Christ taught, the cycle of 
hatred between Jew and Gentile could fester. Unless they temper their 
supremacism with acceptance and love, they could suffer a replay of 
the terrible excesses of the past. 

The government, church, and media establishment work 
zealously to diminish Gentile intolerance of Jews. That objective can 
be realized only through an equal effort to lessen Jewish chauvinism, 
suspicion, and anger against Gentiles. As the Israeli human-rights 
activist Israel Shahak wrote, "Anti-Semitism and Jewish chauvinism 
can only be fought simultaneously." 



76 Understanding Jewish Supremacism 

After reading the words of Zionism's modern founder, Theodore 
Herzl, I fully realized that there are, as he expressed it, "alien" power 
brokers in our civilization. These are people who do not share our cul- 
ture, our traditions, our faith, our interests, or our values. I realized 
that if I desired to preserve the heritage and values of my people, I 
would have to defend my people from the intolerant sector within the 
Jewish community that seeks domination rather than conciliation. 

When I was 16, I never suspected that just by pointing out the 
powerful Jewish elements of anti-Gentilism I would be labeled anti- 
Semitic. I do not accept that label today, and I still believe that it is no 
more anti-Semitic to oppose Jewish Supremacism than it is anti-Italian 
to oppose the mafia. 



Chapter 3 

Christianity and Judaism 

From the earliest times that I can remember, I have been a believ- 
ing Christian. My father is a devout Christian who taught me about 
the salvation that Jesus Christ offers and about His lessons for living. 
Father was never dogmatic about his faith, and over the years he led 
my family to different churches without worrying about the denomi- 
nation. At one time or another, we were members of Presbyterian, 
Methodist, and Church of Christ congregations. The only important 
consideration for Father was the quality of the minister and the con- 
gregation. When I was in grade school, my family joined the Elysian 
Fields Methodist Church where Father taught Sunday school. When 
we traveled we would almost always try to attend Sunday school and 
church in whatever city we happened to be in. The new perspectives 
we received from the different Sunday school teachers and preachers 
were like shots of adrenaline for our Christian faith. 

At thirteen, I went to Clifton L. Ganus School, a strongly funda- 
mentalist Church of Christ school in New Orleans. At this same time, 
my family and I began to attend services at the Carrollton Avenue 
Church of Christ, which had strong ties to the school. Although I had 
had an infant baptism in the Presbyterian Church, my new teachers 
and friends convinced me that the Bible taught that a conscious deci- 
sion about salvation was needed before baptism. I prayed about it and 
gave myself to Christ as I was laid back in the waters of the baptismal 
pool in our church's sanctuary. Not long after my baptism, after much 
pleading from me, my father found his way to the baptismal pool as 
well. 

My experience of being a renewed Christian had a profound im- 
pact not only on my Christian beliefs, but also on my secular ones, for 
it seemed I saw everything in a fresh light. When a man has confi- 
dence in his own beliefs, he is unafraid to joust with contrary opin- 
ions. Being "saved" gave me a sense of security that made me more 
open to different ideas. When someone has doubts about the underly- 
ing validity of his beliefs, he feels threatened by challenges to them. 
The feeling of being "right with God and the world" gave me freedom 
to explore challenging ideas. 

I knew that the New Testament offered a new Covenant that 
included salvation for all. A few years after my baptism, as I reread 
the Old Testament in light of increased understanding of the Jews, I 
fully recognized its radical ethnocentrism. The Old Testament 
describes the history of one nationality, one people: the Israelites, who 
were designated as a special people, a "chosen people." Life and 



78 Christianity and Jews 

death struggles between the Israelites and the Cannanites, Jacobites, 
Philistines, Amalakites, Assyrians, Egyptians, and dozens of other 
peoples are recorded exhaustively. As I've mentioned in my chapter 
on Jewish Supremacism, I was quite surprised and dismayed by the 
genocide. I continued to find many more verses of the Bible (such as 
Joshua 6:21 150 and 10:28-10:41) 151 detailing the slaughter of entire 
peoples. 

The Jewish forces committed their genocide under the strict 
guidelines established by Moses in Deuteronomy chapter 20. He told 
them that in the lands set aside to become Israel, Jews should exter- 
minate every inhabitant, while people in surrounding nations had to 
die unless they submitted themselves as slaves to Israel. 

When you draw near a city to fight against it, offer terms of peace 
to it. And if its answer to you is peace and it opens to you, then all 
the people who are found in it shall do forced labor for you and 
shall serve you. But if it makes no peace with you . . . you shall put 
all its males to the sword, but the women and the little ones, the 
cattle, and everything else in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as 
booty for yourselves; and you shall enjoy the spoil of your enemies 
. . . Thus you shall do to all of the cities which are very far from 
you, which are not cities of the nations here. 

But in the cities of these people that the Lord your God gives you 
for an inheritance you shall save alive nothing that breathes, but 
you shall utterly destroy them, the Hittites and the Amorites, the 
Canaanites and the Perizzites, the Hivites and Jebusites, . . . 
(Deuteronomy 20:10-18) 152 

The wording is unmistakable. Even innocent children were to be 
killed simply because they were of an enemy nation. It became obvi- 
ous to me that "love thy neighbor" had a very strange meaning in re- 
gard to the Old Testament. 

Love Thy "Neighbor" 

Since my earliest Sunday and Bible school days, I had been taught 
that the greatest instruction of God was to "love thy neighbor as 
thyself" (Leviticus 19:18) 153 . Having grown up on the Ten 
Commandments, the best-known passages of the Old Testament, I 
now wondered how such Old Testament genocide could be 
understood in light of "thou shalt not kill," "thou shalt not steal," and 
"thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house" (Exodus 20:13, 15, and 

17)154. 

I decided to look up the scripture that discusses loving thy 
neighbor as thyself. I found it in Leviticus 19:18 in the Revised 



Jewish Supremacism 79 

Standard Version Old Testament that had belonged to my 
grandmother. It read 

You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of 
your own people, but shall love your neighbor as yourself... (Leviti- 
cus 19:18) 155 

The following is the Jewish translation of the text for their bible 
according to Hebrew texts: 

You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your coun- 
trymen. Love your fellow as yourself. -TANAKH 156 

The verse made it clear that neighbors were "the sons of your own 
people" — in other words, neighbor meant a fellow Israelite and not 
other peoples. The most recent Jewish translation of the verse uses 
"your countrymen" in place of "the sons of your own people." 

The Talmud explains in Baba Kamma 113b 157 that the term 
neighbor specifically does not apply to a Gentile. The Jewish Encyclo- 
pedia says it clearly, "Here the Gentile is excepted, as he is not a 
neighbor..." 158 Years later I read an article by Dr. John Hartung in 
which he explained that the Ten Commandments' legal proscriptions 
were clearly directed at offenses against a "neighbor," which ex- 
cluded non-Israelites. He pointed out that the scrolls from which the 
Ten Commandments were translated had no periods, commas, or 
first-word capitalization. Therefore, the part about "Thou shalt not 
kill" becomes part of a larger context. It could read: 159 

Thou shalt not kill, neither shalt though commit adultery, neither 
shalt thou steal, neither shalt thou bear false witness against thy 
neighbor, neither shalt thou covet your neighbor's wife and you 
shall not desire your neighbor's house, his field, or his manservant, 
or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or anything that is your 
neighbor's. 

So who are the Israelites proscribed from killing? "Thou shalt not 
kill thy neighbor... the children of thy people, the sons of your own 
people, your fellow Israelites." From this narrow definition of 
"neighbor," the mass killing and theft of other people's lands became 
very consistent with the laws of the Ten Commandments. 

Ethnic Supremacism in the Old Testament 

As much as it may surprise many of the Christians reading this, 
the Old Testament also wholeheartedly supports the institution of 
slavery. The bible makes if clear that Israelites may forever engage in 
slavery of other peoples, but they must not enslave their own. 

As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you may 
buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are round 
about you. 



80 Christianity and Jews 

You may also buy from among the strangers who sojourn with 
you and their families that are with you, who have been born in 
your land; and they may be your property. 

You may bequeath them to your sons after you, to inherit as a 
possession forever , you may make slaves of them, but over your 
brethren the people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another, 
with harshness. (Leviticus 25:44-46) 160 

There are also unmistakable passages condemning mixed mar- 
riages. 

And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou 
shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them, thou shalt make no 
covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them; 

Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou 
shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto 
thy son. . . .(Deuteronomy 7:2-6) 161 . . . I am the Lord your God 
which has separated you from other people. (Leviticus 20:24) 162 

. . . Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they 
separated from Israel all the mixed multitude. (Nehemiah 13:3) 163 

The Bible goes on to say to Israelites who marry non-Israelites, "so 
will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you." (Deuteronomy 7:4) 164 

The Old Testament decries the mixing of the "holy seed of Israel" 
in other versus as well. Jewish priests complain that "the people of Is- 
rael, and the priests and the Levites, have not separated themselves 
from the peoples of the lands, doing according to their abomina- 
tions... (Ezra 9:1) 165 For they have taken of their daughters for them- 
selves and for their sons; so that the holy seed have mingled them- 
selves with the peoples of the lands." (Ezra 9:2) 166 Ezra goes on to list 
107 men who renounced their foreign wives and their children by 
them as part of their obedience to God. 

I also found that genealogies were used as proofs of untainted 
bloodlines. Racially impure genealogies were used to deny the priest- 
hood to some who returned from Babylonian captivity. Genetic heri- 
tage is paramount in the Old Testament. 

Jewish Anti-Christianism 

As every reader of the Bible knows, the New Testament takes a 
dramatically different tone on ethnic matters than the Old Testament. 
The New Testament essentially says that salvation through Christ is 
available to every one. The "turn the other cheek" tone of the New 
Testament is quite a turn from the "eye for eye" dictum of the Old. As 
I became increasingly familiar with the role that organized Jewry 



Jewish Supremacism 81 

played in Communism, Zionism, and liberalism, I also noticed their 
animosity toward Christians. 

Hollywood produces an abundance of movies that attack Christi- 
anity, and the publishing establishment generates prolific anti- 
Christian literature. For instance, in my college days I read a best- 
selling, highly promoted book called the Passover Plot, written by a 
Jewish scholar named Joseph Schonfield. 167 He alleged that Jesus had 
not died on the cross, but was actually drugged by His followers to 
fake His death and resurrection. Jewish organizations routinely lead 
the fight to ban Christian prayers from schools, prohibit the mention 
of Christ in public facilities, and even forbid the singing of Christmas 
carols in our schools. 

Once, when I criticized Jewish organizations for such actions on a 
radio talk show, a caller called me un-Christian for daring to criticize 
them. "After all," he retorted, "the Jews are God's chosen people." I 
had already done enough biblical research to know that such a state- 
ment told only the first half of the story. For the New Testament clari- 
fies that believing Christians had become the "heirs of God's prom- 
ise," and that God no longer viewed the Jews as in His Covenant. 168 

As I became more enlightened, I discovered that many Jews con- 
sistently endeavored to undermine the dominant religion and solidar- 
ity of any nation in which they dwell, or wherever it suits their pur- 
pose (such as agitating and militarily supporting the Christian Pha- 
langist minority and subsequent civil war in the nation of Israel's en- 
emy: Lebanon). 

Looking into the historical attitude of the Christian Church 
towards Judaism, I found that it had changed remarkably in the 
twentieth century. This was a period that also marked the rise of 
Jewish economic, political, and media power. The Christian Church 
had a long record of fundamental conflict with the Jews. It is a record 
of which Jewish writers frequently complain. In the early fledgling 
days of Christianity, Jewish persecution of Christians, as depicted in 
the gospels (and in historical accounts as well), was still fresh in the 
minds of church leaders. A former Pharisee, Paul, was one of those 
cruel persecutors until his miraculous conversion on the road to 
Damascus. Eventually, Christianity became an overwhelmingly 
Gentile faith, and organized Jewry became its implacable enemy, 
claiming that Jesus was a bastard and Mary a whore, and that 
Christians were to be boiled in excrement. On the other side, using the 
New Testament, some Christians blamed Jews for the crucifixion of 
Jesus and widespread persecution of Christians. 

Many Christians think that the Jews' only religious books are 
those found in the Old Testament. As I described in my chapter on 
Judaic Supremacism, the Talmud is a collection of the chief books of 



82 Christianity and Jews 

Jewish commentary. The American Heritage Dictionary describes it as 
"... constituting the basis of religious authority for traditional Juda- 
ism." 

There are three main branches of the Jewish religion: Orthodox, 
Conservative, and Reform. The Orthodox is the traditional source of 
Judaism and is considered to be at its heart. Very similar to Orthodox 
Judaism is the Conservative branch, but it offers some greater leeway 
in observance of the stringent Jewish laws. More modernistic, the Re- 
form movement is far less bound by Pharisaic traditions than either of 
the other branches. The Encyclopedia Judaica describes the current reli- 
gious picture of the nation of Israel. 

There are very few Reform or Conservative congregations in the 
State of Israel. Orthodoxy is the official religious position in Israel 
with the majority of the rabbis belonging to the old school of 
Talmudic jurists. 169 ("Judaism." Encyclopedia Judaica, pg. 396) 

The tendency within the Jewish Theological Seminary [in New 
York] has been emphatically . . . toward a more orthodox stance 
than existed within it in the previous generation. 170 ("Conservative 
Judaism," Enc. Encyclopedia Judaica, pg. 906) 

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia makes it very clear that the Tal- 
mud, not the Torah or Old Testament, is the supreme authority for 
Judaism. 

Thus the ultimate authority for Orthodoxy is the Babylonian Tal- 
mud. The Bible itself ranks second to it in reality, if not in theory. 
171 {Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, "Authority" pg. 637) 

The Talmud makes it clear that Judaism regards Jesus as a "char- 
latan," "magician," "seducer," and "deceiver." The Talmud also al- 
leges that the biblical account of the crucifixion was a lie, maintaining 

that Jewish priests rather than the Romans ac- 
tually crucified Jesus. They maintain that they 
strangled Him in a pit of dung, and hated Him 
so much that they executed Him four different 
ways! The Talmud portrays Jesus Christ as the 
bastard son of a prostitute, and it even sug- 
gests that He was a Gentile. In some startling 
passages it even boasts that Jesus Christ was 
conjured up from the dead by a Jewish magi- 
cian and then punished for his heresies by be- 
ing boiled in hot semen. 

Below are direct quotes I confirmed from 
the Talmud, dealing with Jesus and Christians: 



^SSfr^ 



^^■^mBU 



■^^_~ T _ - . _,,_ — ■■ ■■ ■ ■ * •->— 



'— »g™^w;.wi i 



Jewish Supremacism 83 

♦ Balaam [Jesus] fornicated with his jackass. (Sanhedrin 105a- 
b) 172 

♦ Jewish priests raised Balaam [Jesus] from the dead and pun- 
ished him in boiling hot semen.(57a Gittin) 173 

♦ She who was the descendant of princes and governors [The 
Virgin Mary] played the harlot with a carpenter (Sanhedrin 
106a) 174 

♦ [Jesus] was lowered into a pit of dung up to his armpits. Then a 
hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck, 
and the two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was 
dead. (Sanhedrin 52b) 175 Also, says they gave him four different exe- 
cutions in Sanhedrin 106a. 176 

♦ Hast thou heard how old Balaam [Jesus] was?"... bloody and 
deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he 
was thirty-three or thirty-four years old. (Sanhedrin 106) 

♦ Those who read the uncanonical books [New Testament] will 
have no portion in the world to come. (Sanhedrin 90a) 

♦ Jews must destroy the books of the [Christians]. (Shabbath 
116a) 

When I first encountered these Talmudic quotations in Elizabeth 
Dilling's book The Jewish Religion, such as those above and those re- 
produced in Chapter 16, I told myself that they couldn't be accurate, 
that they had to be fakes or forgeries. Then I looked up the offending 
quotations and confirmed their presence in the Soncino Edition (the 
most popular 20th century English translation of the Talmud). The 
anti-Gentile quotations also received ample coverage in the Jewish En- 
cyclopedia, enough so that no one could seriously doubt their authen- 
ticity. The Jewish Encyclopedia even details how the English transla- 
tions make use of code words such as Amalakites, Cutheans, Egyp- 
tians, heathens, and other monikers to denote Gentiles in general. Us- 
ing these specific terms, the writers sought to hide from the Gentiles 
how viciously the Talmud speaks of them. It also says clearly that the 
word "Balaam" is a code name for Jesus Christ (see my Jewish 
Supremacism chapter). 

As a younger man I reacted to this hidden Jewish racism first with 
shock and then with anger. How could the liberal Jewish pundits and 
media moguls condemn those who simply exposed Jewish 
intolerance, while their own Holy Writ taught hatred and violence 
against us, the non-Jews. When I began to talk publicly about the 
hatred that was in the Talmud, I was branded a hater, a bigot, and an 
anti-Semite by the media and by groups like the Anti-Defamation 
League of B'nai B'rith (ADL). The ADL is a multimillion-dollar, 
world-wide organization whose whole purpose is to defame and 
discredit those who simply tell the truth about Jewish Supremacism 
and hatred against Gentiles. 



84 Christianity and Jews 

I became very upset, not only at the hatred that I saw in the tradi- 
tional Jewish writings, but also in the hypocritical attacks by the Jew- 
ish leadership on those who exposed Jewish intolerance. Over the 
years, they have frequently attacked me for simply quoting the Tal- 
mud publicly, when I did nothing but simply read directly from their 
holy books. For exposing their hate, they called me the "hater." 

Ultimately, the unjust and hypocritical attacks I faced only sharp- 
ened my resolve to stand up, no matter how alone, for the cause I be- 
lieved in. Unexpectedly, I found that there are a number of Jews who 
dare to expose the truth about Zionism and Jewish Supremacism. A 
much-persecuted and slandered group, they are just as appalled as I 
was about the intolerant and hateful strains of Judaism that had 
arisen in the Jewish community and the Zionist State. They have in- 
cluded Americans such as Alfred Lilienthal, Noam Chomsky, Nor- 
man Finklestein and a courageous Jew in Israel, the late Dr. Israel 
Shahak. These scholars have dared to stand up against Jewish intoler- 
ance. 

Dr. Israel Shahak risked all to bring what he calls "decent human- 
ity" to Judaism and the Zionist State. Professor Shahak was born in 
Warsaw in 1933 and was liberated from the Nazi concentration camp 
at Bergen-Belsen; therefore, by the Jews' own definition, he was a 
Holocaust survivor. He immigrated to Israel, served in the Israeli 
army, and became a respected chemistry professor. Dr. Shahak was a 
lifelong human rights activist who has written on many aspects of Ju- 
daism in both Hebrew and English. Among the many books he au- 
thored, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, is his best known. 177 Gore Vidal 
wrote an excellent foreword to the current American edition. Here are 
some excerpts from Shahak' s book exposing the attitude of the Jewish 
religion toward Christianity: 

Judaism is imbued with a very deep hatred toward Christianity 
combined with ignorance about it. This attitude was clearly aggra- 
vated by the Christian persecutions of Jews, but is largely inde- 
pendent of them. In fact, it dates from the time when Christianity 
was still weak and persecuted (not least by Jews), and it was 
shared by Jews who had never been persecuted by Christians or 
who were even helped by them... 

According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rab- 
binical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and con- 
tempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which 
mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; 
in the Talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned. . . 

The very name Jesus was for Jews a symbol of all that is abomi- 
nable, and this popular tradition still persists. The Gospels are 



Jewish Supremacism 85 

equally detested, and they are not allowed to be quoted (let alone 
taught) even in modern Israeli schools. 178 

He points out that enough Israelis so hate Christianity that there 
was a long, drawn-out battle to remove the international arithmetic 
plus sign because it resembled a cross! 

Pious Jews object to the international plus sign for it is a cross, 
and it may in their opinion, influence little children to convert to 
Christianity. Another "explanation" holds; it would then be difficult 
to "educate" them to spit on the cross, if they become used to it in 
their arithmetic exercises. Until the early 1970s two different sets 
of arithmetic books were used in Israel. One for the secular 
schools, employing an inverted "T" sign. In the early '70's the reli- 
gious fanatics "converted" the Labour Party to the great danger of 
the cross in arithmetic, and from that time, in all Hebrew elemen- 
tary schools (and now many high schools as well) the international 
plus sign has been forbidden. (From Israel Shahak statement on 
the Jewish hatred of Christianity) reprinted by Radio Islam. 

Professor Shahak reported that the Zionists publicly and ceremo- 
niously burned hundreds of copies of the New Testament in Jerusa- 
lem on March 23, 1980. They were destroyed under the auspices of 
Yad Le'akhim, a Jewish religious organization subsidized by the Is- 
raeli Ministry of Religions. 179 To think that this is the same govern- 
ment that some Christian ministers say we should support with 
American tax dollars! Among other startling charges, Dr. Shahak 
wrote: 

Jewish children are actually taught — passages such as that 
which commands every Jew, whenever passing near a cemetery, to 
utter a blessing if it is Jewish, but to curse the mothers of the dead 
if it is non-Jewish. . . it became customary to spit (usually three 
times) upon seeing a church or a crucifix. . . . 180 

Dr. Shahak quoted the very popular, Israeli-published Talmudic 
Encyclopedia, which discusses the relationship between Jew and Goy 
("Goy" meaning any non-Jew). 

If a Jew has coitus [sexual intercourse] with a Gentile woman, 
whether she be a child of three or an adult, whether married or un- 
married, and even if she is a minor aged only nine years and one 
day — because he had willful coitus with her, she must be killed, 
and as is the case with a beast, because through her a Jew got into 
trouble. 181 (The Talmudic Encyclopedia)™ 2 

I knew of such hateful Talmudic laws long before I read Shahak' s 
latest book, yet they still astonish me each time I read them. The 
monstrous implications still shock me. If a Jew rapes a young 
Christian or Moslem girl, the little girl must be killed because she got a 
Jew in trouble! How does one even respond to such depravity, to such 



86 Christianity and Jews 

evil? Professor Shahak goes on, page-after-page, giving numerous 
examples of hateful Judaic laws against Christians. He exposes laws 
that permit Jews to cheat, to steal, to rob, to kill, to rape, to lie, even to 
enslave Christians. 

The bulk of his book shows that Judaism in Israel, instead of mod- 
erating these anti-Gentile laws, actually becomes more openly hateful 
of Gentiles with each passing day. Dr. Shahak confirms that in order 
to hide their beliefs from Christians in Europe, many anti-Christian 
Talmudic passages and common prayers were hidden from Chris- 
tians by code words (such as Cuthean for Gentile or Balaam for Jesus) 
by the Jewish authorities. Lists of Talmudic Omissions were circulated 
to fully clarify the code words in the viciously anti-Gentile passages. 
But today the passages are again being restored and published in 
their original form (without code words) for Israeli schoolchildren. 183 

From the earliest days of Christendom, Catholic popes issued 
edicts condemning the Jews for their usury, prostitution trafficking 
and other forms of the slave trade; and their anti-Christian teachings 
and activities. Protestants were just as vociferously anti-Jewish. The 
founder of Protestantism, Martin Luther, read the books of the 
Talmud and called the Jews "agents of the Devil." 184 

Do Jews currently have a Covenant with God? 

The dominant Christian viewpoint from the first century until the 
1960s was that the Jewish people once had a special relationship with 
God, a Covenant. However, that Covenant was strictly conditional. In 
Deuteronomy 7:6-12 God states the covenant in explicit terms. 

Know, therefore, that only the Lord your God is God, the faithful 
God who keeps His covenant and steadfast love to those who love 
Him and keep His commandments, to a thousand generations and 
requites to their faith those who hate him, by destroying them — 
never slow with those who reject Him, but requiting them instantly. 
Therefore, observe faithfully the instruction-the laws and the rules 
— with which I charge you today. (Deuteronomy 7:6-12) 185 

Until very recent decades, most Christians believed that the Jews 
had broken the Covenant when they crucified and then later spurned 
Jesus Christ and His apostles. Jesus Christ made salvation available 
for Jews as well as anyone else, but there was no longer any special 
relationship for the people who rejected God and his Son. A New 
Covenant was established between God and all who accepted the sal- 
vation of Christ. The Catholic catechism and most Protestant churches 
persisted in this view until very recent times. Below are some of the 



Jewish Supremacism 87 

scriptures on which this view was founded. I find the following pas- 
sages of particular interest. 

For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from 
Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen by race. . . 

But it is not as though the word of God had failed. For not all who 
are descended from Israel belong to Israel, ... 

This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the 
children of God, but the children of the promise are reckoned as 
descendants... 

As indeed he says in Hosea, 

Those who were not my people I will call 'my people, ' 

. . And in the very place where it was said to them, 'You are not 
my people,' 

they will be called 'sons of the living God.'. . . 

What then? Israel failed to obtain what it sought. The elect ob- 
tained it, but the rest were hardened, 

(Romans 9:1-3, 6-8, 24-26 and Romans ll:7-8) 186 

The Book of Hebrews in the New Testament states with absolute 
clarity that God put an end to the old covenant and a new one formed 
through Christ for those who accept Him as Lord. 

For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, 
saith the Lord when I will make a new covenant with the House of 
Israel and the House of Judah: 

Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers, in 
the day when I took them by the hand out of the land of Egypt; be- 
cause they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, 
saith the Lord. (Hebrews 8:6-7, 9-10) 187 

Therefore I tell you, t he kingdom of God will be taken away from 
you and given to a nation producing the fruits of it... 

And when the chief priests and Pharisees heard his parables, they 
perceived that he spoke of them. (Matthew 21:43-45) 188 

As I read these passages, I thought, How can the Judaized Christian 
preachers ignore these clear Scriptures? "...they continued not in my 
covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord." 

One can argue effectively from a New Testament perspective that 
the Pharisees crucified Jesus because He challenged Jewish power and 
practices. Judaism of today traces its lineage directly to the Pharisees. 
Just days before the crucifixion, Christ raised their ire by turning over 
the moneychangers' tables in the temple. He struggled with them all 
of His life and issued one of the most damning statements ever made 
against them, calling them the father of the lie. 

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love 
me. 



88 Christianity and Jews 

...Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye 
will do: he was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in 
truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he 
speaketh of his own; for he is a liar and the father of it. 

...Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well 
that thou are a Samaritan, and has a devil. ..(John 8:42-48) 189 

Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom there is no guile! (John 

1:47) 190 

The gospels have repeated warnings about the anti-Christian and 
misanthropic nature of many Jews. Some examples include: 

. . .for you suffered like things of your own countrymen as they 
did from the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the proph- 
ets, and drove us out and displease God, and oppose all men. . . 
But God's wrath has come upon them at last. (1 Thessalonians 
2:14-16) 191 

This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they 
may be sound in the faith, instead of giving heed to Jewish myths 
or to commands of men who reject the truth. (Titusl:13-14) 192 

The Judaized Christians seem never to quote these powerful pas- 
sages. To simply quote these passages by Jesus or the apostles would 
cause one to be called anti-Semitic. In fact, I shudder to draw the 
comparison of what would happen to the person who went into a 
synagogue with a cat-o'-nine-tails and drove the Jews out. It is no 
wonder that many Jews so passionately hate Jesus Christ. Ironically, 
anyone who dares to complain about hateful anti-Christian Jewish at- 
titudes is quickly libeled as "un-Christian." I pondered that by the 
media's definition, even Jesus Christ is anti-Christian! 

Shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade 
Center in New York, influential Jews have rushed to support new 
limitations on freedom of speech, even freedom of religion and free- 
dom of thought. In Great Britain, a new law is being prepared to 
make disparaging remarks about a religion punishable by up to seven 
years in prison! 

Under the headline, "Religious hatred law survives," a BBC story 
on November 26, 2001, says, "Some Labour MPs with Muslim com- 
munities in their constituencies, including former minister Gerald 
Kaufman, were among those to back the latest part of the bill to cause 
controversy. Telling how he had experienced anti-Semitism as a prac- 
ticing Jew, Mr. Kaufman said action against religious hatred was long 
overdue." 193 

The Board of Jewish Deputies in Britain strongly supported this 
bill to halt religious criticism and imprison their opponents. 194 You 
can be sure that the law will not be aimed at those who disparage 



Jewish Supremacism 89 

Christianity, but only against those who expose the intolerance of Ju- 
daism. 

In modern times, almost everyone believes that the Inquisition's 
practice of imprisoning people for disparaging religion was one of the 
darkest periods for liberty in world history. Yet, that is precisely the 
kind of suppression that this new British law seeks. By this law, even 
the New Testament could be banned because of its anti-Jewish senti- 
ment, just as it was in the early days of Jewish Bolshevism and exactly 
has been done in many Israeli institutions. By this law a person could 
be imprisoned for up to seven years for simply quoting the New Tes- 
tament on the Jewish question! Of course, by this draconian law, any 
person who expresses a negative opinion about any religion could be 
imprisoned at the whim of Government courts. It is probably the most 
extensive and dangerous step away from freedom of speech in hun- 
dreds of years! 

As the centuries passed following the crucifixion, the antagonisms 
between Christian and Jew grew and became even more hostile. In 
Rome the first great persecution of Christians occurred under Nero. 
The leaders of the early Church carefully noted that this persecution 
came under the ceaseless urgings of Nero's Jewish mistress, Poppaea 
Sabina. Even Jewish histories record the collusion of the Jews with the 
Moors during their oppressive occupation of Christian Spain. In rela- 
tively recent times, Jewish Communists played a principal role in the 
greatest murder and oppression of Christians in history — that which 
took place under the Communist regimes of the Soviet Union and 
Eastern Europe. As I mentioned in the last chapter, Aleksandr Solz- 
henitsyn showed that Jews administered the Gulags in Russia that 
murdered many millions of devout Christians. 195 

Through such evidence uncovered during my research, I came to 
understand fully one of the most chilling verses of the New Testa- 
ment. It appears repeatedly in the Gospels: 

Yet for fear of the Jews no one spoke openly of him (John 7:13) 196 

In modern America, Jews lead the effort to de-Christianize Amer- 
ica. More importantly, Jews dominate the very un-Christian mass 
media. Book publishing and distribution, major newspapers, maga- 
zines, movies, and television are empires in which Jews are greatly 
over-represented and Christians are vastly under-represented. The 
few Christians have learned to say what they must to survive and 
prosper. The ancient opponents of Christ are, through their pervasive 
power in the media, able to convince millions of Christians that Chris- 
tian doctrine holds that the Jews are still God's Chosen People and 
that God still today has an exclusive covenant with the Jewish people. 
Christians are told that to resist the Jews' anti-Christian actions would 



90 Christianity and Jews 

be to oppose the will of God Himself. Yet, God says explicitly in He- 
brews 8:9: Not according to the Covenant that I made with their fathers, in 
the day when I took them by the hand out of the land of Egypt; because they 
continued not in my Covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. 197 

Some ministers argue that prophecy holds that the Jewish people 
will eventually come to Christ, and that therefore we should support 
Israel no matter how many terrible, anti-Christian acts it commits. 
That is equivalent to saying that we should give the keys to our 
churches to arsonists seeking to burn them down because they may 
someday come to Christ. The offer of God's salvation is for everyone, 
but that does not mean that we should not oppose the forces of evil, 
or that we should financially and militarily support the worst enemies 
of Jesus Christ. I believe that we have a moral obligation to defend 
our faith against those who attack Christ and to defend fellow Chris- 
tians who face persecution at the hands of Christ's enemies. 

Although many of the leading lights of modern Christianity tell us 
repeatedly how special and wonderful the Jews are, the New Testa- 
ment itself has no qualms about opposing the Jews. In fact, there is a 
world-wide effort by Jews to change the text of the New Testament. 
Various Passion Plays around the world have been modified to delete 
what the Jews see as offending passages directly from the Gospels. 

'The Jews.' It is a term that appears 195 times in the New Testa- 
ment... But unlike the millions who have shrugged off — or suffered 
under — the New Testament image of 'the Jews,' Irvin J. Borowsky 
is on a campaign to rid the Good Book of its dark depiction of his 
people. A retired magazine publisher and founder of the Liberty 
Museum in Philadelphia, Borowsky has for 19 years been urging 
Bible publishers to find other ways to translate the Greek hoi Iou- 
daioi — literally, 'the Jews.' The New Testament was written in 
Greek. Hoi Ioudaioi (pronounced hoy yu-dye-yoy) appears 151 
times in John and Acts, often referring to enemies of Jesus. 198 

It is important to clarify that although I think we must defend our 
faith and heritage, we need not be hateful or spiteful ourselves. While 
we shouldn't be hateful, we must be resolved to oppose their efforts 
to destroy our way of life, our Christian faith, and our freedom and 
our very survival as a people. In my life, I have tried to approach 
every individual fair-mindedly. There is no reason to regard an 
individual Jew with disrespect or hatred. But, if he works to destroy 
our heritage, we have the right to — indeed we must — oppose him. 

Television evangelists are very careful what they say about the 
"Chosen People" because they know that can be booted from the air- 
waves at any time the Jewish owners so choose. I remember clearly 



Jewish Supremacism 91 

one of Jimmy Swaggart's programs long before his sexual scandals. 
He whimpered and cried that he had to tell us that the Pentecostals 
were not following the Word of God; that the Catholics were not; that 
the Presbyterians were not; and that the Methodists were not. Jimmy 
was careful not to mention the one extremely powerful religious 
group that openly opposes Jesus Christ. Swaggart may have lost a lit- 
tle by criticizing Catholics and Methodists (fellow Christians who 
love Christ but who differ in some interpretations of the Holy Bible), 
but he knew he would have risked much more (in fact, everything) by 
uttering the slightest criticism of Jews. 

As I became more aware of the all-encompassing, world-wide 
scope of Jewish power, I also learned that Jews have endeavored to 
undermine the religious foundations of whatever nation they have 
lived in. The Koran for instance details Jewish machinations against 
them and against Christians through the ages. 

Islam and Christianity: Similar Views on the Jews 

Years later, upon reading the Muslim Holy Book, the Koran, I be- 
came intrigued by its warm view of Christ and its view of the Jews 
that echoes the New Testament. For instance, although the Koran 
views Christ as a great prophet rather than savior, it says Mary was a 
virtuous woman and God had fathered her son, Jesus. It also says that 
God resurrected Jesus from the dead. The Koran, like the New Testa- 
ment, suggests that the Jews had a covenant with God that they broke 
and that God then offered a new covenant to all believers. It con- 
demns the Talmud's assertion that Mary was a whore and disputes 
the Talmud's boast that Jews themselves murdered Jesus Christ rather 
than the Romans at their behest. 

Those of the children of Israel who went astray were cursed by 
the tongue of David and by Jesus the son of Mary. That is because 
they rebelled and transgressed.... Evil for them indeed is that which 
they send on before themselves (with the result) that Allah's wrath 
is upon them, and torment they will abide. 5:77-80 (Sura 5 is 
Al-Ma'idah) 

Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find 
the Jews and Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the be- 
lievers wilt thou find those who say "we are Christians": Because 
amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who re- 
nounced the world, and they are not arrogant. (Sura 5 Al-Ma'idah 
"5-82) 

They (Jews) have incurred divine displeasure: in that they broke 
the covenant... And little is it they believe. 

That they rejected faith and they uttered against Mary a grave 
false charge... 

That they said (in boast) "we killed Christ Jesus, the son of 
Mary, the messenger of Allah- but they killed him not, nor crucified 



92 Christianity and Jews 

him. But so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ 
therein are full of doubts... 

Nay, Allah raised him up Unto himself; and Allah is exalted in 
power. 

And there is none of the people of the book but must believe in 
him before his death, and on the Day of Judgment, he will be a 
witness against them. (Sura 4 AINisa 153- 159) 

The Jews say: "Allah's Hand is tied up... (Allah says) Nay, both 
His Hands are widely outstretched. He spends (of His Bounty) as 
He wills. Verily,... enmity and hatred amongst them till the Day of 
Resurrection. Every time they kindled the fire of war, Allah extin- 
guished it; and they (ever) strive to make mischief on earth... (5-64) 

As I researched Jewish history, I became aware of the fact that the 
Jewish people of today share little of the heritage of the Old Testa- 
ment with the original Israelites. Reading the Jewish Encyclopedia I 
learned that the Jewish people classify themselves into two major di- 
visions: the Ashkenazim and Shephardim. The Shephardim, who mi- 
grated from Palestine to the Mediterranean nations, are supposedly 
related to the original tribes of Israel, while the Ashkenazim first 
emerged from an area of Southwest Asia called the Khazar (also 
called Chazar) Empire and filtered into Russia and Eastern Europe. 

The Jewish Encyclopedia contains a long article on the Khazars and 
admits that the Kingdom of Khazaria converted to Judaism around 
740 AD. Arthur Koestler, the eminent Jewish author, in an exhaus- 
tively researched book called the Thirteenth Tribe 199 argues persua- 
sively that the Khazars became the Ashkenazim branch of Jewry, 
which forms the great majority of the modern Jewish people. Of 
course, this historical inquiry is little pursued because if it could be 
shown that many of the Jewish people have no direct lineage to Abra- 
ham, then their "ancient homeland" justification for the state of Israel 
would be completely undermined. (See Barnes Review: The Khazars, 
Non-Semitic Jews) 200 

Furthermore, many of the original Israelite tribes fell under 
Babylonian captivity, and Jews have been minorities in every nation 
of the world in which they have resided. In spite of their 
ethnocentrism and the Talmudic prescriptions opposing 
intermarriage, without a doubt the Jews have intermarried to a certain 
extent with their host peoples. Even with only a slight interbreeding 
compounded over the last 3,000 years, the Jews probably have altered 
some of their original genetic heritage. Yet, as they have slowly 
absorbed the genes of other nationalities, close inbreeding in their 
minority communities has certainly led to great genetic similarities 



Jewish Supremacism 93 

among them. Exclusively Jewish diseases such as Tay-Sachs reveal a 
linked genetic heritage of Jews no matter where they reside in the 
world. 201 

While in college I encountered the Christian Identity faith that 
maintains that the original Israelite tribes became the differing na- 
tionalities of the European peoples. The denomination claims that 
with the coming of Christ, those of the original Israelites who main- 
tained their heritage became Christians. They believe that those who 
were amalgamated with the other peoples (such as the Babylonians 
and then later the Khazars) and followed the Talmud became what 
are now called Jews. I researched and prayed about the issue, but I 
kept my more traditional Christian attitude about Jews. Over the 
years, though, many Identity Christians have become my friends, and 
I have been impressed by their dedication to Jesus Christ in the strug- 
gle for freedom from Jewish Supremacism. I view them warmly as fel- 
low Christians with whom I share many sentiments and with whom I 
disagree on few. I am thankful that they are in alliance with all those 
dedicated to freedom from Jewish Supremacism. 

I came to understand that I was not going against the Word of 
God to recognize and wish to preserve the heritage of my own people 
nation and indeed all races that he created. If anything, I was fulfilling 
the laws of his creation. I also finally realized that according to the 
Holy Bible the coming of Jesus Christ created a New Covenant; and 
that the chosen people of God now were those who accepted Him and 
His Father. I knew that I was right to defend my Christian heritage 
from the powers seeking its demise. Then, as now, I believe in 
freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Jews have every right to 
believe whatever they wish and to be actively anti-Christian and anti- 
Gentile. Zionists have every right to seek their own political 
supremacy. But, we certainly have the right to oppose them, to defend 
ourselves from their power, to preserve our heritage in the face of 
their attacks, and to fight for our precious freedom from their 
domination. 

Although I am Christian and a person of European heritage, I care 
that the ultimate triumph of Jewish Supremacism would mean the 
destruction of all heritages, nationalities and religions other than their 
own. As the Jewish Supremacists are united in their efforts against us, 
so despite our obvious differences in our cultures and faiths, we must 
at least be united in our efforts to defeat the power of their New 
World Order. 



94 Christianity and Jews 



Chapter 4 

Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

The eccentric woman in the Citizens Council office who railed 
about the Jews and Communism obviously had some of her facts 
straight. The facts were inescapable: Communism and Zionism were 
born from the same Jewish soul, personified in Moses Hess. 202 

I slowly became aware of a dual morality permeating Jewish- 
Gentile relations. Jews practice one morality for themselves and 
preach another for non-Jews. Judaic morality is racial pride taught 
solidarity, tradition and self-interest. They preach diversity and liber- 
alism for their perceived competitors. If such dualism does not exist, 
how could the Jewish-dominated American media: 

• Support the nation of Israel, which promotes Judaism in its 
schools, while opposing even the singing of Christmas carols 
in American public schools? 

• Support the nation of Israel, which has strictly segregated 
schools, communities, and facilities for Jews and Arabs — 
while condemning segregated schools and housing in Amer- 
ica and South Africa? 

• Support the nation of Israel, with its restrictive "Jews Only" 
immigration laws, while subverting American attempts to 
curtail even illegal immigration? 

• Support the nation of Israel, which allows every Jewish citi- 
zen to carry a machine gun if desired, while advocating strict 
gun control for American citizens? 

• Support the nation of Israel, which openly states its mission 
to preserve the Jewish people and heritage, while condemn- 
ing Europeans who dare to advocate the preservation of the 
Western heritage and culture in America? 

• Always depict the historical relations between Jews and Gen- 
tiles with the Gentiles as evildoers and the Jews as innocent 
victims, while condemning Gentiles that simply dare to de- 
fend themselves from such ethnic slanders? 

The moral hypocrisy became obvious. Powerful Jews advocate 
one morality about racial pride for Jews and an opposite agenda for 
Gentiles. If their policies of solidarity are morally good for them, why 
would they not be morally good for us as well? Why the double 



96 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

standard? If by their own arguments "White racists" are morally 
reprehensible, why are not Jewish Supremacists reprehensible as 
well? 

While Herzl and other Zionists feverishly gathered world-wide 
Jewish support for the establishment of the exclusively Jewish state, 
Jewish activists were busy trying to negate the Christian component 
of American culture and remove even Christmas carols from our 
schools. While they trumpet their belief that they are a "Chosen Peo- 
ple" above all others, and celebrate a unique people defined by heri- 
tage from Abraham to the present — they tell European Americans 
that race consciousness is evil. While they established a Jewish nation 
where citizenship is based almost exclusively on the heredity of the 
"Jewish people," Jewish anthropologists promote the idea that the 
European race doesn't exist. Palestinians are said to be evil for simply 
desiring their own nation run by their own people, despite that this is 
the founding principle of Israel itself. 

Even though Jews devotedly support their own exclusively Jew- 
ish-run state of Israel, they work feverishly to undermine the White 
control and character of America through massive non-European 
immigration. They consistently work for "diversity" and pluralism in 
every nation of the world except for their Jewish world center in Is- 
rael. While they have laws in Israel prohibiting Gentiles from owning 
certain forms of media, they boldly move to gain control of the great 
majority of the mass media in America. 

Communist Ideology and Race 

Mattie Smith told me that the Jews have the leading roles in the ef- 
forts to destroy the very underpinnings of our heritage. I had read 
that Jews were the leaders of the academic movement promoting the 
idea that nations and races are artificial entities. In looking into the 
foundations of racial egalitarianism, I found that adherents of interna- 
tional Communism pioneered the modern notions of universalism. 
Across the world, Communism allied itself with racial and national 
minorities and their struggle for "liberation from imperialism, coloni- 
alism, and oppression." I soon found out that Jews dominated the In- 
ternational Communist movement in modern times just as they had 
led Bolshevism in Russia early in the 20 th century. 

Jewish scribe Nathan Glazer 203 stated matter-of-factly that in the 
1960s and 1970s the Jews comprised half of all the active Communists 
in the United States and four out of five of its leaders. Two Jews, Jerry 
Rubin and Abbie Hoffman, led the Marxist-oriented, Yippie 



Jewish Supremacism 97 

Movement, and they were two of the five Jewish members of the 
revolutionary "Chicago Seven" group — tried for the violent 
disruption of the 1968 Democratic Convention. I read a book called 
Behind Communism, and I was surprised to discover that at least 4 out 
of 5 of all those caught and convicted of Communist espionage and 
treason in the United States and Canada were Jews. 204 

Probably the most infamous act of treason in American history 
was the theft of atomic bomb secrets by Ethel and Julius Rosenberg. 205 
They were part of the Fuchs-Gold spy ring that operated in and 
around the Manhattan Project and other branches of the American 
atomic weapons program. Seven members of the Fuchs-Gold ring 
pled guilty to charges associated with espionage. They were Klaus 
Fuchs, Harry Gold, David Greenglass, Abraham Brothman, Miriam 
Moskowitz, Sidney Weinbaum, and Alfred Slack. Another suspect, 
Morton Sobell, fled to Mexico, but Mexican authorities turned him 
over to the United States to face trial and subsequent conviction. A 
jury also convicted the Rosenbergs, and they were executed. 206 Of the 
ten spies most responsible for the selling of our atomic secrets to the 
Soviets, only one, Alfred Slack, was a Gentile. 

Other major spy cases included the Amerasia Case, the Gerhart 
Eisler Case, the Judith Coplin Case, and the Alger Hiss Case. Jews 
figured prominently in these cases and made up a clear majority of 
the defendants. The only prominent non-Jewish spy was Alger Hiss. 
In the Hollywood Ten Case, The House of Representatives convicted 
ten of Hollywood's leading film writers of contempt of Congress. 
They appeared before the House 
Committee on Un-American Activities 
and refused to testify when asked if 
they were Communists. Jewish publi- 
cations alleged that the Committee ru- 
ined the writers for no apparent rea- 
son. Recently a number of movies 
have been made defending the Hol- 
lywood Ten as unjustly and unfairly 
persecuted, yet six of the ten proved 
to be dues-paying members of the 
Communist Party. The other four had 
records of many Communist-front ac- 
tivities and connections. Nine of the 
ten were of Jewish heritage. 

While Jewish Marxists pursued 
the political part of the "civil rights" 
effort, they pushed just as hard in the 
academic realm. Until the 1930s, the biological sciences recognized the 




Julius and Ethel Rosenberg 



98 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

different races of mankind as surely as they did the different species 
and subspecies of the animal kingdom. That is, as commentator Kevin 
Strom says, "Until the egalitarian political wind blew into American 
academia, propelled by a clever, connected, and well-heeled minority 
with an agenda." 207 

I began to realize that African Americans were not the primary 
proponents of racial miscegenation. Most African Americans, as is 
true of all peoples, are proud of their distinctiveness, although they 
certainly desired economic and social advancement. The most popu- 
lar Black leader in the early part of the 20th century was the Black 
separatist Marcus Garvey, who sought repatriation for Blacks back to 
Africa and the foundation of a new Black nation. Against this move- 
ment of Black separatism and the efforts of European Americans to 
preserve Western heritage, arose a minority that sought to sabotage 
both agendas. Even today, despite the best efforts of the Jewish media 
to defame him, the most popular African American leader is the Mus- 
lim Minister Farrakhan who unashamedly seeks the preservation of 
his own race. 

A Movement Hostile to All Nationalities 

Franz Boas is the accepted father of the modern egalitarian school 
of anthropology. He was a Jewish immigrant from Germany with lit- 
tle formal training in the anthropological field, having done his doc- 
toral thesis on the colors of water. Boas introduced what he called 
"cultural anthropology" to the discipline. Until his arrival, anthropol- 
ogy officially belonged to the physical sciences. Boas effectively di- 
vided anthropology into the separate disciplines of cultural and 
physical anthropology. 

Early physical anthropologists were truly race scientists because 
they studied man and his evolutionary development through the 
study of the measurable physical characteristics of the human races, 
past and present. Any good physical anthropologist could pick up a 
human skull and, based on its characteristics, quickly identify the race 
of the specimen. Of course, this physiological knowledge was vital in 
sorting out the unearthed remnants of early man and piecing together 
man's prehistory and evolutionary development. Cultural anthropol- 
ogy dealt more with the different contemporary cultures of mankind 
and culturally related questions of antiquity and prehistory, making it 
a far less precise science, and one open to wide interpretation. 



Jewish Supremacism 99 

Surprisingly, before he became such a prominent anthropologist, 
Boas expressed his acceptance of racial differences in mental charac- 
teristics. In The Mind of Primitive Man, he wrote: 

Differences of Structure must be accompanied by differences of 
function, physiological as well as psychological; and, as we found 
clear evidence of differences in structure between races, so we 
must anticipate that the differences in mental characteristics will 
be found. 208 

Both of Boas' parents were radical socialists in the revolutionary 
movement that swept over Europe in 1870. In his biography of Boas, 
his student Melville Herskovits wrote that Boas' political sympathies 
"leaned towards a variety of socialism." 209 The United States House of 
Representatives cited Boas' involvement with 44 Communist-front or- 
ganizations. Coinciding with the rise of Nazism in Germany and the 
increasing influence of racially aware anthropologists in the world 
scientific community, Boas began to marshal his anthropological in- 
fluence in service of his political sympathies. He began to advance the 
quack idea that there are really no such things as individual human 
races. He argued that although they had variations of skin colors and 
features, the groups called races possessed little difference genetically. 
He claimed that the immediate environment alone created all of the 
superficial differences. By 1938 Boas dropped the above quotation 
from the new edition of his book. 

He gathered many Jewish disciples around him, including Gene 
Weltfish, Isador Chein, Melville Herskovits, Otto Klineberg, and Ash- 
ley Montagu. He also had among his followers the African American 
scientist K. B. Clark and two women, Ruth Benedict and Margaret 
Mead. Mead later wrote her famous book on Samoa (Coming of Age 
in Samoa) 210 suggesting that indiscriminate sexual relations would 
lessen teenage traumas and problems. (Her opus was later soundly 
refuted by Derek Freeman, who showed that Mead had falsified her 
data on Samoa.) 211 212 213 

Boas and his entire cadre of disciples had extensive Communist 
connections. He repeatedly proclaimed that he was in a "holy war 
against racism" and he died suddenly during a luncheon where once 
again and for the last time, he stressed the need to fight "racism." 
Boas and his comrades gained control over the anthropology depart- 
ments of most universities by encouraging their egalitarian comrades 
to always support their own in their academic appointments. While 
traditional anthropologists had no ax to grind and no sacred cause to 
champion, Boas and his followers embarked on a holy mission to ex- 
tirpate racial knowledge from the modern academic establishment. 
They succeeded. 



100 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

Whenever egalitarians achieved positions of influence or power, 
they aided their comrades advance in the teaching departments of the 
colleges and academic departments they administered. They 
consistently assisted their co-religionists, as well as Gentile 
egalitarians, in getting professorships and research appointments and 
promotions. Similar collusion took place in the ranks and on the 
boards of anthropological associations and journals. However, the 
coup de grace was the massive support given the egalitarian dogma 
by the media establishment, which was overwhelmingly in Jewish 
hands. 

Racial equality was (and still is) presented to the public as scien- 
tific fact, opposed only by the "bigoted" and the "ignorant." Egalitar- 
ian writers such as Ashley Montagu and others received great praise 
in magazines, newspapers, and later, on television. Whether one was 
a Jew or a Gentile, professing a belief in racial equality became essen- 
tial dogma for anyone who wanted to advance in anthropology or 
any other part of the academic world. Adherence to the "politically 
correct" line of thought led to prestige and acclaim, money and suc- 
cess. Racial truth-telling led to personal attack, dead-end careers and 
often even to economic hardship. 

Ashley Montagu became the best-known spokesman for the 
equality hoax, superseding Boas as the most popular exponent of an- 
tiracism. His well-modulated British accent and aristocratic name 
added instant credibility to his opinions about racial equality. I can 
still, after thirty years, remember his impressive appearances on the 
Today television program. His book, Race: Man's Most Dangerous Myth, 
became the bible of equality, and it profoundly impressed me before I 
had a chance to read the other side of the issue. 214 Montagu's birth 
name was actually not Montague at all, but Israel Ehrenberg. In a bril- 
liant exercise of psychological camouflage, Ehrenberg changed his 
name a number of times, finally settling on not simply an Anglo- 
Saxon moniker, but the name Montagu, which is one of Britain's most 
aristocratic and oldest medieval-titled families. 215 

By the late 1990s, Jewish writers began to write brazenly about 
their domination of American anthropology. In a 1997 edition of 
American Anthropologist, which is published by the American Anthro- 
pological Association, Jewish scholar Gelya Frank writes that egalitar- 
ian American anthropology is so thoroughly Jewish that it should be 
classed as "part of Jewish History." Frank goes on to admit that an- 
thropology is in the service of a social agenda and that her essay fo- 
cuses on Jewish anthropologists who are "concerned with turning 



Jewish Supremacism 101 

multiculturalist theories into agendas for activism." The same breed 
of anthropologists who so fervently declare that "there is no such 
thing as race" when it comes to Blacks and Whites — are now hypo- 
critically affirming the unique genetic homogeneity of Jews. More- 
over, increasing numbers of Jewish anthropologists have come out of 
the closet in celebration of their special genetic and cultural heri- 
tage. 216 

Unless they speak about the Jewish Chosen People, egalitarianism 
still dominates America's academic climate. Richard Lewontin, Leon 
Kamin, Jared Diamond and Stephen Jay Gould are its four self- 
acknowledged Jews and the leading academic exponents of egalitari- 
anism. In spite of an avalanche of fresh scientific data proving the vi- 
tal role of genes in producing individual and group differences, racial 
egalitarianism is still the holy writ of anthropology and human psy- 
chology as characterized by the popular media. The writings of Le- 
wontin, Kamin, Gould, Rose, Diamond and other egalitarians fre- 
quently appear in the pages of magazines such as the Smithsonian, 
Natural History, Nature, Discover, Time, Newsweek, and other wide- 
circulation publications. Television programs often interview them as 
"authorities" on the subject of race — and seldom allow any contra- 
diction from academic opponents of egalitarianism. Most of the lead- 
ing egalitarian spokesmen are self-described Marxists, a detail the 
media never seems to mention. Imagine if one of their opponents was 
a self -proclaimed Nazi; I suspect that fact would always be cited. 

Perhaps the best way to prove the purposeful deception utilized 
by Jewish egalitarians is by exposing the blatantly hypocritical writ- 
ings of one the leading lights of Jewish egalitarianism: Jared Dia- 
mond. 

In the New York Review of Books, Diamond has praised Cavalli- 
Sforza for "demolishing scientists' attempts to classify human popula- 
tions into races in the same way that they classify birds and other spe- 
cies into races." 217 But, in a recent Natural History magazine article, 
Diamond says that genetic studies prove that Jews differ from non- 
Jews. He makes the startling assertion, "There are also practical rea- 
sons for interest in Jewish genes. The state of Israel has been going to 
much expense to support immigration and job retraining of Jews who 
were persecuted minorities in other countries. That immediately 
poses the problem of defining who is a Jew." 218 So Diamond says that 
there are no real differences between the major races of mankind, but 
that it is indeed both possible and desirable to distinguish the far less 
pronounced differences between Jews and non-Jews. 

A good example of the Jewish strategy can be seen in their hopes 
for the widespread assimilation of the Palestinian people into other 
cultures and peoples. Palestinians are overwhelmingly Muslim and 



102 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

Christian, two faiths that generally are universalistic in their outlook 
as opposed to the racial supremacist view of Judaism. As the Pales- 
tinians that were driven out of what is now Greater Israel have fil- 
tered into Western Countries many have intermarried and assimilated 
into the populations of their host countries. Jewish Supremacists cor- 
rectly predict that assimilated Palestinians will naturally have weaker 
ties and less commitment to their Palestinian heritage and the cause of 
Palestinian freedom. What applies to Palestinians apply to all people 
that Jewish Supremacists see as their enemies and competitors. That is 
why they consistently seek to break down the desire to preserve the 
racial heritage, culture and solidarity in all people other than them- 
selves. Egalitarianism is for Gentile consumption only, while racial 
distinction and supremacism remains the soul and sinew of Judaism. 

Despite the well-organized "part of Jewish history" control of an- 
thropology, the scientific affirmation of race is growing so quickly 
that the popular egalitarians may not be able to hold back the scien- 
tific tide much longer. There has never been a greater disparity be- 
tween scientific and popular understanding. 

Of course, it is a strategic necessity for Jewish Supremacists to 
break down any feeling of ethnic solidarity, culture, or loyalty among 
their opponents. If other peoples have strong ties to their own iden- 
tity, heritage and culture, they naturally would not so easily submit to 
Jewish domination. 

The Freudian Assault 

Psychology fell to the Jewish onslaught just as anthropology had. 
From the days of Sigmund Freud, psychology became defined as the 
"Jewish science." One of his Jewish biographers put it this way: 

History made psychoanalysis a "Jewish science." It continued to 
be attacked as such. It was destroyed in Germany, Italy, and Aus- 
tria and exiled to the four winds, as such. It continues even now to 
be perceived as such by enemies and friends alike. Of course there 
are by now distinguished analysts who are not Jews. . . . But the 
vanguard of the movement over the last fifty years has remained 
predominantly Jewish as it was from the beginning. 219 

Since the Great Depression, academic psychology has discounted 
the impact of heredity and attributed almost all individual human be- 
havioral patterns and mental ability to environmental conditioning. It 
claimed that environment rather than heredity is really the source of 
all mental and behavioral differences among the races. Not only did 
the theories of Freud and his disciples attack the principles of race, 



Jewish Supremacism 103 

they made a broadside attack on the spiritual and moral values of 
European civilization. Freud suggested that our Christian sexual mo- 
rality was the cause of mental illness on a grand scale. He relentlessly 
undermined the concepts of sexual fidelity and the foundations of 
marriage. In 1915 he stated: 

Sexual morality — as society, in its extreme form, the American, 
defines it — seems to me very contemptible. I advocate an incom- 
parably freer sexual life. 220 

In Moses and Monotheism (1939) Freud repeatedly attacks Christi- 
anity while promoting the spiritual supremacy of the Jewish people. 

The people, happy in their conviction of possessing the truth, 
overcome by the consciousness of being the chosen, came to value 
highly all intellectual and ethical achievements. 

The Christian religion did not keep to the lofty heights of spiritu- 
ality to which the Jewish religion had soared — Sigmund Freud 221 

Just as the Communist Jews had a political war with the Czars of 
Russia, Freudians pursued a cultural war against Western Christian 
culture. Kevin MacDonald, in his classic study of Jewish ethnocen- 
trism, A People That Shall Dwell Apart, points out that Freud's Totem 
and Taboo 222 reveals his role in the cultural war against Gentiles: 

Freud's speculations clearly had an agenda. Rather than provide 
speculations which reaffirmed the moral and intellectual basis of 
the culture of his day, his speculations were an integral part of his 
war on gentile culture — so much so that he viewed Totem and Ta- 
boo as a victory over Rome and the Catholic Church. 223 

Freud reveled in what he saw as his war against Christendom, 
which he compared with the Roman Empire, and suggested that he 
was like his idol Hannibal and was meant to sack Rome. 

Hannibal. . . had been the favourite hero of my later school days. . 
. . I began to understand for the first time what it meant to belong 
to an alien race . . . the figure of the Semitic general rose still 
higher in my esteem. To my youthful mind Hannibal and Rome 
symbolized the conflict between the tenacity of Jewry and the or- 
ganisation of the Catholic Church . . . 224 

Freud makes his Jewish supremacist viewpoint very clear in a let- 
ter to a Jewish woman who intended to conceive a child by a Gentile 
to heal the split in psychoanalysis. His words were: 

I must confess. ..that your fantasy about the birth of the Savior to 
a mixed union did not appeal to me at all. The Lord, in that anti- 
Jewish period, had him born from the superior Jewish race. But I 
know these are my prejudices. 225 

A year later the same woman gave birth to a child fathered by a 
Jew. Freud responded 



104 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

I am, as you know, cured of the last shred of my predilection for 
the Aryan cause, and would like to take it that if the child turned 
out to be a boy he will develop into a stalwart Zionist. He or she 
must be dark in any case, no more towheads. Let us banish all 
these will-o'-the-wisps! 

I shall not present my compliments to Jung in Munich, as you 
know perfectly well. ...We are and remain Jews. The others will only 
exploit us and will never understand and appreciate us. (quoted in 
Yerushalmi 1991, 45). 226 

So here is perhaps the most famous Jew of recent European his- 
tory revealed as a Jewish Supremacist, anti-Gentile! Not only did 
Freud consciously launch an attack on our cultural values, he conven- 
iently labeled opponents of that assault as mentally ill. In Moses and 
Monotheism, Freud portrays Anti-Semitism as a mental illness that 
arises out of jealousy of Jewish ethical supremacy. 227 

On the deck of a ship steaming toward the United States, Freud 
commented to his friends that the people of America thought he was 
bringing them a panacea, but instead he said, "We are bringing them 
the plague." 228 

The Civil Rights Movement 



Just as Jewish academics lead the scholastic fight for egalitarian- 
ism in science and sociology, and Jewish media moguls lead the 

propaganda fight, the "civil 
rights" movement itself found 
most of its leadership and finan- 
cial support in the Jewish com- 
munity. 

Almost from the first day of its 
inception in 1909, the National 
Association for the Advancement 
of Colored People (NAACP) was 
the premier organization working 
for a racially mixed American so- 
ciety. Interestingly enough, the 
founding board of directors had 
only one prominent African 
American, W. E. B. Dubois (who 
was actually a Mulatto). Most of 
the board consisted of Jewish 

.,..-„, . „. . „ , Marxist ideologues. The U.S. 

NAACP leader Kivie Kaplan ° 




Jewish Supremacism 105 

House of Representatives and many state investigative bodies thor- 
oughly documented the fact that all of the NAACP's founders were 
activists for the Communist cause. Dubois even chose Communist 
Ghana as his burial site. The NAACP's first president was Arthur 
Spingarn, and only Jews served as NAACP presidents from its found- 
ing until the 1970s. Noel Spingarn succeeded his brother, Arthur, and 
following him, Kivie Kaplan reigned over the organization. The Jew- 
ish leadership of the NAACP was little known by the public at large. 
When I came of age, the only name I had associated with the NAACP 
was that of Roy Wilkins, its African American national secretary. Be- 
cause he was so much in the press and public eye, like most Ameri- 
cans, I thought Wilkins was the NAACP leader. But Kaplan was the 
actual NAACP president during that time. Benjamin Hooks became 
the first African American president finally in the 1970s. Once an Af- 
rican American finally made it to the presidency of the organization, 
no longer did the public hear much about the NAACP "national sec- 
retary." From then on the public spokesman was the NAACP presi- 
dent. 

In the recent Black-Jewish split, liberal Jews are quick to cry foul at 
African American resentment against them by reciting the fact that 
the lion's share of the financing of the integrationist cause has come 
from Jews. They also boast that at least 90 percent of the legal effort 
for integration has come from Jewish attorneys and long been sup- 
ported by Jewish money. 229 

Practically every step of the civil rights movement's progress 
came through the courts. They decreed forced racial integration of the 
schools, and ultimately forced the massive anti- White discrimination 
program upon America with the Orwellian name "affirmative ac- 
tion." Here, too, Jews took the predominant roles. 

The organization that fought many of these battles was the 
NAACP Legal Defense Fund, an organization separate from the 
NAACP itself. Even now in the 21 st century Jews still lead The National 
Association for the Advancement of Colored People Legal Defense Fund. 
Jake Greenberg has been active in the legal fund for years and was the 
chief attorney for Brown in the famous Supreme Court case Brown v 
Board of Education. In that nefarious decision, the Supreme Court — 
in one devastating stroke of the pen — initiated the transformation of 
the American public educational system from one of the best in the 
industrialized world to one of the worst. The new system, far from al- 
leviating racial tensions, only heightened hatreds between races in 
America. 

Even in areas where Jews were not the actual leaders in the inte- 
grationist movement, they provided much of the behind-the-scenes 
influence. Martin Luther King Jr. fell under the guidance of Stanley 



106 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

Levinson, who wrote many of King's speeches, including, some say, 
the "I Have a Dream" speech delivered at the March on Washington. 
John and Robert Kennedy warned King to disassociate himself from 
Levinson because of Levinson' s Communist record. King, however, 
found Levinson invaluable and refused. The Student Non-Violent 
Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and the Congress of Racial Equality 
(CORE) also had key Jewish involvement in their formative periods, 
and most of the nominally White "Freedom Riders" that went South 
were Jews. The famous case of the three Freedom Riders killed in 
Philadelphia, Mississippi, involved Schwerner, Goodman, and 
Chaney — two Jews and one African American. 

The public image of the man who called himself "Martin Luther 
King" (his legal name was Michael King) is a textbook illustration of 
the power of the media to influence America. Most people still do not 
know of the extent of King's involvement in Communism, in part be- 
cause the media continues to ignore King's long record of Communist 
associations. King privately declared himself to be a Marxist, 230 and 
told his inner circle that his efforts were a part of the "class struggle." 
His personal secretary, Bayard Rustin, was a Communist. When King 
had to replace Rustin in 1961, he chose another Communist, Jack 
O'Dell. His main advisor ("handler" would probably be a more apt 
term), however was Jewish Communist Stanley Levinson, who edited 
and probably wrote a good deal of King's book Stride Toward Freedom. 
Levinson prepared King's income tax returns, controlled King's fund- 
raising activities, and was also in charge of tunneling Soviet money to 
the Communist Party, USA. 231 

Only recently has it been revealed that King plagiarized large sec- 
tions of his doctoral thesis. Boston University formed a committee to 
determine the extent of King's plagiarism. It determined that 45 per- 
cent of the first part and 21 percent of the second part were taken 
from other authors. 232 Schools regularly revoke degrees upon discov- 
ery of far less cheating, but the importance of King to the civil rights 
movement prevented the revocation of his divinity degree. 

The media have always carefully portrayed King as a good Chris- 
tian family man — the epitome of a man of God. Yet, King had doz- 
ens of liaisons with prostitutes, White and Black, used church money 
to pay them and commonly beat them — all documented by the FBI 
and admitted by King associates. 233 

King even spent the night before his assassination copulating with 
and beating White prostitutes. Recorded on the FBI surveillance tapes 
the "Reverend King" exclaims during intercourse, " I'm f — ing for 



Jewish Supremacism 107 

God!" and "I'm not a Negro tonight!" The King records are so damn- 
ing that the tapes and other FBI documents were sealed for 50 years. 
Despite these facts, King's Jewish handlers and their allies in the me- 
dia were steadfast in their laudatory portrayal of King. 234 

Jewish and Black relations have deteriorated in recent years as Af- 
rican American political sympathies have become more nationalistic 
in their own right. Jewish association with Black civil rights causes 
originated from the days when many Communists saw the Blacks as 
potential revolutionaries for Communist uprising. The Communists 
in their creation of the Soviet State temporarily won the Jewish frater- 
nal struggle between Zionism and Communism that Winston Chur- 
chill described in 1920. Radical American Jews envisioned the Blacks 
as an American proletariat, a transatlantic version of the oppressed 
serfs of Russia that could be utilized as allies helping to usher in a 
Communist revolution. Of course, even non-Communist Jews tended 
to support a nonracial definition of "American," since they more than 
anyone are aware of their status as outsiders in White society. Almost 
all organized Jewish factions supported the dismantling of the laws 
and traditions that supported the continued existence of the White 
race. 

Zionism over Marxism 

After the Second World War, two major factors began to pull the 
Jews away from Communism: the Russification of the Soviet State 
and the establishment of the state of Israel. 

To fight the Germans, Stalin and the Soviet regime motivated the 
Russian people by calling on their deep patriotic feelings. Stalin him- 
self, one of the most paranoid and ruthless leaders of all time, skill- 
fully played one Jewish faction against the other until he emerged as 
the unquestioned authority in Russia. Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein), 
Stalin's chief rival, was forced into exile and later murdered by the 
Russian NKVD. Although individual Jews remained pivotal in his re- 
gime, Stalin saw all Jewish alliances as a threat to his own power. He 
brutally repressed any potential threat he could find, and he turned 
the Soviet Union to a more nationalistic course. The anthem of Soviet 
Communism, the egalitarian and anti-nationalist "Internationale," 
was replaced by a traditional Russian hymn. 

Affirmative action for Jewish Communists in the early days of the 
revolution was replaced by a merit system in universities and the 
military. Many of Stalin's maneuvers against the Jews did not become 
clear until long after the Second World War, and many Jews were 
reluctant to believe that they had lost control of the Soviet regime. 
Even late into the 1960s, in countries other than Russia, Jews still 



108 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

constituted the majority of Marxist leadership around the world — 
including the United States. Many of these Jewish Communists, 
though, had become somewhat anti-Russian and now called 
themselves Trotskyites. Only a few Jewish radicals held onto the 
Communist vision as expressed in Russia. Most others reached for a 
new Marxist ideology rooted in egalitarianism and, while holding 
onto the social tenants of Communism, began a migration to capitalist 
economics. 

While White Russians reclaimed Russia, the Jews created the state 
of Israel, and it seemed that the old, ethnocentric, and orthodox 
prophecies were finally coming true. For 2,000 years Jews had uttered 
the prayer "Next year in Jerusalem." Suddenly, any Jew could go to a 
Jerusalem once more under their direct political control. During these 
years, America witnessed the transformation of many New Left Jew- 
ish radicals. Norman Podhoretz of Commentary magazine, for exam- 
ple, shifted from Communist apologist to capitalist advocate — from 
an anti-Vietnam War dove to an unmitigated Israeli hawk. In the 
1970s, a flood of these New Right Jews poured into the "conservative 
movement," adapting to the tenants of economic conservatism but 
adding the elements of social liberalism, egalitarianism, the New 
World Order, and, of course, super-Zionism. Jews filtered into or- 
ganizations of every conceivable political stripe, espousing different 
viewpoints but always keeping a keen eye out for the interests of the 
Jews and the Israeli State. 

Feminism 

Simultaneous with the sacrifice of our nation upon the altar of an 
impossible racial "equality," came the promotion for the equally ficti- 
tious idea of sexual "equality." Women were told that they were psy- 
chologically the same as men but were just socially conditioned by 
their environment to be wives and mothers instead of research scien- 
tists and captains of industry. Not only did the "women's liberation- 
ists" try to convince women that nurturing and inculturating the next 
generation was less important than sweating on an assembly line or 
sweating the "bottom line" in an executive suite, they went much fur- 
ther by decrying the role of wife and mother altogether. 

Freud also contributed to the destruction of the family in his en- 
dorsement of the supposed liberation of sexual promiscuity. One of 
the strengths of the West has always been high-investment parenting 
as compared to the Third World. Freud and his Jewish purveyors of 
psychoanalysis conflated sex and love and justified the destruction of 



Jewish Supremacism 109 

the family unit because of issues such as unsatisfactory sexual 
gratification. 

Women's liberation has completely restructured the American 
family as most wives and mothers have been forced into the job mar- 
ket by the new economic standards thus limiting the options of those 
who might otherwise choose a homemaking role. Many researchers 
say the creation of millions of "working" mothers has had a deleteri- 
ous effect on family stability and child development. As a result many 
women are now struggling as the sole provider for themselves and 
their children, and the ones in stable, two-parent families often find 
themselves stressed and debilitated by having to do both the tradi- 
tional women's roles in the home and of working eight hours a day 
outside of it. 

The most prominent of the modern feminists were Gloria Steinem, 
Betty Friedan, and Bella Abzug. Interestingly, all three came from one 
of the most sexually repressive religions on Earth: Judaism. A Hole in 
the Sheet by Evelyn Kaye, who grew up in an Orthodox home, illus- 
trates the demeaning and often degraded position of women in the 
Jewish faith and the hatred expressed toward Gentiles outside of it. 
She discusses the Bar Mitzvah and the completely ascendant role of 
the male and writes the following: 

During the prayers which a Jewish man recites every morning are 
a series of blessings, which include: "Thank you, Lord, for not mak- 
ing me a non-Jew, for not making me a slave, for not making me a 
woman." 

In Susan Weidman Schneider's book Jewish and Female, Rabbi 
Laura Geller comments: "Menstrual taboos are responsible for real 
damage to Jewish women's views of themselves and their bodies. I 
have met many women who learned nothing about the Torah ex- 
cept that they could not touch the Torah because they menstruate. 
. . . Their sense of themselves as 'inferior' Jews has already perme- 
ated their relationship to tradition and their own bodies. 235 

Kaye also bravely comments on the anti-Gentile nature of Jewish 

Orthodoxy. 

The final turning point for me was anti-Goyism. 

The mark of a truly devout Hasidic or Orthodox Jew, as well as 
many other Jews, is an unquestioned hatred of non-Jews. This is 
the foundation of the ultra-Orthodox and Hasidic philosophy. It's 
as tenacious, unreasoned and impossible as Anti-Semitism, ra- 
cism, and sexism. And as intractable. 

What it says is that all non-Jews, or Goyim as the word is in Yid- 
dish since it's the plural of "Goy," are wicked, evil and untrust- 
worthy. 

There is a complete litany of all the terrible things about non- 
Jews which apply to every single one and which are believed im- 
plicitly by the Orthodox. These include: 

— All Goyim drink alcohol and are always drunk; 



110 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

— All Goyim are on drugs; 

— All Goyim hate Jews even when they seem to be friendly; 

— All Goyim are anti-Semites, no matter what they say or do; 

— All Goyim have a terrible family life and mistreat their wives 
and children; 

— All Goyim eat pork all the time; 

— Goyim are never as clever, as kind, as wise or as honest as 
Jews; 

— You can never trust the Goyim. 

There's much more. But the essence of anti-Goyism is passed to 
Jewish children with their mother's milk, and then nurtured, fed 
and watered carefully into full-blown phobias throughout their 
lives. 236 

The Talmud often characterizes women as unclean, whores, and 
as deceitful, lower beings. It even has long passages that justify adult 
males having sexual relations with little girls. Women are segregated 
in the Orthodox synagogue. Women are almost as reviled as Gentiles. 
Note the following Talmudic references, starting with the prayer to 
which Kaye refers: 

Blessed be thou. . .who has not made me a goy. . . who has not 
made me a woman, and who has made me an Israelite. . .who has 
not made me a slave. Judah Ben II ai 237 

When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is noth- 
ing, for when the girl is less than this [three years old], it is as if 
one puts the finger into the eye, tears come to the eye,... [footnote] 
(7) again and again but eyesight returns, so does virginity come 
back to the little girl under three years. (Kethuboth lib) 238 

A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in mar- 
riage by coition. (Sanhedrin 55b and 69a-69b) 239 and (Yebamoth 
57b 58a, 60b) 240 

Yet, the Jewish high priestesses of women's liberation have made 
few inroads in reforming those inequities. Only the Reform part of 
Judaism puts women on somewhat of an equal footing. But Israel is 
an Orthodox-run Jewish nation, and nearly all the Reform and Con- 
servative organizations around the world support Israel wholeheart- 
edly. The question of ethnic heritage far overshadows any doctrinal 
debate. It is ironic that women from the religious culture having the 
most demeaning attitude toward women, should focus their efforts on 
promoting a sexual revolution among those of European descent. It 
seems to me that their time could be better spent addressing the rank 
inequities in their own backyard. 



Jewish Supremacism 111 
Egalitarianism and Civil Rights as Weapons 

As I uncovered more information on the Jewish domination of the 
anti- White, and anti-family revolution, it struck me that many power- 
ful Jews might see White America in the same manner with which 
they once viewed the Czar and the White Russians. I began to wonder 
whether we were destined to become a people deposed, a nation con- 
quered not with armies and cannon but by the power of the purse and 
the power of the press. 

If they do not view us as Theodor Herzl did — as aliens — why 
do so many of them attack American traditions and customs, from the 
structure of the family to the singing of Christmas carols in our 
schools? Although not all Jews participate in the crusade against our 
heritage, a vast majority support chauvinist Jewish organizations and 
back the candidates for public office who most sublimate themselves 
to Jewish concerns. Jewish support means far more than their voting 
bloc; it means full campaign coffers and a powerfully influential 
media. And it means almost sure victory if they oppose the other 
candidate for some reason. 

Jewish activists have been relentless in their support for pluralism 
of American politics and culture. The high-sounding Jewish promises 
of the so-called civil rights movement — love, peace, and brotherhood — 
have been replaced with the violent obscenities of a rap song. For Af- 
rican Americans, once rhythmic and peaceful urban communities 
now echo with the sound of gunfire. A third of all young African 
American men are in jail, on probation or parole, and millions are 
chained, hand, foot and soul, to alcohol and drugs. 

What did Jews have to gain from the empowerment of minorities 
in America? Obviously, the Marxists saw minorities as staunch allies 
vital for the advancement of their agenda and political success over 
the more resistant European American. Over the past decades, the 
Black bloc vote has been vital to liberal politics. Perhaps more impor- 
tantly, a Babylon-like, multiracial America suits Jewish interests. In a 
divided land, the most unified group exercises the greatest power. 
Divide and conquer has always been the supremacist prescription for 
power. In a jumbled, kaleidoscope society, the exercise of alien power 
is less apparent to the majority elements, for if a tiny minority has an 
agenda hostile to the majority, that minority needs to be as unobtru- 
sive as possible. Multiracialism muddies the waters. Jews will always 
thrive in such a Babylon. Every blow that has broken the solidarity 
and furthered the dispossession of the founding and once-ruling 
American majority is an opening for the new contenders to the 
throne. Of course, this process goes on not only in America but in 
every nation where Jews constitute a powerful minority. They consis- 



112 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

tently seek to weaken the predominant group, no matter what it 
might be, as to afford an opportunity for increasing their own power 

A great deal of the degeneracy has no design behind it at all. The 
alien nature described by Theodor Herzl finds its expression in thou- 
sands of jabs and body blows to the traditions and values of the An- 
glo-created America. Whether it is a Nativity scene outlawed from a 
public square, or an all-male military academy turned coed, or morn- 
ing radio programs filled with crude talk of human excretory activity, 
or the glamorization of drugs in films and novels, the beat goes on, 
drummed by people almost proud of their alien nature. The tune is 
the funeral march for America and the whole Western world. 

They eat away at our nation's European roots, always gaining in- 
fluence and power and yet always considering themselves outsiders, 
and that is precisely what they are: spiritual, cultural, and genetic out- 
siders who are now on the inside of the American power structure. 
Consider the following statement from a Jewish pundit who has both 
success and fame: 

Decades later, prowling along the river with Texas Rangers to see 
them catch crossing Mexicans, I stopped and sat on the ground. I 
said that's enough — I am one of them, the wetbacks, and not of 
them, the hunters. 241 

A. M. Rosenthal wrote those words, a man who has been head of 
the editorial pages of The New York Times, America's most powerful 
newspaper. With all his money, power, and prestige — sitting in the 
dirt along the muddy banks of the Rio Grande — Rosenthal still iden- 
tifies himself as an "outsider." His loyalties are not with other Ameri- 
cans who want to preserve the American way of life. His allegiance is 
with the aliens who seek to change it. 

The minority racism — the "civil rights" and the egalitarianism — 
that has flourished in America, had its origins in an alien ethnocen- 
trism. Our nation, once distinctively European in nature, is fading 
fast. It was not brewed in the fleshpots of Babylon. Yet, without de- 
termined and courageous efforts for self-preservation, it will die 
there. 

Most Americans who fought against the civil rights movement, 
believing that it would lead to the destruction of the fabric of society, 
never recognized the source of its power. In the South, some blamed 
the "Yankees," some the politicians, and some the media. Few people 
understood that those behind the civil rights movement were of the 
same malevolent power that propelled the Russian Revolution, that 
influenced the participation of America in the First World War, that 



Jewish Supremacism 113 

helped bring about the Second World War, and that finally created 
the Supremacist State of Israel. 

How ironic it is that the civil rights movement had its roots in ra- 
cism, and that it was simply a weapon wielded by the most ethnocen- 
tric people on Earth against their ancient enemies. African Americans 
were simply pawns in a much larger political game, and in real terms 
have suffered in their own ways as European Americans have suf- 
fered in others. Most of the non-Jewish Whites who were enlisted in 
the cause never realized that the struggle was not really about civil 
rights. These participants, like the African Americans themselves, as 
well as so many Whites, were being manipulated in the much bigger 
contest of the Jewish struggle for power. 

The same Jewish dominated establishment that preaches the holy 
writ of racial equality and dissolution, never lets Americans forget the 
right of Jews — in fact, the holy obligation of Jews — to maintain their 
heritage both here and in their Jewish state. It reminds us constantly, 
from the pulpit of television, of their unmatched godliness, their 
eternal innocence and victimhood. Their pundits and scriptwriters 
unabashedly proclaim Jewish mental, cultural, and moral supremacy. 
They are canonized daily by their media, while those who dare utter a 
contrary word are muzzled and demonized. 

A tabernacle for the new religion of the Holocaust stands squarely 
in the midst of the American Acropolis of Washington, D.C. In that 
shrine the American people can worship the Chosen People and feel 
proper guilt for their sins against them. There they can learn of the 
worst transgression of all: questioning the only true "civil right" — 
the Jewish right to rule us culturally, spiritually, and politically. 

They never cease to tell us that the greatest crime in the history of 
the world was Hitler's supposed effort to commit genocide against 
them, to wipe out the Jewish People as a race. Yet, each day the Jew- 
ish powers promote massive immigration into European nations and 
encourage racial intermarriage. Those processes will, of course, con- 
stitute a true genocide against their own ancient enemies; the destruc- 
tion of the unique character and heritage of the European race. 

Alien oppression of our people would be bad enough by itself, but 
our masters clearly plan the genetic extermination of our kind and as 
well as any other people that might stand in their way. Once I under- 
stood that, I could no longer remain silent about the realities of Jewish 
supremacism in the West. Their continued dominance would sweep 
away our folk in a rising tide of immigration, intermarriage and 
European self-sterilization. It is only their twisted media power that 
denotes our desire for our people to survive as "racism." 

The alien-dominated media keep most Americans completely un- 
aware of the ongoing dispossession of our people — and the alien 



114 Jews, Communism and Civil Rights 

segment that cheers it on. I began to see that the media was the most 
powerful weapon they used against us, so I focused my next inquiries 
on Jewish infiltration and domination of the American and world 
mass-communication media. 



Chapter 5 

Who Runs the Media? 

Jewish Media Supremacy 



Such as it is, the press has become the greatest power within the 
Western World, more powerful than the legislature, the executive 
and judiciary. One would like to ask; by whom has it been elected 
and to whom is it responsible? " 

— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn 

Four of the largest five entertainment giants are now run or 
owned by Jews. Murdoch's News Corp (at number four) is the only 
gentile holdout -- however Rupert is as pro-Israel as any Jew, 
probably more so. " (Los Angeles Jewish Times 242 Oct. 29. 1999) 

In the Oscar-winning 1976 movie Network, 2 ^ Howard Beale, the 
"mad prophet of the airwaves/' becomes consumed with the idea of 
exposing an insidious danger facing America: the takeover of Ameri- 
can television by Arabs through their petro-dollars. 

The film was based on an Oscar-winning screenplay by Paddy 
Chayefsky, who depicts a dark plot by Arabs to buy and control the 
TV networks. Howard Beale, played by Peter Finch, is a deranged 
news anchorman who speaks his mind about any subject, resulting in 
skyrocketing ratings. Raving about the inequities and corruption in 
American life, Beale would cry out: "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not go- 
ing to take it anymore!" 

Imagine if Iraqi-American supporters of Saddam Hussein had 
control of the American media. Suppose they controlled the national 
television networks and were a majority of the owners, producers, 
and writers of television entertainment and news. TV is an irresistible 
power that reaches into every American home — the primary source 
by which most Americans learn about the world. Consider the dan- 
gers of that enormous power dominated by a tightly knit, Iraqi, Mus- 
lim minority that supported the Hussein regime. 

If the non-television media were still free, they undoubtedly 
would regard Iraqi media domination as a great danger to America. 
Every non-Iraqi source of media would proclaim that such control 
threatens our freedoms. Congress would likely draft legislation to 
break up the Iraqi stranglehold on television. Patriots would remind 
Americans that if we were not free to obtain unbiased news, 



116 Who Runs The Media 

documentaries, and programming, democracy could not work. The 
power of TV controlled by one point of view would erode the 
foundation of all our freedoms: the freedom of speech. Pundits would 
be outraged that non-Americans, people with allegiance to a foreign 
power, had control over the American mind. 

Taking the analogy further, imagine if the rest of the media were 
also in Iraqi hands. Suppose that the three major news magazines, 
Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report were run by Iraqis, 
that the three most influential American newspapers, The New York 
Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post — as well as a 
majority of the remaining major newspapers and magazines — were 
controlled by Iraqis. Imagine that Muslim Iraqis dominated the Hol- 
lywood movie industry as well as book publishing and even book dis- 
tribution. Picture the Iraqis as also holding immense wealth in busi- 
ness and banking, and as thoroughly entrenched in entertainment and 
Hollywood, academia, the judiciary, and the government. On top of 
all this, suppose that supporters of Saddam Hussein had the most 
powerful lobby in Washington and were responsible for the bulk of 
the fundraising of both the Democratic and Republican parties. Sup- 
pose a dedicated Iraqi was head of the National Security Council at 
the White House. Would such a situation be dangerous for America? 

If Americans awoke one morning and found Arabic names 
scrawled all over their TV and movie credits, on their magazine and 
newspaper mastheads and in the pages of their books, millions would 
say, "We've been taken over!" Viewers would suspect the motives of 
everything they see on television and read in newspapers, magazines, 
and books. They would be especially wary of information about is- 
sues related to Iraqis, Saddam Hussein, Islam, and the Middle East 
conflict. In very short order, many Americans would cry out in the 
fashion of Howard Beale: "I'm mad as hell, and I am not going to take 
it anymore!" 

When I came to the realization that the original Russian Revolu- 
tion was not Russian, that it was financed, organized, and led mostly 
by Jews who were driven by a centuries-old conflict between them- 
selves and the Russian people, I wondered how such an important 
fact of history had been so effectively covered up. Upon learning fully 
about the Communist murder of millions of Christians in Russia and 
Eastern Europe, I asked myself why there were so few movies, dra- 
matic television series or documentaries, novels, books, or magazine 
articles about it, but endless coverage of the Holocaust. 



Jewish Suprem acism 117 

Then I read a copy of the Thunderbolt newspaper, published by Dr. 
Edward Fields of Marietta, Georgia. 244 Dr. Fields carefully docu- 
mented Jewish control of America's three major television networks, 
NBC, CBS, and ABC. I carefully checked Dr. Fields' sources, which in- 
cluded biographies published by Jews. 

At the time of my first inquiry, Richard Sarnoff was the head of 
NBC, William Paley was the head of CBS, and Leonard Goldenson 
ran ABC. I was amazed to learn that all three were Jews, all were 
active in Zionist organizations, and all had been honored by awards 
of numerous Jewish, Zionist, and pro-Israeli groups. Then I 
discovered that the leading newspaper in America, The New York 
Times, is Jewish owned and edited. So is the newspaper that has more 
influence on the federal government than any other, The Washington 
Post. Jews also own the largest circulation daily paper in America, The 
Wall Street Journal. They even own my hometown newspaper, the 
New Orleans Times-Picayune. 

I learned that Jews had dominated Hollywood for years. It was in- 
teresting to find out that of the "Hollywood Ten," who took the Fifth 
Amendment when asked before Congress whether they were Com- 
munists, 9 were Jewish. As I looked into magazine and book publish- 
ing, again I discovered a striking preponderance of Jews — most of 
them dedicated to Jewish interests, much like today's Steven Spiel- 
berg, director of Schindler's List, 245 who is an outspoken supporter of 
Zionist causes. In fact, the most-watched movie ever made about the 
Holocaust, viewed as history by millions, was entirely a Jewish 
production. 

Jerry Molen — producer; Gerald R. Molen — producer; Steven 
Spielberg — director, producer; Kurt Luedtke — screenwriter; 
Steve Zaillian — screenwriter; Janusz Kaminski — cinematogra- 
pher; Michael Kahn — editor; Ewa Braun- set decoration/design, 
production designer; Branko Lustig — producer, production de- 
signer; Allan Starski — production designer; Lew Rywin co- 
producer. 

Years later I read Jewish publications that boasted about Jewish 
domination of American media. I also read An Empire of Their Own 246 
by Neal Gabler, a book that details the Jewish takeover of the film 
industry. 

Ben Stein, a Jewish screenwriter (and son of Herbert Stein, an eco- 
nomic advisor to President Richard Nixon), wrote the book The View 
from Sunset Boulevard. In it he candidly remarks that a great majority 
of Hollywood's television writers and executives are Jewish and that 
they are adamantly opposed to Christian values and the conservatism 
of traditional, small-town America. 247 He wrote an article for El-online 



118 Who Runs The Media 

in 1997 entitled: "Do Jews Run the Media" accompanied by a subtitle 
that read, "You bet they do - And What of it." 248 

In the 1970s Dr. William L. Pierce, chairman of the National Alli- 
ance and editor of National Vanguard magazine, along with his staff, 
researched the question and documented the Jewish dominance in his 
essay "Who Rules America?" 249 

What I discovered was that the worst nightmare of Paddy 
Chayefsky and his Network character, Howard Beale, has been 
realized. A small but cohesive minority, with a 3,000-year loyalty to 
their own people and a fanatical dedication to their newly formed 
nation, dominates America's media. But it is not the Arabs who have 
this power; nor is it the Irish, Germans, French, English, Russians, 
Swedes, Danes, or Italians. It's not Muslims, Christians, Mormons, or 
Catholics. Ironically, it is the group made up of the Paddy Chayefskys 
of the world. Chayefsky — an enthusiastic supporter of Jewish causes 
and the state of Israel — cleverly attempts to influence viewers 
against Arabs by fictionally accusing them of attempting the same 
thing that Jews have already accomplished. The rest of the Network 
staff included director Sidney Tumet, producer Howard Gottfried, 
and editor Alan Heim. The same tribe that financed, produced, wrote 
and distributed the film Network, dominates the American media, and 
truly the media of the entire Western world. 

Jewish media power is so extensive that one can scarcely exagger- 
ate it. It is not simply a question of their power being disproportionate 
to their percentage of the population — their power is breathtaking. 

If you live in a major city, the daily newspaper you read will more 
than likely be Jewish owned or edited. So will the national news- 
magazine you buy at the news counter. More than likely, the national 
cable or regular TV network you watch will be Jewish owned, and if 
not, Jews will be preponderant in the executive and decision-making 
departments. The movie you see in the theater or watch on television 
will very likely have been produced, directed, or written by Jews — 
and often all three. The publishers of the hardbacks or paperbacks 
you read, even the record companies that produce the music you buy, 
will probably be Jewish owned, and if not, they will very likely have 
Jews in key executive positions. Bookstores and libraries often select 
their new book purchases based on reviews by Jewish critics and pub- 
lications such as The New York Times Book Review, another part of the 
Jewish-run New York Times. 

It is certainly true that many people in media are not Jews. Nor do 
I allege that every Jew in media is part of some fantastic and intricate 



Jewish Supremacism 119 

conspiracy or that every Jew is ardently Zionist. But the overwhelm- 
ing domination and thrust of American media is Jewish, and no 
group is more ethnocentric and more organized for their perceived in- 
terests than are Jews. With these facts in mind, can any reasonable 
person believe that Jews present news and entertainment without a 
slant for their own purposes through what Gabler calls "An Empire of 
Their Own"? 

I grew up reading the New Orleans Times-Picayune, and from 
third grade on, I would read it every morning with my father. By the 
time breakfast ended, Father had decorated it with toast crumbs and 
coffee stains, and I had garnished it with oatmeal and milk. My father 
would take the news section first, and I would take the sports and the 
comics pages, and then it would be my turn to get into the headlines 
while he read the other parts of the paper. Up until the late 1950s, the 
Times-Picayune was truly a Southern newspaper. It reflected the 
values, standards, political viewpoints, and heritage of the South. We 
considered the paper our lifeblood of information about the simple 
goings-on around town and about the major events in the world at 
large. It was our paper — and not only because it was printed in our 
city; it represented something of our thinking, our culture, and our 
values. 

When integration of schools began, the Times-Picayune railed 
against the federal intrusion into our way of life. Many articles talked 
about the amicable relationship between Blacks and Whites in New 
Orleans, about the excellent quality of life for Whites and Blacks, and 
about how the city included one of the largest Black entrepreneurial 
classes of any in America. It wrote about how, under White direction, 
Black educational and living standards had progressed over the last 
few decades. The editorial writers of the Times-Picayune predicted 
dourly that forced integration and the stirring up of Blacks by Yan- 
kees and liberal agitators would ruin one of the most beautiful and 
culturally rich and charming cities in the world. Integration, they 
maintained, would retard the progress of the Black community and 
threaten White standards. 

After the purchase of the Times-Picayune by S.I. Newhouse, the 
paper gradually began to shift to the left. As the city's schools and 
government services began to disintegrate under integration and the 
Times-Picayune became increasingly liberal, my father — who was 
mildly conservative — came to dislike it. I still enjoyed the paper, and 
as I got older, I found myself agreeing with its racial viewpoints. I 
didn't know that the Picayune was no longer a Southern newspaper, 
and that the owner, a Jewish refugee of Czarist Russia, resided in the 
New York city area. 



120 Who Runs The Media 

When Newhouse died, he left a media colossus worth about $10 
billion to his two sons, Samuel and Donald. Among their newspaper 
holdings were the Times-Picayune; the Syracuse, New York, morning 
Post-Standard and the afternoon Herald-Journal; the Mobile, Alabama, 
Morning Register and Afternoon Press; the Huntsville, Alabama, morn- 
ing Neivs and afternoon Times; the Birmingham, Alabama, morning 
Post Herald and afternoon News; the Springfield, Massachusetts, morn- 
ing Union, afternoon News, and Sunday-only Republican. 

The Newhouse empire today owns 30 daily newspapers, 12 televi- 
sion stations, 87 cable-TV systems, two dozen national magazines, 
and the Parade Sunday supplement that has a staggering circulation of 
more than 22 million. 

When Newhouse bought the Times-Picayune, it was reported by 
Time magazine that he commented, "I just bought New Orleans." 250 
In some ways, his statement is accurate. Newhouse and his employ- 
ees could say anything they liked about any person or any issue with 
little fear of contradiction. Newhouse, secure in his monopoly, was 
free to push whatever social and political agenda he wished. 

Even today, more than 25 years after Newhouse' s purchase of the 
Times-Picayune, many in New Orleans are unaware that a Jewish New 
York family owns the paper. The editorial page gives a local address 
and says the publisher is Ashton Phelps, a descendant of the family 
that once owned the paper. 

When I was a teenager, just learning of the Jewish control of me- 
dia, I noticed that many of the Picayune's advertisers were Jewish- 
owned businesses, including Goldrings, Levitts, Mintz, Godchauxs (a 
French adapted Jewish name), Kirshmans, Rosenberg's, Rubinstein 
Bros., Gus Mayer's, Adler's, and Maison Blanche. One of the biggest 
advertisers in New Orleans was Sears & Robuck, and Edith Stern, a 
New Orleans activist in Jewish and liberal causes, was Sears' largest 
stockholder. I soon learned that many of the largest advertising agen- 
cies, both local and national, were under Jewish ownership and direc- 
tion. These agencies could steer advertising to whatever newspaper or 
media outlet they desired. 

Jewish advertising power not only has increased the Jewish mo- 
nopolization and consolidation of American newspapers, it also 
greatly affects publications with Gentile management or ownership. 
All major publications are dependent on Jewish advertising revenue, 
so their features, reporting, and editorial policies must be carefully at- 
tuned to Jewish attitudes and interests. Ultimately, the free press is 



Jewish Supremacism 121 

not free. It runs on money. The old axiom certainly holds true in the 
media: "He who pays the piper calls the tune." 

At the beginning of this century, most major cities had two or 
three daily newspapers, and many had even more. There has been an 
alarming trend toward monopolization of daily newspapers. There 
are only about 50 cities in America with more than one daily newspa- 
per, and many of those have the same parent company. The 
Newhouse-owned Times-Picayune and the afternoon States-Item aptly 
illustrate the trend; they merged into the Times-Picayune early and late 
editions. 

As a result, of the 1,600 daily newspapers in America, only 25 per- 
cent are independently owned rather than part of a newspaper chain. 
And only a tiny number are large enough to have even a skeleton re- 
porting staff based outside their own communities. They are depend- 
ent on newsgathering conglomerates such as The New York Times, The 
Washington Post, and the Newhouse chain for their national and world 
news. 

The Jewish domination of American media is longstanding. Even 
as far back as the 1920s, Jews had influence far disproportionate to 
their percentage of the population. And even though media opera- 
tions frequently change hands and the CEOs, chairmen, administra- 
tors, and top editors change, Jewish domination is stronger than ever 
— and the power brokers continue to increase and consolidate their 
power. Much of the news that "independent" newspapers print 
comes from the wire services, the giant of which is the Associated 
Press. Michael Silverman is its current managing editor who directs 
the day-to-day news reporting and supervises the editorial depart- 
ments. Silverman reports to Jonathan Wolman, another Jew, who is 
executive editor for the AP. The other leading sources of news articles 
for local papers are the three most influential newspapers in America 

Three Powerful Newspapers 

The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington 
Post are positioned at the heart of American business, culture, and 
government. Their influence reaches out across the nation. They 
originate news, focus on issues of their liking, elevate public figures 
they approve of and denigrate those they do not. They tell us what 
movies to see, what books and magazines to read, what records to 
buy and what art to admire. They influence how we think on a thou- 
sand different subjects — and, in fact, they frequently choose what 
subjects we are to think about by trumpeting some stories and ignor- 
ing others. 



122 Who Runs The Media 

The New York Times is read all over America — in academia, busi- 
ness, politics, the arts and literary world. It sets our political, social, 
entertainment, literary, artistic, and fashion standards. 

The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times 
Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in 
June 1993 for $1.1 billion; twelve magazines, including McCalVs and 
Tamily Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven ra- 
dio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book 
publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits 
news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by 
wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines. 

Like so many other newspapers, it began under Gentile owner- 
ship and ended up under Jewish control. George Jones and Henry 
Raymond founded the great paper in 1851. Near the turn of the cen- 
tury, Jewish activist Adolph Ochs bought the paper, and now his 
great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is CEO and publisher. 
Executive and managing editors are Max Frankel and Joseph Lely- 
veld. 

Because it is so widely read by Washington's elected and ap- 
pointed federal officials and bureaucrats, The Washington Post has a 
huge impact on our government. It can influence appointments, fir- 
ings, legislation, and foreign and domestic affairs of all kinds. It can 
even be instrumental in bringing down a president, as it did Richard 
Nixon. The bosses of The Washington Post can choose to give publicity 
to an issue or choose to ignore it, choose to be outraged about an 
event or bellow in approval. The Post has numerous holdings in 
newspapers, television, and magazines — most notably, Newsweek. 

The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in 
newspapers (the Gazette Newspapers, including 11 military publica- 
tions); in television (WDIV in Detroit, KPRC in Houston, WPLG in 
Miami, WKMG in Orlando, KSAT in San Antonio, WJXT in Jackson- 
ville); and in magazines, most notably the nation's number-two 
weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. The Washington Post Company's 
various television ventures reach a total of about 7 million homes, and 
its cable TV service, Cable One, has 635,000 subscribers. 

In a joint venture with the New York Times, the Post publishes the 
International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed English- 
language daily in the world. 

Like The New York Times, The Washington Post started out in Gen- 
tile hands. It was founded in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins and was later 
run by the McLean family. Due to the McLeans' conservative policies, 



Jewish Supremacism 123 

Jewish advertising shifted to the other Washington papers, driving 
the Post into bankruptcy. A Jewish financier, Eugene Meyer, stepped 
in to buy it for a trifling sum at the bankruptcy auction. As soon as it 
passed into Jewish hands, advertising from Jewish businesses and 
advertising agencies returned, and the newspaper returned to profit- 
ability. 

In an effort at further consolidation of the media in our nation's 
capital, the Jews ran an advertising boycott of Colonel Robert 
McCormick's Times-Herald, which they detested because of its support 
for anti-Communist Sen. Joseph McCarthy. Unable to sell retail- 
advertising space, the newspaper shrunk dramatically and began los- 
ing about a million dollars a year and was finally sold to Meyer in 
1954 at a bargain price. The Washington Post is now run by Meyer's 
daughter, Katherine Meyer Graham, the principal stockholder and 
chairman of the board. Her son Donald is president and CEO. 

The third leading influential newspaper in America, especially in 
the business realm, is The Wall Street Journal, published — along with 
Barron's and 24 other daily newspapers — by Dow Jones & Company. 
The Wall Street Journal has a circulation of more than two million, 
making it America's largest business daily and a tremendous influ- 
ence on business, banking, trade, and economic issues. The CEO of 
Dow Jones and chairman and publisher of The Wall Street Journal is 
Peter R. Kann, a Jew. 

Most of New York's other major newspapers are in no better 
hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 
1993 the New York Daily News was bought from the estate of the late 
Jewish media mogul Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish 
real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the 
personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of 
the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm. The New York Post is owned by 
News Corporation under the Jew Peter Chernin. 

The Three Most-Read Newsmagazines 

Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report are the three ma- 
jor weekly newsmagazines published in the United States. The largest 
and most respected of these is Time, which has a circulation of more 
than four million. The CEO of Time-Warner is Gerald Levin, a Jewish 
benefactor of many Jewish and Israeli causes. 

Newsweek is the second most widely read weekly, with a circulation 
of more than three million. It is under the control of the Washington Post's 
Katherine Meyer Graham, another avid supporter of numerous Jewish 
causes. 

The third-ranking newsmagazine is U.S. News and World Report, 
whose owner, publisher, and editor in chief is Mortimer B. Zuckerman, 



124 Who Runs The Media 

a proud Zionist who also owns the Atlantic Monthly and the New York 
Daily News. 

The Giants of Book Publishing 

Book publishing is perhaps the part of American media least 
controlled by Jews. Yet they still dominate the most important parts of 
that industry. All one needs is a printer and some cash to publish a 
book, and tens of thousands of printers do business in America along 
with hundreds of small book publishers. Yet here too the Jewish 
influence is powerful, for writing a book, no matter how informative 
and provocative, offers no guarantee of it being published, and being 
published offers no guarantee of it being professionally promoted, 
distributed, or even reviewed. The half dozen or so largest publishers 
and distributors handle 95 percent of the biggest-selling books in 
America. And in those areas of book publishing and distribution, 
Jewish appraisal is inevitable and Jewish approval is crucial. 

According to Publisher's Weekly, the three largest American pub- 
lishers are Random House (and its subsidiaries, including the Crown 
Publishing Group), Simon & Schuster, and Time Warner Trade Group 
(including Warner Books; Little, Brown; and Book of the Month 
Club). Jews control two out of three and the third, Random House, 
has many Jews in important positions throughout its division of the 
conglomerate it has joined. 

Gerald Levin is CEO of Time-Warner Communications, which 
owns Time Warner Trade Group. The other major media, Simon and 
Schuster, is a subsidiary of Viacom Inc. Viacom's CEO and chairman 
is Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein). Additionally, it should 
be noted that the largest publisher of children's books, with more 
than 50 percent of the market, is Western Publishing, whose chairman 
and CEO is Richard Snyder, who just replaced another Jew, Richard 
Bernstein. 

The Suppression of One Book 

One of the most brilliant books of this century dealing with the 
weakening of the American majority is The Dispossessed Majority by 
Wilmot Robertson. 251 This book is rich in research and ideas, and it is 
written with a command of the English language rarely seen today. 
But Robertson was unable to find a major publisher because he dared 
to write about the unmentionable subjects of race and Jewish 
ethnocentrism. No national or major publications would review his 
work, and no national distributors would handle it. Many national 
publications would not permit Robertson to buy advertisements for 



Jewish Supremacism 125 

tions would not permit Robertson to buy advertisements for his book 
because it contained information unacceptable to the self-ordained 
Jewish censors. Despite its ban from the mainstream bookstores and 
not being reviewed by the major media critics, Robertson has sold 
well over 150,000 copies through the mail and by word of mouth. 

Television 

When I read the article by Edward Fields documenting the Jewish 
control of the three major TV networks, I was fascinated. ABC, CBS, 
and NBC produce the overwhelming majority of entertainment 
television broadcasts in America, and for most Americans they are the 
primary sources of news. Leonard Goldenson of ABC, William S. 
Paley of CBS, and David Sarnoff of NBC ran their respective networks 
for decades, setting the tone and breadth of the modern Jewish 
domination of broadcasting. Here is a portion of Dr. William L. 
Pierce's "Who Runs the Media" article on the current state of 
American broadcasting. 

Who Runs the Media? 

Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry 
has resulted, not in the touted increased competition, but rather in an accelerat- 
ing wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a handful of 
multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates. The largest of these conglomerates 
are rapidly growing even bigger by consuming their competition, almost tripling 
in size during the 1990s. Whenever you watch television, whether from a local 
broadcasting station or via a cable or a satellite dish; whenever you see a feature 
film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or to recorded mu- 
sic; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine — it is very likely that 
the information or entertainment you receive was produced and/or distributed 
by one of these megamedia companies. 

The largest media conglomerate today is AOL-Time Warner, created when 
AOL bought Time Warner for $160 billion in 2000. The merger brought to- 
gether Steve Case, a Gentile, as chairman of AOL-TW, and Time Warner chair- 
man Gerald Levin, a Jew, as the CEO. Although AOL-TW isn't (yet) run entirely 
by Jews, the effect of this blend of leadership between a White capitalist whose 
biggest concern is money and a racially conscious Jew will be gradually to in- 
crease the Jewish influence within AOL. Steve Case won't complain when Gerald 
Levin begins hiring mostly Jews to fill key positions beneath him because Case's 
own profits won't be affected. After Case dies or retires, the Jews will have com- 
plete control at AOL. 

Before the merger, AOL was the largest Internet service provider in America, 
and it will now be used as an online platform for the Jewish content from Time 
Warner. 

Time Warner, Inc., with 1997 revenues of more than $13 billion, was the 
second largest of the international media leviathans when it was bought by AOL. 
Levin, chairman and CEO of Time Warner, had bought Turner Broadcasting 
Systems in 1996 from Ted Turner, who had been one of the few Gentile entre- 
preneurs in the media business. Ted Turner, as the company president, became 
the number three man at AOL-TW, after Case and Levin. 



126 Who Runs The Media 

When Ted Turner, the Gentile media maverick, made a bid to buy CBS in 
1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner had 
made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news 
network, CNN, with over 70 million subscribers. Although Turner employed a 
number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public 
positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong 
personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley and the other Jews at 
CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future 
turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had 
worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike 
for Jews. 

To block Turner's bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, ho- 
tel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a "friendly" 
takeover of the company, and from 1986 until 1995 Tisch was the chairman 
and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subse- 
quent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network were obstructed by Levin's 
Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power 
over major deals. When his fellow Jew Sumner Redstone offered to buy CBS for 
$34.8 billion in 1999, Levin had no objection. 

Thus, despite being an innovator and garnering headlines, Turner never 
commanded the "connections" necessary for being a true media master. He fi- 
nally decided if you can't lick 'em, join 'em, and he sold out to Levin. Ted Turner 
is in one respect a reflection of Steve Case. Both of these White men are capital- 
ists with no discernible degree of racial consciousness or responsibility. In July 
2001, AOL Time Warner announced that yet another Jew, Walter Isaacson, 
formerly the editorial director of Time, Inc., will become the new chairman and 
CEO of CNN News Group, which oversees the news empire that Ted Turner 
built. 

Time Warner's subsidiary HBO is the country's largest pay-TV cable net- 
work. Until the purchase in May 1998 of PolyGram by Edgar Bronfman, Jr., 
Warner Music was America's largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest 
of which is Warner Brothers Records. Warner Music was an early promoter of 
"gangsta rap." Through its involvement with Interscope Records (prior to Inter- 
scope's acquisition by MCA), it helped to popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics 
explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites. 

In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the pro- 
duction of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio, Castle Rock Entertainment, 
and New Line Cinema) and in publishing. Time Warner's publishing division 
(editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in 
the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune). 

The second-largest media conglomerate today, with 1997 revenues of $23 
billion, is the Walt Disney Company. Its chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a 
Jew. The Disney empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as "a 
control freak," includes several television production companies (Walt Disney 
Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television) and cable networks 
with more than 100 million subscribers altogether. 

As for feature films, the Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group, under Walt 
Disney Studios, headed by Joseph E. Roth (also a Jew), includes Walt Disney 
Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Roth 
founded Caravan Pictures in January 1993, and it is now headed by his fellow 
Jew Roger Birnbaum. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein 



Jewish Supremacism 127 

brothers, Bob and Harvey, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies as 
The Crying Game, Priest, and Kids. 

When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family, prior to its 
takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. 
While it still holds the rights to Snow White, the company under Eisner has ex- 
panded into the production of a great deal of so-called "adult" material. 

In August 1995, Eisner acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., which owns the 
ABC Television Network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big 
markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and 
Houston. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is 
part owner of several European TV companies. 

ABC's cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven 
Born stein, who is a Jew. The corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime 
Television and A & E Television Networks cable companies, with 67 million sub- 
scribers each. ABC Radio Network owns 26 AM and FM stations, again in major 
cities such as New York, Washington, and Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 af- 
filiates. 

Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC 
earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1997. It owns seven daily newspapers, 
Fairchild Publications (Women's Wear Daily), Chilton Publications (automotive 
manuals), and the Diversified Publishing Group. 

Number three on the list, with 1997 revenues of just over $13 billion, is Via- 
com, Inc., headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein). Viacom, which 
produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 13 
television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through 
Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Redstone acquired CBS 
following the December 1999 stockholders' votes at CBS and Viacom. 

Working for Redstone as CBS's chief executive is a Jew named Melvin A. 
Karmazin. He is the boss and biggest individual shareholder of the company 
that owns the CBS Television Network, 14 major-market TV stations, 160 radio 
stations, the Country Music Television and the Nashville Network cable chan- 
nels, and a large number of outdoor advertising assets. 

Viacom's publishing division includes Simon & Schuster, Scribner, The Free 
Press, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster 
stores. It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks, and video 
games. 

Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is as the world's largest provider of 
cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other net- 
works. Since 1989 MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares 
of the juvenile television audience. The first quarter of 2001 was the 16th con- 
secutive quarter in which MTV was rated as the # 1 cable network for viewers be- 
tween the ages of 12 and 24. Redstone, who actually owns 76 per cent of the 
shares of Viacom, has offered Beavis and Butthead as teen role models and cur- 
rently is the largest single purveyor of race-mixing propaganda to White teenag- 
ers and sub-teens in America and in Europe. MTV Networks plans to acquire 
The Music Factory (TMF) from the Dutch media and marketing group Wegener. 
TMF distributes music to almost 10 million homes in Holland and Belgium. 
MTV is expanding its presence in Europe through new channels, including MTV 
Dance (Britain) and MTV Live (Scandinavia). MTV Italy is active through Cecchi 
Gori Communications. MTV pumps its racially mixed rock and rap videos into 
210 million homes in 71 countries and is the dominant cultural influence on 
White teenagers around the world. 

Nickelodeon, with about 65 million subscribers, has by far the largest share 
of the four-to-1 1 -year-old TV audience in America and also is expanding rapidly 



128 Who Runs The Media 

into Europe. Most of its shows do not yet display the blatant degeneracy that is 
MTVs trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to his 
kiddie viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV. As of early 2001, 
Nickelodeon was continuing a nine-year streak as the top cable network for chil- 
dren and younger teenagers. 

Another Jewish media mogul is Edgar Bronfman, Jr. He headed Seagram 
Company, Ltd., the liquor giant, until its recent merger with Vivendi. His father, 
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., is president of the World Jewish Congress. Seagram 
owned Universal Studios and Interscope Records, the foremost promoter of 
"gangsta rap." These companies now belong to Vivendi Universal. 

Bronfman became the biggest man in the record business in May 1998 
when he also acquired control of PolyGram, the European record giant, by pay- 
ing $10.6 billion to the Dutch electronics manufacturer Philips. With the revenue 
from PolyGram added to that from MCA and Universal, Bronfman became mas- 
ter of the fourth largest media empire, with annual revenues around $12 billion. 
One especially unfortunate aspect of the PolyGram acquisition was that it gave 
Bronfman control of the world's largest producer of classical music CDs: Poly- 
Gram owns the Deutsche Grammophon, Decca-London, and Philips record 
companies. 

In June 2000, the Bronfman family sold Seagram to Vivendi, a French utili- 
ties company led by gentile Jean-Marie Messier. The combined company, 
Vivendi Universal, will retain Edgar Bronfman, Jr., as the vice chairman of the 
new company, and he will continue to be in charge of its entertainment division. 
The strategy for this merger seems to mirror that of AOL-Time Warner: infect 
and wait. Vivendi Universal will pay off the debts it assumed in the merger by 
selling Seagram's alcohol business, retaining its media empire. 

With two of the top four media conglomerates in the hands of Jews, and 
with Jews in executive charge of the remaining two, it is difficult to believe that 
such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, con- 
certed effort on their part. 

What about the other big media companies? 

Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, which owns Fox Television Network, 
20th Century Fox Films, and Fox 2000, is the fifth largest megamedia corpora- 
tion in the country, with 1997 revenues of over $11 billion. It is the only other 
media company that comes even close to the top four. Murdoch is a Gentile 
Australian, but Peter Chernin, who is president and CEO of Fox Group, which 
includes all of News Corporation's film, television, and publishing operations in 
the United States, is a Jew. Under Chernin, as president of 20th Century Fox, is 
Laura Ziskin, a Jewess who formerly headed Fox 2000. Jew Peter Roth works 
under Chernin as president of Fox Entertainment. News Corporation also owns 
the New York Post and TV Guide, and they are published under Chernin's su- 
pervision. Murdoch told Newsweek magazine (July 12, 1999) that he would 
probably elevate Chernin to CEO of News Corporation, rather than allow the 
company to fall into the hands of his own children, none of whom are younger 
than their late twenties. It is hard to imagine a Jew giving a major media corpo- 
ration to a Gentile underling when he has children waiting in the wings. For his 
part, Chernin was quite candid: "/ get to control movies seen all over the world. 
. . . What could be more fun?" 

Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned 
by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World 
Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as "the premier independent 



Jewish Supremacism 129 

TV program producer in the United States," is owned by Ronald Perelman, a 
Jew who also owns Revlon cosmetics and who offered a job to Monica Lewinsky 
when Bill Clinton was trying to keep her quiet. 

The best known of the smaller media companies, DreamWorks SKG, is a 
strictly kosher affair. DreamWorks was formed in 1994 amid great media hype 
by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jef- 
frey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. 
The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and re- 
corded music. Considering the cash and connections that Geffen, Katzenberg, 
and Spielberg have, DreamWorks may soon be in the same league as the big 
four. 

It is well known that Jews have controlled most of the production and distri- 
bution of films since shortly after the inception of the movie industry in the early 
decades of the 20th century. When Walt Disney died in 1966, the last barrier to 
the total Jewish domination of Hollywood was gone, and Jews were able to grab 
ownership of the company that Walt built. Since then they have had everything 
their way in the movie industry. 

Films produced by just the four largest motion picture companies men- 
tioned above — Disney, Warner Brothers, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal 
(Seagram) — accounted for two-thirds of the total box-office receipts for the year 
1997. 

The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and 
NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer in- 
dependent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled 
by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson; NBC first by David 
Sarnoff and then by his son Robert; and CBS first by William Paley and then by 
Laurence Tisch. Over periods of several decades these networks were staffed 
from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network televi- 
sion did not change when the networks were absorbed by other corporations. 
The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong. 

NBC provides a good example of this. The executives at NBC recently were 
shuffled among the key positions. Andrew Lack, who had been chief of the net- 
works news division, ascended to become its president and chief operations of- 
ficer. Neal Shapiro, who had been producing Dateline NBC, moved into Lacks 
old job. Jeff Zucker, who had been producing the Today show, was promoted to 
NBC entertainment president (a job that apparently was created for him), and 
Jonathan Wald moved into Zucker's old spot after shoving aside Michael Bass, 
who had been filling in for Zucker with Today. Some time ago, Wald became 
the producer of the NBC Nightly News, taking the position from Jeff Gralnick. 
When Wald moved to Today, Steve Capus took over as Tom Brokaw's pro- 
ducer. It is not known at this time whether Capus is a Jew or not, but everyone 
else is. 

A similar preponderance of Jews exists in the news divisions of the other 
networks. For example, in February 2000, Al Ortiz moved to head the "Special 
Events" coverage at CBS, making gentile Jim Murphy the executive producer of 
The CBS Evening News with Dan Rather — and the only exception that we 
know of to an otherwise solidly Jewish cadre of television news producers. The 
new CBS Early Show, which replaced CBS This Morning, had an internal 
shakeup in which three producers were fired, ostensibly for not being "aggres- 
sive" enough. One wonders whether they were also not Jewish enough. The 
shakeup did not, however, affect the outgoing executive producer Al Berman, 
who transferred to a new job as a program developer, and Steve Friedman has 
become the executive producer of the Early Show. 



130 Who Runs The Media 

Paul Friedman is still the executive producer of ABC World News Tonight 
with Peter Jennings. Rick Kaplan, once an executive at ABC, moved to CNN in 
1997, where he became the president of CNN/USA. 

The overwhelming Jewish control that Dr. Pierce writes about in 
television and movies is not a new phenomenon. It is not a short-term 
aberration in the entertainment and news industry. It has been preva- 
lent for decades. Over time the names may change, but the heritage 
usually remains the same. If anything, the Jewish power in media 
continues to consolidate and grow. Jewish publications themselves of- 
ten boast about their power to their own readers. 

Jewish Media Control - A World Wide Pattern 

Jewish supremacy over the mass media is not limited to the 
United States of America. In Russia, Jewish crime bosses Boris Bere- 
zovsky and Vladimir Gusinsky have the two largest media empires. 
Gusinsky, who is now in Spain trying to avoid Russian criminal 
prosecution, also happens to be the head of the Jewish Congress in 
Russia. Berezovsky retains control over his media empire in the Rus- 
sian Federation even though he is also under a self-imposed exile to 
avoid criminal arrest. 

In Britain, the largest TV conglomerates are also under direct Jew- 
ish ownership and control. They include the ITV network, which is 
owned by Michael Green and his Carlton Communications company; 
Granada PLC, which is under Steve Morrison, and Anglia Television 
under Graham Creelman. The other major player in British media is 
of course, Rupert Murdoch, who, if he is indeed a Gentile, has been 
described as more pro-Israel than many of the most radical Zionist 
partisans. Even the BBC, which supposedly is owned by the British 
people, has many Jewish supremacists in important positions. Alan 
Yentob, for instance, is head of BBC programming. Even BBC Radio, 
which is the most listened to radio programming in the world, is 
headed by Jenny Abramsky, an unabashed Jewish partisan. 

Jewish Media Supremacy In Canada 

The Canadian mass media affords yet another example of Jewish 
media supremacy. With the sale of last major Gentile conglomerate, 
Conrad Black's Southam Publications, one Jew, Israel (Izzy) Asper, 
now has a majority of Canada's major media under his direct control. 
Asper' s company, called CanWest, now owns more than 60 percent of 
all Canada's newspapers and other media outlets. It owns 128 local 
newspapers, and 14 major metropolitan dailies including the Vancou- 



Jewish Supremacism 131 

ver Sun, the Vancouver Province, the Calgary Herald and the Montreal 
Gazette. Asper also owns the National Post, a nationwide publication. 

The courage of one investigative reporter, Bill Marsden, at the 
Montreal Gazette exposed Asper's suppression of stories that were 
critical of Israel. Marsden, at great risk to his career, went public with 
Asper's directive that gave him direct control of new national editori- 
als that would appear in all of the newspapers. The directive stated 
and that no local editors would be allowed to have a differing edito- 
rial position on issues such as Asper's support for Israel. Furthermore, 
Asper made it clear that he wanted to see nothing in his newspapers 
in any way critical of Israel. On the Canadian Broadcasting Corpora- 
tion As It Happens program, Marsden said, "On issues such as on the 
Middle East, they don't want to see criticism of Israel," and that, "We 
do not run in our newspaper op-ed pieces that express criticism of Is- 
rael and what it is doing in the Middle East." 

Later in the broadcast, the hosts asked Asper's national editorial 
writer, Murdoch Davis, if any of CanWest's newspapers could print 
anything about Israel that Asper did not like, he replied, "No. It is 
clearly the intent that the newspapers will speak with one voice on 
certain issues of overarching national or international importance." 

Of course, and that "one voice" has a distinctively Jewish tone. 
The one thing of overarching national and international importance is 
not to write anything even remotely critical of Israel! Such a policy, of 
course, is not in the interest of truth or the most basic principles of 
journalism. Such is not in the interest of the Canadian people who 
should have a right to know the whole truth and not simply the Jew- 
ish supremacist propaganda emitted by CanWest. Such is not in the 
interest of a truly free press. But, such media control and deception is 
in the interest of Jewish supremacism, for only through lies and de- 
ception can its evil survive. 

Even though Asper's directive became public, he has no intention 
of rescinding it. In fact, his son David has even sarcastically urged the 
protesting reporters (who are protected somewhat by union agree- 
ments) to resign. One can imagine the many directives issued by other 
Jewish firms that never have been publicly revealed. Of course, such 
directives not to write anything critical of Israel is overkill, for how 
dumb must a journalist be not to quickly understand what his Jewish 
bosses want in regard to Jewish issues. How many journalists would 
knowingly sacrifice their jobs, careers and future advancement by 
daring to defy their Jewish Supremacist bosses on even the smallest 
point? And what if the journalist dared to stand up and really expose 
the world's oldest, most ruthless and virulent racial supremacism? 
Not only would he lose his career, he would probably face universal 



132 Who Runs The Media 

scorn and derision, Jewish supremacists might even compare him to 
David Duke, God forbid! 

Other Methods of Press Control 

Not only do the Jews have immense power in media through 
ownership and through key positions of control in production, man- 
agement, hiring, editorship, and writing, they also have key watchdog 
groups that monitor all major publications (and public figures) for 
any evidence of opposition to Jewish Supremacism and Israel. One of 
these multimillion dollar, international organizations is called the 
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith. Any person who dares to 
speak freely is liable to run afoul of this organization that can destroy 
the career of almost anyone it deems a threat. The ADL also monitors 
every conceivable source of information available to the public, at- 
tempting to suppress anything it sees as harmful to Jewish public re- 
lations. One of the more recent enterprises was the development of an 
internet filter for individuals, libraries and educational institutions. Of 
course my website and all other sites that dare to expose Jewish su- 



Through its 31 offices across the country, 
the ADL monitors school curricula, library 
acquisition lists, and public conferences 
and symposiums, working behind the 
scenes to stifle intellectual freedom." 

Robert Friedman, The Jewish Thought Police: How the Anti- 
Defamation League Censors Books, Intimidates Librarians, 
and Spies on Citizens, The Village Voice, July 27, 1993. 



premacism are blocked by the self-appointed censors. 

The ADL has a long history of receiving millions of dollars from 
Jewish gangsters and criminals. In return it has rewarded them with 
awards, such as giving a gangster like Moe Dalitz the "Torch of 
Liberty Award in 1985. 252 It is gallingly ironic that through its internet 
censorship, a group with organized crime connections can keep 
millions of Americans from ever discovering that very fact. Although 
the Jews have breathtaking domination of the media and an effective 



Jewish Supremacism 133 

system of monitoring and suppressing dissident thought, still their 
control is not monolithic. 

Groups like the ADL, however, will not be satisfied until Jewish 
control of the media becomes completely monolithic. They seek not 
only complete control of the mass media, but also to make illegal for 
anyone to even dare to offer a contrary opinion to their agenda. They 
have succeeded in Canada and in many European nations toward that 
sinister end, and they are working hard to accomplish the same thing 
in America. 

"An Empire of Their Own" 

Even though it is hard to imagine now, Gentiles originated Amer- 
ica's film industry. Thomas Edison patented many of the early cam- 
eras and projection techniques and launched the first major studio. 
The man who pioneered the modern movie was D. W. Griffith, a bril- 
liant director whose techniques and films are still studied by film 
classes around the world. His silent classic Birth of a Nation 253 held the 
title of most-watched movie in the world until Gone with the Wind. 25 * 

Birth of a Nation is a film version of The Clansman, a novel by 
Southern writer Thomas Dixon. 255 The film depicted the fratricidal 
conflict of the War Between the States and the oppression of the 
Southern people during the "Reconstruction" era. (see Willis Carta's 
Barnes Review, July, 1997) 256 

When Birth of a Nation appeared, Jewish organizations actually 
went into the courts attempting to ban the film in a number of major 
cities, and they applied financial pressure on theaters to keep it from 
playing. A special showing of the film in the White House garnered 
an enthusiastic review by President Woodrow Wilson and initiated an 
irrepressible groundswell of support. The Jewish forces in the fledg- 
ling film industry realized that it was far more effective to control the 
film industry from the inside than to have to fight rearguard actions 
to suppress films that they did not want the American people to see. 

The attempted Jewish banning of Birth of a Nation was not the first 
or the last attempt at Jewish censorship in America. Many people are 
surprised when they learn that Jewish groups actually were able to 
ban a play by the greatest writer of English literature: William Shake- 
speare. Performing Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice 257 became 
forbidden in New York City in the early years of the 20th century at 
the behest of the Jewish community, which claimed that it was anti- 
Semitic. 

In the 1990s, the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) did a running 
series of all Shakespeare's plays that included The Merchant of Venice. 
A long editorial introduction attempted to condition the audience into 



134 Who Runs The Media 

interpreting the play as sympathetic to Shylock, the central Jewish 
character who demanded the Gentile's "pound of flesh." The lines in 
which Shylock defends himself in court, pleading "If you prick a Jew 
doth he not bleed/' were emphasized to encourage the viewer to in- 
terpret the play as favorable to Jews. Interestingly, the Jews made no 
such interpretation of the play when they intolerantly argued for 
making performance of the play illegal. Recently, the Canadian Jewish 
News reported an attempt by Jews to suppress the play in a Canadian 
school district. 258 

As they have gone from outsiders to now thoroughly dominating 
the Western governmental and media establishment, many Jews have 
shifted from strong defenders of free speech to some of its most will- 
ful suppressers. 

The Jewish students who dominated the "free-speech" movement 
at Berkeley in the mid-1960s sang the praises of free speech for the 
purpose of inviting to campus the likes of the filthy-mouthed and re- 
pugnant Allen Ginsberg and the violent, openly Communist, black 
revolutionary Angela Davis. Today they attempt to silence anyone 
who dares to speak before a student audience on the issues raised in 
this book. 

In some cases they have reverted to tactics similar to their cam- 
paign against The Merchant of Venice. In 1976 a national Black talk 
show broadcast on PBS, Black Perspectives on the News, invited me to 
Philadelphia for an appearance. After the taping, but before the show 
aired, the Anti-Defamation League and other Jewish organizations 
discovered that I mentioned the historically well-documented Jewish 
role in the Colonial slave trade. Jewish activists Sol Rosen, Harry Bass, 
and Peter Minchuck sought an injunction in the Common Pleas Court 
in Philadelphia, asking the judge to censor the program. The Jewish 
judge, Stanley Greenberg, issued an order demanding that the pro- 
gram not be aired until the tape was delivered to him and "ap- 
proved." Luckily, the First Amendment Coalition and attorney David 
Marion appealed the decision to the State Supreme Court and won. 
However, the Jewish methods of censorship were by no means ex- 
hausted. 

Jewish organizations then went nationwide in an attempt to 
suppress the show at each PBS affiliate where the program was to be 
broadcast. In a massive campaign of intimidation, Jews wrote and 
called local PBS stations, threatening a cutoff of donations and public 
support if they aired the show. If that did not work, my opponents 
promised picketing, harassment, and even violence against the 



Jewish Supremacism 135 

stations. By the time they finished their dirty work, the original 
program aired on only a small percentage of the local PBS stations. 
Furthermore, the stations that did have the temerity to air the original 
one-hour show — immediately followed it with a special program 
attacking my positions and my character without allowing me to 
respond. 

An example of quiet suppression, from among many I could cite, 
was my experience with the Tomorrow Show with Tom Snyder in 1974. 
The Tomorrow Show was a late-night talk show that went into serious 
topics rather than vapid celebrity banter. I did not fit the media image 
of the "anti-Semite" that host Tom Snyder had expected, and during 
the program he surprised me when, on camera, he referred to me as 
"intelligent, articulate, and charming." Snyder laughed heartily at my 
witticisms and repeatedly stated on air that I would soon be back on 
the show. His last words on the program were "David Duke will be 
back here." 

Three days later Snyder's staff called to set up the follow-up 
show. They said that I would appear along with a Black civil rights 
leader, a Jewish rabbi, a liberal Catholic, and a Protestant clergyman. 
Flight and hotel reservations were made, and I received a confirma- 
tion letter from the show. Only three days before the planned taping 
of the program, a staff member called and told me that she was sorry, 
but the program had been forced to cancel my appearance. I asked her 
why, and she confided in me that the Jewish executives at NBC had 
sternly informed the program that "David Duke will never again ap- 
pear on the Tomorrow Show." 

The program went on as scheduled, but my detractors were the 
only guests. They denigrated me for the entire hour with cheap in- 
sults. The rabbi, evidently well-versed in Freudian psychology, at- 
tributed my negative view of Jewish Supremacism to "sexual frustra- 
tion." And so it went. The media masters had presented three high 
priests of egalitarianism railing at me, and silenced any dissent. 

Israel and Arabia 

Perhaps the best way to illustrate the bias of the media is to exam- 
ine the media coverage of Israel as compared to its Arab neighbors. 
There is no more revealing evidence of how Jews wield their media 
power in pursuit of their interests. 

Consider the following: 

Iraq was condemned and attacked for invading its neighbor Ku- 
wait, a part of Iraq until just a few short years ago, YET — 

Israel invaded its neighbor Lebanon which eventually cost the 
lives of at least 20 thousand Lebanese civilians and countless bil- 
lions of dollars of property. 



136 Who Runs The Media 

The reason for the attack against Iraq, was the fact it had dis- 
obeyed UN resolutions to vacate Kuwait, YET — 

Israel has defied UN resolutions since the original invasion in the 
1980s and still remains in the Golan heights. 

Another reason the world attacked Iraq was ostensibly that Iraq 
had violated UN regulations on unconventional weapons, YET — 

Israel, of course, has violated those weapons regulations from the 
very beginning, having developed everything from nerve gas, bio- 
logical weapons to nuclear weapons. 

When Palestinian terrorists blow up Israeli buses or markets in 
suicide attacks, it is world-wide front page news, YET — 

When Israel drops Napalm on refugee camps and kills scores of 
women and children, it receives far less coverage and is almost al- 
ways called "retaliation." 

Consider the media reaction, if one of the Arab states had shot 
down a commercial airliner with passengers aboard, YET — 

Israel shot down a passenger airliner over the Sinai Peninsula 
with hardly a ripple of protest. 

To catalogue the host of pro-Jewish films produced by the Holly- 
wood establishment would be a monumental task, but I can offer 
some pertinent examples. 

Not surprisingly, the most lavishly promoted miniseries of all 
time was also the most important film of all to the Jews: The Holocaust. 
The film was a thoroughly Jewish production. It was directed by 
Roots' director Marvin Chomsky. Gerald Green wrote the screenplay. 
Morton Gould composed the music. The producers were Robert 
Berger and Herbert Brodkin. TV Guide remarked that during filming 
in Europe, the writer's father died. Rather than return home for his 
funeral, Green felt he was honoring his rabidly pro-Zionist father by 
staying in Europe to work on The Holocaust. For a dozen hours, the 
film, a work of extreme ethnic hatred, portrayed Germans and other 
Eastern Europeans as either bloodthirsty or spineless, and of course, it 
portrayed every Jew as a paragon of virtue, love, and kindness. Never 
had a television production received more advance coverage or more 
praise than The Holocaust. Jewish-run publications and pundits acted 
as though it was the most important piece of drama in the history of 
cinema. 

Of course, many of the Jewish-made films deal on other issues 
that direct Jewish concerns. They have done their part in stirring up 
ill-will in minorities against the European majority. Divide and 



Jewish Supremacism 137 

conquer has always been their strategy. While I was still in college, I 
attended a so-called Black-exploitation film called Farewell Uncle 
Tom. 259 I read about the film before its showing in New Orleans, 
where it played in a mostly Black movie house downtown. Expecting 
a difficult situation, I drove down from Baton Rouge with two of my 
bravest and most dedicated LSU friends. In 90 minutes, at a matinee 
filled with Blacks, my friends and I received an emotional and graphic 
education on the heinous impact of the Hollywood anti-White 
movies. 

Set in the antebellum South, the film portrayed slave life as an 
orgy of White mutilation, starvation, murder, and rape of Black men 
and women. A Black revolt occurs, and the screen erupts with re- 
venge-minded Blacks hacking to death White men, women, and chil- 
dren. With each bloody outrage, the audience howled with approval. 
"Right on!" some screamed. "Rape the Bitch!. . . Kill 'em!" The Black 
crowd laughed and cheered during the goriest scenes of mutilation, 
rape, and murder. 

To make sure the film's point was clear to its patrons, the film's 
ending flashed to the present day, showing afro-wearing Black men in 
leather jackets and sunglasses, sneaking into the bedroom of a White 
couple. The camera depicts the couple's horror as the attackers hack 
them to death with a hatchet. In slow motion, the hatchet falls 
repeatedly, splattering blood and brains across the room. Even after 
20 years, I vividly recall the film and the raw hatred it engendered in 
the Black audience. 

At the sight of the murders, the audience worked itself into a 
frenzy. As soon as the credits appeared, my friends and I, sitting in 
the rear of the theater, grabbed our coats and left quickly. We were 
somber as we drove back to LSU because we knew that Farewell Uncle 
Tom was designed to incite Blacks to murder and rape Whites across 
America. 

In researching the film, I discovered that Cannon Releasing Cor- 
poration had released it and that Cannon's president was Dennis 
Friedland. His associates included Marvin Friedlander, Thomas Israel, 
James Rubin, and Arthur Lipper. I found out later from a film review 
that most of the Jews involved with the White-hating film actually 
had their names removed from the film credits. 

The time I spent in that dark theater touched my emotions so 
powerfully that I swore to myself and to God that I would make 
whatever sacrifices I must to someday stop the brutal attacks against 
our flesh and blood as symbolized in that hateful film. I also resolved 
to stand up against filmmakers who create a climate of anti- White ha- 
tred. During my hundreds of interviews over the years, whenever I 
mentioned Jewish media domination, my interrogators first would 



138 Who Runs The Media 



deny the Jewish preponderance of power. Then, when that defense 
sank beneath a sea of facts, they acted shocked that anyone could 
even suggest that Jews might use their media power for their own 
advantage. 

The domination of America's news and entertainment media is so 
obvious that some Jewish media have begun to acknowledge it, but 
they suggest the Jewish domination makes no real impact on content. 
The cover of the August 1996 issue of Moment magazine was embla- 
zoned with the headline, "Jews Run Hollywood, So What?" The arti- 
cle, written by well-known Jewish film critic Michael Medved, in- 
cludes the following comments: "It 
makes no sense at all to try to deny 
the reality of Jewish power and 
prominence in popular culture. Any 
list of the most influential production 
executives at each of the major movie 
studios will produce a heavy major- 
ity of recognizably Jewish names." 
Medved reports how Walt Disney 
studios hire only "highly paid Jewish 
moguls" such as Jeffery Katzenberg, 
Michael Ovitz, and Joe Roth as pro- 
ducers. He goes on to state that: 

The famous Disney organization, 
which was founded by Walt Disney, a 
Gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semitic atti- 
tudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most power- 
ful positions. 260 

Interestingly, in spite of the attempts to besmirch the name of 
Walt Disney as an anti-Semite, his films were the most morally and 
spiritually uplifting - as well as educational - in the industry. All this 
while Michael Eisner's new Disney and its subsidiaries continue to 
make anti-Christian and sexually degenerate films such as The Priest 261 
and The Crying Game. 262 

Not only do the Jewish producers create a plethora of pro-Israel 
and pro-Jewish propaganda along with their anti-Christian, anti Gen- 
tile hate films and documentaries, they are careful to monitor films 
made by both Jews and Gentiles. For example, Jewish censors of the 
fact-based film, Seven Years in Tibet, felt that the main character, an ex- 
Nazi explorer from Austria, was not repentant enough about his past. 



Jews Run 
Hollywood 



, <* v* 



What? 



Jewish Supremacism 139 

They had the filmmaker invent a repentance scene and insert it into 
the "true story." 263 

Michael Medved writes in his article that "Jewish writers and di- 
rectors employ unquestionably flattering depictions of Jews for audi- 
ences that react with sympathy and affection." It goes without saying 
that Jewish directors and writers depict those who oppose Jewish Su- 
premacism as thoroughly evil. 

A 1998 made-for-television film documentary aired on the Arts & 
Entertainment cable network boasted of the preeminent Jewish role in 
media and the shaping of our society to their purposes. It was made 
by Elliot Halpern & Simcha Jacobvici Productions, and written and 
directed by Simcha Jacobvici. The documentary tells how Jews over- 
came the Gentile filmmakers such as Thomas Edison and D.W. Grif- 
fith, and gradually replaced their traditional American themes. Mov- 
ies such as Griffith's Birth of a Nation which honored our traditional 
heritage, became replaced with paeans to the immigrant and multira- 
cialism. They interview Jewish author Neil Gabler, who frankly tells 
how they replaced the "real" America. 

They created their own America, an America which is not the real 
America... But ultimately this shadow America becomes so popular 
and so widely disseminated that its images and its values come to 
devour the real America. And so the grand irony of all of Hollywood 
— is that Americans come to define themselves by the shadow of 
America that was created by the Eastern European Jewish immi- 
grants who weren't permitted in the precincts of the real America. 

The narrator goes on to say that the Hollywood Jews became al- 
most godlike in their power and set up a system to raise their prestige 
in the eyes of Americans. 

Where there were new Gods there must be new idols. So, the stu- 
dio heads began a movie guild with the lofty title of The Academy 
of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. It was Mayer's brilliant idea to 
create the Oscars where the movie moguls' guild honor themselves 
by giving each other awards. In this way, they went from being a 
group of immigrant Jews to award-winning American producers. 

The Lesson of Marlon Brando 

Jewish power is such that they can make craven even the greatest 
of Hollywood icons. Marlon Brando is a prime example. In the early 
days of his acting career he was completely under the control of Jew- 
ish agents and acquaintances. Brando wrote in his autobiography that 
he was given an important role in a disgustingly pro-Zionist play 
called A Flag Is Born, written by avid Zionist Ben Hecht and directed 
by Luther Adler. As Brando notes, 



140 Who Runs The Media 

It was essentially a piece of political propaganda advocating the 
creation of the state of Israel ... Everyone in A Flag Is Born was 
Jewish except me ... I did not know then that Jewish terrorists 
were indiscriminately killing Arabs and making refugees out of 
them in order to take their land ... The play, as well as my friend- 
ship with the Adlers, helped make me a zealous advocate for Israel 
and later a kind of traveling salesman for it... 

Brando then began giving propaganda speeches for a Zionist or- 
ganization, and even contributed money himself to the Zionist Irgun 
organization, a terrorist group. 264 

Marlon Brando later learned the truth about Zionism and dra- 
matically changed his opinion. "Now," he said in 1994, "I understand 
much more about the complexity of the situation than I did then ... 265 
...I sided with Jewish terrorists without acknowledging that they were 
killing innocent Palestinians in their effort to create the state of Israel 
... 266 ... One of the strangest government policies is that largely because 
of the political influence of Jewish interests, our country has invested 
billions of dollars and many American lives to help Israel reclaim land 
that they say their ancestors occupied three thousand years ago." 267 

During an appearance on the Larry King television show, actor 
Marlon Brando dared to comment that "Hollywood is run by Jews. It 
is owned by Jews." Brando contended that Jews are always depicted 
as humorous, kind, loving, and generous while they slander every 
other racial group, "but are ever so careful to ensure that there is 
never any negative image of the Kike." 268 

Jewish groups came down unmercifully on Brando, stating in 
their press releases that they would see to it that he "would never 
work again." No one in the Jewish press seemed to notice that the 
threats simply validated Brando's observation of their unchallenged 
media power. Brando became so intimidated by the onslaught of ha- 
tred and threats against him that he had to arrange an audience with 
Rabbi Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. In probably the best act- 
ing job of his life, Brando cried and got on his knees and kissed Rabbi 
Hier's hands, begging for forgiveness for offending the Supreme Jew- 
ish Gods of the Western World. Brando publicly renounced his Her- 
esy against the Jewish Gods, and thus the Jewish Priest absolved him 
of his sin. Brando had become a good object lesson for famous Gen- 
tiles who might dare speak the truth about Jewish Supremacism, and 
he has said nothing but positive things about Jews ever since. 

If someone wants to understand how the Jewish Supremacists 
maintain their almost complete media control, the Brando incident is 
an excellent illustration. They do it by both the carrot and the stick. 



Jewish Supremacism 141 

They reward those Goyim who go along with their evil as they did 
Brando in his early career, but they are unmerciful to anyone who 
dares to even utter a word against them. Public figures who publicly 
oppose them have to be either incredibly stupid or magnificently 
brave. Marlon Brando naively thought that by telling the obvious 
truth about Israel he might endure serious criticism, but he never 
dreamed of the tidal wave of filth and abuse that would descend 
upon him. In a pitiful scene, Brando caved into his masters like a 
whimpering dog, literally licking the hand of the master that beats 
him. 

There can be no renewal for our people until that kind of intimi- 
dating power is broken. There is no possibility of redemption for our 
people until we summon the courage necessary to defy our Jewish 
supremacist overlords. Finally, no regeneration of our society can oc- 
cur until our people again have real freedom of speech and press once 
more. 

Once I discovered the Jewish power over the American media, I 
resolved never to surrender my freedom of speech in deference to it. 
No matter if it might cost me my reputation, my freedom or even my 
life; I became and still remain determined to oppose the media mas- 
ters who seek to destroy our way of life and our very life form. I am 
confident that in time my kinsmen will likewise rise up in defiance 
rather than kneel in dishonor — as Marlon Brando did— to our su- 
premacist masters. 



Chapter 6 

Jewish Political Supremacy 

The U.S. has no longer a government of Goyim [Gentiles], but an 
administration in which the Jews are full partners in the decision mak- 
ing at all levels. Perhaps the aspects of the Jewish religious law con- 
nected with the term 'government of goyim' should be re-examined, 
since it is an outdated term in the U.S. ( From the major Israeli newspaper 
Maariu) 269 

"I've never seen a President — I don't care who he is — stand up to 
[the Jews] ... They always get what they want. The Israelis know what 
is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wouldn't write any- 
thing down. If the American people understood what a grip these peo- 
ple have got on our government, they would rise up in arms." (Admiral 
Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff) 270 

"... terrific control the Jews have over the news media and the bar- 
rage the Jews have built up on congressmen .... I am very much con- 
cerned over the fact that the Jewish influence here is completely 
dominating the scene and making it almost impossible to get congress 
to do anything they don't approve of. The Israeli embassy is practically 
dictating to the congress through influential Jewish people in the 
country" 

— Sec, of State John Foster Dulles in Feb. 1957 quoted on p.99 of 
Fallen Pillars by Donald Neff 

In recounting my learning about the Jewish power in the govern- 
ment of the United States, I will skip ahead about five years to an 
event I saw on television on April 15, 1973. Senator William Fulbright 
appeared on the CBS Face the Nation 271 program when, in discussing 
American policy in the Mideast, he stated very simply, 

"Israel controls the United States Senate." 

Since the middle 1960s I knew enough about the pro-Zionist pol- 
icy of the U.S. government to realize that what he said was true, but I 
was shocked that he would say such a thing openly. I wondered what 
impact such a charge would make on the public. After all, he made 
one of the most sensational charges ever spoken by a U.S. Senator, an 
allegation with incredible implications — that a foreign power con- 
trolled the highest legislative body in America. 

In a matter of just a few days, Fulbright' s accusation of Zionist 
control disappeared from the press almost as if it had never hap- 
pened. However, Senator Fulbright, a popular personage in his home 
state, who had been reelected easily even during the highest patriotic 



144 Who Runs American Politics 

passions of the Vietnam War (He came to oppose the war), suddenly 
found himself in political hot water. 

In his next election, he paid dearly for his truth telling. Huge 
amounts of Jewish money poured into Arkansas to defeat him, and 
Jews with any position of influence in business, government, or media 
— both inside and outside of Arkansas — rallied to help Israel-Firster, 
Dale Bumpers. One of the remarkable aspects of the affair was that 
most Jews had liked Fulbright early on because he took a position on 
the Vietnam War that they endorsed. Jews overwhelmingly opposed 
the war, from the radical Communists in the street such as Jerry 
Rubin and Abbie Hoffman to the influential Jews of the New York 
Times and The Washington Post. 

Senator Fulbright dared to say that just as it was not in our true 
interests to be in Vietnam, neither was it in our true interests to be 
embroiled in the Mideast conflict. Ironically, many Jews had called 
Fulbright a hero for casting the lone Senate vote in the early 1950s 
against continuing the funding of Wisconsin Senator Joe McCarthy's 
Permanent Investigations Subcommittee. 272 They owed him a great 
debt, but all of Fulbright' s past support for the liberal policies of Jews 
meant nothing to them when he refused to pledge unquestioning 
subservience to Israel. By criticizing the U.S. government's policy in 
the Mideast, he lost his Senate seat. 

As I learned about the Jewish domination of the news and enter- 
tainment media in the late 1960s, I also came across copious evidence 
of their enormous political power. I found it to be two-headed. Obvi- 
ously, through their domination of the media, they have tremendous 
influence on elections and on public issues. Not only can they influ- 
ence the public's perceptions by weighting propaganda for or against 
a candidate or an issue, they can essentially determine whether cer- 
tain issues will even be discussed at all. The second way they influ- 
ence politics is more direct. They have become, by far, the most pow- 
erful players in American campaign financing — their support is cru- 
cial to every major candidate. Those who cater to them with the most 
servility receive support, while support is withheld from those whom 
they deem less servile. They deliver great rewards for those who play 
along and politically annihilate those who won't. 

In the 1970s, I read a Wall Street Journal article entitled 'American 
Jews and Jimmy Carter" by James M. Perry. He wrote, "Jews are gen- 
erous with their money. The White House's Mr. Siegel, a longtime 
Jewish employee of the Democratic National Committee, estimates 
that as much as 80% of the big gifts that sustain the party, year in and 



Jewish Supremacism 145 

year out, come from Jews." 273 Another article in the Wall Street Journal 
about campaign financing frankly stated that most of the money of 
the Democratic Party came from Jewish contributors, and half of the 
Republican war chest came from Jews as well. Campaign contribu- 
tions to politicians are like oxygen; they are necessary for political life. 
Is there anyone who thinks that such money does not buy influence? 
Because Jewish money and organized Jewish support is so essential, 
Jewish advisors and assistants also become absolutely vital. 

Not long after Sen. Fulbright's statement claiming Jewish control 
of the Senate, the highest-ranking military officer in the United States 
— General George Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — 
spoke candidly at Duke University about the Jewish control of the 
American government, media, and economy: 

We have the Israelis coming to us for equipment. We can say we 
can't possibly get the Congress to support a program like this. And 
they say don't worry about the Congress. We will take care of the 
Congress. This is somebody from another country, but they can do 
it. They own, you know, the banks in this country, the newspapers. 
Just look at where the Jewish money is. 274 — (General George S. 
Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) 

As I discussed in my chapter on Jewish group strategy, they eth- 
nocentrically support each other until they come to dominate most 
organizations they are brought into. Such is also true of the American 
government. From the "advisory" roles of Bernard Baruch and Louis 
Brandeis to President Woodrow Wilson, to the complete domination 
of Bill Clinton's National Security Council, Jewish power has grown 
steadily as the century draws to a close. 

My awakening to Jewish power came in the mid-1960s, during the 
administrations of Johnson and Nixon. During the Johnson era, I was 
particularly aware of Wilbur Cohen who as head of the Health, Edu- 
cation, and Welfare Department, was pushing racial integration and 
the baby-factory welfare system that I saw as an inevitable disaster for 
America. I also knew that Zionist partisan Walt Rostow was one of 
Johnson's chief foreign advisors, as was the ambassador to the United 
Nations, Arthur Goldberg. 

Despite Richard Nixon's supposedly cryptic, anti-Semitic views as 
exposed by the Watergate tapes, he feared their power and readily 
placated it. He surrounded himself with high-level Jewish advisors 
and cabinet members. He made Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State, 
and appointed James Schlesinger as Secretary of Defense — both 
crucial positions of course, in regard to Israel. In the economic realm 
he appointed Arthur Burns, chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, 
Herbert Stein as his chief economic advisor, Laurence Silberman, as 



146 Who Runs American Politics 

deputy Attorney General, and Leonard Garment, as legal council and 
head of the White House civil rights department. 

The Zionists covered all their bases, as they usually do, by also 
having key positions in the inner circles of the other party. Hubert 
Humphrey's closest advisor, E. F. Berman, and Humphrey's 11 largest 
contributors were Jews. 275 George McGovern's top advisor was Frank 
Mankiewicz. 

After Nixon's resignation, Gerald Ford kept Henry Kissinger and 
brought in an old Stalinist sympathizer, Edward Levi, as Attorney 
General, and he named Alan Greenspan as his chief economic advi- 
sor. Jimmy Carter continued the disproportionate Jewish representa- 
tion by appointing Harold Brown as Secretary of Defense and adding 
a troop of the "Chosen" to the National Security Council and impor- 
tant economic positions. Reagan and Bush added to the Jewish on- 
slaught with the appointment of a host of other Jews to positions 
throughout the bureaucracy, always reserving many key roles for 
Jews in foreign and economic policy. From the early days of the 20th 
century, Jewish power has steadily progressed until such enormous 
power is now breathtaking in its scope. As their power became more 
entrenched, the Jewish-dominated media found less need to deny its 
clout, in fact they may find it somewhat to their advantage to boast of 
it in the elite circles so as to make sure no Goyim will dare challenge 
it. 

The major Israeli newspaper Maariv ran a story called "The Jews 
Who Run Clinton's Court" on September 2, 1994, in which it boasts of 
the Jewish domination of Clinton's advisors and cabinet. It quotes a 
prominent Washington rabbi to the effect that the government of the 
United States is no longer a government of Gentiles. It bears repeat- 
ing: 

The U.S. has no longer a government of Goyim [Gentiles], but an 
administration in which the Jews are full partners in the decision 
making at all levels. Perhaps the aspects of the Jewish religious 
law connected with the term 'government of goyim' should be re- 
examined, since it is an outdated term in the U.S. 276 

The article boasts of their complete domination of the administra- 
tion, and describes many top officials around the president as "warm 
Jews" on whom Israel can always count. 

In the National Security Council, 7 out of 11 top staffers are 
Jews. Clinton had especially placed them in the most sensitive 
junctions in the U.S. security and foreign administrations: Sandy 
Berger is the deputy chairman of the council; Martin Indyk, the in- 
tended ambassador to Israel, is a senior director in charge of the 



Jewish Supremacism 147 

Middle East and South Asia; Dan Schifter, the senior director and 
adviser to the president, is in charge of Western Europe; Don 
Steinberg, the senior director and adviser to the president, is in 
charge of Africa; Richard Feinberg, the senior director and adviser 
to the president, in charge of Latin America; Stanley Ross, the sen- 
ior director and adviser to the president, is in charge of Asia. 

The situation is not much different in the president's office which 
is full of warm Jews: the new Attorney General, Abner Mikve: the 
president's schedule and programs manager, Ricky Seidman; dep- 
uty chief of staff, Phil Leida; economic adviser, Robert Rubin; me- 
dia director, David Heiser; staff director, Alice Rubin; Ely Segall, in 
charge of volunteers; Ira Mezina, in charge of the health program. 
Two Cabinet members, Labor Secretary Robert Reich and Micky 
Cantor in charge of international trade agreements, are Jewish. 
They are joined by a long list of senior Jewish officials in the State 
Department, headed by the head of the Middle East Peace Team, 
Dennis Ross, and followed by many deputy secretaries and even 
more senior secretaries' chiefs of staff. 277 

Bar-Yosef begins the article by pointing out those "warm Jews" 
(dedicated Zionists) who every day go over the most secret intelli- 
gence information presented to the President of the United States. 
One wonders why Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard is locked up in federal 
prison when extreme partisans for Israel, such as Sandy Berger, have 
daily access to America's most secret intelligence. 

Even in my college days, it was obvious to many people that the 
Jewish lobby had a tremendous impact on Capitol Hill and in the 
White House. A real dichotomy existed between what the politicians 
would do and what they would say. Even though Nixon ran on a con- 
servative platform, which emphasized issues such as victory in Viet- 
nam and opposition to forced busing, his administration began the 
first affirmative-action programs. Although he gave lip service to end- 
ing busing for racial integration, he appointed the officers in the At- 
torney General's office who continued to push for it in courts across 
America. His Jewish Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, helped frame 
the Paris Peace Accords that led to the inevitable victory of the Viet 
Cong and a peace with "dishonor," making meaningless the sacrifices 
of hundreds of thousands of American fighting men. Interestingly, 
many of the same dovish voices decrying the napalming of Viet Cong 
soldiers were Israeli hawks cheering the use of the same weapon on 
women and children in the Palestinian refugee camps. 

The Israeli newspaper also makes it clear that effective Jewish con- 
trol includes both Democrats and Republicans: 

Incidentally, although the Jewish power in the current Democ- 
ratic Administration is so huge, there are also many warm Jews 
heading for the top positions in the Republican Party. 278 



148 Who Runs American Politics 



Survey of Jews in critical Clinton Ad 


ministration positions 


Secretary of State 


Madeleine Albright 


Secretary of the Treasury 


Robert Rubin 


Secretary of Defense 


William Cohen 


CIA chief 


George Tenet 


Head of National Security Council 


Samuel Berger 


Secretary of Agriculture 


Dan Glickman 


Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board 


Alan Greenspan 


Health Care Chief 


Sandy Kristoff 


Head of Voice of America 


Evelyn Lieberman 


Under Secretary of State for Europe 


Stuart Eisenstat 


U.S. Trade Representative 


Charlene Barshefsky 


Chief Aide to the First Lady 


Susan Thomases 


Heads National Economic Council 


Gene Sperling 


Heads National Health Care Policy 


Ira Magaziner 


Deputy Secretary of State 


Peter Tarnoff 


Ass. Sec. of State for Congressional Affairs 


Wendy Sherman 


On Board of Economic Council 


Alice Rivlin 


On Board of Economic Council 


Janet Yellen 


Presidential Advisor 


Rahm Emanuel 


Council to the President 


Doug Sosnik 


Deputy National Security Council 


Jim Steinberg 


NSC Senior Director for Speechwriting 


Anthony Blinken 


Drug Policy Coordinator 


Robert Weiner 


Special Liaison to the Jewish Community 


Jay Footlik 


Presidential Personal Chief 


Robert Nash 


Presidential Attorney 


Jane Sherburne 


Asian Expert on Security Council 


Mark Penn 


Communications Aide 


Robert Boorstine 


Communications Aide 


Keith Boykin 


Special Assistant to the President 


Jeff Eller 


National Health Care Advisor 


Tom Epstein 


National Security Council Member 


Judith Feder 


Asst. Sec. of Veterans Affairs 


Richard Feinberg 


Deputy Head of Food and Drug Admin. 


Herschel Gober 


White House council 


Steve Kessler 


Asst. Secretary of Education 


Ron Klein 


Director of Press Conferences 


Margaret Hamburg 


Director of St. Dept. Policy 


Karen Alder 


Member National Security Council 


Samuel Lewis 


Member of the National Security Council 


Stanley Ross 


Director of the Peace Corps 


Dan Shifter 


Deputy Chief of Staff 


Eli Segal 


Dep. Director of Man. and Budget 


Jack Lew 


Under Secretary of State 


James P. Rubin 


Under Secretary of the Treasury 


David Lipton 


Special Council to the President 


Lanny P. Breuer 


Special Representative to NATO 


Richard Holbrooke 


Chief of Social Security 


Kenneth Apfel 


Deputy White House Council 


Joel Klein 


Special Advisor to the First Lady 


Sidney Blumenthal 


Chief of Food and Drug Administration 


David Kessler 


Acting Solicitor General 


Seth Waxman 


Presidential Pollster 


Mark Penn 


Special Middle East Representative 


Dennis Ross 


General Counsel for the FBI 


Howard Shapiro 


White House Special Counsel 


Lanny Davis 


Secretary of Management and Budget 


Sally Katzen 


Heads FBI Equal Opportunity Office 


Kathleen Koch 


Deputy Chief of Staff 


John Podesta 


Vice Chairman of Federal Reserve Board 


Alan Blinder 


Heads Council of Economic Advisors 


Jane Yellen 



Jewish Supremacism 149 

The primary use of Jewish power in Washington obviously is to 
promote Zionist interests, such as our pro-Israel policy. In that area, 
Israel has all her bases covered. The President's top security advisors 
such as Sandy Berger and Leon Perth are dedicated Zionists, and they 
have Jews in the critical positions of Secretary of Defense William 
Cohen, and Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. When the United 
States mediates Mideast peace talks between the Palestinians and the 
Israeli Prime Minister, Dennis Ross is the chief arbitrator — a nice, as 
they say, "warm" Jew. Is it any wonder that the Palestinians feel that 
they do not get a fair shake when the so-called mediators of the con- 
flict are as dedicated a bunch of Zionists as are the official representa- 
tives of Israel? The hypocrisy goes on and on. 

Salon Magazine, in a February 17, 1997 article by their Washington 
correspondent, Jonathan Broder (a writer for the Jerusalem Report), had 
this to say: 

WASHINGTON-following the recent revelations about Madeleine 
Albright's Jewish roots, the new U.S. Secretary of State faces a 
new conundrum: All her top candidates for a slew of senior posi- 
tions in the State Department are Jewish—and male. 

A number of foreign policy experts have been quick to note the 
exquisiteness of the irony. "It suggests that we've come a long way 
in this country from the days when the foreign service was reserved 
for a very WASPy elite," says former National Security Council 
Middle East advisor Richard Haass, who now directs foreign policy 
studies at the Brookings Institution. 279 

When Albright traveled to the Balkans, she attacked the immoral- 
ity of Croatia for not allowing refugees to return. But, she makes no 
similar moral demands for Israel to allow the return of the million 
Palestinian refugees it has banned for decades. 280 

As any group seeking power would understand, economic prow- 
ess is the next important component of control after directly- 
administered political power. Jewish power in the economic processes 
of our country is practically monolithic. 

Many of these positions, of course, change from time to time, but 
as of this writing in the last term of President Clinton, Jews hold all 
the most powerful economic positions. The most powerful position of 
all is the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, and it is interesting 
to note that this critical economic appointee, Alan Greenspan, has re- 
mained in office through both Republican and Democrat administra- 
tions. 

Are Americans so naive as to believe that this cohesive, ethnocen- 
tric people of immense wealth do not share information and network 
with their brethren for their own benefit? In the section on Jewish 
economic strategy within my upcoming chapter on the Roots of Anti- 



150 Who Runs American Politics 

Semitism, I point out how in the economic sphere, early knowledge of 
government policy or access to other privileged government informa- 
tion is worth countless billions of dollars. As I discovered these 
things, I asked myself, Do these Jewish economic czars have an opportu- 
nity to advance their own common interests? Does not reason suggest 
that they have pressed their own economic interests in the same way 
they have advanced their interests in America's pro-Israel policy? 

Jewish interests go far beyond Israel and economic policy. The 
top advisors to the President of the United States influence every area 
of American life from welfare to taxes, immigration to criminal jus- 
tice. Consider their influence on the appointment of federal judges 
alone. In my own federal court district, the Eastern District of Louisi- 
ana, which has only a very small Jewish population, Jews constitute a 
third of the sitting federal judges. On the Supreme Court of the 
United States there are currently two Jews and seven Gentiles. Jews 
often have had specific agendas in the areas of civil rights, immigra- 
tion, feminism, homosexuality, religious beliefs, the arts, gun control, 
and many other areas of American life. Invariably, they have insinu- 
ated themselves into positions of great power and influence which 
impact government policy on those and many other issues. 

It is not only President Clinton's top advisors and councilors who 
are Jewish; Vice-president Al Gore's Chief of Staff is the Jew, Ron 
Klein. So we can say that they are even prepared to mobilize in the 
event of the president's death or impeachment. Perhaps one of the 
most telling indications of the special status of Jews in the U.S. gov- 
ernment is the startling fact that Clinton has officially appointed a po- 
sition of "Special Representative to the Jewish Community." 

Jay Footlik's position is a unique one as there is no "special repre- 
sentative" for any other ethnic, racial, or religious group. There is no 
representative exclusively for the Irish, Germans, or Italians or, for 
that matter, even Christians. But there is one for the Chosen, and it is 
easy to see why when one considers their incredible power. It is a 
power clearly understood by every President of the United States. 

A partial list of the key governmental positions occupied by Jews 
appears in this chapter. This list by no means shows their complete 
power. Who knows how many bureaucrats are like Madeleine Al- 
bright — Jews who expect us to believe that they don't know they are 
Jewish until after they are appointed to office. The Spotlight 281 news- 
paper as well as Dr. Edward R. Fields of the Truth at Last, and I have 
publicly talked about her Jewish pedigree for over two years before 
she supposedly knew of it. 



Jewish Supremacism 151 



One of the many low points of the Clinton administration was the 
pandering of the White House Lincoln bedroom for big campaign 
contributors. The newspaper Jewish Week proudly reports that: 

"There was a definite Semitic aspect to the list," Said Johns 
Hopkins University political scientist Benjamin Ginsberg. In fact, 
half or more of the White 
House visitors listed were 
Jewish, ... from the new 
DNC [Democratic National 
Committee] chair and for- 
mer president of the pro- 
Israel lobby, Steve 
Grossman, to superstar 
singer Barbara Streisand. 



That result was hardly sur- 
prising, given the special 
character of Democratic 
party fund raising, Ginsberg 
said. 282 



List of donors who slept at die 

White House reveals many 

with Semitic-sounding names. 

Lyj^wk. TtK hW Ytfkrimc?.ff]MahPLl j|gj 

at liurvuri-fiKhi: LVirAtruliL Njtinnul {"uniniiiirr 

whn jI'-j/i t nj'.i; lJ ■.!■. Lrn IL.KI :kVhirnmi*±tiinn--. jj; ihtf- CtiiUvfl 

T\ hiu- \Um'< R^fHihk-jw lum durgtd (hal Utr jdiTiini'dri- 

Ikirtwjn IMctjJIy rrnliny. ituI Che [.irvuln Dednxim JK .1 fund- 

fairing gimmick (at 

quiL-kK iwiiffri one 

striking hg . 

" ITWctc w ai a defl ■ 
ni'.c StrriiLJL jsjwlI in 
thu list, " uid Joh<K 
Htfifcil» Univos*}- pw 
1 1 C i r-j 1 K-icnlat R*n- 
jam it) GirtJKrg. 

In r j-I , h.ill '.t hiitcl 
nrf IN: WTiih; 3 Ii1j< '.j^ - 
ir^ifx lutcul T*Trc Jcw- 




T*e Lin«H* 6e4own , located on one 
n1 Id* piitMc J^idpiw 1|«fs vt Etw 
WHlltHtHH*. 



Not only do Jews exercise 
great power inside the govern- 
ment bureaucracy and diplo- 
matic corps, they also have dis- 
proportionate power in the lob- 
bying organizations that most influence government. The three most 
powerful foreign-policy lobbying organizations on Capitol Hill are 
pro-Zionist organizations, and the heads or key administrators of 
many other special interest groups are Jews. They also have great in- 
fluence in many foundations and organizations that in turn affect 
politicians and government. They include such groups as the Ameri- 
can Civil Liberties Union, the American Medical Association, the 
American Bar Association, and many more. Of course, they wield 
immense power in the press, such as Katherine (Meyer) Graham's 
Washington Post and the Sulzberger's New York Times, as well as hav- 
ing immense influence in television. Without question, the Jewish- 
dominated media constitute the most powerful governmental lobby 
in the world. 

Jewish power in government and media has grown so great that 
they appear to think they are unassailable. Upon the reelection of Bill 
Clinton to the presidency, Jewish Week, on January 24th, 1997, reported 
a gathering in Washington, D.C., at the Jewish Community Center for 
a "Jewish Leadership Celebration." The article makes the case that in 
years past: 

Jewish leaders would not be so bold in celebrating Jewish 
political involvement... The worry was that acknowledging Jewish 



152 Who Runs American Politics 

successes would only reinforce anti-Semites. . . Jews feel secure 
enough in their accumulated clout... Politically we've come out of 
the closet... comfortable enough with our own achievements to 
celebrate them openly 

...the Jewish community has reached a kind of critical mass in 
politics that guarantees that many of the gains of the Clinton years 
will remain, no matter who occupies the White House. 283 

No matter who occupies the White House, they boast, their im- 
mense power will remain. Are they implying that no one could even 
attempt to become President without subservience to their power? If 
that implication were made by Gentiles, it certainly would be viewed 
as anti-Semitic. 

Perhaps the most telling barometer of whether the American 
government has become what some refer to as a Zionist Occupational 
Government, or "ZOG," is Jewish representation in the diplomatic 
corps. If, after all, the government is in reality a "Jewish Occupational 
Government," it certainly stands to reason that its key representatives 
overseas would reflect that fact. Here is the amazing list of Jewish 
Ambassadors (as of 1997), which does not include the multitude of 
Jewish bureaucrats and under-ambassadors serving lower-level 
positions. 

America's emissaries to its three closest neighbors, Canada, 
Mexico, and Cuba, are Jewish. They are: Ambassador Gordon Griffin 
for Canada, Jeffrey Davidow for Mexico, and our "U.S. Interest 
Diplomat" for Cuba is Michael Kozak. In the Middle East, America 
has Jewish Ambassadors to both Israel and to Egypt. 

Jewish diplomatic hegemony is equally impressive in Europe. Its 
two largest nations, France and Germany, have Jewish ambassadors: 
Felix Rohatyn in Paris and John C. Kornblum in Berlin. It hardly ends 
there, as Jews also serve as ambassadors to Belgium, Denmark, Nor- 
way, Sweden, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Belarus and Switzerland. 
Switzerland was successfully blackmailed by Edgar Bronfman's 
World Jewish Congress over supposed Holocaust bank accounts. 
America's Jewish Ambassador, Madeleine Kunin helped Bronfman. 
The New York Times on October 4, 1997 reported that she, "...doggedly 
pursues the Swiss on the issue of Gold for Holocaust survivors." 284 
Just as they have come to be key advisors and appointees of the 
President of the United States, Jews are accomplished at their Jewish- 
partisan, team politics in the lower echelons of power as well. They 
hold a vastly disproportionate share of positions of influence in 
groups from social clubs to labor unions. Their domination of many 



Jewish Supremacism 153 

labor unions is an ironic display of their power, for no group in the 
United States is less disposed to physical labor. Such leadership 

Clinton's Ambassadors for Whom? 



North America 


Mexico 


Jeffrey Davidow 


Canada 


Gordon Griffin 


Cuba 


Diplomat Michael G. Kozak 


Europe 


France 


Felix Rohatyn 


Belgium 


John C. Kornblum 


Germany 


Alan J. Blinkin 


Denmark 


Edward R. Elson 


Norway 


David B. Hermelin 


Sweden 


Thomas L. Siebert 


Switzerland 


Madeleine Kunin 


Poland 


Daniel Fried 


Hungary 


Donald M. Blinken 


Romania 


Alfred H. Moses 


Belarus 


Kenneth S. Yalowitz 


Others 


Turkey 


Marc Grossman 


Egypt 


Daniel C. Kurtzner 


Israel 


Martin Indyk 


India 


Frank Wisner 


New Zealand 


Josiah H. Beeman 


Morocco 


Marc Ginsberg 


South Africa 


James A. Joseph 


Singapore 


Timothy A. Chorba 


Brazil 


Melvyn Levitsky 



may explain why union administrators have often sold out their 
overwhelmingly European-American membership by supporting 
programs such as affirmative action, and taking only half-hearted ac- 
tions in opposition to free trade and immigration. Once in positions of 
great power, they are not reluctant to use their positions to advance 
an agenda that conflicts with the interests of the overall membership. 
In my campaigns for the U.S. Senate and for governor of Louisiana, 
Jewish officials in diverse groups from insurance companies to tour- 
ism — would use their influence in the organizations to promote their 
own political agenda against me. 



154 Who Runs American Politics 

A New President, the Same Jewish Agenda 

The election of George Bush to the American Presidency in the 
year 2000, has had little effect on the overwhelming Jewish power in 
the American governmental bureaucracy. Although the Jewish estab- 
lishment overwhelmingly supported Al Gore for President, it knew 
that Bush understood the political necessity of following political 
agendas set by supremacist Jews. Powerful Jews such as Federal Re- 
serve Chairman, Alan Greenspan, continued to span both Democratic 
and Republican administrations. Although Jews lost some of their 
more visible positions in the new Bush administration, the underlying 
Jewish dominated, "civil service" bureaucracy has continued with a 
multitude of Jews holding critical "undersecretary" and "deputy" po- 
sitions in the State Department, Pentagon, CIA, and other important 
agencies. Even President Bush's primary public spokesman is appro- 
priately Jewish. Press Secretary Ari Fleischer even shares the same 
ethnically-derived first name as Israeli Prime Minister Sharon. 

A recent Director of National Affairs (domestic policy) of the 
American Jewish Committee (Probably the most powerful Jewish or- 
ganization in America), Dr. Stephen Steinlight, wrote an essay in Oc- 
tober of 2001 about the Jewish-led, American immigration policy. It 
reveals much more than Jewish attitudes on immigration; it also ex- 
poses widespread sentiments of Jewish Supremacism and power. 

Jewish Political Power in 21 st Century America 

In his article, "The Jewish Stake in America's Changing Demogra- 
phy," Steinlight writes of the preeminent Jewish role in changing 
American immigration policy over the last century to the point where 
Whites will now become a minority in America. He expresses fear 
that the change is now occurring so fast that, although multicultural- 
ism has been a big advantage to Jewish power, it will pose a threat 
unless it is slowed to allow for Jewish propagandizing of the new ar- 
rivals. He is especially concerned about Muslim immigration, arguing 
that their voting and lobbying might pose a danger to Jewish political 
power. In making his case to his fellow Jews, he speaks guardedly, 
but makes some amazing admissions about Jewish power in America. 

...will Jewish sensitivities continue to enjoy extraordinarily high 
levels of deference and will Jewish interests continue to receive 
special protection? Does it matter that the majority non-European 
immigrants have no historical experience of the Holocaust or 
knowledge of the persecution of Jews over the ages and see Jews 
only as the most privileged and powerful of white Americans? 285 



Jewish Supremacism 155 

Steinlight goes on to write about what he sees as a threat to Jewish 
power, and even indirectly reveals why real campaign finance reform 
(favored by overwhelming numbers of Americans) will fail. 

...Not that our disproportionate political power (pound for pound 
the greatest of any ethnic/cultural group in America) will erode all 
at once, or even quickly... Unless and until the triumph of campaign 
finance reform is complete, an extremely unlikely scenario, the 
great material wealth of the Jewish community will continue to 
give it significant advantages. We will continue to court and be 
courted by key figures in Congress. That power is exerted within 
the political system from the local to national levels through soft 
money, and especially the provision of out-of-state funds to candi- 
dates sympathetic to Israel,... 286 

He speaks frankly about the incredible power of the Jewish con- 
trolled media. 

It is also true that Jewish economic influence and power are dis- 
proportionately concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the 
news industry, theoretically a boon in terms of the formation of fa- 
vorable public images of Jews and sensitizing the American people 
to issues of concern to Jews... 287 

He even confesses the rampant Jewish supremacism of which 
most Gentiles are completely unaware. 

I'll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids 
of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a 
quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative 
years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish 
summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, 
dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national 
anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and 
dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigra- 
tion to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many 
other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working 
in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. 
More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my 
people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to 
view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom 
sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, 
intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the 
lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one. 

...Of course we also saluted the American and Canadian flags 
and sang those anthems, usually with real feeling, but it was clear 
where our primary loyalty was meant to reside. 288 

If any Gentile politician dared to say that "typical Jewish kids" are 
taught that their real loyalty is to Israel rather than America, and that 
Jews teach their children that they are superior to Gentiles in 



156 Who Runs American Politics 

intelligence and morals, he would be condemned and hounded out of 
politics as an anti-Semite. Yet, these are the precise words used by the 
head of the Domestic Policy division of the American Jewish 
Committee. His words are not from an off-handed or careless 
conversation, but are the carefully chosen words of a major article he 
wrote for Jewish consumption. Steinlight even speaks frankly about 
one of the traditional methods of Jewish power: divide and conquer. 
(Note that the wording is similar to many other Jewish writers; they 
write as if they were at war with the Gentile world) 

For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jew- 
ish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide 
and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our 
agenda. 289 

I guess I am supposed to be an "anti-Semite" because I am one 
American citizen who prefers that our nation not be "divided and 
conquered." Jewish political tactics similar to those used on the local 
and national level are employed in the international arena as well. 
Jews in critical positions in the U.S. government can use their influ- 
ence to blackmail other nations of the world to support Israel. Foreign 
aid, trade status, and other U.S. policies are used like a carrot and 
stick to coerce other nations to support Israel's position in the United 
Nations. Zionist influence is also used to buy off, with huge expendi- 
tures of American taxpayers' money (as foreign aid), Israel's enemies 
such as Egypt and Jordan. Jewish power in Government and media 
has also prodded U.S. military actions against Israel's enemies such as 
Saddam Hussein or Muammar Kaddafi. America, with her great 
might, has become a surrogate strong-armed enforcer for Israel and 
the Jewish people world-wide. The tail truly wags the dog. 

In Switzerland's battle with Edgar Bronfman's World Jewish Con- 
gress, Zionists in the United States used our government to blackmail 
the Swiss into capitulating to Bronfman's extortion of $1.2 billion dol- 
lars, by threatening to have the United States government shut down 
Swiss banking in the United States. 290 Even city governments were 
used in the blackmail effort, and of course, New York City as a center 
of banking can severely punish the Swiss for failing to accede to Jew- 
ish demands. To quote the Times-Picayune of August 13, 1998, "A 
number of cities and states in the United States had threatened to im- 
pose sanctions on UBS. AG and the Credit Suisse group if they did 
not agree to an acceptable settlement." 



Jewish Supremacism 157 

When I began the previous chapter on the Jewish domination of 
American media, I asked, "What if Iraqis who supported Saddam 
Hussein controlled the American media?" Americans would correctly 
see that situation as dangerous to our freedoms and our national in- 
terests. Suppose for a moment that the same Iraqis that were loyal to 
Saddam had the most powerful lobby in Washington, were the top 
national security advisors to the president, and practically controlled 
the economic policies of the United States. No true American patriot 
aware of that alien domination would tolerate it. 

Is the situation any less tolerable that these men and women are 
not Iraqis but fanatical Zionists reared in catechism of anti-Gentile, 
Jewish supremacy and completely dedicated to the most racist nation 
on earth? 

Few in America seem to ask these important questions. The si- 
lence is understandable, however, when one identifies the tribe who 
decides what questions are to be posed and what facts are to be given 
to the American people. It is also understandable, considering the 
real-life examples of the political consequences of telling the truth 
about Jewish Supremacism and power. Men such as Senator William 
Fulbright, Senator Charles Percy, Representative Paul Findley, Pat 
Buchanan and I have paid a high price for frankness. Congressman 
Findley wrote an excellent book detailing the incredible intimidation 
and suppression exercised against those who stood up against the Is- 
rael Lobby: They Dare to Speak Out. 291 

Perhaps the Jews have every right to try to influence the American 
government and its policies. But we, the great majority of the 
American people, have the right to demand that our government be 
"ours" and not "theirs." The right of self-government is basic to all 
political freedom. A government manipulated against the best 
interests of its people on behalf of a tiny minority is called tyranny. 
When some of my friends in the patriotic movement coined the 
aforementioned term Zionist Occupation Government, or ZOG, I 
thought the term a bit extreme, but after much reading and thought, I 
realized that it is a rather apt description of the sad state of affairs in 
Washington, D.C. 

The quotation from the Israeli Maariv newspaper should send a 
shiver up the spine of every loyal American. I will quote it for the 
third time, and I will do so again and again in my political life, until 
the American people understand its gravity: 

The U.S. has no longer a government of Goyim [Gentiles], but an 
administration in which the Jews are full partners in the decision 
making at all levels. Perhaps the aspects of the Jewish religious 
law connected with the term 'government of goyim' should be re- 
examined, since it is an outdated term in the U.S. 292 



158 Who Runs American Politics 

So America no longer has a "government of Goyim," and the only 
ones who make a point of saying it publicly are Zionists boasting for 
the edification of their fellow Jews in Israel. It is my belief that there 
are still millions of Americans, who, if they have the opportunity to 
read these lines will become as angry as the character of Howard 
Beale in the movie Netzvork. 293 They will become "mad as hell" and 
they will do what it takes to change things so that the next generation 
of Americans will not have to "take it anymore." 

The human instinct to protect one's family, race, and nation is 
called patriotism. It beseeches us to oppose any alien group seeking 
the control our nation's government, whether it be Zionists, Iraqis, 
Germans, or even, theoretically, the fanciful notion of invaders from 
outer space. Such impulses are not Anti-Semitism but simply good 
patriotism. We have every right to stand up for ourselves just as Jews 
stand up for themselves. Stephen Steinlight, the AJC director who I 
have quoted extensively, put it in elemental terms. He wrote, We 
rightly ask, "If I am not for myself who will be for me?" 294 In America 
and the Western world, only Jews are allowed to exhibit true patriot- 
ism — for those of us whose patriotism dares to go beyond enjoying 
the fireworks on the Fourth of July, we are attacked relentlessly. Jews 
who seek to exert control over other nations are never condemned, but 
we Gentiles who simply express the natural desire to have our own na- 
tions reflect our own traditions, values and interests; are branded as 
anti-Semitic and hateful. This rank hypocrisy will be swept away only 
after the Jewish stranglehold on the media and government is broken. 



Chapter 7 

The Roots of Anti-Semitism I: 
Economic Exploitation 



[Anti-Semitism] is an understandable reaction to Jewish 
defects - Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism 

(From his diaries, as quoted by Arthur Kornberg 295 ) 

When I became aware of the existence of Jewish Supremacism and 
its powerful influence in the United States government and the 
American media, I spoke openly about it. In a high school civics-class 
I remarked that Jewish bureaucrats who authored American Mideast 
policy had a potential conflict of interest. In an effort to quickly dis- 
miss me, my teacher quickly pointed out that the President of the 
United States was a Gentile. I recounted to her what I thought was an 
impressive list of important government positions that were held by 
Zionist Jews who would likely put Israel's interests over that of stra- 
tegic American interests. 

My teacher, frustrated in trying to rebut my points, dropped an 
intellectual atomic bomb. "That's the kind of sentiment that led to the 
deaths of six million Jews," she said. "You don't want to give us the 
impression that you're an anti-Semite, do you?" The usually restless 
and boisterous class became still, and I fell silent. I feared being ac- 
cused of Anti-Semitism. What was Anti-Semitism? Had I become an 
anti-Semite for simply opposing elements of Jewish Supremacism? 

That very afternoon I went to the school library and found some 
books on Anti-Semitism. Jews wrote all of them, and from what I 
could discern, most of the writers were Zionists. I looked up Anti- 
Semitism in the four encyclopedias on the library shelves, and found 
that all of the articles on Anti-Semitism had Jewish authors. 

As illustrated by the popular Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia by 
Funk and Wagnall's, they are still authoring almost all the articles on 
anti-Semitism. The Encarta article on Anti-Semitism has a Jewish au- 
thor, Nahum Norbert Glatzer, a revered scholar in the Jewish com- 
munity and author of the very supremacist and ethnocentric Jewish 



160 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Economic Exploitation 

History. Encarta also has a recommended reading list on Anti- 
Semitism. I reproduce it here. 

Bein, Alex. The Jewish Question: Biography of a World Problem. Fairleigh 
Dickinson, 1990. History of Anti-Semitism world-wide. 

Belth, Nathan C. A Promise to Keep: A Narrative of the American Encounter 
with Anti-Semitism. Various publishers. Historical account of Anti-Semitism in 
America and Anti-Defamation League efforts to combat it; for general readers. 

Furet, Francois, ed. Unanswered Questions: Nazi Germany and the Geno- 
cide of the Jews. Schocken, 1989. Balanced collection of essays covering a variety 
of issues on the Nazis and Jews of Europe, ("balanced"? It is anything but bal- 
anced) 

Gerber, David A., ed. Anti-Semitism in American History. Illinois, 1986. Col- 
lection of essays focusing on hostility towards Jews in America. 

Katz, Jacob. From Prejudice to Destruction: Anti-Semitism, 1700-1933. Har- 
vard, 1980, 1982. Recommended historical survey of Anti-Semitism in France, Aus- 
tria, Germany, and Hungary. 

Lewis, Bernard. Semites and Anti-Semites: An Inquiry Into Conflict and 
Prejudice. Norton, 1987. Analysis of Anti-Semitism in the Islamic World. 

Poliakov, Leon. The History of Anti-Semitism. 3v. Vanguard, 1964-75. VI, 
Christ to Court Jews; V.2, Mohammed to Marranos; V.3, Voltaire to Wagner; V.4, 
Suicidal Europe, 1870-1933; translated from the French. 

Reinharz, Jehuda, ed. Living With Anti-Semitism: Modern Jewish Re- 
sponses. Brandeis Books/Oniversity Press of New England, 1987. Essays on varied 
reactions over 200 years, arranged geographically. 296 

The theme common to the article and all Jewish-authored books 
recommended by the encyclopedia is rather simple: Throughout his- 
tory, Jews have been innocent victims of evil Gentiles. In hundreds of 
civil, national, and religious reactions against the Jews outlined by 
these books, there is never a hint that Jews could have done anything 
of a disreputable nature. They were always innocent little lambs led to 
the slaughter. Christians, Muslims, Zoroastrians, Pagans and other 
antagonists are all said to be motivated by religious or ethnic intoler- 
ance and hatred of Jews. The books also argue that innocent Jews are 
universally made into scapegoats for social and economic problems. 
Just so the reader understands that Encarta is not an exception, I also 
reproduce here the suggested reading list at the end of Grolier's Ency- 
clopedia's article on Anti-Semitism. 297 Erich Rosenthal wrote its article 
and presumably picked out the reading list. 

Bibliography: 

Almog, Shmuel. Anti-Semitism through the Ages (1988) 
Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951; repr. 1983) 
Curtis, Michael, ed., Anti-Semitism. (1986) 

Katz, Jacob, From Prejudice to Destruction (1980) in the Contemporary World 
(1985); 
Dinnerstein, Leonard, Anti-Semitism in America (1994; repr. 1995) 



Jewish Supremacism 161 

Gager, J. G., The Origins of Anti-Semitism (1983) 
Gerber, D. A., ed., Anti-Semitism in American History 
Poliakov, Leon. The History of Anti-Semitism, 4 vols. 

Aren't these suggested reading lists equivalent to recommending 
articles on the Arab-Israeli conflict written only by Palestinians or ar- 
ticles on anti-Communism written only by Communists? 

It is suggested by some of the authors that inherent Jewish 
superiority in ability and morals causes Gentiles to be jealous and 
spiteful. Many books on Anti-Semitism even argue that Anti- 
Semitism is a manifestation of mental illness and that it is an inherent 
defect among Gentiles. In discussing the almost universal, oft- 
repeated anti-Jewish attitudes of the past 2,000 years, Glatzer, 
Rosenthal, and the other writers fail to recognize a few things. They 
never make the slightest suggestion that the Jewish people may have 
been at least in part responsible for the repeated negative reactions to 
them. One would also never suspect that Jews themselves held any 
intolerant attitudes toward Christians and other Gentiles. Without 
exception, in every conflict between Jews and Gentiles, the Gentiles 
and Christians are depicted as evil, while the Jews are depicted as 
paragons of goodness. 298 2 " 300 301 

Glatzner, Rosenthal, and the other Jewish partisans have a one- 
sided point of view. None of their books mention that the negative 
Christian reaction to Judaism arose out of the Jewish anti-Gentile 
rhetoric of the Talmud and the persecution of early Christians by Jews 
such as Paul (Saul) until his conversion. Viciously anti-Gentile, Jewish 
teachings long predated the anti-Jewish Christian writers. None of 
these Jewish authors mention this important fact. 

The more I read, the more I realized that the articles and books 
castigating Europeans as anti-Semites are racist in the most pejorative 
sense. To portray a race of people as inherently psychotic and mur- 
derous is just about the worst thing someone can say about a race. 
And yet, the mainstream Jewish media characterizes European Chris- 
tians precisely that way. And, it must be said that the media also cate- 
gorizes Palestinians and Arabs in the most unflattering ways. 

So this is how I am supposed to get to the truth about Anti-Semitism, I 
thought. Jewish chauvinists must explain it to me. If that is good logic, 
then we might as well learn about the Second World War only from 
the perspective of Nazis or the history of the Palestinian people only 
from followers of Menachem Begin. How could anyone discover the 
truth about the causes of the Gentile-Jewish conflict from reading only 
the Jewish side of it, or from only those Gentiles who endorse the Jew- 
ish view? Gentile writers cannot help but learn quickly that there are 
great advantages to adopting the Jewish point of view to get their 



162 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Economic Exploitation 

books accepted by major publishers or reviewed in the thoroughly 
Jewish New York Times Book Review. The same is true if they want to be 
interviewed on programs such as the Jewish-produced Today Show. 
And, of course, they must promote philo-Semitism for their works to 
become "recommended reading" by the encyclopedias. 

Why, in all the mainstream media, are people not allowed to hear 
the reasonable view that Anti-Semitism has frequently been a reaction 
to Jewish Supremacism and misanthropy? Certainly, there have been 
intolerant outbreaks of Anti-Semitism in which innocent Jews have 
suffered or died. That being said, we must also acknowledge that 
Jews have had more than their share of anti-Gentile intolerance. 
However, we never hear about the Jewish excesses. To end the recur- 
ring cycles of Anti-Semitism, we must try to learn its real causes. 

Is Anti-Semitism an irrational response that finds its genesis in the 
mental pathology of its adherents, or does it find its origin as an un- 
derstandable reaction to Jewish behaviors? It is reasonable to think 
that Jewish supremacy and Anti-Semitism nourished each other over 
the generations, ultimately producing the modern horrors of the Sec- 
ond World War, the Holocaust and Zionist imperialism. The conflict 
may well reach a dehumanizing crescendo in the 21 st century unless 
we learn the true roots of the conflict between Jew and Gentile. 

To understand what has motivated Gentile opposition to Jews as a 
group, it is important to be aware of Jewish patterns of behavior that 
Glatzner and other authorities on Anti-Semitism fail to acknowledge. 
So-called anti-Semites have alleged over the centuries that, as a group, 
Jews have disproportionately engaged in unethical and exploitative 
practices such as usury, the slave trade, prostitution, fraudulent 
business schemes and various other criminal enterprises. Many have 
alleged that Jews use unethical business practices and collusion to 
gain control over commerce. Anti-Semites have charged that many 
historic examples exist of Jews collaborating with the foreign enemies 
of their host nations. Charges of Jewish disloyalty have been voiced 
since the time of their sojourn in Egypt, and have continued to the 
present day. The case of convicted Israeli spy, Jonathan Pollard, is a 
recent example. 

It was time for me to dig into the roots of Anti-Semitism. 

Religious Intolerance or Economic Resentment? 

When I delved into the great body of popular Jewish authors on 
Anti-Semitism, two themes emerged. The first and most popular 
theme is that Anti-Semitism stems from the fact that Gentiles blame 



Jewish Supremacism 163 

Jews for the crucifixion of Jesus. To quote the Encarta Encyclopedia, 
"Jews from the fourth century and perhaps even before then were 
viewed as the killers of Jesus Christ." Another theme of Jewish and 
philo-Jewish writers is that Anti-Semitism arose from Gentile jealousy 
of Jewish economic and social success. Jewish writer Arthur Hertz- 
berg shows how blaming Anti-Semitism on Christian intolerance has 
a strategic advantage: 

To blame Christianity and only Christianity for most Anti- 
Semitism has certain advantages for Jews. Their sufferings 
through the centuries can be conceived as noble martyrdom; the 
attacks on Jews are not to be connected with their own distinctive 
beliefs, culture, and patterns of behavior, and in some cases their 
faults, but only with their faith. -Arthur Hertzberg 302 

Thorough study of historical Jewish-Gentile interaction reveals 
that blaming the crucifixion of Christ on the Jews had only a minor 
role in ancient and modern Anti-Semitism. For instance, biblical 
passages asserting that Jews crucified Jesus Christ did not prevent 
Christians from trying to convert Jews and bring them into the 
Christian community. Obviously, the Christian Church did not see 
Jews as irredeemable because of the actions of their pharisaic 
ancestors. Early multiethnic Christians opposed Jews not on the basis 
of race or ethnicity, but primarily because of Jewish beliefs and 
practices. In regard to religion, Jews as a group were opposed 
primarily because of the intractable anti-Christian and anti-Gentile 
character of the Talmud and 
concomitant anti-Christian acts 
— illustrated by the mass 

1 1 /" ^T w m r m n p.. l^HubbE Wm r mmm imMi rw44rL 9rr ^bbbbt ^^bW*I LbbObbbbbbpi 

persecution and murder of — ._ ^ — m.*^..^ .^.^ jSi^ j-m 



Study affirms genetic link 
in Jewish priestly class 



■vi n^ifa Jiii tm- n i | fc" ■—■p ji wtJ hi hh u- ^^■■■■" ■*■■■■-■ ■*■■■ m 

bbbbbbbbbbl abb! ^rau ■■ tri^a^a* bbb. TVT i brbbbbbbbbbbi ■ bbbbbt — - 




Christians by the emperor fcH^v?^ — JizZZLftt ~Jgr°- 
Nero s Jewish mistress, EC— "■__-?■,'££- "iT^T.*^---* 2» 
Poppaea Sabina. 303 304 

In stark contrast to the eth- 
nically more tolerant Chris- 
tians, Jews based their opposi- 
tion to Gentiles on race. While 
Christians repeatedly tried to 
convert Jews, Jews made no 
real attempt to convert Christians. Instead, they erected barriers to 
conversion, and the small number of Gentiles who did convert were 
designated, according to Jewish law, as bastards. Jewish priests were 
forbidden to marry Jews who were converts or even descendants of 
converts, a policy still in effect today. 305 In all of Jewish history in 
Western civilization there is not one Gentile convert who became a 
significant Jewish leader. 



fcf IU Om ,7t.Mr ill - B i n . JBB* I > mmmT^M *U B. *_%. 

■ b- nMmm- Mi mT r^BM M^i 7U mn 4 C4Bt» m* \*t*m 

1-BBB ■ BBH tH mU U ~™ U^ Bm m'b ~h!^. 

Mb* i "w— i i n '^u t^nWii^Bl 



164 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Economic Exploitation 

Christianity evolved from a precarious, fledgling faith into the 
state religion of Rome, and later Europe itself became synonymous 
with Christendom. Once secure in its own power, Christianity became 
more tolerant of other faiths — even if disapproving of them. Hostil- 
ity toward Jews found its base in economic, social, ethnic, and 
political issues, and there is much evidence that these factors 
dominated anti-Jewish attitudes even during times of little religious 
turmoil. For instance, Anti-Semitism was not historically limited to 
Christians but found virulent expression before the Christian era and 
in many non-Christian lands. Religious antagonism often seemed to 
be a rationalization of economic and social hostility. 

I sought out the works of the giants of European literature, phi- 
losophy and science on the Jewish issue. Sometimes I would spend 
hours in the library looking up "Jews" and "Judaism" in the indexes 
of the books of some of the greatest Western writers. I found that 
many had things to say that would be considered anti-Semitic today. 
It would be impossible to list them all, but a few of them include Mil- 
ton, most of the Catholic Popes as well as major Protestant leaders, 
Shakespeare, Kant, Goethe, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Voltaire, Shaw, 
Emerson, Melville and Dickens. Even my favorite American author, 
Mark Twain, made some interesting comments about the Jews. Most 
of Twain's remarks on the Jews in an 1899 Harper's magazine article 
are extremely flattering to the Jewish people. But some parts of his es- 
say are impermissible today. 

In the cotton States, after the war, the simple and ignorant ne- 
groes made the crops for the white planter on shares. The Jew 
came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the 
negro's wants on credit, and at the end of the season was proprie- 
tor of the negro's share of the present crop and of part of his share 
of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew, and it is 
doubtful if the negro loved him... 

The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not con- 
cealed... .He was always ready to lend money on a crop, and sell 
vodka and other necessaries of life on credit while the crop was 
growing. When settlement day came he owned the crop; and next 
year or year after he owned the farm, like Joseph... 

In the dull and ignorant England of John's time everybody got 
into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his 
hands; he was the king of commerce; he was ready to be helpful in 
all profitable ways... 

Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, [anti-Semitic 
Prejudice] but not for the other nine. 306 



Jewish Supremacism 165 

To my amazement, Jewish histories, which are intended mainly 
for Jewish eyes, frankly record cases of Jewish economic exploitation 
from ancient times to the present. I found the Jewish historians far 
more enlightening on the issue than the Gentile writers. They had no 
prejudice against Jews; if anything, they had a clearly supremacist 
bias for their own people. Many of them practically gloated about 
their financial victories over the Goyim. 

CISCIRY 

Jews are a nation of usurers . . . outwitting the people amongst 
whom they find shelter. . . . They make the slogan 'let the buyer 
beware' their highest principle in dealing with us — Imanuel Kant 307 

The philosopher Immanual Kant was not the first Westerner to 
make the charge that the Jews are a nation of usurers, and that their 
economic practices were often exploitative. Since the Israelite sojourn 
in Egypt, non-Jewish politicians, theologians, and chroniclers have 
spoken of Jewish avarice and exploitative practices. Even Shakespeare 
immortalized the Jewish usurer in The Merchant of Venice through his 
character Shylock, who, in the absence of the money due him, de- 
mands the Christian's "pound of flesh." There are numerous exam- 
ples of medieval governments receiving huge percentages of their 
revenues from the taxation received on the profits of Jewish usury. In 
the Diaspora (the Jewish people living outside of Palestine) there is a 
pattern of Jews being employed by Gentile kings and governments as 
tax farmers and revenue collectors, and of their being utilized as the 
administrators of foreign occupational governments. 

By their very nature, farming and ranching require periodic infu- 
sions of capital. Diseases, insect infestation, and natural disasters can 
place those who cultivate crops or animals at the mercy of those who 
have ready money to lend. This is especially true among those who 
draw little more than their essential sustenance from such pursuits, 
which was true for most people from ancient times to the modern era. 
Historically, such needs for capital were often provided by coopera- 
tives and intervention by the civil authorities, but more often such 
needs went unanswered, resulting in times of severe suffering and 
want. In all business, capital is crucial to ameliorating the unforgiving 
cycles of prosperity and recession. Amid these economic uncertainties 
enters the Jewish moneylender, far more skilled and knowledgeable 
in the manipulation of currency and gold than his customers. 

There was little financial regulation of lending practices until 
fairly recent times, offering many opportunities for the unscrupulous. 
It should be made clear that the term usury means not simply a fair 
and moderate interest rate but an excessive one. Usury would be what 



166 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Economic Exploitation 

one would call loansharking today — with exorbitant interest and 
compound interest rates. 

usury n. 

1 . the lending or practice of lending money at an exorbitant interest. 

2. an exorbitant amount or rate of interest, esp. in excess of the legal rate. 

3. Obs. interest paid for the use of money. 

loansharking n. 

the practice of lending money at excessive rates of interest 
Random House Webster's Unabridged Electronic Dictionary 1 996 

Jews themselves understood the exploitive nature of their 
usurious practice on the Gentiles. Maimonides, who is considered 
the greatest European Jewish teacher, wrote the following in his 
important Book of Civil Laws: 

It is permissible to borrow from a heathen or from an alien resi- 
dent and to lend to him at interest. For it is written Thou shalt not 
lend upon interest to thy brother (Deut. 23:20) 308 — to thy brother 
it is forbidden, but to the rest of the world it is permissible. Indeed, 
it is an affirmative commandment to lend money at interest to a 
heathen. For it is written Unto the heathen thou shalt lend upon in- 
terest (Deut. 23:21). 309 {The Code of Maimonides, Book 13, The 
Book of Civil Laws, ch. V:l, 93) 310 

ISesek ("biting," usury) and marbit ("increase," interest) are one 
and the same thing. . . . Why is it called nesek? because he who 
takes it bites his fellow, causes pain to him, and eats his flesh. 
{The Code of Maimonides, Book 13, The Book of Civil Laws, ch. 
IV: 1, 88-89) 

The usury practiced by the Jews of the medieval world are outra- 
geous by modern standards. 

• In A History of the Jews in England, Cecil Roth finds Jews 

charging interest rates between 22 and 43 percent. 3n In north- 
ern France the interest rate was limited to 43 percent in 1206 
as the authorities tried to reduce the prevailing rate of 65 per- 
cent plus compounding. 312 

• In The Jews of Poland: A Social and Economic History of the 
Jewish Community in Poland from 1100 to 1800, writer Ber- 
nard Weinryb shows similar outlandish rates in Poland in the 
14th and 15th centuries. 313 

• In the 1942 book The Jews in Spain: Their Political and 
Cultural Life During the Middle Ages, the Jewish author A. A. 
Neuman writes that in Castile the authorities allowed Jews to 
charge an interest rate of 33 1/3 percent. When farmers 
desperately needed to purchase seed during the great famine in 



Jewish Supremacism 167 

Cuenca in 1326, the Jews refused to lend money unless they 
were allowed 40 percent. 314 

The most important political document from medieval England 
and perhaps in the history of Western civilization, the Magna Carta 
reveals the power of Jewish usurers by declaring that widows and or- 
phans have first claim on estates over Jewish moneylenders. 315 

In The Social Life of the Jews of Northern France in the XII-XIV Centu- 
ries as Reflected in the Rabbinical Literature of the Period, Louis Rabi- 
nowitz notes how the Jewish usurers themselves saw their occupation 
as far more profitable than farming or artisanry. 316 Many Jewish histo- 
rians have documented the tremendous wealth accumulated by the 
Jews through usury. Rabinowitz points out, for example, that the 
taxes on Jewish usury alone amounted to more than the rest of the or- 
dinary royal revenues in France in 1221. King Louis IX, who vigor- 
ously denounced the Talmud, had more concern over the Jewish eco- 
nomic predatory behavior. In 1254 he barred Jews from moneylend- 
ing and said they should live by trade and manual labor. 

As an illustration of the far-reaching impact of Jewish usury, 
Achille Luchaire shows that in medieval Europe even many churches 
and monasteries were closed because of debts owed to the Jewish 
moneylenders. 317 Jacob R. Marcus, one of the world's leading Jewish 
historians, in his Encyclopaedia Britannica article "Jews," states, "the 
floating wealth of the country was soaked up by the Jews, who were 
periodically made to disgorge into the exchequer." 318 

Gentile opposition to Jewish predatory economic activity, far from 
always being pathologic and hateful against Jews, was more often ra- 
tional and compassionate. Today loansharking is viewed as a perni- 
cious activity that deserves criminal prosecution. It has been also 
shown that in communities that limited such activity, Anti-Semitism 
was also mitigated. Davidson quotes two patricians in 16th century 
Venice as saying that moneylending is the way that the Jews "con- 
sume and devour the people of this, our city." 319 The Venetian au- 
thorities eventually codified precise regulations of Jewish economic 
activity, including a maximum interest rate of 5 percent on loans. 320 
Brian Pullen quotes a rabbi of the times who, after elucidating the 
causes of Anti-Semitism elsewhere, noted: 

Usury makes them unpopular with all the orders of the city; 
engaging in crafts with the lesser people; the possession of 
property with nobles and great men. These are the reasons why the 
Jews do not dwell in many places. But these circumstances do not 
arise in Venice, where the rate of interest is only 5 percent, and the 
banks are established for the benefit of the poor and not for the 
profit of the bankers. 321 



168 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Economic Exploitation 

Arthur Kornberg, in Theodor Herzl: From Assimilation to Zionism, 
quotes extensively from the founder of modern Zionism, Theodore 
Herzl — including fascinating parts of his diary. Herzl writes that 
Anti-Semitism arising from Jewish financial domination was com- 
pletely understandable and insisted that "one could not expect a ma- 
jority to Tet themselves be subjugated' by formerly scorned outsiders 
whom they had just released from the ghetto." 322 In another section he 
quotes Herzl as saying that Jews had been educated to be "leeches" 
that possessed "frightful financial power" and were a "money- 
worshipping people incapable of understanding that a man can act 
out of other motives than money." 323 Herzl commented, "I find the 
anti-Semites fully within their rights." 324 

Modern Jewish writers on Anti-Semitism never acknowledge the 
possibility that Gentiles have a basic right to defend themselves from 
"frightful" Jewish financial power and that anti-Semites could be 
"fully within their rights." If a Gentile described Jewish financial 
predators as "leeches," — even when such is acknowledged by one of 
the leading lights of Zionism — he would certainly be called an anti- 
Semite. 

Is it any wonder that a thoughtful Christian such as Saint Thomas 
Aquinas, who was considered a great exponent of love and charity, 
would also speak out against the Jewish practice of usury? 

The Jews should not be allowed to keep what they have obtained 
from others by usury; it were best that they were compelled to 
work so that they could earn their living instead of doing nothing 
but becoming avaricious.'' — THOMAS AQUINAS, Saint. 13th 
century scholastic philosopher. 325 

As I read more Jewish histories, I learned that usury was just one 
of many predatory financial practices in the commercial sector that 
provoked opposition in the Christian community. 

Jewish Commercial Activities 

Usury was the greatest source of Jewish power and certainly the 
wellspring of the Jewish banking families that dominated Europe for 
hundreds of years, but Jews also found profit in many other activities, 
both credible and contemptible. 

While Jewish religious teaching forbade usury to fellow Jews as a 
pernicious practice, it encouraged Jews to engage in usury against the 
Gentiles. The same principle extended to every economic competition 
between Jew and Gentile. Financial acumen combined with powerful 
group cohesion and economic strategy provided powerful weapons in 



Jewish Supremacism 169 

the battle for commercial dominance in Europe and later in America. 
The fact that Jews practiced a dual set of ethics — an altruistic one for 
themselves and a predatory one for Gentiles — contributed to their 
economic domination even in the more ordinary business endeavors. 

Many of the most egregious practices were condemned by a (Jew- 
ish) Frankfort synod of 1603 in order to prevent hillul hashem (disgrace 
of the Jewish religion). "Those who deceive Gentiles profane the name 
of the Lord among the Gentiles." 326 

That statement has been much quoted by those who dismiss anti- 
Gentile financial measures as representative of a bygone era. How- 
ever, a subsequent rabbinic responsa clarified the issue as a result of a 
dispute between two Jews who contested the spoils of the deception 
of a Gentile. It held that exploitation and deceit against Gentiles is 
permissible as long hillul hashem does not occur; that is, if the act does 
not damage the Jews as a group. Jacob Katz says, "Ethical norms ap- 
plied only to one's own kind." 327 Just as it was morally wrong to prac- 
tice usury on fellow Jews and morally commendable to be usurious 
with Gentiles, it is decreed morally ethical for Jews to engage in prof- 
itable unethical acts toward Gentiles as long as they can do so without 
harming the Jewish community. 

The following passage from the vital Code of Maimonides clearly 
shows the dual economic morality in business dealings. It should not 
be forgotten that Jews consider Maimonides their greatest philoso- 
pher during the enlightenment. 

A heathen cannot prefer charges of overreaching because it is 
said "one his brothel (Lev. 25:14). 328 However, if a heathen has 
defrauded an Israelite he must return the overcharge according to 
our laws (in order that the rights of) a heathen should not exceed 
(those of) an Israelite. (The Code of Maimonides, Book 12, The 
Book of Acquisition) 329 

Jewish teaching commanded Jews to aid their brothers and not to 
compete with one another in attempts to exploit Gentiles. Jacob Katz 
traces a large body of Jewish literature forbidding competition be- 
tween Jews. They were barred from interfering with monopolies con- 
trolled by other Jews and from underbidding fellow Jews. They were 
always to cooperate with other Jews in the face of Gentile competition 
so as "not to lose the money of Israel." 330 

The Jewish Team Strategy 

It is difficult to overstate how Jewish economic solidarity and, 
when they deem them necessary, economic boycott or hostility can 
injure commercial enterprise. In my chapter on media control, I 
discussed the well-coordinated Jewish takeover of the Gentile-owned 
Times-Herald in Washington, D.C., which was accomplished by 



170 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Economic Exploitation 

quietly having Jewish advertisers and agencies leave the Herald and 
drive it into insolvency and then returning their revenue after the 
newspaper was safely in Jewish hands. Such is indicative of the many 
ways that group strategy can have tremendous economic impact on 
almost any business enterprise. 

Take, for example, the impact that government has on almost any 
major corporation in America. Key bureaucrats can influence gov- 
ernment contracts, environmental compliance, civil rights, tax liabil- 
ity, and regulations on items such as food and drugs. If a Jewish gov- 
ernment administrator has hostility toward a particular corporation 
— or a vested interest in it — obviously he can have a tremendous 
impact on its financial health. If a Jew has an important corporate 
purchasing authority, he can choose to buy a product from either a 
Gentile firm or one owned by fellow Jews. His decision will have a 
profound effect, for good or ill, on the two entities. The Gentile in this 
instance has been conditioned to think that everyone must be judged 
on his or her merits and that it would be immoral to be biased for his 
own race. Furthermore, he learns that his primary mission is the good 
of the company or government agency he serves. The Jew, on the 
other hand, has been conditioned from early life to think in terms of 
the good of his group and of Gentile perfidy from Pharaoh to Hitler. 
Is it any wonder that the Jewish manager is likely to choose the Jewish 
firm to fill the contract or the Jewish applicant to fill the important ex- 
ecutive vacancy? Such actions might seem altruistic, but they are also 
self-serving, for just as he knows he will assist a fellow Jew when he 
can, he knows that somewhere along the line he will be assisted in the 
same way. 

A classic example of ruthless Jewish team business strategy was 
revealed in a 2001 study by Avner Halperin of MIT's Faculty of Busi- 
ness Administration. The Israeli daily Ha'aretz had a story about 
Halperin' s study called, "Why American CEOs of Israeli Firms Fail." 
331 It stated, "Lots of startups hired Americans as top executives in or- 
der to facilitate entry into the United States market." The gist of the 
article is that dozens of Israeli firms lured American executives to 
their firms as executive officers so as to get a jump start in American 
markets. Not surprisingly for anyone who understands Jewish team 
ethics and strategy, all the Gentile hires were fired after they had 
served their purpose. The Jewish Mr. Halperin blames the firings on 
cultural clashes between Jews and Gentiles, but the fact remains that 
in his study of over 90 firms with 25% of them having hired a Gentile 
CEO, that, "The result: every one of the companies wound up firing 



Jewish Supremacism 171 

their American CEO." 332 While ever increasing numbers of American 
firms such as Disney are taken over by team-aligned Jews (while Gen- 
tiles are told it would be wrong to discriminate against Jews or any 
other minority), Jewish firms work relentlessly purge any potential 
Gentile interlopers. 

Historically there are many examples of this "team effort" utilized 
for economic and political advantage. Roth discusses the appointment 
of a Marrano Jew, Diego Arias Davilia, as state treasurer in 15th cen- 
tury Spain. 333 The terms "Marrano" and "New Christian" are used to 
denote Jews who falsely converted to Christianity, while practicing 
Judaism covertly. 334 Roth points out that through Davilia's influence 
many other "New Christians" rose to high positions. He also shows 
that the Marranos also controlled all New World imports and exports 
as well as their distribution in Spain. If Roth is right and the Jews, as a 
closed syndicate, controlled all the trade during that period, would 
not that cause hostility from Gentile merchants? 

All over Europe the Jews used their common languages and or- 
ganizations to gain a competitive advantage over Christians and Mus- 
lims in the Mediterranean region. In his book The Jews of the Ottoman 
Empire and the Turkish Republic, Stanford Shaw shows how Jews had a 
system of bills of exchange honored only by other Jewish traders and 
bankers, giving them a competitive edge. 335 

A case study in Opatow, Poland, during the 17th and 18th centu- 
ries by Gershon Hundert called The Jews in a Polish Private Town: The 
Case of Opatow in the Eighteenth Century 336 illustrates how the Jews 
came to dominate commercial life. There were constant complaints 
that the Jews refused to join the craft guilds; that they controlled the 
trade and prices of raw materials; that they imported finished goods 
into the town, undercutting the local Christian artisans; that they did 
not buy from Christians; that there were complaints . . . that Jews had 
pushed Christians entirely out of commerce, with the result that 
Christian merchants were forced to move elsewhere. 337 Hundert 
writes that "Jewish domination of the town's commerce . . . was al- 
most complete." 338 He also notes that Jews came to dominate all 
phases of the alcoholic beverage business, including its manufactur- 
ing, distribution and retail. 

Some Jewish writers even implied that Jewish union leaders in 
America were more inclined to be conciliatory to management if their 
union membership was mostly Gentile rather than Jewish. 339 If that is 
true, then one could presume that Jewish firms would be likely to get 
more favorable labor agreements than Gentile firms. One can easily 
see the powerful advantage such firms would have over their Gentile 
competitors. There are many ways that group cohesiveness and loy- 
alty can corrupt and ultimately pervert supposedly free markets. 



172 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Economic Exploitation 
Banks and Stock Exchanges 

The first family of banking over the last two centuries has been the 
Rothschilds. From them came the most powerful banking houses of 
Europe. The founder of the House of Rothschild, Mayer Amschel 
Rothschild, was born in 1743 in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Am- 
schel studied first to be a rabbi and then decided to go into money- 
lending and finance instead. He ultimately became the financial agent 
of the British government during the Napoleonic Wars and launched 
the greatest banking houses in Europe, with his sons going to the con- 
tinent's major capitals and establishing banks there. 

I read a very flattering book on the Rothschilds that related the 
story of Mayer Amschel's most famous financial coup. During the 
great battle between Napoleon and Wellington at Waterloo, the Lon- 
don stock market suffered as traders worried about the possibility of 
Napoleon's victory. Amschel saw the important battle as an unparal- 
leled business opportunity. Knowing that if Napoleon won, the stock 
market would crash, and that if France lost, the market would soar, 
Amschel set up a system whereby he would learn the outcome of the 
war before anyone else got the news. Using carrier pigeons over land 
and a series of boats with signal lanterns at intervals of a mile or so 
across the English Channel, he learned before anyone else that Napo- 
leon had lost at Waterloo. He then had his confederates put out the 
false information that Napoleon had won. This lie led to a devastating 
crash of the London stock exchange. Valuable stocks sold for pennies 
on the dollar. Amschel and his Jewish associates, knowing that Britain 
had actually won, bought up the stocks for a pittance. Overnight, as 
the London market learned of the British victory, these stocks became 
worth a huge fortune. 

The book presented the Rothschild's fraud as clever and 
admirable. One must pause to think about the fortunes lost — 
fortunes that had been acquired by years of toil and genius — of 
businesses literally stolen from their creators, of lives broken. Did the 
author think that this huge fortune simply materialized out of the air? 
Did the author care that money comes not only from those who create 
and lead companies, but also from the hard work of thousands of 
laborers? Such a theft affects salaries, working conditions, 
employment and many other factors. Many hundreds of thousands 
ultimately had to pay the high cost of Rothschild's swindle. 

Mayer Amschel used the enormous wealth he acquired through 
his Waterloo scheme (among others) to establish his five sons, 



Jewish Supremacism 173 

Amschel, Salomon, Nathan, Karl, and James, in their own banking 
houses across Europe. As discussed in my chapter on the Russian 
Revolution, the Rothschilds have readily used their massive wealth to 
influence nations on behalf of Jewish interests, as when they ripened 
Russia for revolution by canceling loans in protest over the Czar's 
May Laws. 340 Rothschild's ill-gotten wealth also effectively bought his 
family the first Jewish seat in the British Parliament and even 
membership in the British aristocracy. By combining the power of 
their own family's huge banks and other Jewish-owned banks, they 
could literally bring a nation's economy to its knees. By dominating 
international banking, they could set their own financial terms to 
cash-hungry nations and amass even greater riches. 

Because of the competitive advantages of Rothschild's interna- 
tional contacts, Jews dominated private banking throughout Europe. 
For instance, there was almost a complete absence of Gentile banking 
firms in Prussia in the late 19th century. In 1923 Berlin there were 150 
Jewish banks and only 11 non-Jewish banks. 341 342 

In the stock market, schemes similar to Rothschild's Waterloo ploy 
have been used for generations, finally resulting in the center of world 
trading, Wall Street, becoming dominated by Jewish stock and in- 
vestment-banker operations. 

In the book Our Crowd and a relatively recent one, the New Crowd: 
The Changing Jewish Guard on Wall Street, Jewish writers Judith Ehrlich 
and Barry Rehfeld fawningly relate the overwhelming Jewish take- 
over of the nexus of the American economy. 343 344 Ivan Boesky and 
Michael Milken, who stole close to two billion dollars between them, 
are glowingly praised for their brilliance and market savvy. 

When I was in high school, my father had some modest stock in- 
vestments. His broker was a politically conservative Jew, R. New- 
mann of the firm of Kohlmeyer & Company. I got a job working for 
Newmann, "plotting curves" — the term for charting stocks and 
commodities. At the time of my employment, I had little understand- 
ing on the Jewish issue. I liked Newmann, and he always seemed to 
have a pertinent statement handy in response to the latest outrages of 
liberalism. Newmann had made a fortune in the market, and while I 
worked for him I discovered the real secret of making money in the 
market and the reason Jews have come to dominate the brokerage in- 
dustry. 

Newmann was constantly on the phone with his fellow Jews in 
New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. Each member of his circle 
knew other Jews as well as a few Gentiles in business, government, 
and media and at the critical junctures of the market. In his conversa- 
tions Newmann often spoke using words that I could not understand: 
they were Yiddish. Occasionally, after the telephone conversation, he 



174 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Economic Exploitation 

would quickly write out an order for a major stock or commodity 
purchase and have me run it to the clerk for submission. I remember 
frequent transactions that netted him tens of thousands of dollars. I 
asked him what his secret was, and he told me that he had no secret. 
"Information," he said, "that's how you make real money in the mar- 
ket. You have to get the information before the crowd gets it. Once it 
is in the newspapers it's too late." 

He felt safe bragging to a quiet high-school student, and I listened 
and learned a lot. 

"Let's take the government," he said. "Imagine you knew some- 
one in the Federal Reserve who had inside information that Arthur 
Burns planned to raise interest rates. After all, someone has to know 
these things before the world knows. How could you do in the bond 
market or, for that matter, a dozen other markets that are extremely 
interest rate sensitive? Or how about if you knew a friend in the De- 
partment of Defense, and he knew if Lockheed or McDonnell-Douglas 
would get the new fighter-plane contract, do you think you could 
make a fortune? 

Face it, someone must know ahead of time. Or how about if your 
friends knew where the next military base would be opened? Think 
you could do pretty well in real estate? Or say you knew someone at 
the Justice Department who lets you know that they will drop their 
antitrust litigation against IBM. When that news comes out, what 
happens to the stock? Would you buy IBM stock? And it's not just 
government information that can make you a king's ransom. For in- 
stance, if you had friends at IBM and knew before anyone else that 
IBM was going to give a contract for a hundred thousand computer 
cases to a small company, what do you think might happen to that 
penny stock? There's a million ways," he would tell me, "how infor- 
mation means money." 

I asked Newmann if insider trading was illegal, and he told me, 
"They might as well make breathing illegal." He said it was techni- 
cally illegal but that it was almost impossible to prove — and that it 
was not really even looked into except in the most blatant cases — 
usually involving huge amounts of money. 

Years later, such manipulation of enormous sums of money led to 
the biggest stock-market scandal in history. In 1986 Dennis Levine, 
Ivan Boesky, Martin Siegel, and Michael Milken were charged with 
insider trading of stocks and bonds worth billions of dollars. Boesky 
admitted his guilt and was fined $100 million, and millions more 
were eventually paid by Milken, who after all the fines and litigation 



Jewish Supremacism 175 

and some jail time, still came out a very rich man. In 1987 Milken 
made $550 million for his activities the year before — more than all 
but the top 41 of the Fortune 500 companies earned that year. Levine, 
Boesky, Siegel, and Milken were guilty of the greatest financial fraud 
perpetrated since the Rothschild's theft of the English stock exchange. 
It should also be noted that with their Jewish lawyers, and facing 
Jewish judges, they served light sentences in minimum security 
federal jails for their enormous crimes. 

It is instructive to note how the Jewish power structure reacted to 
the Boesky affair. Some top Jewish leaders, including Laurence Tisch 
(who later became top man at CBS), Felix Rohatyn (now U.S. ambas- 
sador to France), and David Gordis, executive vice-president of the 
American Jewish Committee, came together to do damage control. 
The Palm Beach Jewish World quoted Rabbi Gordis as saying that be- 
cause of the arrests, Jews would be seen as "exploiters of the economy 
and profiteers." 345 

If my friend Mr. Newmann was right and inside information 
equals "money" in a modern market economy, what does that mean 
for the most cohesive and organized group in the world? Many Jew- 
ish young people are as knowledgeable in finance from an early age 
as many Gentile kids are familiar with the star players of the Super 
Bowl or World Series. Ivan Boesky is exceptional only in the magni- 
tude of his theft. Insider information of one sort or another is incredi- 
ble power in the hands of people who know how to make use of it. 
Around the corner, or around the world, it is the greatest weapon in 
an economic war. The spoils of that war are not only the luxuries that 
money can buy, but also the enormous political and media power it 
purchases. 

The fact that tiny Jewish minorities often rise to economic domi- 
nance in Gentile nations of both the Mideast and Europe certainly 
played an important role in the repeated rise of anti-Semitism. Even 
when businessmen act perfectly legally, a cohesive and powerful 
team effort will consistently amass collective power over a scattered 
and individualistic mass. Such is the elemental nature of business. 
When the team strategy is combined with inside information gar- 
nered by Jewish penetration into upper-level administrative roles in 
Government and businesses, the accumulation of incredible power is 
inevitable. 

I was soon to learn, however, that the secrets of Jewish financial 
success were far more than simply intelligence and team effort. I came 
to learn about an unexpected Jewish dominance in some of the most 
unsavory criminal enterprises that have ever afflicted mankind. It was 
time for me to investigate how the darkest sides of the Jewish charac- 
ter influenced the rise of anti-Semitism. 



176 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Economic Exploitation 

I read that Jews have played a surprisingly powerful role in or- 
ganized crime from ancient to present times. From having watched an 
endless stream of Hollywood movies portraying an Italian flavor to 
gangsterism, I did not expect that the worldwide Jewish involvement 
in organized crime made Sicilians look very small-time. 



Chapter 8 

The Roots of Anti-Semitism II: 
Crime and Treachery 

I grew up on movies. I never failed to go to the Saturday matinee, 
and over the years movies have been my main form of entertainment. 
My idea of an evening out is still dinner and a movie. Of the hun- 
dreds of films I have seen over the years, I have many recollections of 
gangster films. Because of those films and many newspaper and 
magazine articles and novels, I long associated organized crime with 
Italians — specifically, with Sicilian- Americans. It is a common asso- 
ciation. Gangsters are synonymous in almost everyone's mind with 
Italian features and Italian accents. One makes an almost automatic 
subliminal connection between the gangsters and spaghetti. 

In high school I came across an article about Murder, Inc., a huge 
criminal syndicate based in New York City that was one of the most 
evil and powerful crime organizations in the history of the United 
States. It specialized in murder-for-hire and ran every kind of criminal 
racket, generating hundreds of deaths and the theft of tens of millions 
of dollars. Thomas Dewey (later a presidential candidate) helped 
break up the organization. The cast of characters of Murder, Inc. 
amazed me, for they were almost all Jews. Its original members be- 






178 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

came the leaders of organized crime through the 1980s and included 

crime boss Meyer Lansky. 

I then read that the biggest boss of organized crime since the time 

of Al Capone was Jewish. I 
thought he would be a Sicil- 
ian as depicted in the movies. 
The book Lansky by Hank 
Messick documented a view 
of organized crime far differ- 
ent than I saw at my Saturday 
matinees. 

The top law enforcement 
sources and investigative re- 
porters agreed that Lansky 
was the master gangster in 
America. He had been the 
most powerful person in the 
American crime syndicates 




Jews objected to the cover on 
the left pointing out that Jews 
control organized crime in the 
United States. 



for four decades, yet most Americans — who certainly know the 
names Al Capone and John Dillinger — have never heard of Meyer 



Colorful Members of Murder, Inc. 


Al GLASS 


Carl SHAPIRO 


"Nig" ROSEN 


Max 'The Jerk" GOLOB 


Irving "Chippy" WEINER 


"Fat Sidney" BLATZ 


"Abbadabba" BERMAN 


"Waxey" WECHSLER 


Allie "Tick Tock" 


Bo WEINBERG 


"Tootsie" FEINSTEIN 


TANNENBAUM 


Emanuel "Mendy" WEISS 


Hyman KASNER 


Max SHAMAN 


Sholem BERNSTEIN 


Mickey COHEN 


"Happy" MELTZER 


Jacob "Hooky" 


"Pittsburg Phil" 


Al SLIVERMAN 


ROTH MAN 


STRAUSS 


Harry "Big Greenie" 


Charlie WORKMAN 


'Jack" GOLDSTEIN" 


GREENBAUM 


MertWERTHEIMER 


Abe" WAGNER 


Jacob SHAPIRO 


'Pretty" AM BERG 


"Bugsy" GOLDSTEIN 


Sam GASBERG 


"Dopey Benny" FEIN 


"Bugsy" SIEGEL 


Arnold ROTHSTEIN 


FrankieTEITELBAUM 


Benny "The Boss" 


Joey SILVERS 


"Lulu" ROSENKRANZ 


TANNENBAUM 


"Fattv" KOPERMAN 


Charlie SOLOMON 


Meyer LANSKY 


Izzzy FARBSTEIN 


Lou COHEN 


"Gangy" COHEN 


Lou GLASSER 


Abe SLABOW 


"Puggy" FEINSTEIN 


Willie SHAPIRO 


Yasha KATZENBERG 


"Dandy Phil" KASTEL 


Max BLECKER 


Max RUBIN 


"Longy" ZWILLMAN 


Harry MILMAN 


Charlie YANOWSKI 


Isidore "Curlev" HOLZ 


"Muddy" KASOFF 


Moses "Moey Dimples" 


Paul BERGEN 


Hyman YURAN 


WOLINSIKY 


"Wolfie" COLDIS 





Jewish Supremacism 179 

Lansky. The most notorious gangster was not Italian; he was in fact 
Jewish and an ardent supporter of Zionism. Newsweek reported the 
following: 

Each year, Lansky and his underworld associates pour vast sums 
into the Israeli bonds and Israeli philanthropies. As the daily 
Ha'aretz saw it, the government seemed afraid of losing the mil- 
lions of dollars in illicit money first "laundered" in mob-controlled 
institutions and then funneled into Israeli business and industry. 346 

Investigative reporter Jack Anderson talked about the issue in The 

Washington Post: 

This underworld boodle — much of it raised from nefarious enter- 
prises in the U.S. — is "laundered" before it arrives in Israel. 347 

In Lansky, Messick reveals the relationship between Israeli and 
American Jewish gangsters 

Certainly Jewish gangsters have long and openly supported Jew- 
ish causes and the state of Israel. On the night Lansky's ex- 
partner, Bugsy Siegel, was executed, the Flamingo was taken over 
by Moe Sedway. When asked how he so conveniently happened to 
be in Las Vegas, he explained that he was there to arrange a United 
Jewish Appeal fund drive. 348 

As an illustration of how Jewish gangsters are treated in the Hol- 
lywood media, one only has to look at the treatment accorded the no- 
torious gangster Bugsy Siegel in the film 

Bw?si/. 349 The film downplayed his Jew- 

. * J , . j r A • , Welcome to the ' 

ishness and portrayed one of America s Kosher Nostra 

most bloodthirsty and merciless mur- _. ... . 
derers as a handsome and playful ro- 
mantic, a man of vision, portrayed by 
the thoroughly Anglo-Saxon-looking 
Warren Beatty. Siegel was portrayed as a 
kind-hearted man who had a somewhat BuQSV Siegel 

rough side. Even though I was familiar 

with the horrible deeds of the real Bugsy Siegel, while watching the 
movie I found myself liking him. It did not surprise me to learn that 
the film had been written by James Toback and directed by Barry Lev- 
inson. 

Messick sums it up well when he writes: 

The real leaders of crime have remained hidden while the nation's 
law enforcement agencies have chased minor punks. . . . Research 
reveals that non-Mafia leaders of crime have been hiding behind 
the vendetta-ridden society for decades. ... I have been smeared 
as anti-Semitic from coast to coast by gangsters who used religion 
as a cloak. 350 



w 




180 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 
"Russian Revolution" and/or "Russian Mafia" 

In the final years of the 20th century, the most dangerous criminal 
organization in the United States and all over the world is the 
"Russian Mafia." Much like the truth about the so-called Russian 
Revolution, the "Russian Mafia" is neither Russian nor Mafia. In a 
word, it is: Jewish. 

Just as the media downplayed the huge role of Jewish organized 
crime in America throughout the 20th century (from Murder, Inc. to 
Meyer Lansky's Syndicate), so they have hidden from the American 
people the truth about the modern crime syndicate called the Organi- 
zatsiya — the most powerful criminal organization in the world. 

The members of the Organizatsiya come from parts of the former 
Soviet empire, but they don't identify themselves as Russian, and cer- 
tainly not as mafia. They are exceedingly proud Jews who support 
Jewish causes with the same exuberance shown by Meyer Lansky and 
his cohorts. 

In the mid-1970s I read Hustling on Gorky Street, a book written by 
Yuri Brokhin, a former Jewish pimp for one of the crime organizations 
in Russia. 351 Konstantin Simis, a prominent Jewish lawyer for organ- 
ized crime, wrote another important book on the subject called USSR: 
The Corrupt Society. 352 Both books make clear the Jewish control of or- 
ganized crime in the Soviet Union. Brokhin brags that Jews are the 
only ones intelligent enough to run large-scale organized crime. Slavs, 
he says, are capable of only street crime. Of course, neither book men- 
tions the advantages of Jewish criminals having allies in the heavily 
Jewish Soviet bureaucracy. When the Communist regime fell, the al- 
ready powerful and Jewish crime groups grew dramatically, so much 
so, that it could be said that no nation has ever suffered more in the 
grip of organized crime than Russia does today. 

Even the Russian President, Boris Yeltsin, is clearly under the 
thumb of organized crime, as evidenced by his appointment of Jewish 
organized crime figure Boris Berezovsky to Russia's National Security 
Council. Yeltsin had to rescind Berezovsky's appointment after some 
of Russia's non-Jewish newspapers made an issue of his crime 
connections. Berezovsky is thought to be the richest person in Russia, 
followed closely by his fellow tribesman, Vladimir Gusinsky, who has 
become the most powerful media boss. Since the fall of the Soviet 
Union, the Jewish mob spread rapidly all over the world, and many 
authorities in law enforcement now considered its American branch 
as the most powerful and dangerous crime organization in America. 



Jewish Supremacism 181 



After the murder of comedian Bill Cosby's son in Los Angeles, the 

press identified the alleged murderer as Mikail Markhasev, a 

Ukranian immigrant, when in fact he was a 

Jewish member of the so-called "Russian 

Mafia." Invariably, Jewish film and 

television producers portray the gangsters 

as blond, blue-eyed Russians, with not even 

a scant suggestion of their real Jewish 

identity. Casting these Jewish criminals as 

Russian is a double lie. It is inaccurate as to 

their Jewish origin, and it libels the Russian 

people. Again, the contradictions of Jewish 

power come to the fore. The masters of the 

media will not tolerate even a truthful 

expose of Jewish perfidy, yet they 

perpetuate false and pernicious images of 

others. 

Occasionally, though, the truth breaks 
out, even if it isn't in the movies. The Village 
Voice, on May 26, 1998, ran a story called 
"The Most Dangerous Mobster in the World" by Robert Friedman. 353 
He writes: 




Mikail Markhasev, con- 
victed slayer of Bill 
Cosby's son, labeled as 
Ukranian by the media, 
is actually Jewish. 



According to the FBI and Israeli Intelligence, Semion Mogilevich 
rules over an arms trafficking, money-laundering, drug-running and 
art-smuggling red mafia, the most dangerous mobster in the 
world... 

The leader of the Red Mafia is a 52 year old Ukranian born Jew. 
He is a shadowy figure known as the brainy Don — he holds an 
economics degree — and he has never been exposed by the media. 

Robert Freedman, himself Jewish, writes that the Organizatsiya 
has even brought in ex-commandos from Israel as gunmen, and they 
are so ruthless that some policemen will not work the cases because 
they won't hesitate to go after a cop's family. Freedman goes on to 
write: 

Jewish organizations have lobbied the Justice Department to 
downplay the Russian Mob, fearing that adverse publicity will jeop- 
ardize the mass exodus of Russian Jews to Israel. 354 

As well it might. But what about the exodus of "Russian Mafia" 
Jews to America? Obviously there is no concern about that, for the in- 
terests of the Israeli state to augment its Jewish population — and the 
sacred interests of Jewish public relations — are far more important 
than the rights of the people of the United States to defend themselves 
from this horrific Jewish organized-crime syndicate. 



182 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

The Jewish 2 percent of the population has the dubious distinction 
of producing the lion's share of organized crime in America in the 
20th century, from Murder, Inc. to Lansky's Syndicate to the "Russian 
Mafia" of Semion Mogilevich. This hidden fact suggests the possibil- 
ity of similar behavior in former times. 

In looking into the history of Jewish criminal behavior, I found 
many major historical figures and chroniclers who feared Jewish 
criminal organizations. (If this volume could afford the space, the be- 
low sampling could expand a hundredfold): 

Roman statesman Marcus Cicero: Flaccus, a friend who was a customs 
official found himself persecuted for stopping the illegal flow of gold from 
Rome to Jerusalem. Cicero in defending Flaccus condemns such early 
smuggling and money-laundering and the efforts to intimidate an honest 
public official from doing his duty. He says, Softly, Softly! I want none but 
the judges to hear me. The Jews have already got me into a fine mess, as 
they have many other gentlemen. (Oratio Pro Flacco) 

First century Roman philosopher Lucius Seneca referred to the Jews 
as that "most criminal nation." 

Napoleon: The Jews are the master robbers of the modern age; they are 
the carrion birds of humanity. . . . We ought to ban the Jews from com- 
merce because they abuse it. . . " 

Daniel Defoe: The works Roxana, Robinson Crusoe, and The Military 
Memoirs of Capt. George Carleton have frequent allusions to greedy and 
unprincipled criminal Jews whose stock in trade is "fenced stolen arti- 
cles." 

William Prynne, a Puritan writer opposing Cromwell's efforts to allow the 
Jews back into England, describes Jewish offenses as "usuries and de- 
ceits, clippings and falsifying monies." (from A short Demurrer to the 
Jewes long discontinued Remitter into England). 

Charles Dickens had the classic characterization of the criminal Jew (Fa- 
gin) in Oliver Twist. The character would enlist Gentile children to pick- 
pocketry and an assortment of similar criminal enterprises. 

Tacitus Among themselves they are inflexibly honest and ever ready to 
show compassion, though they regard the rest of mankind with all the ha- 
tred of enemies. . . (The History 5.4,659) 

There is much evidence of a Jewish-dominated criminal under- 
world that has existed for hundreds of years. One of the most amaz- 
ing things I discovered was a book published at the time of Protestant 
reformer Martin Luther. Europe was so plagued by organized crime 
that the authorities felt compelled to publish a lexicon of criminal 
terms. Luther supported its publication as a means of fighting crime 
and wrote an introduction to the lexicon in which he noted that the 
vocabulary of criminals was full of Hebrew words. In the preface Lu- 
ther wrote: 



Jewish Supremacism 183 

I consider it useful that this book be widely read, so that it may 
be seen and understood how the Devil rules this world, so that men 
may be wise against him. It is true that this Rothwelsche Sprache 
(underworld slang) comes from the Jews, for it contains many He- 
brew words, as those who know Hebrew will observe. 355 

When Criminals Control the Media 

he fact that so few Gentiles are aware of the long and integral rela- 
tionship between Jews and organized crime is due to their enormous 
power in media that shields them from the image that Italians have in 
relation to the mafia. It is perhaps typified in the interconnectivity of 
Jewish organized crime in Russia and Jewish media power there. For 
instance, two of the leading organized crime figures there are Bere- 
zovsky and Vladimir Gusin- 
sky. Both are media moguls 
in Russia, having enormous 
power in TV, radio, news- 
papers and magazines. Gus- 
insky was recently indicted 
by the Russian Prosecutor's 
office for corruption and 
money-laundering. 

In 1999 Berezovsky 
seized control of Moscow's 
TV-6 television station. Rus- 
sia's premiere daily newspa- 
per, Kommersant was also ac- 
quired by Berezovsky and he 

promptly fired its editor, Raf 
Shakirov, who said that "his 
ouster [is] an attempt to curb 
often critical coverage of the 
tycoon's business and politi- 
cal activities." 356 

Forbes magazine published a scathing article about Berezovsky 
entitled "The Godfather of the Kremlin," with no byline for fear of vio- 
lence against its authors. The magazine's editor, James Michaels, said 
that Berezovsky "stands tall as one of the most powerful men in Rus- 
sia. Behind him lies a trail of corpses, uncollected debts and competi- 
tors terrified for their lives." 357 The Forbes article asserted, 

"Assassination is a tool of business competition. Scores of 
business leaders and media personalities have been killed ... Bere- 
zovsky controls Russia's biggest national TV network. His control 
was solidified shortly after the first chairman of the network was 




Vladimir Gusinsky on his way to Russian 
Prosecutors office. Gusinsky is also head 
of the Russian Jewish Congress and now 
Hives in Soain to avoid Russian extradition 



184 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 



assassinated gangland style. Berezovsky was immediately fingered 
by the police as a key suspect, but the murder remains unsolved 
two years later ... Such is the Russian business environment today 
that the men at the top have use for the shadowy army of killers 
and thugs who work further down in the scale of corruption, run- 
ning prostitute and protection rackets." 358 

Incredibly, in 1996 Berezovsky became a member of the Kremlin 
Security Council and privy to the most sensitive information of Rus- 
sia. It was also revealed by the Moscow Times newspaper that Putin 
used to take his holidays at Berezovsky's summer home in Moscow. 
Yet, even for Putin, Berezovsky's blatant murder and racketeering 
was too much. The Russian Prosecutor is now pursing him for crimi- 
nal indictment. Both Bere- 
zovsky and Gusinsky, now 
on the run from authori- 
ties, are screaming that 
they are simply victims of 
"anti-Semitism." The rela- 
tionship between Jewish 
organized power, organ- 
ized crime, media and gov- 
ernment power is crystal 
clear in the former Soviet 
Union. Just as they seized 
power in 1917 as Bolshe- 
viks, they have now seized 
power at the fall of Com- 
munism through corrup- 
tion and organized crime. 

Fortune magazine ran 
an article entitled "Russia's 
Robber Barons," profiling 
ten of the most important 
Russian business tycoons 
and mobsters who have 
catapulted to economic 
dominance in Russia with the collapse of communism; these included 
Gusinsky, Berezovsky, Boris Hait, Mikhail Friedman, Vladimir 
Vinogradov, Vladimir Potanin, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Alexander 
Smolensky, and Pyotr Aven. 359 It is estimated that more than 50 
percent of Russia's raw wealth is owned by these ten men. While the 
average Russian barely survives on less than an average of $200 per 



OF THE 

Kremlin 

BORIS BEREZOVSKY 

AND THE 
LOOTING OF RUSSIA 



EBNIKOV 



Jewish Supremacism 185 

month, enormous wealth and power has been concentrated in the 
hands of a tiny group of men loyal not to the Russian people but only 
to their tribe. These men certainly did not earn this vast wealth that 
they accumulated in only 3 or 4 years after the demise of 
Communism. It was acquired through fraud, corruption, bribery, 
theft, and murder. The world knows almost nothing about the Jewish 
character of this theft of practically an entire nation because the 
Jewish media in Russia and in the rest of the world has chosen to keep 
this vital fact from our consciousness. Nine out of the 10 leading 
robber barons of Russia listed by Fortune magazine are Jews. 

The Slave Trade 

44 As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you 
may buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are 
round about you... 

46 You may bequeath them to your sons after you, to inherit as a 
possession forever ; you may make slaves of them, but over your 
brethren the people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another, 
with harshness. (Leviticus 25:44) 360 

Although the institution of slavery existed throughout most of 
human history, trade in human flesh has never been looked upon as a 
noble occupation. Compassionate men and women have long decried 
cruel mistreatment of slaves, especially of women and children, by 
slave traders and holders. Many agreed with Christ's admonitions to 
slaveholders to treat their slaves kindly. In contrast to the benevolent 
image assigned to them by the media, Jews historically dominated an 
international institution that embodied the darkest evils of human ex- 
ploitation: the slave trade. 

My introduction to the important Jewish role in slave trading 
came from an article about Jews written by a leading Jewish historian 
and apologist, Jacob Marcus, in the Encyclopaedia Britannica. Marcus 
casually remarked about the Jewish control of commerce in the Mid- 
dle Ages — particularly in the slave trade. 

In the dark ages the commerce of western Europe was largely in 
his [the Jew's] hand, in particular the slave trade. . . . 361 

The Jewish mastery of the slave trade did not go unnoticed to 
Christian writers of the Middle Ages. I read poignant accounts of 
European children who suffered sexual and other abuses from Jewish 
slavetraders who acquired them. In Roman times they often followed 
the path of the conquering Roman army and enslaved enemy soldiers 
and civilians. Chroniclers of the ancient and medieval periods wrote 
of their preference for fair women and children, and of their frequent 
sale in the Levant. The Jewish slavers were more than happy to satisfy 



186 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 



darker men's taste for White flesh. Horrified by reports of abuse of 
Christian women and children by Jews, a number of Christian princi- 
palities issued edicts detailing these abuses and forbidding Jews to 
own or trade in Christian women and children. Jews, in writing their 
own histories, have matter-of-factly acknowledged the Jewish role in 
slave trading, looking at it as simply an extremely lucrative Jewish 
commercial venture. In A History of the Jew: From Babylonian Exile to the 
End of World War II, published by the Jewish Publications society of 
America, the author writes very emphatically: 



Jews were among the most important 
slave dealers [in European society]. 362 



Brougkt 
to America 




What really surprised me was when I 
found out that Jews played a prominent 
role in American slavery. In the early 1970s 
I came across a book called Who Brought the 
Slaves to America by Walter White. 363 I 
could understand the role of Jews in the 
slave trade of the Mediterranean region, 
but it seemed unlikely to me that the very 
small Jewish population in the early 
American Colonies could dominate such a 
large enterprise. I also retained, at that 
time, Hollywood's image of White men, 
perhaps even Southerners, sailing to Africa 

and rounding up Black natives for the slave trade. In movies, articles 
and books, slavers were Anglo-Saxons with names like Smith or 
Jones. Usually they were hard drinking, uncouth Southern types. 
Later I learned that slavery was ubiquitous in Africa among native 
Blacks themselves, and that they were seldom rounded up by Whites. 
Usually, Black African slaveholders were the ones who sold them to 
the slavetraders. 

Who Brought the Slaves to America steered me to the library collec- 
tions that housed the records of the slave ships, contemporary ac- 
counts, and a number of Jewish historians who documented the role 
Jews have played in slavery (also see the Barnes Review, Sept. 97). 364 
The Jewish writers I read were prideful in their accounts of the great 
Jewish slave traders. A good case in point is Marc Raphael's Jews and 
Judaism in the United State: A Documentary History. 

Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, 
in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, 
or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated. 



Jewish Supremacism 187 

This was no less true on the North American mainland, where 
during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular 
trade' that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there 
exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New 
England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa 
of Charleston in the 1750s, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 
1760s, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760s and early 
1770s dominated Jewish slave trading on the American conti- 
nent. 365 

In North America, the slave trade had its most powerful center in 
Newport, Rhode Island. Newport formed a pivotal part of the trian- 
gular slave trade of rum and molasses from New England to Africa 
for slaves and back to the West Indies and the Colonies with the hu- 
man cargo. I discovered that it was no coincidence that Newport, cen- 
ter of the slave trade, had the oldest synagogue in America and the 
largest thriving Jewish community in the American Colonies. 

Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew of Marrano descent and a resident 
of Newport, was one of the most powerful slave traders in the 
Americas. He owned dozens of ships and imported thousands of 
Blacks into the Western Hemisphere. In an account of just two 
voyages of one of Lopez's ships, the Cleopatra, at least 250 Blacks 
perished. 366 Such horrendous loss of life in such a dirty business did 
not prevent Jewish chronicler Jacob Marcus from praising Lopez: 
"What can be said about this most attractive figure.?" 367 Although 
Lopez acquired riches in the Colonies, he violated the anti-British 
non-importation trade agreements during the revolutionary period, 
supporting Britain's interests rather than the Colonies.' 368 

Jews dominated the slave trade not only in the American Colonies 
but all over the New World. In a major Jewish history of the early 
Americas called, New World Jezvry, 1492-1776, one can find the follow- 
ing passage: 

They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. 
The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often 
appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale.... [They] were the 
largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the 
shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise.... The ships were 
not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and 
sailed under the command of Jewish captains. 369 

Many Jewish writers chronicled the Jewish role in slavery, often 
boasting of their shrewdness in the business. 

The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves 
from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It 
happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers 
who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and be- 
cause of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low 
prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the 



188 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and 
most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in 
sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often 
realized with high interest rates.. ..If it happened that the date of 
such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be 
postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644. 370 

Although certainly indefensible by today's moral standards, slav- 
ery in the United States was many times preferable to the incredibly 
cruel and murderous conditions of African slavery. The greatest in- 
humanity of Black slavery is associated with the passage to America. 
Some say that 10 to 15 percent of Black slaves died in the cramped 
and filthy conditions on the ships. Since the Jews have dominated the 
slave trade from ancient times, I realized that it is not only Blacks who 
have suffered from those inhuman conditions, but also untold num- 
bers of White people of the Mediterranean region. It should also be 
pointed out that not only were Jews the principal slave traders, they 
had a markedly higher per capita holding of slaves than non-Jews. 

All through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth, 
Jews in the North were to own black servants; in the South, the 
few plantations owned by Jews were tilled with slave labor. In 
1820, over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Rich- 
mond, and Savannah owned slaves, employed as domestic ser- 
vants; almost 40 percent of all Jewish householders in the United 
States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against 
slavery as such by Jews in the South, where they were always out- 
numbered at least 100 to l....Very few Jews anywhere in the United 
States protested against chattel slavery on moral grounds. 371 

Considering that less than 10 percent of colonists owned slaves, 
Marcus reveals that individual Jewish Households (40 percent owned 
slaves) were far more likely to own slaves than were Gentiles. With 
their comparatively greater numbers in the Mediterranean world, 
Jews constituted disproportionate slaveholders in the ancient and 
medieval world just as they were in the Colonies. The importation of 
slaves to America is a relatively recent historical phenomenon that 
lasted about 200 years. From before the time of Christ to the African 
trade of the 1700s, most of the slaves owned and bartered by Jews 
were White. 

When I learned of the Jewish role in the slave trade, it seemed to 
me that it could have certainly added to the resentment against the 
Jews felt by their host populations. Being known as the greatest 
perpetrators of the slave trade is not the best of public relations for 
Jews. It is no wonder that the Jewish-dominated media have avoided 
the issue. Only Jewish scholars, who faithfully record Jewish history, 



Jewish Supremacism 189 




primarily for Jewish readers, are allowed to travel on to such 
forbidden historical ground. 

After my first efforts on national television in the early 1970s to 
expose the Jewish role in slave trading (on PBS's — Black Perspectives 
on the News), the Nation of Islam also did extensive research on the is- 
sue. Their historical research de- 
partment came up with a tremen- 
dous amount of documented ma- 
terial on the subject that they pub- 
lished in the book called, The Se- 
cret Relationship between Blacks and 
Jews. 372 

Today, simply by repeating 
the words of prominent Jewish 
historians on the Jewish role in 
slavery, one becomes guilty of 
Anti-Semitism. It was only when 
the public began to learn some of 
the little-known facts previously 
reserved for Jewish scholars, that 
the ADL found it necessary to 
counter such "anti-Semitic" 
propaganda. The ADL and other 
Jewish organizations have re- 
sponded by trotting out a number 
of prestigious Jewish scholars 
who have publicly announced that the Jewish role in the colonial 
slave trade was "minimal." 

In Spielberg's blockbuster movie on the slave trade, Amistad, 373 
there was hardly a Jew to be found in the film. Although the Jews 
dominated the Newport, Rhode Island slave trade, all the slavers in 
the film seemed conspicuously Christian. A number of articles that 
discussed Amistad and the slave trade, including Time and Newsweek, 
went out of their way to deny a major Jewish role in slave trading. 
Unfortunately, most of their readers were not told what prominent 
Jewish historians themselves wrote about the matter before it became 
an embarrassing issue. 

Few will read the words of the editor of the magazine of the 
American Jewish Historical Society; "Jewish merchants played a 
major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, 
whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants 
frequently dominated. This is no less true on the North American 
mainland..." 374 



Steven Spielberg's movie about 
the slave trade made no mention 
of the predominant Jewish role in 
the Newport, Rl slave trade. 



190 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 
White Slavery 

Prostitution, or White slavery as it is aptly called, is another insti- 
tution as old as civilization. Even in ancient times, the fair-skinned 
beauty of European women and little boys and girls brought a pre- 
mium from the purveyors of perhaps the most brutal kind of slavery 
of all: the sexual defilement of one's body. The subjection of countless 
innocents to the filth and pain of sexual degradation is a crime of 
enormous magnitude. 

Just as they dominated the organized slave trade, Jews dominated 
prostitution. It originally came about as a natural adjunct to slavery, 
as it took no special commercial acumen to realize that a female or 
young boy slave could be rented out for sexual abuse. And fair Euro- 
pean maidens could fetch great prices from the sultans of the darker 
nations. 

From the days of the concubines of King David to the modern 
"madams" Xaviera Hollander and Heidi Fleiss, Jews have dominated 
the sex business. The Talmud is obsessed with sexual "connections" 
of what it calls "natural and unnatural" kinds, of sexual relations of 
adults with little boys and girls, with bond maidens, and with harlots. 
In the modern age, Freud and his colleagues in academia brought this 
perverted view of our natures into the classrooms and living rooms of 
America. Freud, with the help of the Jewish-influenced media, told 
Western society — with a straight face — that sexual and excretory 
organs are the most important factors in life and that every male se- 
cretly desires to have sexual relations with his mother. 

In looking into the history of prostitution, I read about a malefi- 
cent deception Jews used in Central Europe during the last century. 
During times of famine or economic hardship, well-dressed, fast- 
talking Jews would go into peasant communities and tell the parents 
of attractive Christian teenagers that their children could have a better 
life in America, which had a shortage of household labor. The Jews 
told the parents that after a short time their children could pay off the 
cost of their passage and begin a new life in the land of freedom and 
plenty. In spite of the pain of being separated from their children, 
some of the parents would consent to such an arrangement, wanting 
the best for their daughters. Instead of finding a bright, new life, tens 
of thousands ended up suffering in the brothels of the New World. 

In his book Prostitution and Prejudice, Jewish historian Edward 
Bristow writes about the world prostitution network and clearly 
shows the prominent Jewish role. 375 376 It is not hard to conceive of the 



Jewish Supremacism 191 

reaction of many Eastern Europeans to the Jewish enslavement and 
degradation of tens of thousands of Christian girls. Bristow reveals 
that the center of the Jewish trade in Gentile women from Poland and 
surrounding regions was a small town called Oswiecim, which the 
Germans called Auschwitz. That simple revelation can bring much 
understanding of the recurrent Jewish and Gentile conflict. 

Jewish domination of White slavery continues. In fact, it is on a 
larger scale now than ever before in history. The New Orleans Times- 
Picayune on January 11, 1998, ran an article titled "Slave traders Lure 
Slavic Women." It (written by Michael Specter and distributed by the 
Jewish-run New York Times News Service) documents a Jewish-run 
White slave operation of huge proportions. The piece begins with a 
poignant story about how a beautiful blonde Ukrainian girl hoping to 
escape the poverty and despair of her village life answered an ad in a 
small newspaper in her hometown promising work and opportunity 
abroad. She wound up a sex slave in Israel. 

She was 21, self-assured and glad to be out of Ukraine. Israel of- 
fered a new world, and for a week or two everything seemed possi- 
ble. Then, one morning, she was driven to a brothel, where her 
boss burned her passport before her eyes. 

"I own you," she recalled his saying. "You are my property, and 
you will work until you earn your way out. Don't try to leave. You 
have no papers and you don't speak Hebrew. You will be arrested 
and deported. Then we will get you and bring you back." 377 

In Israel the government does little to end the brutal slave system 
other than deport a small percentage of the girls they find with no 
immigration papers. Almost 1,500 Ukrainian women have been de- 
ported from Israel in the past three years. The deck is completely 
stacked against the Gentile woman and in favor of the slavemasters, 
for if they file a complaint against the slavemaster, they must remain 
in prison until a trial is held. Specter quotes the prison director at 
Neve Tirtsa as saying she did not know of a single girl who chose to 
testify against her Jewish slavemasters. The White slaver is thus pro- 
tected by the Israeli system, while the victims are punished. 

Specter identifies both the prostitutes and their masters. He quotes 
an Israeli White slave master, Jacob Golan: 

The women who work there, like nearly all prostitutes in Israel, 
are Russian, their boss is not. 

"Israelis love Russian girls," said Jacob Golan. . . . "They are 
blonde and good looking and different from us," he said, chuck- 
ling. 378 

Of course, Israel is not the only destination of the Eastern Euro- 
pean women. The Jewish gangs in Russia have strong connections 
with Jewish organized-crime syndicates all over the world. According 



192 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

to the Ukraine's interior ministry, an estimated 400,000 women under 
the age of 30 were lured from the Ukraine in the past decade — and 
that is just one of the former Soviet states. Specter quotes the Interna- 
tional Organization for Migration as estimating that 500,000 Eastern- 
Block women are trafficked into Western Europe and around the 
world annually. 379 It is a tragedy of huge proportions that gets very 
little press. 

Moment magazine, the "Magazine of Jewish Culture and Opin- 
ion," had an article on page 44 of the April, 1998 edition, called 
"Hookers in the Holy Land." 380 In it they discuss the thriving prostitu- 
tion of blonde Russian girls as a "national institution." It goes on to 
talk about the customers who even include rabbis riding bicycles to 
the whore houses. 

A good percentage of the customers — or Johns, in the lingo — 
are ultra-Orthodox Jews, pious men whose lives are guided by 
halachah (religious law), which tells them when they can or cannot 
have sex with their wives. So, on Thursday afternoons, (boys night 
out in Israel) busloads of Orthodox Jews travel from Jerusalem, 
Haifa, and points beyond to Tel Aviv for a few precious moments of 
passion in a massage parlor, behind a sand dune, or in an alleyway. 
Other customers are accountants, lawyers, policemen, and 
politicians. "The entire spectrum of Israeli society is keeping the 
hookers in business." Claims Detective Shachar, a cynical veteran 
on the Tel Aviv vice detail... Tel Baruch is so very absurd and so 
very Israel. 381 

It blatantly goes on to describe the girls, who are mostly East 
European Gentile women along with some Palestinians, as virtual 
slaves who are put on a slave auction block. 

Once the girls arrive in Israel, the crime bosses take over. The 
girls are usually taken to an "auction house," where the owners of 
the various massage parlors can bid on the talent — each one of- 
fers a price, and the highest bidder gets the girl.... The girls are vir- 
tual slaves. 382 

The article goes on to note that many of the prostitutes in Israel, 
especially those of Arab descent, encounter physical abuse from Jews 
who abuse them as an expression of their "racial-nationalist fervor." 

...find that their Jewish customers only come to them after a Pal- 
estinian terrorist act to get their own brand of sexual revenge laced 
with racial-nationalistic fervor, "...and they do it with hate and an- 
ger." 383 

In discussing the forged documents used to smuggle the girls into 
Israel, Specter notes that they have often been obtained from "elderly 



Jewish Supremacism 193 

Jewish women in the Ukraine." Even so, Specter casually refers to the 
Jewish perpetrators of this international White slavery ring as "Rus- 
sian crime gangs" or "Russian mafia." It would be bad for Jewish 
public relations if the Times-Picayune had titled the article "Jewish 
Slave traders Lure Gentile Women." 

Jewish writers on Anti-Semitism never mention the Jewish domi- 
nation of the slave trade or of prostitution over the centuries. They 
never point out that such Jewish activities could understandably lead 
to unfavorable attitudes toward Jews. 

Imagine the world-wide media reaction if Gentiles were enslaving 
hundreds of thousands of Jewish girls, putting them on auction 
blocks, and subjecting them to indescribable brutalities? Consider the 
outrage that would bellow from the Jewish media. Yet, with millions 
of Christian girls becoming the victims of Jewish criminals, there is no 
moral outcry — no international cause trumpeted by celebrities and 
politicians. 

After my discussion of these issues on the national PBS program 
Black Perspectives on the News, attacks on me as an "anti-Semite" be- 
came even more shrill. As a young man, when I read about slavery in 
the South, my heart was touched by the tales of cruelty and suffering, 
so much so that I felt guilty. But as I learned the truth about the slave 
trade, I noticed that the same Jewish writers and producers and pub- 
lishers who had instilled guilt in me never once suggested that Jews 
had any "collective guilt" for a 2,000-year record of plying their trade 
in human flesh. 

Apparently, in the new morality of the Jewish press, learning 
about White exploitation of Blacks is "history," and learning about 
Jewish exploitation of both Whites and Blacks is called "hate." 

Disloyalty 

Historically, the most common term other than moneylender asso- 
ciated with Jews has been tax collector. There are many examples, all 
the way through the 20th century, of Jews being the main instruments 
of tax collection that ruling bodies used to raise revenue. The Jewish 
historian Josephus, in his Antiquities of the Jews 384 , tells the story of a 
Jewish tax collector named Joseph in the court of the Ptolemies who 
was so ruthless and effective in collections that he bid twice the 
amount of anyone else for the right to collect taxes. In those times 
kings often took bids from tax collectors, and the one who promised 
the highest set amount would obtain the commission, and he would 
keep for himself all he collected over the amount he promised the 
king. 



194 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

Joseph's success came in no small part from the fact that he would 
kill and confiscate the property of those who refused to pay what he 
demanded. Josephus described his success as "stripping Syria to the 
bone." Yet he showed no restraint in his praise: "Joseph was a good 
man, and of great magnanimity; and brought the Jews out of a state of 
poverty and meanness, to one that was more splendid." 385 

Rulers of multicultural empires often used Jews as administrators 
because the ruling powers knew that they would have no loyalty to 
the non-Jewish people of the lands where they resided. Jews made ex- 
cellent tax collectors. They had good financial acumen, and they had 
the required trait of all good tax collectors: little sympathy for the tax- 
payer. 

In the Muslim world, the practice of using Jews as occupying ad- 
ministrators can be seen in the Arab conquest and rule of Spain in the 
eighth to 11th centuries, in the Fatimid rule over Tunisia in the 10th 
century, the Merinid occupation of Morocco in the 13th through 15th 
centuries, during Mongol rule in Iraq, and in the 16th century Otto- 
man period. The practice has continued even into the 20th century — 
in Morocco, where the French used them in this role over the Mus- 
lims, in the post-World War II satellite states of the Soviet Union in 
Eastern Europe, and even, at one time, in the control exercised by 
King Faysal in Iraq. 

One of the most repeated charges that anti-Semites have made is 
that, in retaining loyalty to their own perceived group interest, Jews 
have historically betrayed their host nations in times of war, occupa- 
tion, and hardship. Byzantine history affords an example of a relent- 
less conflict between the Jews and their host people during wartime. 

Constantinople: A Story of Repeated Betrayal 

• Jewish writers Gedalia Alon 386 and Michael Avi-Yonah 387 show 
that Byzantine authorities prophetically feared that their Jews 
would aid Persian invaders. They also were correct in fearing 
that they would assist Muslim armies as well. 

• Jews were killed in great numbers after the uncovering of a 
Jewish plot to deliver a city to the Persians. 388 

• Jews sided with the Persian invaders of the early 7th century 
and in collusion with the Samaritans massacred 100,000 Chris- 
tians. 389 

• When the Christian Byzantines retook the city, Jews were 
forcibly converted to Christianity. 

• The Jews supported the Arabs when they conquered the area in 
636-40. 390 391 



Jewish Supremacism 195 

• In the 12th century, the Byzantine Jews supported the invading 
armies of Seljuk Turks. 392 

• In the 14th-century they supported the invasions of the Otto- 
man Turks — the final conquest of Constantinople occurring 
through a Jewish quarter with the active assistance of the 
Jews. 393 

• In gratitude for their support, the Sultan imposed Jewish eco- 
nomic domination over his Christian subjects and Jews immi- 
grated into the area from throughout the Diaspora. 394 

A great deal of evidence exists that Jews supported the Saracen 
conquest of Spain 395 and served as the harsh administrators of the 
Muslim occupation government. 396 397 398 Jewish communities have 
aided the invader whenever they have seen an advantage in the over- 
throw of the existing order. Of course, Muslim societies have just as 
often been betrayed by Jews as have Christian ones. 

After the Second World War, Jews became the prominent admin- 
istrators and secret police of the brutal regimes installed by the Sovi- 
ets in Eastern Europe. In his 1981 book Uprising, David Irving shows 
that Jews so dominated in the secret police that tortured and mur- 
dered hundreds of thousands in Soviet-controlled Hungary, that 
"Anti-Semitism" was one of the motivations of the anti-Communist 
uprising. 399 Considering the Jewish involvement in the murderous 
specter of Communism, it should be no puzzle why the Jews accuse 
Eastern Europeans as being the most "anti-Semitic." 

In Russia itself, Jewish Communists were the forces that dispos- 
sessed the Russians of their own government, that made up the lead- 
ership of the murderous KGB, and who murdered the Russian royal 
family, including all the children. America 
experienced one of the most treacherous acts 
of treason in the annals of history when 
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and their Jewish 
co-conspirators stole America's atomic bomb 
secrets and gave them to the Soviets. During 
the Vietnam War, the Jewish-dominated 
New Left led pro-Viet Cong demonstrations 
while American boys died from Viet Cong 
bullets and bombs. The two most famous of 
the Vietnam era seditionists were Abbie 
Hoffman and Jerry Rubin. Jewish spies for 
Israel such as Jonathan Pollard have stolen 
some of America's most closely guarded se- 
crets. His stolen secrets were then bartered 

by Israel to the Soviets, which devastated our intelligence operations 
in Eastern Europe. 




196 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

Perhaps the classic example of their role as administrators and ex- 
ploiters in an oppressive government is found in their own chronicles. 
It is the story of their sojourn in ancient Egypt. 

The Story of Joseph 

Every Sunday school child is familiar with the biblical story of Jo- 
seph, his "coat of many colors/' and his betrayal by his brothers, en- 
slavement, and subsequent rise to great power in Egypt. When I was 
in college a friend recommended that I read the account of Joseph and 
the Israelite sojourn in Egypt in the light of my new understanding of 
historical Jewish behavior. I took out my Bible and turned to the last 
pages of Genesis and the first of Exodus, and after reading and reflect- 
ing on what I had read, I think I finally understood why God was so 
often put out with the "Chosen People." 

Genesis introduces Joseph at age 17, tattling to his father, Jacob, 
about his brother's wrongdoing. Jacob is so taken by Joseph that he 
gives him a coat of many colors that evokes jealousy in two of his 
brothers. The brothers are also disgusted by Joseph's self- 
aggrandizement in relating his dreams of his future superiority. In 
one dream, Joseph tells how he is in a field binding sheaves and how 
his sheaf stood up, whereas his brothers' sheaves were gathered all 
around it, bowed low. 400 Soon afterward, he relates a dream in which 
the sun, the stars, and the moon bow down before him. Even Jacob 
rebukes Joseph for his display of insufferable chutzpah. His brothers 
hate him so much that they decide to kill him and subsequently throw 
him down an abandoned well. However, when they see an Ishmaelite 
caravan bound for Egypt, they decide to sell their brother into slavery 
instead. 401 Joseph is taken to Egypt and eventually sold to Potiphar, 
captain of the Pharaoh's guard. 

Joseph's glib tongue and financial acumen lead to his rise as over- 
seer of an entire household. Potiphar trusts him with every detail. 
One day, while Potiphar is away, his wife cries out that Joseph is try- 
ing to rape her, and when the other servants come running, they find 
Joseph's clothes, left behind as he fled. Joseph claimed it was he who 
was victim of an attempted rape, but an enraged Potiphar throws him 
into prison anyway. 402 

Again using his cleverness and acumen, Joseph rises to become 
the top trustee of the prison and virtually runs the jail and has all the 
prisoners under his control. In the prison are several of the Pharaoh's 
servants. From them Joseph undoubtedly learns all the gossip and go- 
ings on at the royal house. Two of Pharaoh's servants, a butler and a 



Jewish Supremacism 197 

baker, have dreams that Joseph cleverly interprets. The butler is even- 
tually reinstated, and after the Pharaoh has a disturbing dream, the 
butler tells Pharaoh about Joseph's abilities. Brought before the Phar- 
aoh, Joseph interprets the famous dream of the seven fat beeves and 
the seven thin ones. Intelligently understanding the cyclical nature of 
prosperity and famine, he tells the Pharaoh that there will be seven 
good years and seven bad ones. Joseph then suggests that Pharaoh 
appoint a man "discreet and wise, and set him over the land of Egypt" 
(Genesis 42:33) . 403 Pharaoh then makes Joseph the most powerful man 
in Egypt other than himself and has him gather up the crops of Egypt. 
For the next few years Joseph collects vast amounts of grain from 
Egyptian farmers and ensconces himself as the "Lord of Egypt" and 
"ruler of Egypt," acting in the name of the Pharaoh. When drought 
and famine finally hit, Joseph hatches a scheme to increase his and the 
Pharaoh's wealth and power. As the starving Egyptians appeal to the 
Pharaoh to get back some of the grain they have deposited over the 
years, the Pharaoh tells them to go talk to Joseph. He tells them that 
they must pay for the grain and "gathers up all the money that was 
found in the land of Egypt." (Genesis 47:14) 404 A severe depression 
occurs when the currency fails. Following are a few of the powerful 
verses: 

15: And the money failed in land of Egypt, and in the land of Ca- 
naan and all the Egyptians came to Joseph and said, Give us 
bread, for why should we die in thy presence? For the money 
faileth. 

16: And Joseph said, give your cattle, and I will give you food for 
your cattle, if money fail. 

17: And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave 
them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the 
cattle of the herds, and for asses, and he fed them with bread for 
all their cattle for that year. 

18: When that year was ended, they came unto him the second 
year, and said unto him. We will not hide it from my Lord, how our 
money is spent: my lord also hath our herds of cattle: there is not 
ought left in the sight of my lord but our bodies and our lands. 

19: Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our 
land? Buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be 
slaves unto Pharaoh... 

21: and as for the people, he made slaves of them from one end 
of Egypt to the other... 

So Joseph first takes away all the money of the free Egyptians, 
then all their domesticated animals, then their homes and lands, and 
finally he puts them back on the Pharaoh's new land as slaves with 20 
percent of their crop going to the Pharaoh. The Pharaoh is ecstatic 
with this arrangement, for his treasury is overflowing, and Joseph has 



198 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

taken away all the lands of the people and put them back on it work- 
ing essentially as sharecroppers. At the same time the Egyptians are 
going through this misery, Joseph sends for and brings all of his Jew- 
ish Brethren to Egypt. Genesis makes it quite clear that Joseph gives 
the Israelites bags of gold and food and that they "live off the fat of 
the land." 

45:18 And take your father and your households, and come unto 
me; and I will give you the good of the land of Egypt, and ye shall 
eat the fat of the land. 

47:6 The land of Egypt is before thee; in the best of the land 
make they father and brethren to dwell: in the land of Goshen let 
them dwell; 

47:13 and there was no bread in all the land; for the famine was 
very sore, so that the land of Egypt and all the land of Canaan 
fainted by reason of the famine. 

47:27 And Israel dwelt in the land of Egypt, in the country of 
Goshen; and they had possessions therein, and grew, and multi- 
plied exceedingly. 

One can imagine what the Egyptians thought about Joseph taking 
all their lands and possessions and reducing them to slavery while the 
foreign Israelites are given gold, free food, and the best land in all of 
Egypt. The Egyptians had built a grand civilization with magnificent 
artistic and cultural achievements, and advances in mathematics, en- 
gineering, architecture, astronomy and agriculture. They had built the 
most enduring architectural creations in the world: the pyramids. 
How they must have chafed under the absolute power of this foreign 
tribe. According to Genesis and Exodus the arrangement persisted for 
a long time, suggesting that the Israelites were the privileged admin- 
istrators of Egypt during a long period of time. The Pharaoh could 
count on them having no loyalty to the native aristocrats or merchant 
class of Egypt, and they might have served the Pharaoh's purpose by 
directing the wrath of the people toward the Jews rather than toward 
the Pharaoh himself. At any rate, eventually the numbers and political 
and economic power of the Jews grew so excessive that even the royal 
family felt threatened — a pattern that has often been repeated in Jew- 
ish history. Note the following passages from Exodus. 

1:7 And the children of Israel were fruitful, and increased abun- 
dantly, and multiplied, and waxed exceedingly mighty, and the land 
was filled with them. 

1 :8 Now there arose up a new king over Egypt who knew not Jo- 
seph. 



Jewish Supremacism 199 

1 :9 And he said to his people, behold, the people of the children 
of Israel are more and mightier than we: 

1:10 Come on, let us deal wisely with them; lest they multiply, 
and it come to pass, that, when there falleth out any war, they join 
also unto our enemies and fight against us, and so get them up out 
of the land. 405 

Then are recorded dutifully the Egyptian pogroms against the 
Jews and Jewish celebration of Egyptian infanticide and Jewish expul- 
sion and deliverance as represented in Passover. 

The Egyptian Pharaoh was not the last who sought to expel Jews 
from his land. Following is a partial list of the expulsion of Jews from 
European kingdoms: 

Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann wrote the following about fre- 



Expulsions of Jews from European States 


Mainz, 1012 


Upper Bavaria, 1442 


Naples, 1533 


France, 1182 


Netherlands, 1444 


Italy, 1540 


Upper Bavaria, 1276 


Brandenburg, 1446 


Naples, 1541 | 


England, 1290 


Mainz 1462 


Prague, 1541 j 


France, 1306 


Mainz, 1483 


Genoa, 1550 


France, 1322 


Warsaw, 1483 


Bavaria, 1551 


Saxony, 1349 


Spain, 1492 


Prague, 1557 


Hungary, 1360 


Italy, 1492 


Papal States, 1569 


Belgium, 1370 


Lithuania, 1495 


Hungary 1582 


Slovakia, 1380 


Portugal, 1496 


Hamburg, 1649 


France, 1394 


Naples, 1496 


Vienna, 1669 


Austria, 1420 


Navarre, 1498 


Slovakia, 1744 


Lyons, 1420 


Nuremberg, 1498 


Moravia, 1744 


Cologne, 1424 


Brandenburg, 1510 


Bohemia, 1744 


Mainz, 1438 


Prussia, 1510 


Moscow, 1891 


Augsburg, 1439 


Genoa, 1515 





quent hostile reaction to Jewish presence: 

Whenever the quantity of Jews in any country reaches the satura- 
tion point, that country reacts against them. . . . [This] reaction . . . 
cannot be looked upon as Anti-Semitism in the ordinary or vulgar 
sense of the word; it is a universal social and economic concomi- 
tant of Jewish immigration and we cannot shake it off. 406 

According to the popular Jewish version of history, in every case 
Gentiles were at fault in the conflict. After tolerantly allowing Jewish 
immigrants into their nation, Gentiles are accused of unreasoning ha- 
tred against Jews, who are depicted as blameless sources of economic 
and social benefit. 

When I read of the hostility toward Jews in dozens of different lo- 
cations and historical circumstances, it seemed analogous to a man 



200 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

charged and convicted of dozens of rapes in several states over the 
course of many years. The man claims that he is always innocent, and 
that the dozens of rape convictions are merely the results of an unrea- 
soning "hate" that the victims had for him. One perceptive writer, Jo- 
seph Sobran, said it well when he suggested that the term "anti- 
Semite" no longer means someone who dislikes Jews — it now means 
someone whom the Jews dislike. 

The Jewish View of Anti-Semitism 

As I continued my reading, I discovered what Jewish scholars be- 
lieve is the historical origin of the Jew-Gentile conflict. If one delves 
back into the pages of Genesis preceding the story of Joseph, one 
comes upon the striking story of Isaac and Rebecca and their two 
sons, Esau and Jacob. The Jewish faith claims that the two sons repre- 
sent the two separate nations of Jew and Gentile. 

From Genesis chapters 25: 

23 And the Lord said to her. Two nations are in your womb, and 
two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the 
one people shall be stronger than the other people, and the elder 
shall serve the younger. . . 

25 And the first came out red all over like a hairy garment, and 
they called his name Esau, and after that came his brother Jacob 
and he took hold on Esau's heel. . . 

27 And the boys grew; and Esau was a cunning hunter, a man of 
the field; and Jacob was a plain man, dwelling in tents. . . 

28 And Isaac loved Esau, because he did eat of his venison, but 
Rebecca loved Jacob. 

29 . . . And Esau came from the field, and he was faint [sick]. And 
Esau said to Jacob, feed me I pray for I am faint. Feed me with the 
same red pottage: Afterward he was called Edom. (after the red 
pottage) 

31 And Jacob said I will feed you for the price of your birthright 

32 And Esau said, I am at the point of death, what good then will 
my birthright do for me? 

33 And Jacob said, Swear to me your birthright and I will feed 
you. Esau swore to him and sold his birthright. And Jacob fed him 
bread and pottage, and when Esau ate and drank, and got better, 
he went away... 407 

Esau's good and faithful conduct causes him to remain Isaac's fa- 
vorite. Ailing and of poor eyesight, Isaac calls Esau and asks him to 
hunt down and bring him some venison, saying that after he did he 
would offer him the blessings of God. Rebecca, upon hearing this, 



Jewish Supremacism 201 

schemes with Jacob to pretend that he was Esau and bring Isaac ram 
meat prepared to taste like venison. Jacob disguises himself to feel 
and even smell like Esau. Jacob then lies to his father and presents 
himself as the firstborn Esau. Ultimately, from this deceit and treach- 
ery, he receives his father's blessing. 

19 Jacob said to his father, "I am Esau your first-born. I have 
done as you told me; now sit up and eat of my game, that you may 
bless me..." 

21 Then Isaac said to Jacob, "Come near, that I may feel you, my 
son, to know whether you are really my son Esau or not." 

22 So Jacob went near to Isaac his father, who felt him and said, 
"The voice is Jacob's voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau..." 

24 He said, "Are you really my son Esau?" He answered, "I am..." 

29 Let peoples serve you, and nations bow down to you. Be lord 
over your brothers, and may your mother's sons bow down to you. 
Cursed be every one who curses you, and blessed be every one 
who blesses you! 408 

Returning from the hunt with the venison, Esau discovers that his 
brother had deceived his father, and cheated him out of his blessing. 

33 . . .1 have eaten before you came, and have blessed him, yes, 
and he will be blessed. 

34 And when Esau heard the words of his father, he cried with a 
great and exceeding bitter cry, and said to his father, bless me 
also, oh my beloved father. 

35 And he said. My brother came in deceit and took away my 
blessing. . .he has robbed me two times, for he took away my birth- 
right and now he has taken away my blessing. Father, have you not 
reserved a blessing for me. 

37 (Isaac) Behold, I have made him your lord and all his brethren 
have I given to him for servants. . 

38 . . . And Esau lifted up his voice to him and wept. . . 

39 And by your sword shall you live and serve thy brother, and it 
shall come to pass when you have dominion, you will break 
Jacob's yoke from your neck. 

Jacob and Esau found reconciliation 22 years later, but according 
to Jewish commentary, Esau's descendants became the Gentile 
Edomites, while Jacob's became the Jews. Jewish scholars later re- 
ferred to the Romans as Edomites, and the term Esau became syn- 
onymous with Europeans and all Gentiles. The story of Jacob and 
Esau is an allegory of the Jew and Gentile with which the Jewish relig- 
ion still identifies. Allusions to Esau are found in Raphael Patai's 
popular book The Jewish Mind and hundreds of other Jewish works. 409 
Sholem Aleichem, the famous Yiddish-language author, wrote in his 
autobiography about a crude Russian ferryman, 



202 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

Esau! Only a Goy could do work like that, not a Jew. The Bible 
says of Esau, 'and thou shalt serve thy brother.' It is good that I am 
a descendant of Jacob, and not of Esau. 410 

Popular Jewish intellectual Sidney Hook recounts how he ques- 
tioned his Jewish teacher about the injustice of Jacob's actions against 
Esau. He quotes his rabbi as saying, "What kind of question is that? 
Esau was an animal." 411 

Jacob, who became renamed "Israel," is considered the father of 
the Jewish people. Esau is seen as the archetype of the Gentile. 
Because Jews suggest that Jews are always blameless of the Anti- 
Semitism inherent in Gentiles, Esau's hatred of Jacob is considered the 
origin of Anti-Semitism as well. 

Rabbi Leon Spitz, quoted in the American Hebrew, illustrates the 
depth of hatred of many Jews for Esau and his descendants: 

Let Esau whine and wail and protest to the civilized world, and let 
Jacob fight the good fight. The anti-Semite. . .understands but one 
language, and he must be dealt with on his own level. The Purim 
Jews stood up for their lives. American Jews, too, must come to 
grips with our contemporary anti-Semites. We must fill our jails 
with anti-Semitic gangsters. We must fill our insane asylums with 
anti-Semitic lunatics. We must combat every alien Jew hater. We 
must harass and prosecute our Jew-baiters to the extreme limits of 
the laws. We must humble and shame our anti-Semitic hoodlums 
to such an extent that none will wish or dare to become their fellow 
travelers. 412 

When I understood that Jacob and Esau are an apt Jewish allegory 
for the eternal conflict between Jew and Gentile from a Jewish per- 
spective, I realized that Gentiles might learn from it too. Is not the fact 
that Esau worked hard in the fields while Jacob stayed in tents, sym- 
bolic of the history of Jew and Gentile? It corresponds perfectly with 
the Europeans' inherent love of Nature, the outdoors and land — 
with the Jews' love of urban life. 

Even reading the account written from the bias of Jacob's descen- 
dants, would not any fair-minded person find Esau's tears and rage 
justified? Is Jacob blameless and innocent or was Esau the one 
cheated? Shylock asking for a "pound of flesh" in Shakespeare's Mer- 
chant of Venice represents no less avarice and cold-heartedness than 
does Jacob withholding food from his sick brother so he could steal 
his birthright. In addition, consider Jacob's disguising of himself to 
defraud both his father and brother. Is that what the Jewish scholars 
see as justice? Is Esau's anger "hate" and "Anti-Semitism"? Is it anti- 
Semitic to note that by its own account, Israel found its earliest roots 
in fraud, treachery and deceit — and that it boasts about it? 



Jewish Supremacism 203 

Perhaps Isaac was prophetic when he said that Esau would be a 
servant to his brother until he obtained dominion (complete control 
over the land in which he lived) and thus broke "Jacob's yoke" from 
around his neck. Even though the philo-Semitic version of history is 
one long tale of Jewish woe at the hands of Gentiles, Jacob's descen- 
dants are certainly not the only ones who have suffered. 

Esau's children have lost untold billions to the descendants of 
Jacob in usury, fraud and organized crime. Millions of Gentiles have 
suffered torturous slavery, degradation and death at the hands of the 
Jewish masters of the slave trade and prostitution. Esau's tears have 
fallen for the murder of millions of Christians at the hands of Jewish 
Bolsheviks in Eastern and Central Europe. They have been shed for 
millions of combatants and civilians who died in the two great fratri- 
cidal World Wars of the 20 th Century, encouraged in no small part by 
Jewish power. Is not Esau's justifiable rage found in the Palestinian 
people who lost their land, their freedom and, for so many, even the 
lives of their children? 

If the story of Jacob and Esau is what the Jewish rabbinate say it is 
— the story of the genesis of the Jew and Gentile — it is a story of 
Jewish deceit and treachery against those whom they consider Gen- 
tiles. Such treachery must end. If it continues, it is only a matter of 
time until Esau's rage rekindles once more, just as it has a thousand 
times since the "sons of Jacob" first entered our lands. 

Thoughtful and intelligent Jews must recognize that just as cer- 
tainly as Jews have grievances against Gentiles, Gentiles have real 
grievances against Jews. Those Jews must take sincere action to miti- 
gate Jewish Supremacism and destructive anti-Gentilism. They have 
the power of the media and wield great influence in government — 
certainly enough to break the cycle of Jewish Supremacism and Anti- 
Semitism. We do not ask Jews to sacrifice their identity and heritage. 
In fact, we understand their natural urge for the survival of their cul- 
tural and genetic heritage, but we demand that they recognize that 
same fundamental right for the peoples among whom they dwell. 

For instance, how hypocritical it is for Jews to promote in the Is- 
lamic World, books that are deeply offensive to Muslims, such as 
Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses, and for Jews to seek to ban Christ- 
mas carols from American public schools, yet they seek support for 
the exclusively Jewish religion by American tax dollars! They cam- 
paign to open America's borders to the Third World while working to 
send American tax money to a nation that denies immigration to non- 
Jews, denying return even to those who were born there and whose 
families lived there for generations! 

If farsighted Jews would refrain from such hypocrisies and abide 
by our standards of morality while living among us, if they would 



204 The Origins of Anti-Semitism: crime and Treachery 

stop the manipulation and exploitation, then we may avoid the tragic 
anti-Semitic reaction that has erupted repeatedly in so many nations. 

From the lessons of Jewish history that I have learned from the 
works of the Jews themselves, it seems unlikely that their leadership 
will see the wisdom in my proposal. History teaches harsh and often 
bloody lessons, but few heed them. 

I also know that we cannot rest in the vain hope and trust of the 
magnanimity of our traditional enemies. No, we have the right to be 
masters in our own house. We have the natural right to have our 
Western nations reflect our own soul, our own spirit, our own esthet- 
ics, our own art, our own values, our own desires, our own interests, 
our own destiny. Every people, culture and nation have that inherent 
right. 

As always in history, one can never negotiate successfully from 
weakness, only from strength. It is our task to become strong. Know- 
ing the truth will make us strong. We must understand that we are in 
an evolutionary, life-or-death struggle — and we must understand 
that if we fail in this effort, all the beauty and greatness purchased by 
the blood and sacrifices of our ancestors will be lost, and along with 
them all hopes for the future for our people. 

As the Bible says so elegantly, only when Esau has dominion will 
Jacob's yoke be broken. I seek no yoke upon the Jewish people. I only 
seek our own dominion in our own lands, free of Jewish political, in- 
tellectual and cultural domination and deformation. 

Jews may be able, theoretically, to trace their lineage to Jacob, but 
obviously, the European Peoples of the Earth were not born of Esau. 
Our progenitors whether Nordic, Alpine, or Mediterranean (origi- 
nally Arabic) had already built the Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Babylo- 
nian, Mycenaean, Sumerian, Hittite and many other civilizations 
when Rebecca had her twin sons. Our ancestors designed the great 
pyramids and the complex astronomical observatory at Stonehenge 
long before the Jews established the kingdoms of Solomon and David. 

I and my kinsmen seek no war against the Jews. We ask only to 
live and let live, but it must be made clear: We do intend to live! Only 
when Jewish Supremacism abates will Anti-Semitism disappear. 

Europeans, Asians and Africans will not accept the deceit or the 
supremacy proclaimed by Jacob. We will not wear the yoke of 
subservience. Our dominion shall be won. We have earned the 
blessings of God and Nature by our genius, our hard work, our 
creativity and our faith. We will not shrink from the fight for our 
freedom, and we reject the label of Anti-Semitism from those who are 



Jewish Supremacism 205 

themselves the embodiment of ethnocentrism, intolerance, and anti- 
Gentilism. 

I am not an anti-Semite. I simply strive for the life and freedom of 
my people and all peoples and nations around the world. While hav- 
ing respect for those Jews who act honorably, I must oppose the Jew- 
ish Supremacism that plagues so many nations. It is as simple as this: 
Because I love my own people I have no choice but to oppose those 
who would harm us or threaten our survival. Such is as natural and 
life-giving as the breath we take each moment. 

As long as I live I will breathe. As long as I live I will defend the 
life and the freedom of my people. 



Chapter 9 

Israel: a Jewish Supremacist State 

Jesus Christ couldn't please them when he was here on Earth, so 
how could anyone expect that I would have any luck. — President 
Harry S. Truman under pressure to recognize the newly announced Zionist state in 
Israel. 413 

For all its disappointments, Israel is who we are, uncamouflaged 
and unadorned. — Hillel Halkin 414 

American Jews must have the courage to declare openly that 
they have a double loyalty — to the country in which they live, and 
to the state of Israel. The Jew must not let himself be talked into 
merely being a good patriot of a country in which he lives. 415 

In the Zionist movement's new campaign to conquer the commu- 
nities of Free Diaspora, the government of Israel will give every 
moral and political support... to the limits of its capacity. 416 

As I delved deeper into the Jewish question and Zionism, attempt- 
ing to get a clear understanding of this enigmatic people, I realized 
that exploring the foundations and policies of the modern nation of 
Israel would answer some of my questions. For the first time in over 
2000 years, Jews had their own sovereign state, a nation created en- 
tirely in their own image. 

By the time I began my inquiry, it was obvious to me that the 
press and the entertainment industry were very pro-Israel. They had 
induced in me an early prejudice in favor of Israel. I now noticed that 
the reporters covering the stories for the TV networks and for the ma- 
jor newspapers are usually Jewish. Suspecting that much of my pro- 
Israel sentiment had come from biased sources, I sought to learn the 
undisputed basics of the Mideast conflict, and I first turned to my en- 
cyclopedias. 

I found in my encyclopedias, information similar to what one will 
find today in the "Israel" article in the very popular Encarta Encyclope- 
dia. 

Of the more than 800,000 Arabs who lived in Israeli-held territory 
before 1948, only about 170,000 remained. The rest became refu- 
gees in the surrounding Arab countries. 417 

In 1948, the year the Israeli nation was set up, more than three- 
fourths of the entire Palestinian population living in the Israeli-held 



Jewish Supremacism 207 

territory had become refugees. According to Encarta, 630,000 people 
were no longer able to dwell in their homes and to work on the land 
where their families had lived for thousands of years. Since then, Is- 
rael expanded its borders in the wars of 1956, 1967, 1973, and in the 
Lebanon invasion in 1982 — creating hundreds of thousands of addi- 
tional Palestinian refugees. 

Would people voluntarily leave their homes, their businesses, their 
farms? I asked myself. Would they freely choose to live as penniless, state- 
less people in squalid refugee camps ? Obviously, the Zionists had driven 
them from their homes and property; and furthermore, the expulsion 
had obviously been intentional, for the Palestinians were forbidden to 
return to their homes after the fighting ended. 

While in high school I wrote to a Palestinian information organi- 
zation in Washington, D.C., and asked for some books giving their 
side of the Israeli-Arab conflict. From them and from libraries I ob- 
tained many well-documented sources — including some amazing 
Zionist ones — that gave a very different answer to the Mideast ques- 
tion. I learned that the fledgling Israeli government had passed regu- 
lations forbidding the expelled Palestinians from returning to their 
homes and property. They also enacted a special law that deemed this 
Arab property "abandoned" and subject to confiscation without com- 
pensation. The Nazis of Hitler's Reich could not have disposed of the 
problem with any more cold-blooded efficiency. 

I checked the figures compiled by the British Census in 1922. At 
that time, Jews accounted for only about 10 percent of the population. 
In the last such census, taken the year before the establishment of Is- 
rael, Jews had made up only about half of the population within the 
area that subsequently became Israel. The Palestinians then owned 
93.5 percent of the land. The facts were inescapable and damning: Zi- 
onist immigrants had forced their way into Palestine against the 
wishes of the inhabitants and then, through the weight of arms and 
terror, had driven the residents from their homes, robbing them of 
their land and possessions. 

The facts could not be more plain. The Zionists, with help from 
their cohorts all over the world, had stolen a whole nation: the nation 
called Israel. No equivocation, no mountain of pro-Israeli propa- 
ganda, no playing of "Exodus" on the radio, and no replay of millions 
of feet of Hollywood films showing Arabs as brutal terrorists and 
Jews as innocent victims — none of this could change the obvious and 
inescapable facts. 

The pro-Israeli propaganda I read suggested that Palestine was 
essentially an empty country. Tell that to the more than one million 
people who have been driven out of it since 1948. Zionist leaders un- 
derstood from the beginning that Israel was going to be acquired by 



208 Israel: A Supremacist State 

colonization and conquest. The dedicated Zionist leader Vladimir 
Jabotinsky makes this clear in his 1923 book The Iron Wall: We and the 
Arabs." 118 

Zionist colonization must either be terminated or carried out 
against the wishes of the native population ... an iron wall... to re- 
sist the pressure to the native population. ... A voluntary recon- 
ciliation with the Arabs is out of the question... for without an 
armed force ...colonization is impossible. . .Zionism is a coloniza- 
tion adventure ... It is important ... to speak Hebrew, but... more 
important to be able to shoot... 419 

Israel was born of the Holocaust, but it was sired thousands of 
years before then. For at least 2,000 years lews prayed, "Next year in 
lerusalem." And until the middle of the 20th century, such prayer was 
only a religious metaphor. Then, dramatically, in 1948, the possibility 
of "next year in lerusalem" became a possibility for every lew in the 
world. The political machinations of the Zionist State are testimony to 
the cohesive and pervasive lewish power in the West. In its operation, 
Israel lives as testimony to the very supremacist nature of both hida- 
ism and its partly secular son, Zionism. 

lewish messianic tradition goes back as far as their recorded his- 
tory. Even when the lews were one of the smallest tribes of the Mid- 
dle East, they fashioned a faith that designated themselves a special 
people, a chosen people, a people who were promised to rule the 
world. These messianic intentions are not paranoid delusions of anti- 
Semites, but are written plainly in their own Hebraic scriptures, and 
since that time they have been dutifully appended, even to the pre- 
sent day. Compare the following Biblical quotation to the messianic 
words of Israel's first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion. 

. . .and kings shall come from you and shall rule wherever the 
foot of the sons of man has trodden. I shall give to your seed all 
the earth which is under heaven, and they shall rule over all the na- 
tions according to their desire; and afterwards they shall draw the 
whole earth to themselves and shall inherit it for ever' (Jub. 
32:18-19) 

In Look magazine in 1962, Ben-Gurion stated his prediction for the 
next 25 years, a prediction of amazing prescience: 

The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination: The 
Cold War will be a thing of the past. Internal pressure of the con- 
stantly growing intelligentsia in Russia . . . may lead to a gradual 
democratization of the Soviet Union. On the other hand . . . trans- 
form the United States into a welfare state with a planned econ- 
omy. . .With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian 



Jewish Supremacism 209 

state, all other continents will become united in a world alliance, at 
whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will 
be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the 
United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the 
Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be 
the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind. 420 

Many people are amazed to discover that most Jews in Israel are 
"non-religious/' just as was their first great leader David Ben-Gurion. 
However, these mostly atheistic Jews tolerate a religious state. Appar- 
ently, Jews who have no belief in God support Judaism as a state- 
sponsored institution that preserves both Jewish culture and the Jew- 
ish genotype. Other than a few intolerant fanatics, the Jewish Ortho- 
dox institutions allow a wide range of religious belief, from atheism to 
forms of the occult called Kabbalism. Only the Talmud could have a 
passage where a rabbi claims to have argued with God and defeated 
him. To Jewish orthodoxy, biblical and theological interpretations 
may vary greatly as long as Jewish tradition and Jewish heritage is 
scrupulously preserved. 

Is God a Zionist? 

Israel supports its claim on Palestinian land by saying that God 
gave it to the Jews. A corollary secular argument is that the remote 
ancestors of the Jewish people lived 2,000 years ago on parts of what 
is now Israel. They argue with a straight face that this gives them the 
right to take that land away from whoever has lived on the land dur- 
ing the intervening years. 

That argument is much like saying that because the Romans had 
ruled the Mediterranean 2000 years ago the Italians now have the 
right to conquer the entire Mediterranean Basin and drive out three- 
fourths of its population. Furthermore, the Jewish people cannot 
claim they were the first people dwelling in the "Promised Land." 
The Bible clearly records Jewish invasions and genocide in the region. 
The Palestinian people are descended from the same peoples who 
lived in the area before the Jewish conquests. If the claim that who- 
ever lived on the land first has the rightful claim, then the Palestinians 
should have the primary claim to the land because many of their an- 
cestors lived on it long before ancient Israel even existed. 

The allegation that Jewish rule over Palestine today is God- 
ordained poses a more difficult question, especially for contemporary 
Christians. It is difficult because the Jewish powerbrokers have been 
able to completely change 2,000 years of Christian interpretation of 
the Bible. Servile Judeo-Christian preachers have made alliances with 
the Zionists because of their media power. They quote liberally from 



210 Israel: A Supremacist State 

Old Testament verses that proclaim a covenant between God and the 
Israelites that bequeaths the land referred to as Israel to the lews. 

The Christian Church of our fathers, though, from its earliest his- 
tory up to recent times, has always refuted that claim. Christian 
scholars, from the writers of the New Testament itself to the mid- 
point of the 20th century, pointed out that the Bible makes it very 
clear that all promises made by God are conditional upon continued 
faithfulness. God says clearly in the Old Testament that if the Israel- 
ites reject him, he will requite them. The New Testament emphatically 
makes the point that the lewish nation, by rejecting God and his Son, 
has dissolved the Old Covenant. New Testament scriptures quote 
God as making a New Covenant with a new promise of salvation of 
Christ for all. As I have previously quoted, the scriptures cannot pos- 
sibly be any more explicit than in Hebrews 8:10, in which God says 
the lews are no longer in the covenant he made in the Old Testament. 

8:10 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers, 
in the day when I took them by the hand out of the land of Egypt; 
because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them 
not, saith the Lord. 

Is it any wonder that lews reject the New Testament and that Is- 
rael forbids even quoting from it in their schools? Government- 
funded groups in Israel have even organized public burnings of the 
New Testament, and Israeli laws provide for criminal prosecution and 
five-year imprisonment for Christians who seek to convert lews. It 
seems quite odd, in light of these facts, that many denominations of 
the Christian Church are now busily adopting the view that lews are 
still today the "chosen people." 

It is understandable that supremacist lews who reject Christ and 
the New Testament would say that God sanctions their terror against 
the Palestinian people, but it is scandalous that Christians could 
possibly support them in their bloody adventure. Many of those who 
suffered from the Zionist onslaught were Christian Palestinians. 
Israel's crimes have significantly hurt the many Christians among the 
Palestinian people. The fact that some Christian leaders lend moral 
and financial support to a nation that hates and oppresses Christians 
is testimony to the penetration and subversion of Zionist power and 
influence — even into the highest councils of various Christian 
denominations. In doing so they have undermined the Christian faith 
in the entire Mideast. And, indeed, in the entire World. 

The Israeli claim that God gave them the land of Israel is ludicrous 
when one considers that at least three-quarters of Israelis don't 



Jewish Supremacism 211 

believe in God in the first place. (Israeli government statistics say 85 
percent do not believe in God.) How can a God that they do not 
believe in, promise them land that belongs to others? Far from being a 
religious promise, Israel's creation came not from divine intervention, 
but from Zionist intrigue that began during the First World War. 

The Balfour Declaration 

The First World War laid the political foundation of the Zionist 
State. Britain was having a tough time of it. For years, the war had 
droned on causing a horrendous loss of life. Despite oceans of spilled 
blood, the front lines had moved only a few kilometers back and forth 
on the Western front. 

Jewish loyalties were somewhat divided during the war. Some 
Jews favored the allies for business or other reasons. Others favored 
the Germans for the main reason that German success against Russia 
would weaken their long-time enemies, imperial Russia and the Czar. 
Just a decade earlier, financiers Jacob Schiff and Bernard Baruch led a 
campaign to finance the Japanese in the Russo-Japanese war, resulting 
in a defeat for Russia. 421 Now Jewish powerbrokers around the world 
hoped for an even more calamitous Russian defeat in the Great War 
to provide an opportunity to overthrow the Czar and establish a Jew- 
ish-Bolshevik government. 

The Germans, desperately fighting a war on two fronts, knew that 
a revolution in Russia might remove Russia from the war. Toward 
that end Kaiser Wilhelm approved one of the most treacherous deeds 
in the annals of Western civilization. In his zeal to defeat Russia, his 
ministers assisted Lenin, Trotsky, and hundreds of other Bolshevik 
revolutionaries, mostly Jewish, to cross Germany in a sealed train to- 
ward Russia. Allowing the Bolshevik terrorists and assassins access to 
Russia unleashed the greatest period of human oppression, torture, 
and murder that the world has ever experienced. 

Britain and her allies fought to a stalemate against Germany, but 
as Russia weakened, the allies knew that her defeat would allow the 
entire German army on the Eastern Front to almost double their army 
in the West, dramatically tipping the military balance toward the Cen- 
tral Powers. Britain understood that it was critical that they bring the 
United States into the war on the Allies' side to counter the Russian 
collapse. 

Onto this stage of crisis, stepped the British Lord Arthur Balfour. 
He met with the Rothschilds, and made an agreement that in return 
for pledging Britain's support in the creation of a Jewish homeland in 
Palestine, the Jews would use their great international power and 
influence to draw the United States into the war. (see Willis Carto's 



212 Israel: A Supremacist State 

Barnes Review) 422 Lord Balfour drew up a document — the Balfour 
Declaration — that called for the Jewish homeland. Even our popular 
encyclopedias admit the reason for the Balfour Declaration: 

It has been commonly accepted that the Balfour Declaration was 
a unilateral undertaking by the British government. The immediate 
purpose was to win for the Allied cause in World War I the support 
of Jews and others in the warring nations and in neutral countries 
such as the United States. 423 (Encarta Encyclopedia) 

Read what David Lloyd George, Britain's wartime prime minister, 
wrote about the Balfour Declaration. Note his pointing out that the 
Jews of Russia had been the "chief agents in the betrayal of the Rus- 
sian war effort" as well as "the disintegration of Russian society — 
later recognized as the Revolution." 

Russian Jews had been secretly active on behalf of the Cen- 
tral Powers from the first... by 1917 they had done much in 
preparing for that general disintegration of Russian society, 
later recognized as the Revolution. It was believed that if Great 
Britain declared for the fulfillment of Zionist aspirations in Pal- 
estine under her own pledge, one effect would be to bring Rus- 
sian Jewry to the cause of the entente. 

It was believed, also, that such a declaration would have a po- 
tent influence upon world Jewry outside Russia, and secure for 
the entente the aid of Jewish financial interests. In America, 
their aid in this respect would have a special value when the Al- 
lies had almost exhausted the gold and marketable securities 
available for American purchase. Such were the chief consid- 
erations which, in 1917, impelled the British Government to- 
wards making a contract with Jewry. 424 

Samuel Landman, in his book Great Britain, The Jews and Palestine, 
confirms the Jewish role in bringing America into the war. Landman, 
a leading Zionist and secretary of the Zionist Organization from 1917 
to 1922, confirms from the Jewish perspective exactly what Lloyd 
George says: 

. . . the only way (which proved so to be) to induce the Ameri- 
can President to come into the War was to secure the co- 
operation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and 
thus enlist and mobilize the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful 
forces of Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favor of the 
Allies on a quid pro quo contract basis... 425 

Some of President Woodrow Wilson's top advisers during the pe- 
riod were the Jewish Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, Rabbi 
Stephen Wise, and the powerful banker and international financier of 
New York City, Bernard Baruch. Although Wilson had campaigned 



Jewish Supremacism 213 

for president on the slogan "He kept us out of the war/' once the Bal- 
four Declaration was proposed, Jewish influence quickly pushed him 
to an interventionist path. When Balfour came to the United States in 
May 1917 in hopes of pulling America into the war, he ignored the 
U.S. State Department (which created much resentment) and met with 
Brandeis, who had no authority to speak on foreign relations. 426 

The Jewish protagonists for war were also aided in their jingoism 
by a number of American magnates who saw American participation 
in the European conflict as writing a blank check for the military- 
industrial complex. The press that was Jewish-owned or Jewish- 
controlled agitated unashamedly for war, running lurid tales of Ger- 
man atrocities, and promoting stories that Germany planned to in- 
vade the United States through Mexico — even though, in four years 
of war, it had been unable to even take Paris. 

In short order, the Germans — although racially and morally no 
different from the British and Americans — were labeled "Huns" and 
"baby-killers." The Allies, despite Britain's and France's non- 
democratic foreign empires, were said to be fighting for "democracy." 
Even though Germany had electoral institutions similar to those of 
the Allies, it was called tyrannical. 

The two prominent slogans for the greatest and bloodiest war in 
all of history were, "The War to Make the World Safe for Democracy" 
and, incredibly, "The War to End War!" If those were truly the Allied 
objectives of the First World War, it is easy to see the fruits of their 
victory. As the 21st century begins, democracy around the world still 
seems to be in precious short supply, and war since 1918 has been a 
thriving business. 

Most historians now agree that the First World War was not the 
result of aggression or dictatorship or any sinister force other than en- 
tangling alliances structured to preserve the balance of power. Essen- 
tially, it was prompted by nothing but national fears and bravado. For 
most of that internecine conflict, America sensibly stayed out of the 
war's insanity, but finally, Jewish power, whose concern, as always, 
was only its own interests — tipped the scales for war. After all, what 
were the lives of a few hundred thousand young Americans com- 
pared to the interests of the Chosen? 

The media keeps Americans blind to the Jewish influence in our 
participation in the First World War, just as they had cloaked the piv- 
otal Jewish involvement in the Russian Revolution. The world didn't 
even learn until 1999 that Lord Balfour was actually a Jew, 427 and 
while ostensibly working for Britain's interest was secretly working 
on behalf of the world Zionist organization. Even to this day, few 
Americans are aware of the preeminent Jewish influence directly re- 
sulting in America's involvement in the First World War. 



214 Israel: A Supremacist State 

The Balfour Declaration was innocuous-sounding enough, and it 
took pains to state, 

...that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and 
religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, 
or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other 
country. 428 

The Zionists, though, did not want a homeland containing a 
significant non-Jewish community. From the outset, they were de- 
termined not to set up a multicultural, pluralistic democracy that 
they were so busy planning for America and the rest of the Euro- 
pean world. They wanted a chauvinistic, ethno-religious, purely 
Jewish state, but they could not reveal this until they had attained 
power in Palestine. Among themselves, though, they made clear 
their intentions to create an ethnic state — one amazingly similar to 
the nation they most hated: Nazi Germany. 

Zionism/Nazism: Born in Each Other's Image 

In the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials, Julius Streicher, the noto- 
rious publisher of the Nazi magazine, Der Sturmer, gave the follow- 
ing testimony when asked if he had helped develop Germany's ra- 
cial laws: 

The accused (Streicher) : Yes, ...I had been writing that all mixing 
of German and Jewish blood had to be prevented in the future. I 
wrote articles to that effect, and I have always repeated that we 
had to take the Jewish race, or the Jewish people, as a model. I 
have always repeated in my articles that the Jews were to be re- 
garded as a model by other races, for they have given themselves a 
racial law, the law of Moses, which says: "If you go unto foreign 
lands, you must not take foreign wives." And this, Gentlemen, is of 
great importance in judging the Nuremberg laws. It was these Jew- 
ish laws that were taken as a model. When, centuries later, the 
Jewish legislator Ezra saw that, despite this, many Jews had mar- 
ried non-Jewish wives, these bonds were broken. This was the ori- 
gin of Jewry which, thanks to its racial laws, survived for centuries, 
whereas all the other races and civilizations were destroyed. 429 

The racial awakening in Europe of the 19th and 20th centuries 
grew in great part because of the presence of the Jewish people. There 
were no Blacks or Orientals in Europe, but there was no shortage of 
Jews. Scientific and social observers noted that their character and ap- 
pearance differed from those of the indigenous races of Europe. 

One of the first major figures to recognize the dynamic power of 
race and write extensively about it was the British prime minister 
Benjamin Disraeli, who himself was of Jewish heritage. He stated: 



Jewish Supremacism 215 

"The racial question is the key to world history... all is race, there is no 
other truth." Scholars who recognized the role of race in history knew 
that the power and perseverance of the Jewish race rests in its ethno- 
centrism and prohibitions against intermarriage, enabling it to sur- 
vive after 2,000 years of living among Gentiles. As Streicher's testi- 
mony proves, the formulators of European racial ideology had 
learned a lot from studying Jewish institutions and history. Although 
Zionists and Nazis saw each other as mortal enemies, many of the 
leaders of both movements had extremely similar ideas, and many 
collaborated in pursuit of their mutual aims. 

The National Socialists wanted their own nation free of Jewish in- 
fluence, and the Zionists sought nonassimilation with Gentiles and a 
nation of their own. (Even today in modern America and Europe 
most major Jewish organizations oppose intermarriage.) At first 
glance, it seems unbelievable that Zionism and Nazism sometimes 
had worked together, but the historical record reveals fascinating evi- 
dence. 

Most Jews in Europe and the rest of the world virulently opposed 
Hitler and National Socialist Germany. In fact, as Hitler gained power 
in 1933, the World Jewish Congress, claiming to speak for Jews world- 
wide, declared economic war on Germany and announced their inten- 
tion to do everything in their power to destroy Germany and National 
Socialism. 430 

Within the Jewish community, however, there were many Zionists 
who saw the anti-Semitic policies of Germany as an aid to the creation 
of the Jewish state. They saw those policies as encouraging emigration 
to Palestine and increasing Jewish anger and solidarity. And, interest- 
ingly enough, they viewed the racial thinking of Hitler as analogous 
to what they desired for their own people. For these Jews, collusion 
between the Zionists and the Nazis served the interests of both. 

Britain had difficulty dealing with the increased Jewish immigra- 
tion into Palestine in the 1930s, as it caused marked unrest in the Arab 
sectors of the mandate. To lessen tensions, the British attempted to 
limit Jewish immigration into Palestine. Into this opportunity stepped 
Hitler and Nazi Germany. Hitler had misgivings about Israel becom- 
ing a center for international Jewish power in the same way the Soviet 
Union had become one for international Communism. Although he 
had concerns about damaging German relations with the Arab world, 
he saw the emigration of the Jews from Germany and all Europe as 
being of paramount importance. In his mind, a Jewish state in Pales- 
tine might be a practical destination for Europe's Jews, although he 
favored the far less populated, and larger, island of Madagascar. 

From the earliest days of Hitler's rise to power, the leading Zionist 
organization in Germany sought out common ground with him. 



216 Israel: A Supremacist State 

Within months of Hitler's achieving the chancellorship, the Zionist 
Federation of Germany presented him with a statement suggesting 
that Zionism could solve the "Jewish Question." 

In the foundation of the new State, which has proclaimed the race 
principle, we wish to adapt our community to these new struc- 
tures... 

Our recognition of the Jewish nationality allows us to establish 
clear and sincere relations with the German people and its national 
and racial realities. Precisely because we do not want to underes- 
timate these fundamental principles, because we too are against 
mixed marriages and for the maintaining of the purity of the Jew- 
ish group. . . 

. . .Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a peo- 
ple, which is now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on 
its Christian and national character, must also come about in the 
Jewish national group. For the Jewish people, too, national origin, 
religion, common destiny and a sense of its uniqueness must be of 
decisive importance in the shaping of its existence. . . 

. . .We are not blind to the fact that a Jewish question exists and 
will continue to exist. From the abnormal situation of the Jews se- 
vere disadvantages result for them, but also scarcely tolerable con- 
ditions for other peoples. 431 432 433 434 

Joachim Prinz, a German Zionist who emigrated to the United 
States and who later became head of the American Jewish Congress, 
wrote in his 1934 book Wir Juden [We Jews] 435 that the National Social- 
ist revolution in Germany meant "Jewry for the Jews." Prinz in later 
years also wrote scathingly about Adolf Hitler's view of the impor- 
tance of race, but hypocritically showed no reluctance to defend the 
concept of the "Jewish race." 

We want assimilation to be replaced by a new law: the declaration 
of belonging to the Jewish nation and the Jewish race. A state built 
upon the principle of the purity of nation and race can only be hon- 
oured and respected by a Jew who declares his belonging to his 
own kind... No subterfuge can save us now. In place of assimilation 
we desire a new concept: recognition of the Jewish nation and 
Jewish race. 436 

In the key book of modern Zionism, the Jewish State, Theodore 
Herzl maintained that the Jews were much more than a religious 
community; they were a people. Herzl even used the well-known 
German racialist word Volk to describe them. Volk was also one of 
Hitler's favorite words. With it he described his ideal state, the 
"Volkishe Staat." Herzl wrote, long before Hitler's rise, that Anti- 
Semitism is a natural reaction of Gentiles to Jews. He advocated a 
separate state as the only real answer to the conflict. 437 438 439 440 



Jewish Supremacism 217 

The Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in noticeable 
numbers, Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews. 
... I believe I understand Anti-Semitism, which is a very complex 
phenomenon. . .1 consider this development as a Jew, without hate 
or fear. . . It is a national question. To solve it we must, above all, 
make it an international political issue. . . a final solution of the 
Jewish question. 

The leading German Zionist paper, Judische Rundschau, in 1935 
even went so far as to express approval of the "Nuremberg Laws" 
designating Jews as an alien nationality and forbidding intermarriage 
and sexual relations between Germans and Jews. 

The new laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own cul- 
tural life, its own national life. In the future it will be able to shape 
its own schools, its own theatre, and its own sports associations. 
In short, it can create its own future in all aspects of national life . . 

# 441 

Georg Kareski, the former head of the largest Jewish community 
in Western Europe (that of Berlin) and leader of the Zionist State Or- 
ganization and Jewish Cultural League, made the following comment 
to the Berlin daily Der Angriff at the end of 1935: 

For many years I have regarded a complete separation of the cul- 
tural affairs of the two peoples [Jews and Germans] as a pre- 
condition for living together without conflict. ... I have long sup- 
ported such a separation, provided it is founded on respect for the 
alien nationality. The Nuremberg Laws . . . seem to me, apart from 
their legal provisions, to conform entirely with this desire for a 
separate life based on mutual respect. . . . This interruption of the 
process of dissolution in many Jewish communities, which had 
been promoted through mixed marriages, is therefore, from a Jew- 
ish point of view, entirely welcome. 442 443 444 445 446 

Other leading Zionists around the world spoke similarly. Rabbi 
Stephen S. Wise, president of the American Jewish Congress and the 
World Jewish Congress, speaking before a rally in New York in 1938, 
said: 

I am not an American citizen of the Jewish faith, I am a Jew. I am 
an American. I have been an American for sixty-three sixty-fourths 
of my life, but I have been a Jew for 4000 years. Hitler was right in 
one thing. He calls the Jewish people a race and we are a race. 447 

Not only did the Nazis and Zionists cooperate with each other, 
they actively collaborated up to and even during the Second World 
War. The Nazi government set up a series of 40 agricultural centers 
throughout Germany to train young Jews for kibbutz life in Palestine. 
It supported emigration of Jews to Palestine until prevented by the 
war. The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, supported Zion- 
ism in front-page editorials. 448 



218 Israel: A Supremacist State 

The SS collaborated with the Haganah, the Zionist underground 
military in Palestine, with help in Jewish emigration and even pro- 
vided smuggled guns for the Zionist forces. Despite misgivings, Hit- 
ler continued to support Zionist objectives in Palestine. 449 450 451 452 

Hitler told his army adjutant in 1939 and again in 1941 that he had 
asked the British in 1937 about transferring all of Germany's Jews to 
Palestine or Egypt. The British rejected the proposal, he said, because 
it would cause further disorder in those countries. 453 

As the British government became more restrictive on Jewish im- 
migration into Palestine in the late 1930s, the SS made a pact with the 
secret Zionist agency Mossad le-Aliya Bet to smuggle Jews into Pales- 
tine. As a result of this collaboration, Jewish migration, both legal and 
illegal, from Germany (including Austria) to Palestine increased dra- 
matically in 1938 and 1939. 10,000 Jews were scheduled for emigration 
in October 1939, but the beginning of the war prevented it. During 

1940 and 1941, and as late as March 1942, Germany still assisted with 
indirect Jewish emigration to Palestine and had at least one officially 
authorized Zionist "kibbutz" training camp in Germany for potential 
emigrants. 454 (see also "Secrets of the Mossad" in Barnes Reviezv) 1155 

In the economic sphere, the Ha'avara agreement between Nazi 
Germany and the Palestine Center of the World Zionist Organization 
was vital to the Zionist cause. It began in 1933 and lasted throughout 
the 1930s and allowed the transfer of Jewish wealth to Palestine. 
Through this pact, Hitler's Third Reich did more than any other gov- 
ernment during the 1930s to support Jewish development in Pales- 
tine. 456 457 458 459 460 461 

Probably the most telling document of the willingness of some Zi- 
onist factions to enter an alliance with Hitler was the offer made in 

1941 by the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel, popularly called the 
"Lehi," or the Stern Gang. One of its top officials was Yitzhak Shamir, 
who became its leader and chief terrorist after Stern's death and who 
later became Israel's prime minister in the 1980s. The Stern gang con- 
sidered the British to be Zionism's biggest enemy because Great Brit- 
ain tried to protect the civil rights of the native Palestinians and at- 
tempted to slow the insurgent Jewish immigration. 

In one of the most amazing facts of modern history, the Lehi actu- 
ally made a formal proposal to the Germans of a military alliance be- 
tween the Jewish revolutionary organization and the Nazis. In effect, 
they formally proposed to join the war on Germany's side. Here are 
portions of the text of their communique with the Nazis. 



Jewish Supremacism 219 

In their speeches and statements, the leading statesmen of Na- 
tional Socialist Germany have often emphasized that a New Order 
in Europe requires as a prerequisite a radical solution of the Jewish 
question by evacuation. ("Jew-free Europe") 

The evacuation of the Jewish masses from Europe is a precondi- 
tion for solving the Jewish question. However, the only way this 
can be totally achieved is through settlement of these masses in 
the homeland of the Jewish people, Palestine, and by the estab- 
lishment of a Jewish state in its historical boundaries. 

The goal of the political activity and the years of struggle by the 
Israel Freedom Movement, the National Military Organization in 
Palestine (Irgun Zvai Leumi), is to solve the Jewish problem in this 
way and thus completely liberate the Jewish people forever. 

The NMO, which is very familiar with the good will of the German 
Reich government and its officials towards Zionist activities within 
Germany and the Zionist emigration program, takes that view that: 

1. Common interests can exist between a European New Order 
based on the German concept and the true national aspirations of 
the Jewish people as embodied by the NMO. 

2. Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a re- 
newed, folkish-national Jewry. 

3. The establishment of the historical Jewish state on a national 
and totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty with the German Reich, 
would be in the interest of maintaining and strengthening the fu- 
ture German position of power in the Near East. 

On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that 
the German Reich government recognize the national aspirations 
of the Israel Freedom Movement mentioned above, the NMO in 
Palestine offers to actively take part in the war on the side of Ger- 
many. 

This offer by the NMO could include military, political and infor- 
mational activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational 
measures, outside as well... 

The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the 
New Order of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined 
with a positive-radical solution of the European Jewish problem on 
the basis of the national aspirations of the Jewish people men- 
tioned above, would greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the 
New Order in the eyes of all humanity. 

The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be 
consistent with a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, 
in which Hitler stressed that he would utilize any combination and 
coalition in order to isolate and defeat England. 462 463 464 

No records exist of the German response to the amazing proposal, 
but by the time it was offered, Germany had already committed itself 
to a pro-Arab posture in an attempt to undermine Britain's position in 
the Middle East. 

When I first saw this document, I noticed the ideological similari- 
ties between Zionism and National Socialism, right down to the use of 



220 Israel: A Supremacist State 

that favorite Nazi word "folkish" (Volk) to describe the foundations 
of the state they wanted to create. 

It fascinated me to read about Zionist collusion with Nazi Ger- 
many. Zionist-Nazi collaboration has long been a dirty little secret — 
one that speaks volumes about the ideological foundations of Israel 
and the lengths to which Zionist extremists would go to secure its 
creation. 

Zionist fanaticism had little regard for human lives, including that 
of lews, when it came to the establishment of Israel. Israel's first 
Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, made the following statement 
when German lewry was threatened by Hitler. 

If I knew that it would be possible to save all the children in Ger- 
many by bringing them over to England, and only half of them by 
transporting them to Eretz Yisrael, then I would opt for the second 
alternative. For we must weigh not only the life of these children, 
but also the history of the People of Israel. 465 

If Israel's first prime minister's regard for lewish life was such that 
he would rather see half the lewish children of Germany die than be 
transported to England instead of Israel, how much value could one 
expect him to place on the life of a Palestinian child? How would the 
world react to a Nazi who would say that he would rather see half the 
lewish children die rather than simply go to another country? 

Another classic example of his low regard for human life, even 
lewish life, can be seen in a 1940 terrorist act by Ben-Gurion and the 
founders of the Zionist state. The Haganah, led by Ben-Gurion, blew 
up a ship of lewish refugees from Hitler. The British had been taking 
them to Mauritius rather than allowing them to disembark in Haifa, 
Israel. To arouse indignation against the British, the Zionists blew up 
the ship on Christmas day, 1940, causing the death of 252 lews as well 
as the ship's English crewmen. If Nazis had blown up a ship of refu- 
gees in the waters of Israel, the Mossad would have hunted the perpe- 
trators to the ends of the Earth if need be, so that they could be 
brought before the Israeli "war crimes" courts. There would be well- 
publicized, annual remembrances of the terrible act of terrorism. In- 
stead, Israel chose the murderer as its first prime minister. 466 

Zionism and Nazism are torn from similar cloth, their banners 
stained with blood. Zionists, though, are infinitely better at public 
relations. 

Israel: A Racist State 

On November 10th 1975, a plenary session of the United Nations 
declared that Zionism is a form of racism. Howls of protest went up 



Jewish Supremacism 221 

across America and throughout the world from the (once again) poor, 
persecuted Jews. They were furious that such a charge could have 
been made against the "only true democracy in the Mideast." But 
what exactly is Zionism if it is not racism? Even David Ben-Gurion, in 
discussing the "Hitlerism" of Menachem Begin, wrote, "He can be ac- 
cused of racism, but then one will have to put on trial the entire Zion- 
ist movement, which is founded on the principle of a purely Jewish 
entity in Palestine." 467 

The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of 
Racial Discrimination, adopted by the United Nations General As- 
sembly in 1965, has now been ratified by most member states. Article 
1 of this Convention defines the term racial discrimination as 

. . .any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on 
race, color, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the pur- 
pose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment 
or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental 
freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other 
field of public life. 468 

Israel was and is a nation set up exclusively for Jews. By the Israeli 
"Law of Return," a Jew is defined not by his religious beliefs, but by 
his Jewish ancestry, proven by the heritage of his parents. Although it 
is possible for Gentiles to convert to Judaism, the obstacles are so 
great that the "converted" make up only a tiny percentage of the Jew- 
ish population. As I write these lines, Jewish Orthodoxy, the state- 
sanctioned religion of Israel, is in a major controversy with American 
Reform and Conservative factions because the Orthodox in Israel will 
not even recognize conversions from these two branches of Judaism. 

A Palestinian who was born within the boundaries of what is now 
Israel, and whose family lived there for thousands of years before be- 
ing forced out by the Israeli army, cannot return to his homeland and 
become a citizen of Israel. In contrast, an atheist Jew born in New 
York City and who speaks no Hebrew, can immigrate to Israel and be 
granted instant citizenship. In addition, the Israeli government offers 
him help for housing, living expenses, education, besides numerous 
other benefits. 

In 1948, nearly 94 percent of the land of Israel was owned by Pal- 
estinians. Since then, Palestinian-owned land has been systematically 
confiscated by the Israeli government. Most of the Palestinian land 
went into what Israel calls the "National Jewish Fund," and was de- 
clared by law to be "Land of Israel." It has become "Jewish" land, and 
by law it can never be sold to a non-Jew, rented to a non-Jew, or 
worked by a non-Jew. Much of the land has been given at no cost to 
Jewish settlers. The Zionist army has forced the Palestinians from 
more than 350 cities and villages in Israel and the Occupied Territo- 



222 Israel: A Supremacist State 

ries and then bulldozed the homes. Even ancient Palestinian cemeter- 
ies are often plowed under. 

Two other laws concern the Keren Kayemet ("National Jewish 
Fund" Law passed on 23 November 1953) and the Keren Hayesod 
("Reconstruction Fund" Law passed on 10 January 1956). The presi- 
dent of the Israeli Human Rights League, Doctor Israel Shahak, a pro- 
fessor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, in his book, The Racism 
of the State of Israel,* 69 tells us that there are in Israel whole towns 
(Carmel, Nazareth, Illith, Hatzor, Arad, Mitzphen-Ramen, and others) 
where non-Jews are forbidden by law to live. 

The Palestinians who remained in Israel, although ostensibly citi- 
zens, suffer intense discrimination. They are given citizenship- 
identification cards that have no Israeli nationality designation; na- 
tionality is listed only as Arab or Jewish, lending itself to the many 
discriminatory policies in the Jewish state. There are segregated hous- 
ing areas and complexes, schools, and recreational facilities where 
Palestinians are not allowed. This segregation is not de facto; it is offi- 
cial government policy. Palestinians are not permitted to serve in the 
military, and despite the fact that Palestinians comprise between 15 
and 20 percent of the Israeli population, there has never even been 
one Palestinian in the Israeli cabinet. 

Israeli law does not recognize the legality of marriage between 
Jews and Palestinians, as marriages and other aspects of civil laws are 
decided by religious courts, which do not recognize such marriages. 
Whenever I see Jews in the American media glorifying and encourag- 
ing intermarriage between Blacks and Whites, I think about their hy- 
pocrisy in supporting a nation that will not, by law, recognize a mar- 
riage between a Jew and a non-Jew. 

Haim Cohen, a former judge of the Supreme Court of Israel, noted 

...the bitter irony of fate which has led to the same biological and 
racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infa- 
mous Nuremberg laws, to serve as a basis for the definition of Ju- 
daism within the State of Israel. 470 

It is quite interesting when a respected member of the Israeli Su- 
preme Court says almost exactly the same thing about Jewish Su- 
premacism as did the much Jewish-maligned, Julius Streicher, at the 
Nuremberg Trials. 

It is truly a world turned upside down, when the same American 
and world press that never tires of conjuring up images of the crimes 
and evils of Nazism, in turn gives a Jewish supremacist, Nazi-like na- 
tion international deference and adulation. 



Jewish Supremacism 223 

As the primary founder of Israel, Ben Gurion, admitted — Zionism 
was founded on racist principles. If anyone other than a Zionist leader 
dares say that same thing as the Israeli founder, the world press will 
viciously condemned him. If by their power in the media and in the 
governments of the Western World, Jewish Supremacists can so effec- 
tively hide their extreme supremacism, then disguising their terrorism 
must seem to them like child's play. Having already learned a lot 
about the terrorism and bloodthirstiness of Jewish Bolsheviks in the 
early days of Communism, I now delved more thoroughly into an in- 
vestigation of Zionist terrorism in the Mideast. 

A Palestinian I met in college related to me one of the most de- 
scriptive remarks I have ever heard concerning the Palestinian con- 
flict. He told me that "The Jew always cries in pain as he strikes you!" 



Chapter 10 



Israel: Scipremacism 
Through Terror 

The first obstacle to Zionist objectives was that Britain envisioned 
a Palestine as portrayed by the Balfour Declaration, a society that 
would protect the civil and religious rights of all who lived there. 

To dislodge the British, whom the League of Nations had man- 
dated to govern Palestine, the Zionists developed to a fine art the use 
of terrorism as a modern weapon of political revolution. Menachem 
Begin, Abraham Stern, Yitshak Shamir, 
David Ben-Gurion, and many others began a 
campaign of bombings and assassinations. 
They hanged and garroted British soldiers 
with piano wire and left their mutilated bod- 
ies to be found by the British authorities. Is- 
raeli terrorists blew up the King David Hotel 
in Jerusalem, killing more than 90 people. 
Their operatives invented the letter-bomb 
technique. Jewish hitmen even assassinated 
the UN mediator in Palestine, Count Folke 
Bernadotte, because he dared to express con- 
cern for the rights of the Palestinians. In his 
final report to the UN before his death, Ber- 
nadotte scathingly referred to 

Zionist pillage on a grand scale and the destruction of villages 
without apparent military need. 471 (CI.N. archives) 

It would offend basic principles to prevent these innocent victims 
of the conflict from returning to their homes, while Jewish immi- 
grants flood into Palestine . . . threatening to permanently replace 
the dispossessed Arab refugees who have been here for centuries. 




472 



226 Israel: Supremacism through terror 

The Zionist campaign worked. Eventually tiring of the terrorist 
campaign waged against them and despairing of a world press that 
covered up these crimes, the British finally threw up their hands and 
announced their withdrawal from the region. With the British gone, 
the Zionists could have their way with the native peoples who had 
dared to live on the land they coveted. No force was left to restrain 
them. Aided by both the military and financial support of both the 
capitalist U.S.A. and the Communist U.S.S.R., as well as by the huge 
sums of money that poured in from Zionist coffers from all over the 
world, the Jewish blitzkrieg rolled over their enemies as decisively as 
the Biblical account of the Red Sea rolling over the Egyptians. 

With military victory certain, two significant problems still con- 
fronted the Zionists. The first was that there were hundreds of thou- 
sands of Palestinians who obviously would not sit back and let the 
new Jewish State take away their rights and their lands. Secondly, 
Palestinians owned more than 93 percent of the land of the new na- 
tion — a serious roadblock to the new "Greater Israel." 

Quoting literally from the Book of Joshua, Jewish religious leaders 
warned that Israel must drive the Palestinians out of their borders: 

Else if ye do in any wise go back, and cleave unto the remnant of 
these nations, even these that remain among you, and make mar- 
riages with them, and go in unto them, and they to you; know for a 
certainty that the Lord your God will no more drive these nations 
from out of your sight; but they shall be a snare and a trap unto 
you, and a scourge in your sides, and pricks in your eyes, until ye 
perish from off this good land — (Joshua 23:12-13) 473 

Zionist fanatics ultimately solved their "Palestinian problem" 
with mass expulsions, murder, and well-planned, intentional terror, 
what the press refers to in modern times as ethnic cleansing. 
Palestinians who were born there and whose ancestors had lived 
there for countless generations were rounded up by the Israeli 
stormtroopers and driven over the border. Told they could never 
return to their homes, those expelled had little more than the tattered 
clothes on their backs. Many who refused to leave their homes were 
massacred by the Israeli military, and the Zionists publicized the 
massacres, intentionally causing widespread panic and flight among 
the Palestinians. 

Committing atrocities against the Palestinians became an integral 
part of the Israeli strategy. When Jewish terrorists raped and massa- 
cred the residents of Arab villages, those in the surrounding villages 
naturally gathered up their children and fled for their lives, and that 
was precisely what they wanted. Once the Zionists set up their state 



Jewish Supremacism 227 

and secured their initial borders — minus approximately 630,000 
pesky Palestinian men, women, and children — the beneficent gov- 
ernment of Israel forbade them ever to return to their homes, busi- 
nesses, fields and flocks. By the time the Israeli "War for Freedom" 
ended, only about 170,000 Palestinians were left within Israel's bor- 
ders. 

The Jews, of course, had prominent and powerful spokesmen and 
supporters all over the world, especially in media, telling of the cour- 
age and righteousness of 'Tittle Israel." By the 1960s there were mil- 
lions of adults and children around the world who, like me, were en- 
thralled by the heroic story of Israel — a story romantically retold by 
the Academy Award-winning movie Exodus. 474 At that time I, just as 
most Americans of today, had scant knowledge of the gross injustice 
committed against the Palestinians. 

The Massacre at Dier Yassin 

The most well-known atrocity of the first 
Israeli war was the massacre of Deir Yassin. On 
April 9, 1948, after cessation of fighting in that 
small village, the Zionist terrorist Irgun Gang, 
led by Menachem Begin, murdered 254 people, 
most of them women, children, and the elderly. 
For two days these Zionist terrorists had 
murdered men, women, and children, raped 
women, crushed the stomachs of pregnant women, and stolen their 
possessions. A Red Cross doctor, Jacques de Reynier, chief 
representative of the International Committee of the Red Cross in 
Jerusalem gave a chilling account of the massacre in his official 
report. 475 

De Reynier arrived at the village on the second day and saw "the 
mopping up," as one of the terrorists put it to him. It had been done 
with machine guns, then grenades, and was finished off with knives. 
They decapitated some of the victims and maimed 52 children in the 
sight of their mothers. The terrorists cut open 25 pregnant women's 
wombs and butchered the babies in front of them. 

After his retirement in 1972, Israeli Haganah officer, Colonel Meir 
Pa'el, stated the following about Deir Yassin in Yediot Ahronot, a major 
Jewish publication: 

The Irgun and LEHI men came out of hiding and began to "clean' 
the houses. They shot whoever they saw, women and children in- 
cluded, the commanders did not try to stop the massacre... they 
were taken to the quarry between Deir Yassin and Giv'at Shaul, and 
murdered in cold blood... 476 




228 Israel: Supremacism through terror 

The commander of the Haganah unit that controlled Deir Yassin 
after the massacre, Zvi Ankori, made this statement in the Israeli 
newspaper Davar. 

I went into six to seven houses. I saw cut off genitalia and 
women's crushed stomachs. According to the shooting signs on 
the bodies, it was direct murder. 47T 

Albert Einstein, along with other concerned lews, wrote a letter to 
the New York Times in 1948 decrying Begin as having: "openly 
preached the doctrine of the Fascist State." He went on to describe 
Deir Yassin in these words: 

On April 9, terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which 
was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its in- 
habitants — 240 men, women, and children, and kept a few of 
them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusa- 
lem... the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were 
proud of this massacre... 

Menachem Begin boasts of the importance of the massacre of Deir 
Yassin in his book The Revolt: The Story of the Irgun. He wrote that 
there would not have been a State of Israel without the "victory" of 
Deir Yassin. "The Haganah carried out victorious attacks on other 
fronts... In a state of terror, the Arabs fled, crying, 'Deir Yassin.' " 478 . 

Israel's first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion — no slouch at 
lewish supremacy himself — was quoted as describing Begin with 
these words: 

Begin undeniably belongs to the Hitlerian type. He is a racist, 
ready to destroy all the Arabs in his dream of unification of Israel, 
prepared to resort to any means to realize this sacred goal. 479 

The instigator of the mass murder, Menachem Begin, later became 
the Prime Minister of Israel and even received the Nobel Peace Prize. 
Such an award is symbolic of the incredible world-wide lewish media 
power, for Begin had been guilty of crimes not dissimilar to those of 
Nazis whom lews are still hunting and prosecuting today. Yet instead 
of facing trial and punishment for crimes against humanity, Begin re- 
ceived what many would consider the world's highest honor. 

When I first learned of Dier Yassin, I would recount the Israeli 
massacres and ask my friends, Have you seen any TV documentaries or 
any Hollywood movies about the Israeli terror of Deir Yassin or of many 
thousands of other Israeli acts of terror against the Palestinian people? You 
have heard plenty of violin music for Jewish victims of Hitler, but have you 
heard any violins for the women at Deir Yassin who had their babies cut 
from their wombs by Jewish Supremacists? 



Jewish Supremacism 229 

In the intervening years there have been many more terrible acts 
of Israeli terrorism. Perhaps I can ask the same of those now reading 
this text, have you heard any violins for any of the other thousands of Pales- 
tinian victims of Begin, Shamir, Barak, and Sharon? 

Befitting Israel's long record of terrorism against the Palestinian 
people, Israel has the nasty habit of electing its most notorious terror- 
ists and mass murderers as its Head of State. 

The United States has a whole division of the Justice Department 
dedicated to hunting down Nazis who have committed crimes against 
humanity. While America doggedly pursues elderly suspected Ger- 
man war criminals, American Presidents have state dinners honoring 
Jewish ones! 

The massacre at Deir Yassin was not the only one Israeli forces 
committed. In its May 6, 1992 edition, the Hebrew daily Ha'ir pub- 
lished an article by Guy Erlich called "Not Only Deir Yassin" that out- 
lined a pattern of terror and murder. Erlich quotes the Israeli historian 
Aryeh Yitzhaki as saying the following: 

'The time has come' he says, 'for a generation has passed, and it 
is now possible to face the ocean of lies in which we were brought 
up. In almost every conquered village in the War of Independence, 
acts were committed, which are defined as war crimes, such as in- 
discriminate killings, massacres and rapes. I believe that such 
things end by surfacing. The only question is how to face such evi- 
dence.' 480 

Erlich and Yitzhaki point out that Israeli authorities are still cover- 
ing up the murders. Nor did the massacres cease after the establish- 
ment of the Jewish State; they continued in times of both peace and 
war. Following are the names of some of them: Sharafat Massacre, 
Kibya Massacre, Kafr Qasem Massacre, Al-Sammou' Massacre, the 
Sabra And Chatila Massacre, Oyon Qara Massacre, Al-Aqsa Mosque 
Massacre, the Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre, the Jabalia Massacre. 

There were further killings and expulsions of the Arabs as the 
Jewish State expanded. In subsequent wars and military incursions, 
Israel drove more hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into reloca- 
tion camps. Plagued by hunger and disease, they bore remarkable re- 
semblance to wartime concentration camps. Lebanon also fell victim 
to Israeli aggression in the 1980s and 1990s, when it was bombed and 
invaded. Estimates of civilian casualties in Lebanon exceeded 15,000. 
The Zionist State also surreptitiously helped create and support rival 
factions in the Lebanese civil war which added tens of thousands to 
the death toll. 

The extraordinary diaires of Moshe Sharett, who had once shared 
the prime ministership of Israel with David Ben-Gurion, reveal Is- 
rael's treachery in the Lebanese Civil War. Sharett had been forced 



230 Israel: Supremacism through terror 



out of the cabinet because he would not go along with what he felt 
were Ben-Gurion's clandestine and immoral actions. After Sharett's 
death, his son published the diaries despite a long battle of intimida- 
tion and legal maneuvers by the Zionists. Jewish author Livia Rokach 
quotes Sharett's diaries in her book Israel's Sacred Terrorism. The dia- 
ries tell how Israel purposefully created 
the Lebanese "Civil War" to further Is- 
rael's imperialist ambitions. 481 

In May, 1955 passages, Sharett's 
dairy describes Israel's plans to destabi- 
lize Lebanon's government, a plan that 
eventually produced the 1978 Lebanese 
War. Sharett quotes Moshe Dayan, Ben- 
Gurion's defense minister, at a secret 
cabinet meeting on May 16 th planning to 
foment Lebanese civil war as an excuse 
for Israel to go in and annex land with 
water rights to the Litani River. 482 483 
In the first invasion of Lebanon in 

k^^^^^_ 1982, 10,000 civilians died and one half 
jf^^^^^H of a million people were driven from 
Bm*. M their homes. In the course of the fight- 

ing, Israeli forces devastated the city of Beirut, which before the war 
was described as the garden city of the Mideast. During the Israeli in- 
vasion, The U.S.S. New Jersey, sitting offshore, fired shells into some of 
the Lebanese towns. The U.S. involvement in Israel's 1982 war de- 
stroyed what little credibility America had left in the Mideast and cost 
our taxpayers billions; it also cost the lives of 241 U.S. Marines. More 
than 1,500 women, children, and elderly people were butchered in the 
Sabra and Chatila refugee centers under the watchful eyes of the Is- 
raeli invaders. 

A Terrorist, Mass-Murderer as Israeli Head of State 

Israel's Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, is one of the world's most 
bloodstained terrorists. He is responsible for the cold-blooded slaugh- 
ter of at least 1,500 men, women and children in the Beirut refugee 
camps of Chatila and Sabra. Even a formal Israeli commission found 
Sharon personally responsible for the Lebanese massacres. 484 

In 1982, as Israel's defense minister, Sharon directed Israel's inva- 
sion of Lebanon and the carpet bombing and devastation of the city of 
Beirut (In Lebanon four times more women and children died than in 




Jewish Supremacism 231 



the September New York attack). This terror bombing was carried 
out by Jews using jet fighters and bombs supplied by the United 
States. 

After the Israeli military devastation and occupation, Sharon 
forcibly removed Palestinian resistance fighters from Lebanon. Many 
Palestinian women, children and old people were left behind in refu- 
gee camps near Beirut. The United States publicly guaranteed their 
safety and promised that they would quickly be reunited with their 
loved ones. When Sharon plotted their murder, he not only planned a 
bloody act of terrorism against the refugees; he knew it was an act of 
treachery against the United States that would raise intense hatred 
against America. 

On the night of September 16, 1982, Sharon sent Phalangist mur- 
der squads into two Palestinian refugee camps, Sabra and Chatila. 
With Israeli tanks and troops closely surrounding the camps to pre- 
vent any of the Palestinians from escaping, the murder squads ma- 
chine-gunned, bayoneted, and bludgeoned Palestinian civilians all 
that night, the next day and the following night; all while the Israelis 
surrounding the camps listened gleefully to the machine gun fire and 
screams coming from inside. Sharon then sent in bulldozers to hide as 

much of the atrocity as 
he could. At least 1500 
Palestinian men, 

women and children 
were butchered, and 
perhaps as many as 
2500. (An official Leba- 
nese investigation set 
the figure at 2500) Even 
after the efforts of 
Sharon's bulldozers, 
many Palestinians re- 
mained unburied, and 
Red Cross workers found whole families; including hundreds of eld- 
erly and little children, with their throats cut or disemboweled. Un- 
counted numbers of women and girls were also raped before they 
were slaughtered. 

Ariel Sharon is sought for trial by a Belgium court for crimes 
against humanity, much like they way the Hague Tribunal succeeded 
in extraditing former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic for 
charges of crimes against humanity in Kosovo. Sharon will not travel 
to Belgium for fear of arrest by the International Court for the 
massacre. 485 




232 Israel: Supremacism through terror 

Although he is sought for his Chatila and Sabra murders, Sharon 
could be tried for any of a dozen other massacres committed during 
his sterling career, crimes against humanity that go back at least as far 
as 1953. The Israeli newspaper, Ha'aretz, recalls Sharon's leading of a 
massacre in the village of Kibya in 1953, "The soldiers of Major Ariel 
Sharon killed 70 Palestinians in the reprisal raid, most of them women 
and children " 486 

Israel's murder of the Palestinian refugees after the United States 
had publicly guaranteed their safety was not only a crime against 
humanity, but also one of treachery against America. Sharon and the 
others involved were completely aware of America's well-publicized 
promise of the refugees' safety. 

The Beirut Sabra and Chatila Massacre was the chief motivation of 
the Lebanese suicide bombing attack that killed 241 American Ma- 
rines in Beirut less than a year later, and it clearly demonstrates how 
American support of Israeli terrorism leads to terrible consequences 
for the United States. The Los Angeles Times, in discussing a revealing 
book by a former agent of the Israeli Mossad (secret service), showed 
that the Mossad had foreknowledge of the terrorist attack on the Ma- 
rine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, but treacherously did not warn 
America. 487 

Among Ostrovsky's more shocking allegations are that Mossad 
failed to share with the U.S. detailed intelligence that might have 
averted the 1983 suicide bombing of the Beirut Marine barracks 
that killed 241 U.S. servicemen;... 

The Qana Massacre 

A more recent massacre was at Qana, a small town in southern 
Lebanon. Here are some excerpts of a British journalist's eyewitness 
account of the action so that the reader can fully understand that be- 
hind the cold statistics are real people, people who have faced a hor- 
ror no less real than those who were murdered in the World Trade 
Center bombing. 

Qana, southern Lebanon - It was a massacre. Not since Sabra and 
Chatila had I seen the innocent slaughtered like this. The Lebanese 
refugee women and children and men lay in heaps, their hands or 
arms or legs missing, beheaded or disemboweled. There were well 
over a hundred of them. A baby lay without a head. The Israeli 
shells had scythed through them as they lay in the United Nations 
shelter, believing that they were safe under the world's protection. 
Like the Muslims of Srebrenica, the Muslims of Qana were wrong. 

In front of a burning building of the UN's Fijian battalion 
headquarters, a girl held a corpse in her arms, the body of a gray- 
haired man whose eyes were staring at her, and she rocked the 



Jewish Supremacism 233 

man whose eyes were staring at her, and she rocked the corpse 
back and forth in her arms, keening and weeping and crying the 
same words over and over: "My father, my father." A Fijian UN sol- 
dier stood amid a sea of bodies and, without saying a word, held 
aloft the body of a headless child. 

...When I walked towards them, I slipped on a human hand... 

Israel's slaughter of civilians in this terrible 10-day offensive - 206 
by last night - has been so cavalier, so ferocious, that not a Leba- 
nese will forgive this massacre. There had been the ambulance at- 
tacked on Saturday, the sisters killed in Yohmor the day before, the 
2-year-old girl decapitated by an Israeli missile four days ago. And 
earlier yesterday, the Israelis had slaughtered a family of 12 - the 
youngest was a four- day-old baby - when Israeli helicopter pilots 
fired missiles into their home. 

Shortly afterwards, three Israeli jets dropped bombs only 250 me- 
ters from a UN convoy on which I was traveling, blasting a house 
30 feet into the air in front of my eyes. Traveling back to Beirut to 
file my report on the Qana massacre to the Independent last night, 
I found two Israeli gunboats firing at the civilian cars on the river 
bridge north of Sidon... 

A French UN trooper muttered oaths to himself as he opened a 
bag in which he was dropping feet, fingers, pieces of people's 
arms... 

We had suddenly become not UN troops and journalists but 
Westerners, Israel's allies, an object of hatred and venom. One 
bearded man with fierce eyes stared at us, his face dark with fury. 
"You are Americans", he screamed at us. "Americans are dogs. You 
did this. Americans are dogs." 

President Bill Clinton has allied himself with Israel in its war 
against "terrorism" and the Lebanese, in their grief, had not forgot- 
ten this. Israel's official expression of sorrow was rubbing salt in 
their wounds. "I would like to be made into a bomb and blow my- 
self up amid the Israelis", one old man said... 488 

Unlike the bloody scenes of the aftermath of Palestinian suicide 
bombers in Israel, Americans and Europeans never saw the butchery 




that Fisk describes. The media very seldom draw our attention to suf- 
ferings inflicted by Jews, it is suffering inflicted on Jews that they focus 
on. Those who wear the six-pointed star and who bomb United Na- 
tions shelters, ambulances, civilian refugee camps and civilian auto- 
mobiles are never described as terrorists. They are simply referred to 



234 Israel: Supremacism through terror 

as "commandos" or simply "military forces." In contrast, Palestinian 
fighters outside the borders of Israel are, of course, routinely de- 
scribed as terrorists. 

The remarks of the unknown old man at Qana that he "would like 
to be made into a bomb and blow myself up amid the Israelis," 
proved tragically prophetic, for just a year and a half later a number 
of Palestinians, desperate to exact revenge, sacrificed their lives to do 
just that in a lerusalem marketplace; since that time dozens have done 
so in intervening years. No one can defend any acts that kill or maim 
the innocent, but it is important to understand the horror that has in- 
duced hundreds of Palestinians to sacrifice their own lives to strike 
their feeble blows at those who have murdered their loved ones and 
stolen their homeland. In their grief and rage they also commit acts of 
violence against the innocent. The Zionist leaders also know full well 
that such lewish losses, stroked by their media relentlessly airing the 
blood-splashed video around the world, only increases lewish soli- 
darity and augments non-Iewish sympathy for the eternally suffering 
lewish people. 

When Saddam Hussein tried to take back Kuwait, which just a 
few decades before had been part of Iraq, the Western world went to 
war — encouraged to do so most notably by Israel. Were Iraq's ac- 
tions any more imperialistic than Israel's against the Palestinians or 
the Lebanese? 

Other than the scale of the conflict, what is the difference between 
Israel's perpetual war of conquest compared to Nazi Germany seek- 
ing Lebensraum in the 1940s? Germany treated no nations any worse 
than Israel did Palestine, with its terrorizing and driving out three- 
fourths of its Palestinian residents. No populations of any European 
nation, other than those in some of the Soviet-occupied sectors of 
Germany, had been so massively displaced. It is interesting to note 
that lews also directed the terror against the Germans as well, but in 
that war they wore the uniform of Soviet commissars rather than that 
of the terrorist Stern Gang or Haganah. 

Within the borders of Israel and her occupied territories, under 
the heel of a harsh military occupation, Israel continues to expropriate 
land from the Palestinians, settlement by settlement. Naturally the 
Palestinians resist such confiscation. The greatest uprising in recent 
years was the Intifada. The statistics of Palestinian casualties are omi- 
nous. Here are the figures compiled by the major French magazine Le 
Monde: 



Jewish Supremacism 235 

1,116 Palestinians have been killed since the beginning of the In- 
tifada (the stone -throwing revolt) on 9 December 1987, shot by sol- 
diers, policemen or settlers. The figures break down as follows : 
626 deaths in 1988 and 1989, 134 in 1990, 93 in 1991, 108 in 
1992 and 155 from 1 January to 11 September 1993. Among the 
victims were 233 children under 17 years old according to a study 
carried out by Betselem, the Israeli association for human rights. 

Military sources give a figure of nearly 20,000 for the number of 
Palestinians wounded by bullets and the G.N. Relief and Works 
agency for Palestine Refugees (CINRWA) gives a figure of 90,000. 

...This humanitarian organization also indicates that at least 
20,000 detainees are tortured every year during interrogation in 
the military detention centers. 489 

No country in peacetime — not even the Soviets or the Red Chinese in 
the heyday of their Gulags — has held as many prisoners per capita 
as the nation of Israel. It is one of the few nations that will not offi- 
cially renounce the use of torture. It has long been high on the list of 
the offenders compiled by Amnesty International. The London Times 
Magazine did an extensive expose on Israeli torture in the 1970s, the 
1980s and 1990s. The inescapable fact is that Israel was born and built 
by invasion, murder, and theft. Such injustice requires the use of force 
and terror to maintain its power. 

Over 50 Years of Ongoing Israeli Terrorism 

Since 1948, Palestinians have faced ongoing terrorism from Israel. 
Hundreds of villages have been obliterated and literally wiped from 
the map. Tens of thousands of homes have been bombed, bull-dozed 
or dynamited during peacetime! Tens of thousands of men, women 
and children have been killed. Even greater numbers have been 
blinded, crippled, disfigured and maimed. Hundreds of thousands 
have been imprisoned and/ or tortured. 

In going after Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation, Israel 
has never been shy about bombing refugee camps full of women and 
children. Israeli tanks, helicopters and even jet fighters are used to 
drop bombs or fire missiles into the heart of Palestinian neighbor- 
hoods and refugee camps packed with women and children. These 
weapons cannot discriminate between a supposed terrorist and an 
eight-year-old little girl. Such a weapon kills children as surely as it 
kills enemies of the state. 

Palestinians suspected of actively opposing Israel's occupation of 
the West Bank or Gaza, have had their homes and families attacked 
by Israeli tank cannons, missiles or bombs. And after their suspect is 
killed or imprisoned, the Israeli army bulldozes or dynamites their 



236 Israel: Supremacism through terror 

family's home. Thousands of homes have been destroyed in this fash- 
ion. 

Israel has also killed hundreds of Palestinian leaders by assassina- 
tion and terroristic attacks. These attacks often kill innocent bystand- 
ers. Many of those assassinated have never been associated with any 
terror or violence of any kind; they simply were poets, writers, or cler- 
ics who by their words have inspired in their countrymen the desire 
for freedom. The Israeli Prime Minister previous to Ariel Sharon was 
Ehud Barak. In 1972, during peacetime between Israel and Lebanon, 
he led an Israeli commando death squad into Beirut, Lebanon where 
he personally murdered Palestinian writer Kamal Edwan and his 
whole family. In the middle of the night, using silenced submachine 
guns, he and his team slaughtered Edwan and his wife while they 
slept in their bed. For good measure, he even murdered the couples' 
daughter who was asleep in another bedroom. When the newly 
elected Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Barak, came to New York and 
Washington, the lewish-controlled press treated this man who had 
murdered an entire family, as though he was a conquering hero. 

The double standards never seem to end. When an Israeli cabinet 
official, Rechavam Zeevi, was assassinated by Palestinians in October 
of 2001, Sharon and some U.S. officials denounced it as "terrorism." If 
the shooting down of Zeevi is indeed terrorism, what should we call 
many years of Israeli assassinations of hundreds of Palestinian politi- 
cal figures, philosophers, clerics and poets? Why doesn't the press 
point out that Zeevi was himself a lewish Supremacist who described 
Palestinians living and working illegally in Israel as "lice" and a "can- 
cer in our midst"? 490 Zeevi himself obviously was an extreme lewish 
supremacist and terrorist who advocated the forcible expulsion of all 
Palestinians from the occupied territories and the assassination of all 
those who resist Israel occupation. He even publicly called for the as- 
sassination of Yassir Arafat. Yet, the same press that called Zeevi' s as- 
sassination "terrorism" never called the pro-assassination Zeevi a ter- 
rorist or even a lewish Supremacist. The Zeevi assassination itself was 
in direct response to the Israeli assassination of a Palestinian leader a 
few weeks before. 

In 1991, at an Israeli cabinet meeting, Zeevi said that President 
George Bush, by pressing Israel to peace talks, was "an enemy of Is- 
rael" and that "America was plotting a second Holocaust." 491 With a 
supposed "ally" like this, does America need any enemies? 

The overwhelming power of the lewish partisans in the world 
media keeps many from fully grasping the terror of hundreds of Is- 



Jewish Supremacism 237 

raeli assassinations. In fact, even before the WTC terror attack in Sep- 
tember, the BBC instructed their reporters to call Israel's assassination 
of their enemies "targeted killings" rather than exactly what they are: 
assassinations. 492 However, the BBC (which has a disproportionately 
Jewish executive staff) referred to the Zeevi killing as an assassina- 
tion, and not a "targeted killing." The public has been subjected to 
this kind of sanitized and distorted media treatment of Israel for 
years. It is no wonder why few Britons and even fewer Americans are 
fully aware of Israel's record of terrorism. It is for this reason that I 
cannot blame most Americans for their ignorance of Israeli terrorism. 

At Least 150,000 Palestinians Tortured in Israel 

The brutal torture of thousands of one's enemies must be classi- 
fied as a particularly vicious form of terrorism. Tens of thousands of 
Palestinians have been tortured in Israeli jails. A Jewish human rights 
group in Israel confirmed in a 60-page report that 85% of Palestinian 
detainees undergo torture while in custody. 493 And make no mistake 
about it — many of the tortures endured by these Palestinian victims 
are the stuff of one's worst nightmares. Israeli torture includes every- 
thing from choking victims with urine and feces soaked bags tied 
over their heads, to using electric cattle prods for anal rape and muti- 
lation. Israel often doesn't even admit to who they are holding, so if 
they decide to kill or torture a Palestinian to death while he is in cus- 
tody, his body will simply disappear, or they will later claim that they 
died in a battle with Israeli police before capture. Many thousands of 
Palestinians and Lebanese have died while in Israeli custody. 

A feature article by Joel Greenburg in the very pro-Israel New York 
Times stated matter-of-factly that Israel tortures 500 to 600 Palestinians 
every month. 494 That figure, which is probably too low as it comes 
from the pro-Israel New York Times, means that each year at least 6,000 
Palestinians are tortured in Israel. Torture of Palestinians has been go- 
ing on in Israel since 1948 (53 years to date). Even if one uses just one- 
half of the number of Palestinians that Mr. Greenburg says suffer tor- 
ture each year — at least 150,000 human beings have been tortured in 
Israeli jails since the founding of the Jewish state. 

Bowing to Israel's public relations problems because of its legal- 
ized torture, in 1999 the Israeli Supreme Court made an intentionally 
vague ruling that torture is sometimes illegal, but both Israeli and 
Palestinian rights groups offer much evidence that the ruling is just a 
public-relations veneer. They offer evidence that torture continues 
with the same frequency and brutality as did before the ruling. 495 

Following Israel's lead, Jewish journalists are now beginning to 
advocate the use of torture in America! A recent issue of Newsweek 
headlined an article entitled 'Time to think about torture; it's a new 



238 Israel: Supremacism through terror 

world, and survival may well require old techniques that seemed out 
of the question." 496 Even a supposed Jewish champion of civil liber- 
ties, Alan Dershowitz, now advocates it. 497 

Victor Ostrovsky, a former Israeli Mossad agent, wrote two books 
about Israel's terror against their enemies. In one of them, he dis- 
cusses the fate of Palestinians who illegally cross the border in search 
of work in Israel. Many thousands of these young men simply are 
never heard from again after being captured by Israel's forces. Some 
of them are taken to the ABC research facilities where they endure the 
indescribable terror of chemical, nuclear or biological warfare. 

...ABC standing for atomic, bacteriological, and chemical. It was 
where our top epidemiological scientists were developing various 
doomsday machines... should there be an all-out war in which this 
type of weapon would be needed; there was no room for error. The 
Palestinian infiltrators came in handy in this regard. As human 
guinea pigs, they could make sure the weapons the scientist were 
developing worked properly and could verify how fast they worked 
and make them more efficient. 498 

Israeli Weapons of Terror 

In the early 1990s there was a traveling road show of U.S. Secre- 
tary of State, Madeline Albright, Defense Secretary, William Cohen, 
and National Security Chairman, Sandy Berger. This trio of Jewish 
partisans appeared together in speeches and on television programs 
to promote their renewed bombing of Iraq and their enforced block- 
ading of the country (including food and medicine). Their rationale 
was that Iraq had violated United Nations resolutions because it had 
dared to do research into the development of chemical and biological 
weapons, and that it had refused international inspections. Albright, 
Cohen and other leading American Zionists effectively bullied the 
United Nations into supporting these draconian sanctions. 

Within a few years, the blockade had taken a horrendous loss of 
life in the desert kingdom that has little production of food and medi- 
cal products. The same United Nations that had authorized the sanc- 
tions estimated that over 1,000,000 people, mainly children and the 
elderly, had perished from the effects of widespread malnutrition, 
starvation and lack of medical supplies. 

In perhaps one of the most callous remarks ever made by a United 
States Government official, Madeleine Albright, in response to a jour- 
nalist's question, said that such a loss of life was, "worth it." Some 
Americans reading my words will refuse to believe it, they will refuse 
to believe that America under our Jewish leadership has purposely 



Jewish Supremacism 239 

caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children. Here is the 
transcript of the interview of America's Jewish Secretary of State with 
Leslie Stahl of CBS on May 11, 1996: 

Lesley Stahl , (speaking of OS sanctions against Iraq): "We have heard 
that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children 
than died in Hiroshima. And — and you know, is the price worth 
it?" 

Madeline Albright . "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price 
— we think the price is worth it." 499 

The readily acknowledged fact is that Israel has been one of the 
world's worst offenders in the development of internationally prohib- 
ited nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. They have repeatedly 
violated UN international policies and have never allowed any sort of 
International inspection of their facilities, not even from the United 
States, the nation that has certainly provided most of the military 
funding that Israel has used for such projects. Does the United States 
call for the blockade of Israel for such offenses? Does it make billions 
of dollars of American military aid to Israel contingent on Israel hon- 
oring its commitments not to develop biological, chemical and nuclear 
weapons? 

The former American Secretary of State said she was willing to 
cause the death of 500,000 children in order to slow the spread of bio- 
logical and chemical weapons, but she was just as willing to continue 
to help finance the development and spread of those kinds of horren- 
dous weapons in Israel. Is it any wonder why such double standards 
are increasing hatred toward the United States? 

The Ultimate Supremacist Terror-Weapon 

The unholy marriage of Jewish supremacism and terrorism is best 
symbolized by an entirely new kind of weapon now under 
development in the Supremacist State of Israel. It is an ethnically- 
targeted, biological bomb. The Sunday Times in Great Britain revealed 
that Israel has been developing a terrifying new kind of biological 
weapon. The story broke at the same time America was getting ready 
to bomb Saddam Hussein for not allowing weapons inspectors into 
his country. 

Israel planning 'ethnic' bomb as Saddam caves in 

by Uzi Mahnaimi and Marie Colvin 

ISRAEL is working on a biological weapon that would harm Arabs 
but not Jews, according to Israeli military and western intelligence 
sources. The weapon, targeting victims by ethnic origin, is seen as 
Israel's response to Iraq's threat of chemical and biological at- 
tacks. 



240 Israel: Supremacism through terror 

Yesterday Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi leader, backed away from 
the brink of war and agreed to resume co-operation with the in- 
spection teams seeking his suspected chemical and biological 
weapons plants. 

Kofi Annan, the United Nation secretary-general, said he believed 
Iraq had met UN requirements. As Britain and America stood by to 
bomb Saddam, however, Tony Blair's office said compliance must 
be unconditional. The White House, which is threatening Iraq with 
the biggest onslaught since the Gulf war, said President Bill Clin- 
ton's advisers were assessing whether Iraq's offer was adequate. 
The Pentagon is ready to bomb within days... 

In developing their "ethno-bomb", Israeli scientists are trying to 
exploit medical advances by identifying distinctive genes carried 
by some Arabs, then create a genetically modified bacterium or vi- 
rus. 

The intention is to use the ability of viruses and certain bacteria 
to alter the DNA inside their host's living cells. The scientists are 
trying to engineer deadly micro-organisms that attack only those 
bearing the distinctive genes. 

The programme is based at the biological institute in Nes Tzi- 
yona, the main research facility for Israel's clandestine arsenal of 
chemical and biological weapons. A scientist there said the task 
was hugely complicated because both Arabs and Jews are of Se- 
mitic origin. But he added: "They have, however, succeeded in pin- 
pointing a particular characteristic in the genetic profile of certain 
Arab communities, particularly the Iraqi people." The disease could 
be spread by spraying the organisms into the air or putting them in 
water supplies... 

The idea of a Jewish state conducting such research has already 
provoked outrage in some quarters because of parallels with the 
genetic experiments of Dr Josef Mengele, the Nazi scientist at 
Auschwitz. Dedi Zucker, a member of Knesset, the Israeli parlia- 
ment, denounced the research yesterday. "Morally, based on our 
history, and our tradition and our experience, such a weapon is 
monstrous and should be denied," he said. 

...William Cohen, the American defence secretary, revealed that 
he had received reports of countries working to create "certain 
types of pathogens that would be ethnic-specific". A senior western 
intelligence source confirmed last week that Israel was one of the 
countries Cohen had in mind. 

The "ethno-bomb" claims have been given further credence in 
Foreign Report, a Jane's publication that closely monitors security 
and defence matters. It reports unnamed South African sources as 
saying Israeli scientists have used some of the South African re- 
search in trying to develop an "ethnic bullet" against Arabs. 

It also says Israelis discovered aspects of the Arab genetic make- 
up by researching on "Jews of Arab origin, especially Iraqis"... 500 

Additional reporting: Matthew Campbell in Washington, Hugh 
McManners 



Jewish Supremacism 241 

Israel, of course, has denied this story that appeared in one of the 
most respected newspapers of the world, just as it denies every other 
criticism against them. But, tellingly, it also continues to deny any ac- 
cess or inspections of its weapons facilities, including those biological 
weapons facilities the United States has already identified and has ac- 
knowledged in the Israeli State. 

The fact that Israel would even consider developing such a bio- 
logical weapon in the light of their endless demonization of the Nazis 
has monstrous implications. Whether or not the Nazis are truly guilty 
of all the accusations the Jews have levied against them, the Israel of 
the 21 st Century is approaching in reality the extremes of racial Su- 
premacism of which the most supremacist Nazi could only have 
dreamt. 

In the wake of the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pen- 
tagon in September of 2001, the United States declared a new war on 
terrorism. Many millions around the world who know the truth about 
Israeli terrorism were shocked to see the American President, George 
Bush, learning how to fight terrorism from the Israeli Prime Minister, 
Ariel Sharon. It is certainly true that Sharon should be able to teach 
Mr. Bush a lot about terrorism, considering that he is the world's lead- 
ing terrorist. At least Mr. Bush has sought expert advice! 

While Zionists in Israel were dispossessing the Palestinians, Zion- 
ists in America were busy consolidating their power in all the West- 
ern nations also, promoting policies that would weaken the identity 
and the will for self-preservation of the founding Gentile elements. 
They had even set about to make us a minority in our nation, just as 
they had made the Palestinians a minority in Israel. I knew that if the 
Zionists succeeded in their ultimate objectives they would destroy our 
own people's life and liberty just as they had affected millions in the 
Mideast. 

The structure and form of modern Israel proves that Jewish Su- 
premacism is not an ideology of the past, but an ominous reality of 
the present, overtly expressed in every sinew of the Israeli state. The 
fact that the Jewish power structure in America and around the world 
intensely supports it offers convincing evidence that little had 
changed in the struggle between Jew and Gentile over the last 2,500 
years. Moreover, the fact that Jews have been able to get the Western 
world to support Zionism in all its bloody hypocrisy is testimony to 
their power over all forms of media and over our nation's govern- 
ments. The European and American peoples, the Palestinians, indeed 
all the peoples of the world cannot survive, nor can they be free 
unless that power is broken. 

Jewish supremacism and Jewish terrorism have, of course, gone 
hand in hand from the days of the genocide boasted about in the Old 



242 Israel: Supremacism through terror 

Testament, to the brutal murder and suppression of early Christians 
as recorded in the New Testament, to the mass murder and torture of 
the Gulags of the early days of Jewish-led Bolshevism, and, of course 
to the founding and expansion of the Jewish Supremacist State of Is- 
rael. But, up until a summer day in 1967, I never dreamed that my 
own country could be the recipient of Jewish terrorism. It seemed a 
far away phenomenon, not really applicable to America. 

In 1967 Israel launched a deliberate terror attack against the 
American Navy ship the USS Liberty. Learning the sordid details of 
the attack against my own nation and its subsequent cover-up had a 
profound effect upon the direction of my life, ultimately even playing 
an important role in influencing me to continue my research into Jew- 
ish Supremacism and spurring on my willingness to expose it even 
though I knew that doing so would likely exact a high personal cost. 
My learning about Israeli terrorism against America was one of the 
major reasons that you now hold this book in your hands. Now, I will 
turn to the details of this Israeli act of treachery that so appalled me. 



Chapter 1 1 

Israeli Terrorism and Treachery 
against the united states 

Israel purposely and deliberately attacked the CI.S.S. Liberty - Dean 
Rusk, OS Secretary of State 

On June 8, 1967, an American Navy intelligence ship, the U.S.S. 
Liberty, patrolling off the waters of Israel and the Gaza Strip, came 
under the fire of jet fighter aircraft and torpedo boats. I recall that I 
heard the news from my transistor radio while I was at my summer 
job, scraping the old paint off a house in New Orleans' Lakeview sec- 
tion. The attack occurred during the Israeli- Arab war of 1967, a war in 
which America supported Israel. The first news accounts did not 
identify the attacking parties, and I assumed that the Egyptians, in a 
supremely brutal and stupid attack, had struck a U.S. vessel in retalia- 
tion for our massive support of the Israeli military. Immediately after 
the first reports of the attack came in, a few elected officials had al- 
ready begun to call for immediate military retaliation on Egypt. 

In spite of my growing knowledge of the pernicious nature of Zi- 
onism, my deeply embedded patriotism came pouring out. I became 
angry at Egypt for daring to attack an American vessel. Later on, re- 
ports finally began to filter in that it was the Israelis who had attacked 
the American ship, wounding 171 Americans and killing 31. The offi- 
cial excuse was that the Israelis had mistaken the Liberty for an Egyp- 
tian ship. Over the next few weeks, a great deal of evidence emerged 
revealing that the attack had been deliberate. Still, the major media 
dropped all the stories of the U.S.S. Liberty and its 202 American casu- 
alties in deference to stories of gallant little Israel fighting its heroic 
war with Egypt and Lebanon. 



244 Israeli Treachery against the United States 



The crew had been ordered not to divulge any information about 
the attack. When the silence was finally broken years later by Lieu- 
tenant James Ennes, an officer aboard the Liberty, the overwhelming 
evidence revealed a murderous and treacherous attack by the Israelis 
on an American ship. 

The U.S.S. Liberty, a lightly armed intelligence ship whose mission 
was to intercept foreign radio communications, had been sailing in in- 
ternational waters off the Egyptian town of El Arish, which Israeli 
forces had just captured. Israel knew that the Liberty was monitoring 
its transmissions and was fearful it would learn of preparations for a 
planned invasion of Syria. Also, the Liberty had intercepted Israeli 
radio communications showing that they had murdered hundreds of 
unarmed Egyptian prisoners of war in the Sinai. 

On the clear and breezy morning of June 8, Israeli fighter jets cir- 
cled the Liberty numerous times, coming in so low and close that the 
ship's crewmen waved at the pilots and could actually see their faces. 
The Liberty was clearly marked with its large U.S. Navy identifying 
letters and it had a large American flag flying stiffly in the breeze. 
With no warning, at 2:00 p.m., unmarked Israeli jets attacked the 

Liberty with rockets, cannon fire, 
and napalm bombs. Their first tar- 
get was the radio room, which they 
destroyed along with the Liberty's 
antennas. The fighters made re- 
peated passes, attacking the ship 
until they ran out of bombs and 
ammo and broke off the attack. At 
that point the men of the Liberty 
replaced the first American flag, 
which had been shot away, with an 
oversized 7- by 13-foot flag. 

The Israelis obviously knew the 
ship was American as they inter- 
cepted and tried to electronically 
jam the Liberty's radio signals for 
help. Incredibly, the ship's radio 
operators had managed to rig up a 
new antenna and get a distress call 
through identifying the attackers 
and requesting help from the Medi- 
terranean Sixth Fleet. The carriers 




USS Liberty with gaping hole 
from Israeli Torpedo Attack 



Jewish Supremacism 245 

Saratoga and America sent messages that help was on the way and 
dispatched fighters to defend the Liberty. 

The beleaguered and bloodied crew of the Liberty waited in vain 
for the promised fighter support as Israeli torpedo boats then at- 
tacked, trying to sink the Liberty and finish off the crew who were 
now fighting the napalm fires on the decks and tending to the 
wounded. The Israelis raked the Liberty with 20 and 40 mm cannon 
fire and struck the ship with a torpedo at the waterline, killing 22 
more sailors below decks. The torpedo boats came in close enough to 
machine-gun the crew tending to the wounded on deck. 

Despite 821 holes each bigger than a man's fist, napalm bombs 
exploding on the decks and in the superstructure, and a gaping hole 
and serious torpedo damage at the water line, miraculously, the USS 
Liberty remained afloat (no thanks to the U.S. fighter support which 
never came; they had been called back by orders of President Lyndon 
Johnson before they could intercept the attackers). 

Israel obviously intended to sink the Liberty and kill everyone on 
board. In violation of international law, Israeli torpedo boats even 
machine-gunned the Liberty's deployed life rafts. They sought to 
knock out the Liberty's communication room and jam her radio sig- 
nals to prevent her from identifying her attackers, then to send the 
American ship and her crew to the bottom so no one could refute the 
natural supposition that the treacherous deed had been committed by 
the Egyptians. The Zionists knew that by knocking out the Liberty 
they would have more of a free hand in Syria, and the indignation 
over the sinking of an American ship by the Egyptians would garner 
unconditional support for Israel's most radical war aims. Only the 
courage and resourcefulness of the men of the U.S.S. Liberty pre- 
vented that further miscarriage of justice. 

In his recall of the U.S. Navy jets sent to protect the Liberty, John- 
son committed one of the most treasonous acts of betrayal in Ameri- 
can history. He cared more about preventing a public breach between 
the U.S. and Israel than saving the lives of American fighting men. 
The survivors of the Liberty have stated clearly that had the jets not 
been recalled, the torpedo boat attack could have been stopped, sav- 
ing many American lives. 

Captain William McGonagle, the Liberty's commanding officer, 
although seriously wounded, showed exceptional heroism that 
eventually won him the Congressional Medal of Honor. Usually the 
president awards the nation's highest honor in a White House 
ceremony along with a citation recording the details of the heroic 
deed. President Johnson called the Israelis to see if they had any 
objection to the awarding of the medal and then decided not to take 
part in the ceremony or even allow it at the White House. The 



246 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

Secretary of the Navy ended up awarding the medal at the 
Washington Naval Yard, and the citation did not even identify Israel 
as the attacker. The Washington Post ran no story about Captain 
McGonagle receiving the award. The U.S. Navy conducted a 
perfunctory court of inquiry (lasting only four days), and failed to call 
even one Israeli to testify. 

Lieutenant lames Ennes, one of the Liberty's officers, wrote a de- 
tailed book about the incident called Assault on the Liberty, published 
in 1979. 501 It exposes the tremendous evidence showing how the at- 
tack was a calculated and deliberate attempt to sink a ship the Israelis 
knew was American and kill any survivors so there would be no 
American witnesses. The U.S. ambassador to Lebanon at the time has 
also come forward and stated that when he was on duty in the Middle 
East, he heard U.S.-intercepted Israeli communications with the at- 
tacking Israeli fighters acknowledging the ship was American. Many 
prominent leaders of the U.S. Navy courageously have gone on re- 
cord to demand a real inquiry on the Liberty, and the head of Navy 
Operations said that the evidence clearly pointed to a planned attack. 
Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Admiral Thomas Moorer and the sur- 
viving crew of the U.S.S. Liberty all say that the attack was clearly de- 
liberate. 

Perhaps one could understand such a treacherous act from the 
stated enemies of this country, but not from a supposed ally. The fact 
that Israel had attacked the forces of the nation that has supported it 
more than any other — with money, diplomacy, good will, and even 
military arms (including the very weapons that were turned against 
our men) — has to be one of the most egregious acts of military be- 
trayal in the history of nations. 

I asked myself how Israel could be so reckless as to attack an 
American vessel. The obvious answer was that they knew their opera- 
tion against the Liberty held very little risk, for if the attack succeeded 
and the ship and all its crew were destroyed, Israel would get every- 
thing it wanted in the war. If they failed in their mission to sink the 
Liberty and blame it on the Egyptians, the Israelis knew they could 
pass it off as a mistake. They also knew that their massive influence in 
the American government and the press would help them cover up 
their treachery. After sweeping the terror and dispossession of a mil- 
lion and one half Palestinians under the rug for half a century — the 
USS Liberty was child's play 

The lewish-dominated American media expressed no outrage for 
the attack and supinely accepted the specious Israeli excuse for it. 



Jewish Supremacism 247 

Even though our own Secretary of State and our own Chairman of the 
Joint Chiefs of Staff said the Israeli attack was deliberate, the Jewish 
Lobby was even able to prevent a formal Congressional inquiry into 
the attack. In contrast, the USS Liberty's sister ship, the USS Pueblo, 
was captured by North Korea the following year (1968) with the loss 
of only one life, yet within a year the U.S. Congress launched a formal 
inquiry into that attack. There still has been no formal inquiry into the 
attack on the USS Liberty. 

How did the political leaders of the United States respond to this 
Israeli act of war against it? Did America bomb Tel Aviv as it did Ka- 
bul, Afghanistan? No, the Israeli-controlled American government 
along with the Jewish-controlled media committed a clear case of 
treason against America by covering up this vicious terrorist attack, 
and it continues to send billions of American tax dollars to Israel in 
military and monetary aid. 

I must invoke the example of Pearl Harbor. Any American gov- 
ernment official who would have given aid or comfort to Japan after 
the attack in 1941 would have been prosecuted as a traitor to the 
United States. I charge that those American government officials who 
collaborate with the Jewish Lobby and media in continuing to support 
Israel after its attack on the USS Liberty - are traitors against the 
United States of America! 

When I learned the full truth of the Israeli attack on the USS Lib- 
erty a few weeks after the actual attack — I remembered how in- 
censed I had felt when I heard on my transistor radio how the Egyp- 
tians had apparently attacked an American ship. Those moments of 
anger had long passed when years later I read Ennes's book. How- 
ever, Ennes's poignant accounts of the dead and dying men aboard 
the Liberty caused another anger to rise in me, again only to give way 
to profound sadness for my country. As a young and proud Ameri- 
can, I could not understand how our President could treasonously re- 
fuse to defend American men under fire. How could our government 
willingly cover up the intentional Israeli murder of Americans — and 
even reward the murderers with even more billions of our tax money 
in foreign aid? The incident shocked me so much that it drove me to 
research Israel's true record of terrorism and treachery against the 
United States. I learned very quickly that the Liberty was not the first 
Israeli act of terrorism and treachery against America. 

The Lavon Affair: Israeli Terrorism against America 

In 1954, the Israeli government launched a secret operation of ter- 
ror against the United States called Operation Suzannah. It plotted to 
murder Americans and blow up American installations in Egypt. 
Their plan was to leave false evidence that the Egyptians committed 



248 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

the terrorist acts, so as to make America go to war against Egypt on 
the side of Israel. lewish agents succeeded in blowing up some post 
offices and American libraries in Cairo and Alexandria. On the way to 
blow up an American movie house, the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Thea- 
ter, an Israeli's agent's bomb went off prematurely. Thankfully, for 
both Egypt and for America, the plot was then exposed and stopped 
in its early stages. 

Because of the capture of the Israeli agents, the world learned of 
this Israeli treachery and the Israeli Foreign Minister, Pinhas Lavon, 
was later forced to resign. The whole episode became known as the 
Lavon Affair. Today, the lewish-dominated American media and 
publishing establishment deftly cover up this Israeli treachery against 
us. Most Americans know nothing about it. For instance, only a slight 
mention of the Lavon Affair is found in the popular Encarta Encyclo- 
pedia. The reference can be found in an article about Ben-Gurion au- 
thored by the pro-Zionist, Bernard Reich. It is appropriate to note that 
the article's author illustrates a typical media pattern. When Ameri- 
cans suppose they are reading an unbiased Encyclopedia or news 
magazine account, they more often than not are reading a purposely 
distorted account written by ardent lewish Zionists. Here is the exact 
wording of its reporting of this Israeli terrorism against America. 

Ben-Gurion returned to politics in 1955 to replace Minister of De- 
fense Pinhas Lavon — who resigned after a failed attempt to sabo- 
tage Egypt's relations with the West. 502 

Note how the article meekly says, "a failed attempt to sabotage 
Egypt's relations with the West." What does this mean to the reader? 
"Sabotaging relations" sounds as though Israel might have just said a 
few nasty things about Egypt and America behind each other's back. 
The intentional deception used in this article by its lewish author is 
typical of the distortions that go on countless times in the mass media. 

The line in Encarta should read: 

"--who was forced to resign after Israel was caught committing 
terrorist bombings against the United States to treacherously in- 
cite America to war against Israel's enemy." 

I am sure that ninety percent of those who now read these lines 
have never heard of the Lavon Affair. If you still might doubt that Is- 
rael has committed these terrorist acts against America in Egypt, here 
is a quote from a recent article appearing in the lewish magazine Mo- 
ment, written by Samuel Katz and meant for its small lewish audience. 
The article is more forward than the Encarta reference, yet still omits 



Jewish Supremacism 249 

the provocative word terrorism, a word Israel uses when Palestinians 
blow up libraries and cinemas. 

And the failures were as common as the spectacular successes. In 
the mid '50s, A'man (the Jewish Defense Agency) suffered a seri- 
ous setback during the infamous "Operation Suzannah," when Is- 
raeli agents provoked Jews in Egypt to attack American and Brit- 
ish targets and incite anti-Western sentiment. Many Jews were ar- 
rested, and some were executed. The bungled operation was a se- 
vere embarrassment for the government of Prime Minister David 
Ben-Gurion and his defense minister, Pinhas Lavon 503 

So, in the Lavon Affair we learned how our so-called "best friend 
in the Mideast," Israel, rewards the United States for its unconditional 
monetary and military support: by committing terrorism against us! 
Ponder the fact that most Americans have never even heard about 
this Israeli terrorist attack against us. 

If the Egyptian government had been behind this terror against 
America, we would have rightly considered it an act of war and we 
would have gone to war against Egypt and bombed it unmercifully, 
just as we have done against Afghanistan. And the media; they would 
have clamored for such attacks just as they demanded attacks against 
Afghanistan after the September 11 attacks of 2001. In fact, we at- 
tacked Afghanistan on far less grounds than we have for attacking Is- 
rael. No evidence existed that Afghanistan approved of or even knew 
anything about the attack on the World Trade Center; but in the 
Lavon Affair, the Israeli government had committed a direct act of 
war against the United States. America, of course, did not bomb Tel 
Aviv in retaliation. America did not sever its diplomatic relations 
with Israel. In fact, we did not even cut off our billions of dollars in 
monetary and military aid! Why not? 

Again I invoke the example of Pearl Harbor as I did in recounting 
the attack on the USS Liberty. Any American government official who 
would have given aid to the Japanese after the attack on Pearl Harbor 
would have been prosecuted as a traitor to the United States. 

Let me be perfectly blunt. Those Americans in government who 
continued our support of Israel after it had committed terrorist acts 
against the people of the United States — clearly committed treason 
against the United States. 

If only America's leaders, after Israel's terrorist attack against us 
in the Lavon Affair, or after the attack on the Liberty, would simply 
have stopped their treasonous aid to Israel. There would have been 
no subsequent acts of terror against us such as the World Trade Cen- 
ter and Pentagon attacks. What further acts of terrorism could we 
prevent by stopping the flow of our money and military arms to Israel 
right now? 



250 Israeli Treachery against the United States 
Ongoing Israeli Treachery: The Pollard Affair 

In the 1980s, Israel recruited an American lew, lonathan Pollard, 
to spy against the United States. After his apprehension, Israeli offi- 
cials at first claimed he was a "rogue agent," but later they admitted 
that Pollard was working for 
them from the beginning. Other 
than the lewish spies, Ethel and 
Tulius Rosenberg, who gave our 
atom bomb secrets to the Sovi- 
ets, probably no spies have ever 
done more damage to our coun- 
try than that which was done by 
this single Israeli spy: lonathan 
Pollard. 

Israel's use of Pollard's in- 
formation not only destroyed 
our intelligence operations in 
the Mideast; it practically de- 
stroyed our intelligence appara- 
tus in the Soviet Union and the 
Eastern Bloc. 504 Many of Amer- 
ica's most loyal and best agents 
in the Communist world were 
executed because Israel sold or bartered Pollard's stolen information 
to the Soviets. 505 As the article below by Eric Margolis explains, Amer- 
ica's supposed "wonderful friend and ally" Israel would not even al- 
low the United States to debrief the Mossad agents who handled the 
Pollard spy case. They wouldn't even let us determine the full extent 
of the damage done to the United States and the dangers posed to 
American agents overseas. 

Some of the enormously sensitive secrets stolen by Pollard may 
have been either sold, or bartered, by Israel to the Soviet Union. 

A number of key CIA agents in the East Bloc were allegedly exe- 
cuted as a result of Pollard's spying. The KGB likely gained access 
to top-secret U.S. codes - either directly from Israel, or through 
spies in Israel's government. In short, Pollard's treachery caused 
one of the worst security disasters in modern U.S. history... 506 

So, Israel, which receives billions in American aid, has continu- 
ously and treacherously spied on and broken the very security of the 
United States. To further demonstrate their contempt for us, they even 
bartered the top secret information they had stolen from us - to 




,,..,,-^1 fr-"*T-V j -d f-**fr Wfc<N 



Jewish Supremacism 251 

America's worst enemies. Even after Israel's public relations apolo- 
gies for the Pollard spying, and after assuring American officials it 
would never happen again, it has continued to spy on us. The Los An- 
geles Times in 1997 reported that an American Jew named David A. 
Tenenbaum "admitted to divulging secrets to Israel." 507 To quote the 
Los Angeles Times, "A civilian engineer working at an Army command 
facility near Detroit has admitted divulging classified military infor- 
mation to Israeli officials over the last 10 years." After the September 
11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center, 60 Jews (and 140 even be- 
fore the attacks) were being held by the FBI for spying, "including 
major Jewish intelligence operatives." 

"WASHINGTON — Some 60 Israelis, who federal investigators 
have said are part of a long-running effort to spy on American gov- 
ernment officials, are among the hundreds of foreigners detained 
since the Sept. 1 1 terror attacks, Fox News has learned. 

...Numerous classified documents obtained by Fox News indicate 
that even prior to Sept. 11, as many as 140 other Israelis had been 
detained or arrested in a secretive and sprawling investigation into 
suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States. 

...Documents say they, "targeted and penetrated military bases." 
The DEA, FBI and dozens of government facilities, and even secret 
offices and unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelli- 
gence personnel. The majority of those questioned, "stated they 
served in military intelligence, electronic surveillance intercept and 
or explosive ordinance units." 

...Why would Israelis spy in and on the U.S.? A general account- 
ing office investigation referred to Israel as country A and said, 
"According to a U.S. intelligence agency, the government of coun- 
try A conducts the most aggressive espionage operations against 
the U.S. of any U.S. ally." 

A defense intelligence report said Israel has a voracious appetite 
for information and said, "the Israelis are motivated by strong sur- 
vival instincts which dictate every possible facet of their political 
and economical policies. It aggressively collects military and in- 
dustrial technology and the U.S. is a high priority target." 

The document concludes: "Israel possesses the resources and 
technical capability to achieve its collection objectives." 

...There are other things to consider. And in the days ahead, we'll 
take a look at the U.S. phone system and law enforcement's meth- 
ods for wiretaps. And an investigation that both have been com- 
promised by our friends [sic] overseas. 508 

Every American can obviously understand the immense damage 
that can be caused from a foreign government spying on us. Spying 
has always been prosecuted by every nation as one of the most seri- 
ous crimes, and justly so. A very legitimate question is why does the 



252 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

American government tolerate Israel's spying and treachery against 
our country? Why has not President Bush simply said to Israel, 

America does not have to give you billions of American tax dollars. We 
do not have to diplomatically support your terrorism and supremacism before 
the United Nations. The least we should have expected in return is that you 
do not spy on us and betray us. Since you have repeatedly committed treach- 
ery against us, that's it! You won't get another dime! Furthermore, if you 
commit anymore treachery against America we will answer it with a military 
response that will make our attack on the Taliban look like foreplay! 

Why American officials have not and do not say this offers clear 
proof of Israel's power over them, and clear evidence of the treason 
that prospers in the American government. 

Even after Israel repeatedly proved its willingness to spy on us 
and critically damage America's intelligence operations, President 
Clinton appointed a dedicated, Zionist lew as Chairman of the Na- 
tional Security Council, the highest and most sensitive intelligence 
position in the White House. Even the Israeli daily Maariv referred to 
Berger as a "warm lew," meaning that he is devoted to Israel first. 509 
Appointing Berger as National Security Council chief after the Pollard 
Spy Case is pure insanity. 

The fact that Israel could commit these outrages against the 
United States without suffering scathing media attacks and causing at 
least the cutoff of American aid to Israel (if not placing Israel on our 
enemies list), shows their absolute supremacism over the American 
establishment. It is no wonder that Ariel Sharon could make the fol- 
lowing statement to Shimon Peres when he suggested that Israel 
might lose American aid if it did not pull back recent Israeli incur- 
sions into the West Bank. Sharon responded: 

"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and 
will do that ... I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry 
about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control 
America, and the Americans know it." — Ariel Sharon, October 3, 
200 1 510 

lonathan Pollard is not the only American who has committed 
treason against America. All those in the American government who 
would continue to monetarily and militarily support a foreign nation 
that spies on us and severely damages our intelligence operations 
(along with causing the deaths of American agents) have committed 
treason against the United States of America. In response to these on- 
going acts of treachery against the United States, a truly patriotic 
American Government would have (at the very least) ended our sup- 



Jewish Supremacism 253 

port for Israel. Supporting a foreign nation after it willfully commits 
such acts of treachery against America is nothing less than treason. 
The fact that billions of dollars of American taxpayer support to Israel 
did not miss a single beat is one more indicator of the power of Jewish 
Supremacism over the American establishment. 

Jewish Treachery in the 9-11 Attacks on America 

Examining the reaction of the American media and government to 
the terrorist attacks of September 2001 shows the power of Jewish Su- 
premacism over them. While the fires were still burning in the Twin 
towers and the Pentagon, Jewish partisans in the media carefully be- 
gan conditioning the minds of the American people so that these at- 
tacks would help the Israeli cause. The major news networks ran a 
video tape of a small group of Palestinian kids supposedly celebrating 
the news of the strike against America, and then aired it every five or 
ten minutes juxtaposed to the spectacular carnage of the burning 
WTC and soot-covered Americans crying in horror. In truth, every 
major Palestinian organization condemned the attacks and not even a 
single Palestinian was implicated in the attacks. 

Interestingly enough, the Jerusalem Post reported that Israelis on a 
rooftop nearby the World Trade Center in New York were detained 
by the FBI after they were spotted video-taping and "whooping with 
glee as the Twin Towers burned." 511 Repeatedly running the tape of a 
few Palestinian rowdies was an especially cheap shot that left a pow- 
erful anti-Palestinian impression seared in the consciousness of mil- 
lions of Americans traumatized by the horrible scenes of destruction 
they witnessed on their television screen. 

The Big Lie 

Almost immediately after the attacks, the media began to parrot a 
huge lie about why the event happened so as to protect Israel's image 
and maximize American hatred for Israeli's enemies. There were two 
main parts to the lie. First, the media solemnly announced that the at- 
tacks had absolutely nothing to do with American support of the 
criminal and terrorist policies of Israel. It is vital to the Jewish Su- 
premacists that the American people do not fully realize the huge na- 
tional and personal costs of our Israeli controlled foreign policy. 
Americans might begin to ask why we have a policy that so hurts 
America and that even brings terrorism to our shores. The media can- 
not afford people to ask those kinds of logical questions, so they had 
to manufacture an explanation for the attack that left out Israel. 

Jewish ultra-supremacist Benjamin Netanyahu actually had the 
chutzpah to appear before a Congressional hearing on the incident 



254 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

and claim that the Arab world hates America so much that it is Israel 
that suffers from its association with the United States! 

Thus, the soldiers of militant Islam do not hate the West because 
of Israel, they hate Israel because of the West... 512 

Netanyahu told America not to worry, however, because loyal lit- 
tle Israel would still stand behind the United States even though it has 
been ruining its sterling reputation with the Arabs by associating with 
us. 

President Bush should have immediately responded by telling the 
Israelis that we are very sorry for hurting Israel's image among the 
Arabs, so we will solve that problem for you by cutting off our sup- 
port for Israel. 

Secondly, the media repeatedly alleged that the attackers simply 
did it because they hate American "freedom." The attack on freedom 
was repeated incessantly by the media. Even President George Bush 
repeated that canard in his speech to the U.S. Congress. He said: 

Americans are asking 'Why do they hate us?" 

They hate what they see right here in this chamber: a democrati- 
cally elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They 
hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, 
our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other. 

The media did not bother to tell the American people that the at- 
tack occurred on the anniversary of the League of Nations Proclama- 
tion of the British Mandate, which was made public in Palestine on 
September 11, 1922. The British Mandate was the first major step to- 
ward implementation of the Balfour Declaration; the founding of a 
lewish State in what is now Israel. September 11 is a day of infamy for 
the Palestinians and they apparently sought the same for America. 

The media bosses had to know of the significance of that date. But, 
no major news source even mentioned it. The date can be found in 
many historical dating indexes, including Important Dates in History. 

At the same time the media blamed Bin Laden for being the mas- 
termind behind the attack, they told us he did it because he "hates 
American freedom!" The media knew such claptrap was blatant lie. 
Every media outlet in the world has full access to his past interviews. 
Laden has never said a word against democracy or freedom. In 1998, 
ABC news interviewed Laden and asked him about the previous at- 
tack on the World Trade Center. He praised the attackers and gave 
the reasons why he opposes America. Here are some excerpts of the 
broadcast by ABC three years ago: 



Jewish Supremacism 255 

"I say to them that they (Americans) have put themselves at the 
mercy of a disloyal government, and this is most evident in Clin- 
ton's administration... We believe that it represents Israel inside 
America. Take the sensitive ministries such as the Secretary of 
State and the Secretary of Defense and the CIA, you will find that 
the Jews have the upper hand in them. They make use of America 
to further their plans for the world..." 

"For over half a century, Muslims in Palestine have been (by the 
Jews) slaughtered and assaulted and robbed of their honor and of 
their property. Their houses have been blasted, their crops de- 
stroyed... 

The Jewish media knew why America was attacked from day one. 
They knew all along it was because of our Israel First foreign policy. 
The media bosses had a meeting and decided to air no more inter- 
views with bin Laden (except for government approved excerpts) so 
they could perpetuate their lies about his motivations. They knew that 
the attackers viewed America as under control of Zionists and that it 
has been used to support Israel's terrorism and to attack and murder 
Israel's enemies. 

Saying the September 11 suicide bombers attacked America be- 
cause they hate democracy is as ridiculous as saying wolves eat rab- 
bits because they hop. The truth is that wolves do not eat rabbits be- 
cause they hop, but because they are food. Arab terrorists struck at 
America not because it is a democracy, but because they believed that 
terrorism against us was justified for our support of the Israeli terror- 
ism against them. The world has not read about any plane bombs 
crashing into Switzerland or Iceland, two long-enduring democracies. 

The absolutely absurd, Big Lie about attacking democracy was 
promoted to cover up the obvious truth that the terrorist acts hap- 
pened in retaliation for America's unconditional support for the ter- 
rorist state of Israel and its leader who is one of the world's most 
blood-stained terrorists; Ariel Sharon. 

The Jewish supremacist media felt compelled to lie and divert 
people with a bogus reason for the terrorist acts. If Americans clearly 
understood that the fact that our Israeli policy was the primary cause 
of this tragedy, people might ask obvious questions, such as: 

Is America's support of Israel really worth it? 

• Is it worth the lives of 4,000 American victims lost on 9/1 1 ? 

• Is it worth the one trillion dollars of damage suffered by our econ- 
omy? 

• Is it worth the 200 billion dollars of American taxpayer's money 
sent to Israel since its inception? 



256 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

• Is it worth the additional trillions of dollars we have spent for 
higher petroleum costs? (The Arab oil-weapon response to our pro- 
Israel policies) 

• Is it worth the enormous dangers of biological, chemical and nu- 
clear terrorism upon the American people? 

• Is it worth the loss of our precious Constitutional Rights and free- 
doms? 

• Is it worth making 99 percent of the people of the Mideast hate us 
to please a nation that commits treachery against us? 

• Is it worth it to support a nation created by terrorism and ethnic 
cleansing and whose leader is a long-time terrorist who is respon- 
sible for the death of 1500 men, women and children refugees in 
Lebanon? 

• Is it worth it to support a nation that has committed terrorist acts 
of murder and destruction against the United States? (Such as the 
Lavon Affair and the attack on the American Navy ship, the CI.S.S 
Liberty) 

• Is it worth it to support a nation who spies on us? (Such as the 
Jonathan Pollard Case) 

• Is it worth it to support a nation who steals from us? (Such as the 
theft of enriched uranium for Israel's illegal atomic bombs) 

• Is it worth it to support a nation that sells our most secret defense 
technology to America's most dangerous enemy, the Red Chinese? 

• Is it worth it to allow a foreign nation to have the strongest lobby 
in our own American government? 

• Is it worth it for Israeli agents to bribe American candidates with 
vast sums of campaign money so they will put the interests of Is- 
rael over America? 

The fact that the media could so unanimously cover up the real 
reason for the attack of September 11 is clear proof of the Jewish su- 
premacism over it. Of course, the real truth is that America was at- 
tacked not because we have a truly free press, but because it is con- 
trolled by Jewish Supremacists. We were attacked not because our 
Government is free, but because of our Israeli controlled government, 
as Sen. William Fulbright said, one that has acted directly against the 
most important interests of the American people. 

Right up until September 11, the media daily characterized 
George Bush as the village idiot who stumbled into the Presidency. 
Now that Bush is embracing Israel's Holy War against the Palestini- 
ans and their allies, he has suddenly become a great leader who will 
give us a wonderful victory in the glorious war ahead. At least, as 
long as he continues to serve the interests of Jewish Supremacism. 

The same leftist Jewish bosses and media personnel who have 
subverted every true American patriotic interest to Israel's agenda 



Jewish Supremacism 257 

over the past 50 years, and who have consistently represented those 
who wave American flags as ignorant, country yahoos, have now put 
an American flag everywhere in sight and made flag-waving chic. 
They solemnly tell us that George Bush's campaign to "rid the world 
of evil" is not in the least bit too ambitious. 

Israeli Treachery in the September Attacks 

So, the record is clear. Israel is the worst terrorist rogue state on 
earth. Israel and its terrorist leaders including Ben-Gurion, Begin, 
Shamir, Barak and Sharon have committed a half-century of relentless 
ethnic cleansing, bombings, shootings, torture and murder of the 
Palestinian people. Israel has also committed numerous acts of 
treachery and terrorism against the United States of America as I have 
clearly shown in documenting the Lavon Affair, the Attack on the 
USS Liberty and the Pollard Spy case and the continued spying that 
still continues. 

Because of overwhelming Israeli power in media and government, 
traitors to the United States continue to treasonously betray America 
with little fear of punishment. 

Through the efforts of Jewish and Gentile traitors in service to 
Jewish Supremacism, the American government has embarked on a 
foreign policy that has repeatedly betrayed America's true interests. 
Massive American military and monetary support has enabled Israel 
to continue its relentless terrorism against the Palestinians and has 
thus provoked tremendous hatred against the United States, greatly 
hurt American economic and strategic interests, and ultimately 
spawned the terrorism now rising against America. 

The traitors who sacrificed America to Israel are as guilty of the 
death of 4,000 American lives on September 11 as those who actually 
hijacked and crashed the planes into the World Trade Center and Pen- 
tagon. However, knowing Israel's record of treachery against Amer- 
ica, I had suspicions from the first few moments of the attacks that Is- 
rael played a treacherous role in these attacks from which it was the 
only real beneficiary. 

From the dawn of the new century to September 11, 2001, Israel 
has suffered the worst public relations disaster in its history. The 
election of mass murder Ariel Sharon as Prime Minister was the last 
straw for millions of decent minded people all over the world. The 
UN Conference on Racism, which labeled Israel an "Apartheid state," 
also signaled rapidly growing disapproval of Israel. 

Then, suddenly, the attack on the World Trade Center changed 
everything. In a matter of minutes, the world swung back to Israel's 
favor and has since been given a blank check (which they have 
quickly cashed!) to indiscriminately bomb and kill the Palestinians 



258 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

and crush their fledgling new state. Was all of this just a fortunate co- 
incidence for Israel? 

As I have shown earlier in this chapter, Israeli has a long and 
treacherous record of covert treachery against the United States. They 
are very aware that any Arab terrorist attack on America greatly ad- 
vances their own aims, the bigger the attack against America; the 
more carnage, the better it is for Israel. 

On September 10, 2001, the eve of the WTC attack, The Washington 
Times ran a story on about a recent 68-page study issued by the U.S. 
Army School for Advanced Military Studies (SAMS). The study, is- 
sued by the elite Army officer's school, detailed the dangers of a pos- 
sible U.S. Army occupational force in the Mideast. Here is how the ar- 
ticle commented about the Israeli Mossad: 

Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers 
say: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. 
forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act." 

Ironically, within 24 hours of the story's publication, the World 
Trade Center and the Pentagon were in flames. Could the "ruthless 
and cunning Mossad," as the U.S. Army officers describe it, covertly 
have been behind the attack? 

The Mossad is certainly the most ruthless terrorist organization in 
the entire world. It is also one of the largest and most sophisticated in- 
telligence organizations. No other nation comes even close to match- 
ing its level of infiltration of Arabic organizations. It prides itself on 
infiltrating every sizable militant Palestinian and Arabic organization 
on earth. Knowing these facts, there can be little doubt the Mossad 
has deeply penetrated one of the oldest, largest and what is consid- 
ered the most famous and dangerous Arabic terrorist organization on 
earth; bin Laden' s al-Qaida. 

Furthermore, the FBI and the CIA have clearly stated that the at- 
tack on the WTC and Pentagon was a huge covert operation using an 
international network of at least a hundred terrorists, spanning three 
continents. Could Mossad agents in al-Qaida as well as the rest of 
Mossad's vast network of thousands of infiltrators and informants, 
not have learned about the most extensive and ambitious Arabic ter- 
rorist operation in history? 

It is, of course, extremely difficult to prove the precise role of a se- 
cretive, foreign intelligence organization, such as the Mossad, in a ter- 
rorist act; they are in fact a super-secret spy organization. But, power- 
ful evidence is mounting that the Israelis had foreknowledge of the 
September 11 th attack on America. And, if indeed they had fore- 



Jewish Supremacism 259 

knowledge of these murderous acts of terrorism - and then had the 
cold-blooded mentality not to warn the United States and avert the 
disaster — because they saw a horrendous massacre of thousands of 
Americans as good for Israel - it follows that they would have felt no 
moral restraint from actually instigating and covertly aiding this ter- 
rorist plan through their own agent provocateurs. Let's look at the 
mounting hard evidence indicating the Mossad had foreknowledge of 
the September 11 attack. 

Only One Israeli Casualty at the WTC 

The day after the attack on the World Trade Center, the Jerusalem 
Post, the most respected and famous Israeli newspaper in the world, 
reported that 4000 Israelis were missing in the attack on the WTC. The 
Foreign Ministry compiled the number from Israeli relatives, who in 
the first few hours after the attack, contacted the Israeli Foreign Minis- 
try and gave the names of Israeli friends and relatives who worked in 
the WTC or who had business scheduled in it or its adjacent struc- 
tures. Even without seeing the article in the Jerusalem Post, logic alone 
would tell one that there would be many hundreds, if not thousands 
of Israelis in the World Trade Center at the time of the attacks. The in- 
ternational Jewish domination of banking finance and Trade is legen- 
dary. For instance, two of the richest firms in New York are Goldman- 
Sachs and the Solomon Brothers; and both have offices in the Twin 
Towers. Many executives in many firms in the Trade Towers regu- 
larly commute back and forth to Israel. New York is the center of 
world-wide Jewish financial power, and the World Trade Center is at 
its epicenter. One would naturally expect the Israeli death toll to be 
catastrophic. The Jerusalem Post certainly thought so on September 12, 
2001. Here is the beginning of its article: 

Thousands of Israelis missing near WTC, Pentagon 

The Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem has so far received the names 
of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World 
Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attack. (The head- 
line and first sentence of the Jerusalem Post article) 513 

When George Bush made his speech before Congress, it turns out 
that he made a significant numerical error in addition to making the 
absurd allegation that the WTC attackers did it because they "hated 
freedom." Bush made it a point to say that in addition to thousands of 
Americans, 130 Israelis died in the WTC. The implication was to say 
that Israel shared in our suffering, and that we and Israel are in this 
thing together. Upon hearing the number of 130 Israeli dead, it 
seemed suspiciously low to me. If 4000 Israelis were at the WTC, and 
the WTC death toll was about 4000 (about 10 percent of the 40,000 



260 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

people normally in the buildings at that time), the Israeli toll should 
have statistically been around 400 and not 130. 

As the center of international commerce, the Trade Center was not 
a place of minimum-wage employment like McDonald's, it had thou- 
sands of highly paid, high tech and high level jobs and executive posi- 
tions primarily in international finance, banking and stock trading. Is- 
rael's population is the most over-represented nation in the world in 
the kinds of jobs and type of business found in the WTC. I asked my- 
self how there could be only 130 Israelis dead, while there were at that 
time even an estimated 199 dead from Columbia and about a 100 vic- 
tims from one of the poorest and most obscure nations on earth, Ec- 
uador. Would anyone suggest that Ecuadorians have anywhere near 
the presence in international trading and finance as Israelis? 

Searching through hundreds of articles, trying to track down the 
true Israeli death toll, I finally found a New York Times piece that clari- 
fied the precise number of Israelis who died in the World Trade Cen- 
ter attack. It turned out that of the 130 Israelis President Bush claimed 
had died in the World Trade Center, 129 of them were still alive! Only 
one Israeli had actually died in the World Trade Center! I was in- 
credulous. "Good God," I said to myself, "only one Israeli!" Here is 
the amazing excerpt I found in the NY Times: 

But interviews with many consulate officials Friday suggested 
that the lists of people they were collecting varied widely in their 
usefulness. For example, the city had somehow received reports of 
many Israelis feared missing at the site, and President Bush in his 
address to the country on Thursday night mentioned that about 
130 Israelis had died in the attacks. 

But Friday, Alon Pinkas, Israel's consul general here, said that 
lists of the missing included reports from people who had called in 
because, for instance, relatives in New York had not returned their 
phone calls from Israel. There were, in fact, only three Israelis who 
had been confirmed as dead: two on the planes and another who 
had been visiting the towers on business and who was identified 
and buried. (New York Times, Sept. 22) 514 

Even the very low death toll of 130 had suggested that a number 
of Israelis at the Trade Center had been warned before the attack. 
When I found out the truth that only one Israeli had died, it erased all 
reasonable doubt that there had been a prior warning for many Is- 
raelis. Having only one Israeli casualty among the 4000 dead at the 
WTC is simply a statistical impossibility. For example, there were two 
Israeli casualties among only 157 passengers on the two hijacked do- 
mestic flights that struck the WTC. Certainly there would have had to 



Jewish Supremacism 261 

have been a much higher percentage among the over 40,000 people in 
the Trade Center itself. 

Even if the Israeli Foreign Ministry and the Jerusalem Post had 
grossly overestimated the number of Israelis at the World Trade Cen- 
ter by a factor of 10, there still should have been 400 Israelis there at 
the time of the attacks. Even if only a few hundred Israelis were pre- 
sent at that time, only one Israeli death occurring is statistically ab- 
surd. Either September 11 had to be a big Jewish holiday, or a number 
of Israeli citizens had some advance warning of the impending attack. 

Prior Warning to Israelis 

The next thing I researched was to see if there were any confirmed 
warnings to Israelis prior to the attack. I quickly found an article in 
Newsbytes, a news service of the Washington Post, titled "Instant Mes- 
sages To Israel Warned of WTC attack." 515 The Israeli daily, Ha'aretz, 
also confirmed the prior warnings to Israel and confirmed that the FBI 
is investigating the warnings. 516 The articles detailed that an Israeli 
messaging firm, Odigo, with offices in both the World Trade Center 
and in Israel, received a number of warnings just two hours before the 
attack. 

Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC Attack 

Officials at instant-messaging firm Odigo confirmed today 
that two employees received text messages warning of an at- 
tack on the World Trade Center two hours before terrorists 
crashed planes into the New York landmarks. 

But Alex Diamandis, vice president of sales and marketing, 
confirmed that workers in Odigo's research and development 
and international sales office in Israel received a warning from 
another Odigo user approximately two hours prior to the first 
attack. (From the Washington Post's Newsbytes) 517 

So now I had found powerful and convincing evidence from im- 
peccable sources show some Israelis were warned in advance of the 
attack. First, without a prior warning, there could not have been only 
a single Israeli victim at the World Trade Center. Secondly, there is 
clear confirmation that an Israeli company with offices in both Israel 
and the WTC received instant messages warning of the attack on the 
World Trade Center just two hours before it happened. 

Who would have warned Israelis of the impending attack if not 
Israel's Mossad? The fact that Israel's government had prior knowl- 
edge of this huge, unprecedented attack and had warned potential Is- 
raeli victims, but then deliberately let thousands of Americans die - 
makes the Israelis just as responsible for the carnage as the Arab Ka- 
mikazes. As I continued to look into the matter, I figured that it was 



262 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

only a matter of time before intelligence information leaked out that 
would indicate Israeli had foreknowledge of the attack. 

The media also ran stories immediately after the attack reporting 
the FBI was investigating massive short-selling of airlines and insur- 
ance stocks right before the attacks. They pointed out that the short 
selling (betting the stocks would collapse) indicated involvement and 
prior knowledge in the attacks because the volume of trades in these 
multiple stocks was 1,000 times greater than the normal volume. 
These trades netted tens of millions of dollars in profits in a number 
of exchanges in America and Europe. Americans were told by gov- 
ernment officials that the trades would give us a clear trail to those 
behind these acts. Americans were told that the operatives of bin 
Laden were probably behind them. Strangely, though, after the initial 
flurry of articles, there has been nothing at all released on the identity 
of those who made millions on the transactions. I suspect that the 
media has suppressed the follow-up stories because the profiteers 
turned out to be not Arab terrorists but Jewish supremacists. 

Finally, on December 12, a major news source broke a story that 
openly pointed out that the FBI had evidence of Israeli advance 
knowledge of the attacks. Here are excerpts from the Fox Network 
News story. 

BRIT HUME, HOST: It has been more than 16 years since a civil- 
ian working for the Navy was charged with passing secrets to Is- 
rael. Jonathan Pollard pled guilty to conspiracy to commit espio- 
nage and is serving a life sentence. At first, Israeli leaders claimed 
Pollard was part of a rogue operation, but later took responsibility 
for his work. 

Now Fox News has learned some U.S. investigators believe that 
there are Israelis again very much engaged in spying in and on the 
U.S., who may have known things they didn't tell us before Sept. 
11. 

...CARL CAMERON, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT: Since Sept. 
1 1 , more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained, either 
under the new patriot anti-terrorism law, or for immigration viola- 
tions. A handful of active Israeli military were among those de- 
tained, according to investigators, who say some of the detainees 
also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveil- 
lance activities against and in the United States. 

There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the 9/11 
attacks, but investigators suspect that they Israelis may have 
gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance, and not shared 
it. 



Jewish Supremacism 263 

...HUME: Carl, what about this question of advanced knowledge 
of what was going to happen on 9/1 1 ? How clear are investigators 
that some Israeli agents may have known something? 

CAMERON: It's very explosive information, obviously, and there's 
a great deal of evidence that they say they have collected — none 
of it necessarily conclusive. It's more when they put it all together. 
A bigger question, they say, is how could they not have know? Al- 
most a direct quote. 

At this writing, it has been five days since the story's release. It 
would seem that such information, of the uncovering of a vast Israeli 
spy network in the United States and that Israel purposefully let 
thousands of Americans be slaughtered on September 11, should be 
headline news in every newspaper of America. It should be the lead 
story on every major news broadcast. It should have by now caused 

George Bush to have 

suspended all aid and 

A I diplomatic relations with 

Israel. But, the Jewish 
press only drones on in 
silence about these reve- 
lations of Israeli treach- 
ery. And President Bush, 
who says he will attack 
anyone who aided the 9- 
11 terrorists, remains si- 
lent about the fact that Is- 
raeli was an accessory to 
the worst terrorist act 
ever committed against 
America. By purposefully 
not warning America, Is- 
rael aided this horren- 
dous act of murder and 
terror. President Bush by 
now must know about the Israeli involvement in the September at- 
tack. If he remains silent about it, he too will become an accessory to 
murder and a traitor who would cover up the crimes of a foreign en- 
emy! These words are harsh, I know, and it saddens my heart that I 
must write about the betrayal of my country by its highest leaders. 

You can be sure that joy rose in the hearts of all Israeli suprema- 
cists as they witnessed the smoke plume rising from the twin towers. 
As I mentioned earlier, the FBI even arrested five Israelis on a rooftop 
nearby the twin towers, videotaping and cheering the entire event. 518 
They knew that American and world resistance to Israel's Suprema- 




264 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

cism and terrorism had plummeted right along with the collapse of 
the towers of the World Trade Center. Perhaps the most telling state- 
ment was when a NY Times reporter questioned the former Israeli, 
Benjamin Netanyahu, a man every bit as radical as Ariel Sharon. Here 
are the words of the excited former Israeli Prime Minister: 

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the 
United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime 
minister, replied, "It's very good." Then he edited himself: "Well, 
not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy. 519 

Sharon and his fellow lewish Supremacists did not warn Ameri- 
can authorities and save thousands of American lives because they 
knew such a horrible event would reverse all of Israel's recent losses. 
September 11 would be a twenty-first century Pearl Harbor; galvaniz- 
ing the American people for war; their war! Of course, not warning 
America about the impending attacks would make Israel a cold- 
blooded accomplice in mass terror and murder. But, please tell me 
when Israel or Ariel Sharon has shrunk from such treachery. 

Zionists have never worried about the loss of innocent lives to 
achieve their ends. The Israeli state was founded on terror such as it 
had perpetrated at Deir Yassin, when Menachem Begin' s thugs bru- 
tally murdered over 250 men, women and children. Only lewish su- 
premacists would have the chutzpah to then purposely publicize the 
atrocity in order to terrorize the Palestinians into fleeing from their 
homes and lands. And as I already pointed out, Ben-Gurion pur- 
posely even blew up an entire ship of his own people, (appropriately 
on Christmas Day) to accomplish his supremacist objectives. 

One fact is irrefutable; Zionists are as responsible for the attack on 
America just as surely as if they themselves had piloted those plane 
bombs. It was caused by the lewish control of the American media 
and Congress and its blind support of over 50 years of Israeli terror- 
ism and murder against the Palestinians and the other peoples of the 
Mideast. Their supremacism over America can be illustrated by the 
fact that the American government has continued to support Israel 
with guns and money even after it committed direct acts of terrorism 
and treachery against America — such as in the Lavon Affair, in the 
Assault on the Liberty, and in the ongoing spying and sabotaging of 
American interests. 

The truth is that the Zionists not only seek lewish supremacism 
over the hapless Palestinians; they seek supremacism over all of us no 
matter what our race or nationality. It's not just America they want 
supremacy over, it's Canada, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and 



Jewish Supremacism 265 

every other nation upon the earth. Jewish supremacists already con- 
trol the Hollywood movie and television industry, music, and the 
news media that so strongly influence the entire civilized world. They 
are the most powerful single force, in fact an irresistible force, in the 
government of the United States. Through that control they also direct 
the most powerful military might the world has ever known and can 
thus extend their supremacism even to nations where their power is 
not as pervasive as in the United States. 

The Jewish Supremacists have purposely orchestrated the non- 
European immigration that will dispossess European Americans the 
same way that Jewish immigration into Palestine has displaced the 
Palestinians. They have consciously led the effort to make European 
Americans a minority in our own country as they made Palestinians a 
minority in Palestine. They seek nothing less than to destroy the ge- 
netic, cultural identity and nationalism of all peoples other than their 
own. While they preach open borders for us, they preach ultra- 
nationalism for their own people and support for Israel which has not 
a religious, but a genetic requirement for immigration. 

The inescapable truth is that Jewish Supremacists hate the Euro- 
pean people and Christians just as much as they hate Muslim Arabs 
and Palestinians. They teach their children fear and hatred toward all 
Gentiles, and they endlessly recite Christian and Moslem persecutions 
against them. Their media teaches hatred of their Gentile enemies 
from Pharaoh and Haman to Hitler and Hussein; their hate propa- 
ganda is as ancient as the Talmud and as modern as movies such as 
the horrifying fiction of Shindler's List. 

Jewish supremacists have also been the instigators of the global- 
ism that is sweeping away American sovereignty and truly the free- 
doms, economic independence, and cultural values of all nations. 
They are the architects of so-called hate laws that are the modern 
equivalent of medieval laws against Blasphemy or Heresy. Only this 
time, it is Jewish Supremacism who is the God beyond questioning. 
And now, in the wake of the September attacks of 2001 and the global 
war that follows, they are orchestrating the most massive infringe- 
ment of rights and freedom in world history. They are setting up a 
world government and world police state that will make it a serious 
criminal offense to utter a word against their supremacism. They are 
the new Gods, and those who love freedom are the new Heretics. 

They are also preparing us for the dungeons and torture chambers 
of medieval times. Jewish pundits and even Jewish "civil-libertarians" 
such as Alan Dershowitz are now calling for the legalization of tor- 
ture. 

Am I am alarmist? Were the early Palestinian resistance fighters 
"alarmists" when they said that the Zionist settlers coming to Pales- 



266 Israeli Treachery against the United States 

tine in the 1940s had not come to live as good neighbors but to take 
their country and enslave their people? Were the White Russians 
"alarmists" when they warned that the Jewish Bolsheviks would wipe 
away freedom and cast Mother Russia into a sea of blood? Were po- 
litical untouchables like Patrick Buchanan and myself alarmists when 
we warned that Americans would suffer terrorism and murder by 
supporting the crimes of the Zionist state? Have we been proven 
wrong? 

In my preface I quoted Ben-Gurion's prediction in Look Magazine 
in 1962. 

In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will 
build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all 
continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind. 

520 

I wonder if you, dear reader, after digesting the intervening two 
hundred pages of this book, might now share my fears that Ben- 
Gurion's dark dreams are dangerously close to fulfillment. Is my fear 
just some anti-Semitic nightmare, or will the reader find it a healthy 
reaction to the ravings of unbridled Jewish supremacism? 

Jewish Supremacism is by far the most critical issue in the 21 st 
Century World. As these past two chapters have shown, Jewish Su- 
premacism is a term synonymous with terror. It goes to the very heart 
of the two most important things to every people on earth: survival 
and freedom. 



Chapter 12 

A Holocaust Inquiry 

After I became aware of the ethnocentrism that permeated Judaism and 
Zionism, and of the pervasive Jewish presence in the media, I read some books 
and articles that hinted that the stories of German atrocities during the Sec- 
ond World War were exaggerated and misconstrued. Some suggested that 
the persistent saturation of the media with what is now called the Holocaust, 
decades after the war, was motivated by the strategic interests of Israel. At 
first, I rejected the idea that some of the allegations against the Germans 
could be false, for I had seen the gruesome photos and films that seemed to 
make German atrocities self-evident. The following is an account of how I 
came to question some aspects of this somber episode of European history. 

I wrote an essay for an English class at Louisiana State University 
on the liberalization of American sexual morality. I recounted how I 
had never seen a picture of a frontally viewed, completely nude 
woman until I was a freshman in high school. That reminiscence may 
sound strange to young people of today, but even Playboy magazine 
omitted the most private sexual area until the mid-1960s. After I 
wrote the essay, a right-wing friend who read it told me that I was 
mistaken about not seeing full nudity in my childhood. 

"You have seen fully nude women," he said, "graphic pictures of 
nude men and women, often emaciated, in horrible scenes of death. 
You saw many photographs and films of the Jewish victims of Nazi 
atrocities." 

On reflection, I had to admit that he was right. Television and 
print media of the late 1950s and early 1960s were much more prud- 
ish than they are today, but during the years of my childhood, the 
media often showed horrific photographs and newsreels depicting 
graphic scenes of mutilated and emaciated nude Jewish victims of the 
Second World War. They burdened the pages of magazines such as 
Look and Life; they never failed to appear in television documentaries 
on the war, and even daily newspapers reprinted them — including 
my hometown newspaper, the Jewish-owned Times-Picayune. 

In a time of innocence when my friends and I had never seen a 
photograph of a completely disrobed woman, the media showed us 



268 A Holocaust Inquiry 

cadavers, often of nude women or the small frames of children, piled 
up like so much cordwood being bulldozed by Allied troops into 
mass graves. Those photographs were powerful, for even today those 
images remain vivid, etched deeply by the emotion evoked by them. 

My friend suggested that there was a political reason why the 
media repeatedly showed me the Jewish victims of the Second World 
War. "Was it accidental?" he asked rhetorically. "If it was just for the 
sensationalism of nudity and death, why are Jewish victims practi- 
cally the only ones shown?" 

When the movie The Faces of Death 521 opened in theaters across 
America in 1974, millions lined up to see actual film footage of real 
people in the throes of death. Seeing a human being in the maladroit 
pose of death is perhaps the most riveting sight a human being can 
witness. Parents shield their children from such scenes, and television 
news programs seldom show the most gruesome pictures of a homi- 
cide. Despite the media's frequent use of sensationalism to boost rat- 
ings, even after the crash of a passenger airliner they usually show 
only general footage at the scene rather than severed heads and tor- 
sos. 

In the 1990s many voice concern that television programs and 
movies are too violent and gory for young children, yet the horrific 
scenes of the Holocaust have become mandatory viewing for some 
school children by state law. Jewish groups have lobbied to pass laws 
to require "Holocaust Studies" in public schools, and many thousands 
of local school systems, at Jewish urging, have simply mandated it. 
The bloody violence of the rankest of fictional movies or television 
programs could not possibly be more graphic than the gory scenes of 
the Holocaust. Would those same schools show films of the bloody 
victims of airline crashes to their young charges? Would they show 
the massacres of Palestinian women and children butchered at the Sa- 
bra and Chatila camps in Israeli-occupied Lebanon or the victims 
butchered by the Communists in Cambodia, to 9-year-olds? For what 
reason, I asked myself, must they show little children these horrible scenes 
of Jewish victims of half a century ago? 

Proponents of "Holocaust Studies" for school children say that the 
trauma is necessary to teach them about the dangers of racism and 
Anti-Semitism. Yet they show no victims with their brains blown out 
to teach children about the horrors of criminal homicide, no scenes of 
the millions of corpses starved or butchered by the Soviet mass mur- 
derers to teach children the dangers of Communism. No colleges have 



Jewish Supremacism 269 

a "Gulag Studies Department/' and no public high schools require 
studies about the Gulags to graduate. 

One of the arguments used by those who promote Holocaust 
Studies for our young children is that the Holocaust shows the evils of 
racism. It reveals, they say, that mass murder is the ultimate conse- 
quence of racial consciousness. They fail to point out that far more 
human beings have been slaughtered in the name of equality than in 
the name of racism. From the days of the bloody excesses of the 
French Revolution, to the millions butchered by the Soviets in their 
Gulags, the murderous Red Guards in China, and the killing fields of 
Cambodia, no doctrine has killed more people than Communism — 
and at its very heart lies fanatical devotion to egalitarianism. 

The awful scenes of Jewish suffering and death touched my heart 
as a young man, and they still do. They spawned revulsion at the in- 
humanity that produced such horrors. Indeed, it arouses anger in all 
of us against those responsible for the carnage. Nevertheless, as I be- 
came more aware of the early Jewish domination of the international 
Communist movement, I wondered why the media's focus was al- 
most entirely on Jewish suffering, with little attention afforded the 
other victims of mass murder. 

The only victims of whom I was really conscious were Jews. They 
were the victims I read about, the victims I saw in television dramas, 
the victims I saw in the graphic photographs and newsreels. 

No greater human crime exists than the slaughter of the innocent. 
British historian David Irving labels it "innocenticide." Yet I eventu- 
ally learned of an innocenticide far more extensive than even the ter- 
rible crimes of the Nazis. This knowledge did not come from televi- 
sion documentaries or docudramas or from well-publicized trials of 
war criminals or searches for them, but from the quiet pages of books 
and documents little discussed by the popular media. 

Communists in Russia, Eastern Europe, and China killed at least 
ten times more innocent people than were allegedly killed by the Na- 
zis. As a young teenager, those victims of Communism were outside 
my awareness. I heard comments about atrocities by the Communists, 
but I saw no newsreels or photographs of the victims of Communism. 
I cannot recall even one. I saw no documentaries, nor did I read any 
diaries of young girls (or anyone else, for that matter) who had suf- 
fered at the hands of the Communists. Thus, I had no emotional in- 
volvement with the Christian victims of Communists, but I had 
strong emotional ties to the Jewish victims of the Second World War. 

Spurred on by my anti-Communism, I read about the greatest 
human slaughter in world history: the murder of tens of millions of 
Christians in Communist Russia. I read with fascination about the 
horrible murder of Czar Nicholas and his family by Jewish Bolsheviks 



270 A Holocaust Inquiry 

and the mass murders begun by Lenin and climaxing in the unparal- 
leled slaughter committed by Stalin. Lenin's classic statement about 
mass murder by the Soviet state illustrated the cold-blooded nature of 
these killings. He said, "You can't make an omelet without breaking 
some eggs." By the early 1960s, published information from the 
Kremlin itself acknowledged that the early leaders of Communism 
had organized the liquidation, by the Communist Party's own esti- 
mates, of 25-to-40 million people. During this period, the media re- 
mained focused on the suffering of Jews, with little sympathy or at- 
tention shown to the other victims of totalitarianism. I found it amaz- 
ing that the media lavished so much attention on atrocities against 
Jews while showing indifference to the mass murder of millions of 
Christians by Jewish commissars in the Soviet State. 

The muted response to Soviet atrocities seemed unexplainable 
considering the fact that at the time, America was in a "Cold War" 
with the Communists. What psychological weapon could have been 
better used against the Communists in that world-wide ideological 
Cold War than exposing the historical truth of their massacre of tens 
of millions of human beings? 

The Western press kept mostly silent on the Soviet mass murders 
even while millions still suffered in Communist concentration camps. 
Millions more died in Red China during the "Cultural Revolution," in 
many nations of Africa, in the jails of Cuba, in the killing fields of 
Cambodia, and in the "re-education camps" of Vietnam. Yet, during a 
period when Marxists liquidated millions, all we seemed to see was 
the endless parade of stories about Jewish suffering of decades before. 

At the same moment Jewish pundits were screaming "Never 
again!" about atrocities committed by a solitary regime dead and 
gone for decades, millions of innocent people faced torture and death 
in dozens of Communist tyrannies around the world. While the mur- 
ders continued, we heard only a few whispers about them, but the 
saturation publicity about Jewish suffering in the war goes on to this 
day. During the late 1960s and early 1970s I attended meetings of anti- 
Communist Cubans and many Eastern European nationalities who 
had suffered grievously at the hands of the Communists. Latvians, Es- 
tonians, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, White Russians, Romanians, Hun- 
garians, Czechs, Poles, Croatians, Serbs, and many other refugees told 
a story of oppression, torture, and murder that received only a frac- 
tion of the media coverage of the Holocaust — yet their story con- 
cerned the suffering of even greater numbers of people. 



Jewish Supremacism 271 

While the media trumpeted the search, capture, and trial of Ger- 
man war criminals, modern-day Communist war criminals continued 
incarcerating, torturing, and murdering millions in concentration 
camps across the world. The Jewish-dominated media made no de- 
termined effort to prevent the destruction of lives that might have 
been saved, nor did they make a righteous call for the prosecution of 
Communist war criminals past or present. 

After I learned of the great massacres organized by the Jewish 
Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union, I wondered why I reserved such spe- 
cial rancor for the Nazi perpetrators of war crimes. Why, I wondered, 
did I reserve special enmity for one mass murderer over another? Whether it 
is a commissar murdering the Czar and his children, an SS com- 
mander in war-torn Eastern Europe liquidating Jews, a Chinese Mao- 
ist Red Guard murdering thousands in the so-called Cultural Revolu- 
tion, a Jewish member of the Stern Gang massacring Palestinians at 
Deir Yassin, or an Arab terrorist blowing up a commercial market in 
Tel Aviv, are not all mass murderers equally depraved? Yet undenia- 
bly, it was for the Jewish victims that I had the most empathy, and for 
their anti-Semitic persecutors, I had the most disgust and anger. I 
asked myself, what brought that on ? 

At that point I began to understand how I had been manipulated. 
Because of Jewish influence in the news and entertainment media, it 
was their story I saw on television and in the movies; it was their 
heartbreak I shared in books, their mangled bodies I saw in pictures 
and films, their horror I heard from teachers and preachers. How 
powerful is the impact on a 9- or 10-year-old if the first nudity he sees 
in media is accompanied by horrible scenes of death? 

I began to ask other politically incorrect questions about the Holo- 
caust. Even if everything the media say about the Holocaust is true, 
why does it occupy our attention a thousand fold more than the mas- 
sacre of many more people by the Soviets? Now that Communism has 
fallen, why is there no clamor for Nuremberg-type trials for the 
Communist mass murderers? Another question I have come to ask in 
the 1990s is why there are no war crimes trials for Israel's many mass mur- 
ders of Palestinians, such as at Dier Yassin, at Kibya, at Chatila and Sabra, 
and at Qana. These crimes are documented crimes against humanity, 
easily proven, and there are even many Israeli officials who have al- 
ready publicly confirmed these crimes against humanity. But, no one 
seems to be interested in bringing Jewish murderers to justice. If sus- 
pected German war criminals are the only ones to be targeted, doesn't 
that suggest an anti-German ethnic bias in itself? 

Other questions began to plague me. If putting an innocent Jewish 
civilian in a gas chamber was the epitome of evil, was the aerial fire- 
bombing of millions of German and Japanese civilians morally wrong 



272 A Holocaust Inquiry 

too? Is there an ethical distinction between murdering the innocent by 
poison gas and murdering the innocent by burning them alive? Does 
it make it morally acceptable that America firebombed civilian 
women and children because we were at war with the Germans and 
lapanese? By that standard, would Second World War German atroci- 
ties against lews be somehow acceptable if they considered them- 
selves to be at war with the lews? 

I read a book by David Irving called The Destruction of Dresden. 522 
It exposed the murderous firebombing of Dresden in the waning days 
of the Second World War. Most Americans have heard much about 
the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, but few are aware that more 
people perished in Dresden than in either of the cities obliterated by 
atomic bombs. Dresden was an Allied "experiment." They wanted to 
discover if they could create a "firestorm" by dumping tons of incen- 
diary bombs on the city center. Dresden was a city of priceless artistic 
and cultural treasure that had been untouched up to that point during 
the war. The bombing set the entire inner city ablaze, creating hurri- 
cane-like winds that fed the flames. Asphalt bubbled and flowed in 
the street like lava. 

When the aerial attack was over, some 100,000 people had per- 
ished. To avoid the spread of disease, the authorities burned the 
ghastly remains of tens of thousands of people in grotesque funeral 
pyres. Dresden had no military significance and when it was bombed, 
the war was practically won. If anything, the bombing only stiffened 
German resistance and cost more Allied lives. I sincerely asked my- 
self, was the bombing of Dresden a war crime? Was it a crime against 
humanity? Were the children who suffered the cruelest death of all, 
being burned alive, any less wronged than, say, Anne Frank, who was 
placed in a concentration camp and ultimately succumbed to disease? 

Today the British government admits that their Air Ministry, from 
February 1942, embarked on a policy of targeting German civilians for 
bombing. As Willis Carto's Barnes Review point out, more than 600,000 
men, women and children perished from bombing calculated to kill as 
many civilians as possible. 523 

The United Nations now defines deliberate bombing of civilians 
as a crime against humanity. The double standard that seemed to ex- 
ist in all things dealing with the Second World War nagged at my 
sense of fair play. An example of the media's morality of convenience 
is the treatment of the Oklahoma City bombing as compared to the 
tremendous civilian bombing in the Second World War. I still re- 
member the refrain after the Oklahoma City carnage, and the incredu- 






GERMANY 



Jewish Supremacism 273 

lity that echoed in the trial of Timothy McVeigh. In essence, it went, 
"What kind of monster would bomb and burn to death children?" 

Is the burning alive of tens of thousands of innocent babies by in- 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ tentional civilian bombing from 

planes any less morally wrong 
than the murder of two dozen 
children by Timothy McVeigh? 
Governments give one bomber of 
children medals, and another the 
death penalty. However, the ul- 
timate blame must fall on the 
governments that institute such 
policies, not on the soldiers that 
follow their orders. I view the in- 
tentional mass murder of women 
and children by anyone, any 
cause, or any government — as 
unjustifiable. 

Even after the war's end, for 
many months the Allies allotted 
an official calorie ration for each 
German civilian that was less 
than could sustain life. The Barnes Review pointed out that hundreds 
of thousands of civilians died in those months of hunger, exposure, 
and disease. The Soviets forced millions from their homes in German 
lands in the east. 524 In violation of the Geneva Convention and long- 
standing rules of war, millions of German soldiers were held long af- 
ter the war's end and thousands died from starvation, exposure and 
illness in the Allied-administered camps. Those deaths occurred after 
the fury of war had ceased and while massive stores of food and 
medicine were close by, stockpiled in Allied warehouses. 525 

I found a perfect example of the "us and them" double standard 
of morality in a book I learned about in college called Germany Must 
Perish! 526 by an American Jew, Theodore N. Kaufman. Published in 
1941 before America's involvement in the war and before the allega- 
tion of any German extermination program against Jews, the preface 
states: 

This dynamic volume outlines a comprehensive plan for the ex- 
tinction of the German nation and the total eradication from the 
earth of all her people. Also contained herein is a map illustrating 
the possible territorial dissection of Germany and the apportion- 
ment of her lands. 

Both Time magazine and The New York Times reviewed the book 
rather than simply dismissing it, and neither publication seemed too 




274 A Holocaust Inquiry 

outraged at its open call for genocide. How would today's moralists 
react if the Nazis had published a book called Jews Must Perish, and 
major magazines and newspapers in prewar Germany had publicized 
a book calling for "the total eradication from the Earth of all the Jew- 
ish people?" Would not they offer it as proof of the moral depravity of 
Germany? 

As a teenager, although I was fiercely patriotic and pro- 
American, I began to see that in war no side had a monopoly on vir- 
tue. And in total war, in which one side annihilates the political and 
cultural establishment of the other, only the victors write the history. 
The adage that "In war, truth is the first casualty" applies here. So, 
what of the truth of the Holocaust? 

I knew that America's mass media had deceived me about the ori- 
gins and driving force behind Soviet and international Communism, 
and about the extent of Communist mass murder. It certainly seemed 
possible that the Jewish-dominated mass media would be just as de- 
ceptive on an issue immensely important to them. 

By the time I looked into details of the Holocaust, I had already 
learned that the media-generated image of the always innocent Jewish 
religion and people was false. Yet I still found it difficult to look at the 
Holocaust objectively, for not so many years before, my eyes had 
misted with tears when I read Anne Frank- the Diary of a Young Girl. 527 
I was — and still am — deeply moved by the scenes of human car- 
nage from the Second World War. 

On the surface, it seemed the evidence of the Holocaust was 
overwhelming. Mountains of books, magazine and newspaper arti- 
cles, movies, sermons and speeches, and documentaries proclaimed it 
with nary a word of contradiction. In addition, as a fiercely proud 
young American, with a proud military his- 
tory in my family, I was prone to believe all 
the war propaganda about my country's 
enemies. My father, a full colonel who still 
participated in the active Army Reserves, 
viewed his participation in the Second 
World War as the most meaningful period 
of his life. He would not hear of any mitiga- 
tion of German guilt. 

The Holocaust was part of Father's be- 
lief system and it became part of mine. 
However, I discovered that a number of jktiL 

distinguished Americans had made state- Holocaust survivor and 

revisionist Paul Rassinier. 




Jewish Supremacism 275 

ments dissenting somewhat from the establishment version of World 
War II history. They included such men as Senator Robert Taft, 
Charles Lindbergh, General George Patton, and former Supreme 
Court chief justice Harlan Fiske Stone. 

I read the interesting views of Paul Rassinier, a Holocaust survi- 
vor who spoke out against what he called the lies of the Holocaust. A 
French political opponent of the Nazis, Rassinier suffered greatly dur- 
ing the war. In a number of concentration camps during the war, he 
never saw any evidence of human gas chambers or any program to 
exterminate the Jews. After his liberation, he read sensationalized ac- 
counts that he knew were false. Although he had little respect for his 
German captors, he felt it was his ethical duty to tell the truth about 
the camps and refute the exaggerated and false claims being made in 
the world's press. 

In addition to the poignant accounts of his own experiences and 
observations, he began to research the entire issue after the war. 
Rassinier contended that the death toll in the camps was far lower 
than alleged and that the deaths were primarily caused by the poor 
conditions of the camps — the unintended effect of the losses and 
devastation of a nation crushed in a catastrophic war. He also called 
the allegations of gas chambers "classic examples of war propaganda 
that had no basis in fact." Rassinier had nothing to gain personally in 
postwar France by taking such an unpopular position. In fact, he had 
much to lose, and after suffering all the hardships and privations of 
the German concentration camps, he then suffered intense persecu- 
tion for his courageous writings. 

Three Famous Victims of the Holocaust 

Years later, I read a pamphlet outlining the inconsistencies and 
improbable content of Anne Frank: the Diary of a Young Girl. 528 Dr. 
Robert Faurisson, a liberal professor who specializes in the authenti- 
cation of literature at the University of Lyon, France, made a strong 
case that the book's form and content made it unlikely that a girl in 
her early teens had written it, at least in its published form. It also 
amazed me that this girl, the most famous victim of the Holocaust— 
who spent most of the war at Auschwitz — did not die in the gas 
chambers. Near the end of the war, the Germans evacuated her, along 
with many others, to Bergen-Belsen. In the last months of the war, she 
succumbed to typhus. Anne Frank's sister, Margot, and her mother 
were not gassed either. They both died from typhus as well. Her fa- 
ther, Otto, fell ill while at Auschwitz and was nursed back to health in 
the camp hospital. Near the end of the war the Germans evacuated 



276 A Holocaust Inquiry 

him to Mauthausen and he was liberated there. Otto Frank himself at- 
tested to these facts. 

These facts seemed at variance with the stories I had read about 
Auschwitz. Books and movies portrayed the camp as an assembly line 
of murder, a place where whole trainloads of Jews were taken straight 
from the arrival platforms to the gas chambers. The Nazis supposedly 
inspected the new arrivals and sent the able-bodied to work, the 
young children and the sick to the gas chambers. If these stories are 
true, why then were the young Anne and her sister, who arrived in 
Auschwitz at the supposed height of the killing, not gassed? 

The other famous survivor of Auschwitz is the high priest of the 
Holocaust, Elie Wiesel, the man who won the Nobel Prize for his writ- 
ings about it. Wiesel, like Anne Frank's father, also had a sojourn in 
the camp hospital during the end of the war. In his autobiographical 
work Night, Wiesel relates that in January 1945, at the Birkenau sec- 
tion of Auschwitz, he had surgery on an infected foot in the camp 
hospital. His doctor suggested two weeks of rest, but the Russians 
were soon to liberate the camp. Hospital patients and all others who 
were considered unfit to travel, were given the option by the German 
authorities to remain in the camp to be liberated by the Russians or be 
evacuated with the Germans. After discussing it, Wiesel and his fa- 
ther decided to evacuate with their supposed "killers." 529 530 

I should also note that the third most famous survivor of the 
Holocaust is Simon Wiesenthal, who has become famous for fighting 
those who dare to have doubts about some aspects of the Holocaust. 
Much like Anne Frank's father and Elie Wiesel, Wiesenthal also had a 
sojourn in the Nazi camp hospitals. Wiesenthal wrote that while 
incarcerated by the Nazis he tried to commit suicide by cutting his 
wrists. 531 The Nazis — whom he alleges were trying to kill all the Jews 
of Europe — did not let him die; instead they sent him to the hospital 
where they carefully nursed him back to health. 

If the Germans were the fiendish brutes that Wiesel suggests in his 
books, and were truly dedicated to the extermination of all Jews, why 
would he and his father have chosen to leave with the Germans rather 
than waiting for the Soviets? When I read of this admission by Wiesel, 
I was incredulous. Why would they send Anne Frank's father to the 
hospital, and why on earth would they endeavor to save the life of a 
Jew who tried to commit suicide? Upon learning these things, I real- 
ized they were completely inconsistent with the Holocaust story as it 
is usually presented. 



Jewish Supremacism 277 

I wondered if the Holocaust story had changed over the years. So 
the first thing I did was pull out my much-thumbed volumes of the 
1956 Encyclopaedia Britannica. 532 It had only one reference to Nazi 
atrocities against the Jews. The extensive Second World War article 
made no mention of Nazi pogroms against the Jews. The edition also 
had no articles devoted to the "Holocaust." In an article titled "Jews/' 
there was a short section on the Jews in Europe during the war. This 
article, written by Jacob Marcus, perhaps the preeminent Jewish histo- 
rian in the world at that time, cited many Jewish writers and authori- 
ties as sources, including Encyclopedia Judaica, Judishe Eexicon, the Jew- 
ish Encyclopedia, and the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. A pro-Jewish 
perspective dominated the article, and Marcus described Jewish con- 
ditions under the Nazis with these words: 

In order to effect a solution of the Jewish problem in line with 
their theories, the Nazis carried out a series of expulsions and de- 
portations of Jews, mostly of original east European stock, from 
nearly all European states. 

Men frequently separated from their wives, and others from chil- 
dren, were sent by the thousands to Poland and western Russia. 
There they were put into concentration camps, or huge reserva- 
tions, or sent into the swamps, or out on the roads, into labour 
gangs. Large numbers perished under the inhuman conditions un- 
der which they labored. While every other large Jewish center was 
being embroiled in war, American Jewry was gradually assuming a 
position of leadership in world Jewry. 533 [found in the 1947, 52, and 
56 editions] 

Imagine my surprise to find this description of what is now called 
the Holocaust in the 1956 Encyclopaedia Britannica, published within 11 
years of the war's end and after the most important of the Nuremberg 
War Crimes Trials. I had expected to read a detailed article about the 
"greatest human carnage in history." The article certainly painted a 
grim picture of human suffering, but, importantly, it did not mention 
the famous six million figure or gas chambers or even the word Holo- 
caust. Instead, Encyclopaedia Britannica simply stated that the Nazis 
put Jews into concentration camps and made them work in labor 
gangs where many perished from the terrible conditions. I thought, 
what afar cry from today's image of the Holocaust. 

It seemed curious to me that the most famous and respected ency- 
clopedia in the world would report the Jewish suffering in that way. It 
sparked my first real glimmer of doubt about the whole question and 
began to open my mind to new questions. I went to the public library 
in 1970 and again looked up the heading, "Jews," in a 1967 edition of 
the Encyclopaedia Britannica. 534 In stark contrast to its 1950s editions, it 
stated unequivocally that the Germans attempted to exterminate all of 
European Jewry and had employed a method that was "more efficient 



278 A Holocaust Inquiry 

and economical than shooting or hanging: poison gas." What did the 
Britannica staff know in 1967 that it did not know in 1956? 

Why the change from the earlier editions? I asked myself. Had new 
evidence been uncovered decades after the war? If the efficient Nazi 
war machine controlled Europe's lews and aimed to kill them, how 
could so many have survived? In fact, millions of lews have applied 
for and received compensation from the German government. How 
did all those survive? I also noted that in Wiesel's famous autobiogra- 
phy, published in 1956, the same year as the Britannica article, even 
though he mentions crematories at Auschwitz, he never mentions gas 
chambers — not once. In fact, he writes that lews were killed en 
masse by being thrown alive into burning pits, a horrific allegation to 
be sure, but far different from modern claims. 

Wiesel also quotes accounts of lews being murdered at Babi Yar, 
where for "month after month the ground never stopped trembling" 
and "from time to time, geysers of blood spurted from it." 535 I 
thought, Is this from the man who will tell me the truth of the Holocaust? 

Other impertinent questions occurred to me. Did the Nazis, while 
in the midst of the war effort, really construct huge and complex gas 
chambers; transport millions of lews to camps, and exterminate their 
victims in this manner? If their intention was to kill them, wouldn't 
bullets, costing a few cents apiece, have killed them more efficiently 
and eliminated the huge expense and logistical nightmare of transpor- 
tation, housing, food and medical care? I asked myself, If the Nazis 
really intended to kill all the Jews, why would they even need to build con- 
centration camps? 

I was uneasy asking myself these questions. I wondered if I was 
somehow defending mass murder by questioning whether the atroc- 
ity tales had been exaggerated. I had seen survivors on television tell- 
ing the stories of lewish victims' skin turned into lampshades and 
their body fat made into soap. A wave of sympathy sometimes arose, 
causing me to drop my inquiry for a while. 

I finally decided to continue my reading and think more about the 
issue. The search for the truth is never wrong. The only sin is to lack 
the courage to follow where truth leads. I began my inquiry into the 
Holocaust by looking into the Nuremberg Trials, the international 
proceedings that supposedly proved the nature and extent of the 
Holocaust. 



Jewish Supremacism 279 
The Nuremberg Trials 

My father was a traditional Republican who admired Senator 
Robert Taft of Ohio. Taft agreed with many American military men 
that the Nuremberg Trials set a dangerous precedent that could en- 
danger American military personnel captured in future conflicts. If 
the victorious armies of the Second World War could prosecute their 
defeated enemy for war crimes, he thought the same could happen 
someday to captured American soldiers. I saw the award-winning 
movie Judgment at Nuremberg and read a book that depicted the trials 
as dispensing justice to war criminals who deserved the gallows or 
the firing squad. 

Interestingly, the first alternative view I read about the Interna- 
tional Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, came from a man whom I 
viewed as an enemy of the South: President John F. Kennedy. In the 
pages of his Pulitzer Prize-winning book Profiles in Courage, 5 * 6 Ken- 
nedy wrote of the political heroism of Senator Taft, whose personal 
code of honor required him to denounce the Nuremberg Trials at the 
risk of jeopardizing his lifelong quest for the presidency. Despite vo- 
ciferous opposition and an unprecedented smear campaign against 
him by the Jewish-influenced media, Taft questioned the fairness of 
the Nuremberg Trials. 

He contended that they were not the shining example of Western 
jurisprudence that the mass media had led me to believe. Taft con- 
ducted a Senate investigation in which many American witnesses dis- 
closed that there had been widespread torture of German defendants. 
Such conduct appalled Senator Taft and he had the temerity to sug- 
gest that one could not trust such confessions. He went on to question 
the very foundations of the trials and the image of justice they were 
supposed to represent. 

In Profiles in Courage Kennedy quotes Taft speaking at Kenyon 
College in Ohio. On page 238 Kennedy writes, 

"The trial of the vanquished by the victors," he [Taft] told an at- 
tentive if somewhat astonished audience, "cannot be impartial no 
matter how it is hedged about with the forms of justice." 537 

Kennedy goes on to quote at length from Taft's speech. 

About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and 
vengeance is seldom justice. The hanging of the eleven men con- 
victed will be a blot on the American record we shall long regret. 

In these trials we have accepted the Russian idea of the purpose 
of trials — government policy and not justice — with little relation 
to Anglo-Saxon heritage. By clothing policy in the forms of legal 
procedure, we may discredit the whole idea of justice in Europe for 
years to come. 538 



280 A Holocaust Inquiry 

Kennedy comments, 

Nuremberg, the Ohio Senator insisted, was a blot on American 
Constitutional history, and a serious departure from our Anglo- 
Saxon heritage of fair and equal treatment, a heritage which had 
rightly made this country respected throughout the world. "We 
can't even teach our own people the sound principles of liberty and 
justice," he concluded. "We cannot teach them government in 
Germany by suppressing liberty and justice..." 539 

Taft's argument was that the victor's justice is no justice at all. Al- 
though the media gave the trials an appearance of fairness in a court- 
room setting, it was superficial. Real justice cannot be done when the 
accusers have control over the judges, prosecution, and defense. Our 
Western concept of law rests on the idea of impartial justice. Is that 
possible when the judges are the political enemies of the accused.? Is 
it possible when men face prosecution for acts of war that the Allies 
themselves had committed? Are the trials credible when they allow 
massive amounts of testimony without cross-examination of wit- 
nesses... when so-called evidence consists of confessions exacted 
through torture... when witnesses for the defense could face arrest for 
showing up at court... when men are tried for violations of laws that 
did not even exist at the time of their alleged commission? 

ludge Edward Van Roden was a member of the Simpson Army 
Commission that investigated the methods used at the Dachau Con- 
centration Camp. In the lanuary 9, 1949, Washington Daily News and in 
the lanuary 23, 1949, London Sunday Pictorial he told of some exam- 
ples of the use of torture. 

. . .The investigators," he said, "would put a black hood over the 
accused's head and then punch him in the face with brass knuck- 
les, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. . . . All but two of the 
Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the 
testicles beyond repair. 540 541 

Much of the "Holocaust proof" offered today by historians is the 
"confessions" extracted at the war crimes trials. I thought, Can we 
trust the "confessions" of those whose testicles were damaged during inter- 
rogation? I was also shocked when I learned that Russian KGB offi- 
cials, who themselves had committed extensive crimes against hu- 
manity, sat as judges. 

One of my friends at the Citizens Council told me that an Ameri- 
can judge who was president of one of the tribunals exposed the in- 
justices of the Nuremberg Trials. I found out that Iowa Supreme 
Court justice Charles F. Wenersturm had resigned his appointment in 
disgust at the proceedings. He charged that the prosecution pre- 



Jewish Supremacism 281 

vented the defense from obtaining evidence and preparing their cases, 
that the trials were not trying to create a new legal principle but were 
motivated solely by hatred of Germans. Additionally, he said that 90 
percent of the Nuremberg Court consisted of persons who, on politi- 
cal and racial grounds, were biased against the defense. He contended 
that Jews, many of whom were refugees from Germany and newly 
made "naturalized" American citizens, dominated the staff of the 
Nuremberg Courts and were more interested in revenge than justice. 

The entire atmosphere is unwholesome. . . . Lawyers, clerks, in- 
terpreters and researchers were employed who became Americans 
only in recent years, whose backgrounds were embedded in 
Europe's hatreds and prejudices. M2 

I also found out that my military idol, General George S. Patton, 
had opposed the war crimes trials. For example, in a letter to his wife 
he wrote 

I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket 
and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POWs to work as 
slaves in foreign lands, where many will be starved to death. 543 

The armies of our ally, the Soviet Union, raped almost all the 
German women in their occupied areas — from young children to the 
elderly. They murdered millions and forced millions from their 
homes in the winter of 1945. East Prussia, a German land for centu- 
ries, had its entire German population expelled or murdered by the 
Soviets. In the 1990s, Jewish researcher, John Sack, documented the 
Jewish mass murder of tens of thousands of Germans in the months 
following the war. 544 

It was not only the Soviets and the Jews who committed war 
crimes. The Western allies committed their share as well. One was 
Operation Keel Haul, which deported hundreds of thousands of Rus- 
sian and Eastern European anti-Communists to torture, slave labor 
and mass murder in the Soviet Union. When they learned of the 
forced repatriation planned by the Allies, scores of them committed 
suicide. The Morgenthau Plan was another disgraceful crime the Al- 
lies implemented after the war. The plan called for each German civil- 
ian to receive a ration of food that was less than that alleged to have 
been allotted to inmates in Germany's concentration camps. 

It sickened me to read of German mothers who were forced into 
prostitution to feed their children. After the war was over, hundreds 
of thousands of German civilians and soldiers died in the first year of 
the harsh Allied occupation. 545 When I began to understand that war 
created these kinds of injustices on both sides, I began to seriously 
question my belief that Germans were the only ones guilty of 
wrongdoing during the Second World War. 



282 A Holocaust Inquiry 

Discovering that the Allies also committed atrocities reminded me 
of vicious anti-Southern propaganda unleashed when Yankee forces 
liberated Andersonville Prison Camp in the War Between the States. 
Many Northern prisoners there had died of disease and malnutrition. 
This came about because the Southern forces had literally nothing to 
feed their prisoners. Many Southerners themselves suffered terribly 
from the "scorched-earth" policy of William Tecumseh Sherman, the 
destruction of railroads, and the naval blockade of the South. Under 
such circumstances, it isn't surprising that the prison camps were 
hellholes, and no malevolent plan or conspiracy is required to account 
for it. While still in college I learned that although the North suffered 
no food shortages, the conditions in Yankee-run prison camps were 
little better than those in Southern camps. 546 When I read of Lincoln's 
direct order forbidding Yankee jailers to give their captured South- 
erners the food parcels and blankets sent from concerned relatives, I 
learned the bitter truth that the victors always portray themselves as 
just and the conquered as unjust. 

When I considered the patent injustice of the Nuremberg Trials, it 
became easier for me to view the Holocaust objectively, for its founda- 
tion lay in the allegations set out by the International Military Tribu- 
nal at Nuremberg. 

One example of Nuremberg's shabby evidence is the purported 
confession of Rudolf Hoess, the former Nazi commandant at Ausch- 
witz Concentration Camp. For years, Holocaust historians trumpeted 
the Hoess "confession" as proof that the Nazis purposefully extermi- 
nated the lews. In fact, it formed the foundation of the Auschwitz al- 
legation of mass gassings. Chief Holocaust historian, Raul Hilberg, 
heavily relied upon it, but when its full unedited content became 
widely known in the 1960s, many Holocaust experts became embar- 
rassed by it, and by the 1990s some admitted its obvious unreliability. 
Historian Christopher Browning admitted in a Vanity Fair article that: 

Hoess was always a very weak and confused witness. The revi- 
sionists use him all the time for this reason, in order to try to dis- 
credit the memory of Auschwitz as a whole. 547 

The first problem lay in the numbers. In his alleged confession, 
Hoess said there were more than 2.5 million lews gassed at Ausch- 
witz. Nearly all so-called authorities on the Holocaust, including the 
current curator of the museum and center at the Auschwitz camp, 
Dr. Francizek Piper, now say that the figure was 1.2 million. Why 
should Hoess have lied? 



Jewish Supremacism 283 

Hoess also confessed to things that were impossible. For example, 
he alleged that after hundreds of victims were gassed with hydrogen 
cyanide, workers immediately entered the nonvented rooms and re- 
moved the bodies without wearing gas masks. He described how they 
smoked and ate snacks as they performed their task. By comparison, 
in modern times, the State of California vents its gas chamber for 
hours after an execution. Even then, workers cannot enter the room 
without gas masks and body suits to avoid the toxic substance that 
can kill just by entering the pores. Anyone in the camps who immedi- 
ately entered a large room saturated with deadly hydrogen cyanide 
that had killed hundreds of people would have quickly found himself 
among the victims. In his confession, Hoess also alluded to a concen- 
tration camp that did not even exist — Wolzek. 

Hoess wrote his memoirs while awaiting trial and execution in a 
KGB-run Communist prison in Poland, with all that such circum- 
stances imply. Rupert Butler, in his anti-Nazi and anti-Hoess book Le- 
gions of Death, vividly describes Hoess' capture. Here is Butler's ac- 
count of Hoess' torture and arrest: 

At 5 p.m. on 11 March 1946, Frau Hoess opened her door to six 
intelligence specialists in British uniform, most of them tall and 
menacing and all of them practiced in the more sophisticated tech- 
niques of sustained and merciless investigation... 

We discovered later that he had lost the cyanide pill most of them 
carried. Not that he would have had much chance to use it because 
we had rammed a torch [flashlight] into his mouth... 

Clarke yelled: "What is your name?" With each answer of "Fritz 
Lang," Clarke's hand crashed into the face of the prisoner. The 
fourth time that happened, Hoess broke and admitted who he 
was... 

The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of the Jewish 
Sergeants in the arresting party... 

The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajama ripped from 
his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter ta- 
bles, where it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were end- 
less. Finally a medical officer urged the Captain: "Call them off, 
unless you want to take back a corpse..." 

[Hoess] was dragged back to Clarke's car, where the sergeant 
poured a substantial slug of whiskey down his throat. Then Hoess 
tried to sleep. Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eye- 
lids and ordered in German: "Keep your pig eyes open, you 
swine..." 

The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The 
snow was swirling still, but the blanket was torn from Hoess and 
he was made to walk completely nude through the prison yard to 
his cell. It took three days to get a coherent statement from him. 54S 

Another powerful example of the inaccuracy of the Nuremberg 
Trials was that the Allies had represented as fact that 300,000 people 



284 A Holocaust Inquiry 




had perished by gassing at the 
Dachau Concentration Camp 
near Munich. Today no authori- 
ties on the Holocaust claim that 
the Germans gassed even one 
person at Dachau, and the official 
death toll has been reduced to 
approximately 30,000 from all 
causes. Approximately half the death toll occurred from disease epi- 
demics that had ravaged the camp, and many of the deaths occurred 
even after the Allies took control of it. 

Even after the liberation of the Dachau camp, thousands of in- 
mates died of typhus as the Allies struggled to get the epidemic under 
control. Allied photographs at the time show speed limit signs in Da- 
chau that read, in English, SPEED LIMIT 5 MPH. DUST SPREADS TYPHUS. 
War-torn Europe suffered widespread and catastrophic typhus 

epidemics. German authorities 
fought lice infestation with 
disinfestation chambers for 
clothing and personal articles, 
just as American jails fight lice 
by disinfecting prisoners with 
a delousing spray. Zyklon B 
was used only on clothes and 
other articles and it had to be 
used in a custom-built, airtight 
chamber so as not to endanger 
anyone. 

Because I read the Holo- 
caust literature extensively, 
and compared both the old 
and the new material, I began 
to see cracks in its foundation 
that threatened the whole edi- 
fice. Most of us have read or 
heard accounts of American 
soldiers who have related that 
they knew what the Nazis had 
done because "they saw it 
with their own eyes." 

What did American sol- 




Famous Dachau gas chamber door 
photo shown to the world turned out 
to be disinfection chamber for lice. 



Jewish Supremacism 285 

diers actually see? They saw terrible scenes of human suffering and 
death. They saw piles of corpses emaciated from hunger and disease, 
just as Yankee troops saw the same at Andersonville during the War 
Between the States. Nevertheless, did any Americans see gas cham- 
bers? According to accepted authorities on the subject, including the 
famous Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal, Americans saw no such sights 
in Germany — nor could they have — because the only gas chambers 
used on Jews were in Eastern Europe. 

One classic picture shown around the world depicts a helmeted 
American soldier at Dachau standing next to a heavy metal door 
painted with a skull and crossbones and the German warning 
Careful, Life Threatening. The photo caption read "Gas Chamber 
at infamous Nazi death camp at Dachau." No one who saw that photo 
and caption could be blamed for thinking they had seen a picture of a 
gas chamber in which Nazis had murdered human beings. When I 
first saw the photograph, I thought the same thing. Years later I found 
that it was indeed a gas chamber — one used for the fumigation of 
clothing to kill lice — the vermin that spread typhus and other dis- 
eases that killed concentration camp inmates. In fact, many hundreds 
of Allied soldiers died from those vermin-spread diseases during and 
after the war. The soldier in the famous photograph stood next to a 
disinfestation chamber intended to save inmate's lives, not take them. 

Near the end of the war, Allied governments had to paint the 
German enemy in the worst possible light. Rumors were exploited 
and exaggerations proliferated. It was not a big leap for war propa- 
ganda to represent disinfestation chambers for lice as gas chambers 
for humans. 

American camp liberators, who had read and heard a thousand 
times over about Germans gassing Jews, came to believe that they had 
seen the results of gassing with their own eyes. It is a psychological 
phenomenon familiar to judge and journalist alike. After having ex- 
perienced the psychological shock of the horrible scenes of death at 
the camps, no one could be blamed for believing the "official explana- 
tion" as touted by the media. Many years after the war, long after it 
became known that no American soldiers had seen a single gassed 
victim, the media still support the myth. Newspapers and magazines 
frequently quote soldiers who "know" that the Germans gassed the 
Jews because they "were there" and they "saw it with their own 
eyes." Yet, no editor corrects the error. 

In the late 1960s and early 1970s I noticed the beginnings of a sig- 
nificant revision of the Holocaust story. "Death camps" where hun- 
dreds of thousands had supposedly been gassed suddenly became 
"concentration camps" where there had been no purposeful effort to 
exterminate the prisoners. Camps such as Dachau, which were for- 



9R£ A "Hot r\n a t tct Tmht tit? v 




The much-published map of concentration camps (white) and "death 
camps" (black). Note that all the "death camps" were Soviet-captured.. 

merly alleged to have gassed Jews, suddenly dropped any mention of 
gassing and their death figures were revised downward. Plaques on 
the camp gates showing old inflated numbers of victims were quietly 
replaced. Even the professional "Holocaust historians" began to clas- 
sify Dachau as a "concentration camp" rather than a "death camp." 

Under greater scrutiny, the previous claims of human gassing in 
camps on German soil became exposed as a wartime falsehood. Much 
of the popular press still supports the error, even though the official 
chroniclers of the Holocaust had shifted the gas chamber allegations 
entirely to the "Communist-liberated" camps of the east. The so- 
called experts who now say that all death camps were in the east, had 
just a few years earlier claimed the same of the camps in the west. 

The Jewish Soap Story 

The outlandish story that the Nazis made soap from the bodies of 
Jews is perhaps one of the most startling examples of the fraudulent 
nature of the evidence and conduct of the Nuremberg Trials — and 
the falsehoods contained in the Holocaust story. During the Nurem- 
berg Trials, L.N. Smirnov, chief counselor of justice for the U.S.S.R., 
declared: 



Jewish Supremacism 287 

The same base, rationalized SS technical minds which created 
gas chambers and murder vans, began devising such methods 
of... the production of soap from human bodies and the tanning of 
human skin for industrial purposes... 549 (Nuremberg exhibit U.S.S.R.- 
197) 

Allied prosecutors produced affidavits that alleged that Dr. Ru- 
dolf Spanner, head of the Danzig Institute, had called for the produc- 
tion of soap from the bodies of concentration camp inmates. Dr. 
Spanner's supposed formula for human soap was presented (Nurem- 
berg document U.S.S.R.-196), and actual soap presumed to be made 
from humans was submitted to the IMT (exhibit U.S.S.R.-393). 

Sir Hartley Shawcross, chief British prosecutor, in his summation 
to the court stated, "On occasion, even the bodies of their [the Ger- 
mans'] victims were used to make good the wartime shortage of 
soap." As part of the Nuremberg verdict, the judges stated, "attempts 
were made to utilize the fat from the bodies of the victims in the 
commercial manufacture of soap." 550 This sensational allegation made 
headlines all over the world and is still often repeated today. 

After the Nuremberg Trials, the Jewish soap story grew with each 
recounting. Survivors recounted washing their bodies with Jewish 
soap. 

Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal wrote about the human soap dur- 
ing the Nuremberg Trials. In 1946, in the Austrian Jewish Community 
paper Der Neue Weg, he wrote: 

During the last weeks of March the Romanian press reported an 
unusual piece of news: In the small Romanian city of Folticeni 
twenty boxes of soap were buried in the Jewish cemetery with full 
ceremony and complete funeral rites. This soap had been found re- 
cently in a former German army depot. On the boxes were the ini- 
tials RIF, "Pure Jewish Fat." These boxes were destined for the 
Waffen-SS. The wrapping paper revealed with completely cynical 
objectivity that this soap was manufactured from Jewish bodies. 
Surprisingly, the thorough Germans forgot to describe whether the 
soap was produced from children, girls, men or elderly persons. 551 

The allegation that the Nazis made soap out of Jews during the 
last years of the war was presented simply as a grim fact of the inhu- 
manity of the Germans against the Jews. It was repeated in books 
such as William Shirer's media-touted Rise and Fall of the Third Reich 
and in thousands of articles, documentaries, and even in textbooks. 552 
In Israel, there have even been Jewish funerals for bars of soap alleged 
to be the remains of Jews. The soap bars, wrapped in funeral shrouds, 
were interred according to solemn Jewish ritual. 

Every article, statement, affidavit and drama about the Germans 
making soap from the bodies of Jews has been shown to be false. Af- 
ter the war, the Allies initiated indictment proceedings against Dr. 



288 A Holocaust Inquiry 

Rudolf Spanner. After a lengthy investigation, the prosecutor's office 
found no evidence that the Danzig Institute had ever made soap of 
human bodies, and they dropped charges against him. 

It turns out that the initials "RIF" that appeared on the soap in 
question did not stand for "pure lewish fat" but for the official name 
of the government agency that distributed soap and other cleansers. 
"Reichsstelle fur Indus trielle Fettversorgung" means simply "Reich 
center for Industrial Fat provisioning." In fact, "Pure lewish Fat" 
would be "RIF" (Rein Judisches Fett), not "RIF/' but in the hysterical 
anti-German atmosphere at the end of the war, the Holocaust-hypers 
would not let simple facts get in the way. When "Holocaust revision- 
ists" confronted the atrocity-mongers with the truth, they had to ad- 
mit the soap lie or lose credibility. 

lewish historian Walter Laqueur, in his 1980 book The Terrible Se- 
cret, acknowledged that the human soap story was a fantasy. 553 Gitta 
Sereny, another famed lewish historian, noted in her book Into That 
Darkness 554 that "the universally accepted story that the corpses were 
used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the generally 
very reliable Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation into 
Nazi Crimes." Deborah Lipstadt, professor of modern lewish history 
and Holocaust Studies at Emory University, wrote in 1981 that "the 
Nazis never used the bodies of lews, or for that matter anyone else, 
for the production of soap." 555 

Finally, in April 1990, the man acclaimed as the world's foremost 
Holocaust historian, Professor Yehuda Bauer of Israel's Hebrew Uni- 
versity, as well as Shmuel Krakowski, archives director of Israel's fa- 
mous Yad Vashem Holocaust Center, stated that the human soap sto- 
ries were not true. Bauer said that camp inmates "were prepared to 
believe any horror stories about their persecutors." In his interesting 
statement, Bauer blamed the whole human soap story on the Nazis. 
Krakowski commented that "Historians have concluded that soap 
was not made from human fat. When so many people deny the Holo- 
caust ever happened, why give them something to use against the 
truth?" 556 

Historian Mark Weber, writing in the lournal for Historical 
Review, sums up his article on "lewish Soap" stating, "That so many 
intelligent and otherwise thoughtful people could ever have seriously 
believed that the Germans distributed bars of soap brazenly labeled 
with letters that indicated they were manufactured from lewish 
corpses shows how readily even the most absurd Holocaust fables can 
be — and are — accepted as fact." 557 lust as the "lewish Soap" story 



Jewish Supremacism 289 

turned out to be a gigantic falsehood, there is a wealth of information 
that also contradicts many of the other popular beliefs. Many 
researchers, drawn to the contradictions and implausible scenarios of 
the Holocaust story, independently came up with new findings. The 
body of inquiry that challenges the Holocaust story — "Holocaust 
revisionism" — continues to uncover new evidence even as I write 
these lines. (See also: "The Myth that Refuses to Die," Barnes Review) 558 

The Holocaust experts have countered the revisionists with invec- 
tive and suppression. Just a few years ago, those who dared to ques- 
tion the Jewish soap story were called Nazis and haters. Even today 
anyone who dares to question any part of the Holocaust package: its 
nature, numbers, or policies — is condemned as a "Holocaust denier" 
(a term that will probably be trademarked and written with a capital 
"D," just as Holocaust has come to be spelled with a capital "H"). 

To call anyone who questions the Holocaust dogma a "Holocaust 
denier" is to suggest that he is a witless (or evil), anti-Semitic lunatic. 
How could anyone deny, ask the holocaust "authorities," what, after 
all, everyone has seen with his own eyes — the photos and newsreels 
of gassings and shootings, the mounds of Jewish bodies. 

In reality, I discovered that no responsible revisionist denies that 
large numbers of innocent people, including many Jews, died at the 
hands of the Germans and their allies during the Second World War. 
No one denies that the Germans rounded up the Jews from all over 
occupied Europe and put them into deplorable concentration camps. 
Revisionists do not deny that Nazis committed atrocities against Jews; 
they do, however, contend that the numbers of those killed have been 
grossly inflated. More importantly, they maintain that there was no 
central program, plan, policy, or order by the German government to 
exterminate all of the Jewish people. Revisionists claim that the Nazis 
created the camps to confine Jews because they considered them a se- 
curity risk, much like the American government rounded up and in- 
carcerated Japanese for security reasons. 

Revisionists argue that scientific and documentary evidence sup- 
ports their position and that the proponents of Holocaust orthodoxy 
must ruthlessly suppress debate if the Holocaust story is to survive. 
Finally, they argue that there are powerful political and economic mo- 
tives for the creation and perpetuation of the Holocaust story. 

Throw the Holocaust heretics into prison — 
and cast their books into the fire! 

In the 1990s, hundreds of individuals all over the Western world, 
including many scholars and researchers, have been harassed, intimi- 
dated, physically attacked, fired, fined and even jailed simply for of- 



290 A Holocaust Inquiry 

fering evidence that challenges parts of Holocaust orthodoxy. Profes- 
sors, judges and teachers have been fired from their jobs. Some have 
been fined tens of thousands of dollars merely for expressing politi- 
cally incorrect opinions. Professor Robert Faurisson at France's Uni- 
versity of Lyon-IL for example, has been fined thousands of francs for 
his opinions and had his face crushed and doused with acid in a bru- 
tal attack. Often such victims are well educated, respected men who 
were never accused of Anti-Semitism until they researched and wrote 
about the Holocaust. 

A prime example of the persecution of the Holocaust questioners 
is the story of historian David Irving. His books are found in almost 
every library in the world. Irving has written more than thirty vol- 
umes on the Second World War published by a half dozen of the most 
prominent publishers in the Western World, including: The Viking 
Press; Harper & Row; Little, Brown; Simon & Schuster; and Avon 
Books. 

The most respected historians in the world, including AJ.P. Tay- 
lor, Trevor Roper, Gordon Craig, and Stephen Ambrose have praised 
some of his works. He has researched in the German State Archives 
for more than thirty years, as well as in the U.S. National Archives, 
the British Public Records Office, the government archives of Austra- 
lia, France, Italy and Canada, and even the former Soviet Secret State 
Archives. He was the first historian to challenge the validity of the 
widely heralded (and later debunked) Hitler Diaries. 559 In the course of 
his wide-ranging research, Irving has uncovered many documents 
that challenge parts of the Holocaust orthodoxy. 

While he was in Germany, Irving quoted the videotaped admis- 
sion of the head curator of the Auschwitz State Museum, Dr. Fran- 
cizek Piper. Piper had admitted that the facility shown to the world 
(and more than 40 million visitors) for 40 years — as a genuine Nazi- 
built gas chamber — is not authentic. Polish Communists had actually 
built it after the war. For simply quoting Piper's admission, the gov- 
ernment charged Irving with "Defaming the memory of the dead." 

Although he had clear evidence proving the truth of his state- 
ment, Irving was forbidden to present it at his trial or even to call Dr. 
Piper as a witness. For making his statements of historical fact, the 
German government fined him 30,000 marks. In "the German State's 
interest" they banned him from using the German State Archives 
where he had labored for more than thirty years, and to which he had 
donated priceless collections of original documents. 



Jewish Supremacism 291 

The German government has now banned him from the country. 
Canada, France, Austria, Italy, South Africa, Australia and many 
other nations have subsequently banned him at the behest of the Jews. 
His publishers have been harassed and intimidated into canceling 
contracts. He has been physically attacked and has had lectures bro- 
ken up by pipe-wielding thugs. 

In Canada, at the request of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the 
authorities seized, shackled, and deported him from the country in 
handcuffs. The Toronto Globe & Mail asked why he had been 
handcuffed and then answered its own question with another, "Did 
someone think he might use his typewriter?" 

With the American tradition of First Amendment rights, few real- 
ize that in the so-called "Free World" it is possible for a historian to be 
jailed simply for voicing an opinion about a historical event of 50 
years ago. Speaking inside his home near the U.S. embassy in London, 
Irving did an interview with a French television station, again repeat- 
ing the fact that the main gas chambers shown to tourists at Ausch- 
witz are fakes. For making this statement in his own living room in 
London, he was prosecuted in the Paris courts. In France, it is illegal 
to challenge any of the "crimes against humanity" as alleged in the 
Nuremberg Trials Charter of 1945 — even if one does so in his own 
home and in another country. 

There are those who say that we should not debate aspects of the 
Holocaust any more than we should debate those who say the world 
is flat. Yet, would any knowledgeable person be afraid to debate an 
advocate of the Flat Earth theory? Would he urge the passage of laws 
to prevent the advocate of that theory from speaking, writing or pub- 
lishing? Would he try to have his livelihood destroyed, have him 
fined thousands of dollars, and if that did not work, cast him into 
prison? 

I believe in freedom of speech because I am not afraid. I believe 
that my ideas are well reasoned and that I can back up my opinions 
with logic and evidence. In an atmosphere of free and open discus- 
sion, I fear not, for there is not a truth that I dread. What do the oppo- 
nents of David Irving, or of all revisionists, fear? 

Our libraries and schools are well stocked with orthodox Holo- 
caust literature. Newspapers and magazines publish an endless 
stream of related stories. Theater and television screens light up with 
drama, commentary, interviews, and images of the Holocaust. It 
would seem that with this much overkill, there should be little to fear 
from the David Irvings of the world — unless of course, his persecu- 
tors think that his evidence is convincing, his reasoning sound and his 
presentation eloquent. Thus, to protect their popular version of the 
Holocaust, they seek to hound this man to the ends of the Earth. 



292 A Holocaust Inquiry 

What "historical fact" is so vulnerable that it must be protected by 
terror, by jail, and deportation? What do the opponents of David Ir- 
ving and the other revisionists fear? Are the revisionist arguments so 
convincing that their opponents must use naked political oppression 
to silence them? 

Auschwitz: The Centerpiece of the Holocaust 

The Holocaust story centers on the Auschwitz concentration camp 
in Poland. For years, it was presented to the world as a death camp 
where the Nazis gassed three to four million lews as well as millions 
of non-lews. Whatever doubts visitors might have about the enormity 
of the Holocaust, and the veracity of the gas chamber stories — are 
wiped away by the camp tours. Half of a million tourists each year see 
what are purported to be the actual gas chambers where millions of 
lews were murdered. From 1945 to 1989, a plaque at the front gate 
proclaimed in many different languages that 4.1 million victims had 
died there. During a visit to the camp in lune 1979, Pope lohn Paul II 
stood before this monument and blessed the four million victims' 
souls. It turned out that at least three million of the perished were 
figments of imagination. 

Shortly after the pope's visit, with no fanfare or publicity, the 
camp historians removed the plaque and replaced it with one reflect- 
ing the new official figure: 1.2 million. For many years, the officially 
declared six million lewish victims of the Holocaust included the four 
million supposedly killed at Auschwitz. Interestingly, when the 
Auschwitz figure went down by about three million, there was no 
rush to correct the encyclopedias or the endless stories quoting the six 
million figure. 

When the "experts" made the Auschwitz reduction, they did 
something for which revisionists have been jailed: They revised the 
lewish casualty rate downward. However, they had no real choice. 
They had to radically lower their figures or lose credibility. It was one 
thing to make fantastically ludicrous claims when Auschwitz was a 
little-visited Communist Party-controlled site of the 1950s and 1960s, 
but with greater access came more questions. By revising the figures, 
the camp curators were in effect admitting that the Communists and 
the subsequent camp museum officials had fabricated numbers and 
that they were just too inflated to be believed. 

lewish revisionist David Cole traveled to Auschwitz in Septem- 
ber, 1992. Wearing a yarmulke, he interviewed the curator, Dr. Fran- 
cizek Piper, who admitted that while the "official tour guides" tell the 



Jewish Supremacism 293 

visitors the gas chamber is exactly as it was when the camp was liber- 
ated, it is actually a "reconstruction." That revelation is just one of the 
gaping holes in the bow of battleship Auschwitz, the mothership of the 
Holocaust fleet. Cole was subsequently beaten up and his life threat- 
ened repeatedly. 560 

In the face of mounting evidence exposing the blatant Auschwitz 
falsehoods, the Holocaust promoters admitted much of what people 
such as David Irving had been condemned for saying. Interestingly, 
in perhaps the most authoritative and exhaustive book on Auschwitz 
yet published, Auschwitz: 1270 to Present by Robert Jan Van Pelt and 
Deborah Dwork, it is admitted by the two Jewish Holocaust authors 
that the gas chamber at the main Auschwitz camp and the one shown 
to tourists was a fake built by the Polish Communists long after the 
war. 561 The authors, however, allege that there were gas chambers in 
another Auschwitz camp. 

The overthrow of Communism in Russia brought to light many 
documents that were hitherto inaccessible to Western researchers. 
Startling pieces of evidence have recently turned up in the Moscow 
State Archives. When the Soviets "liberated" Auschwitz, the Germans 
had hurriedly abandoned it, leaving behind tons of documents. 
Among the items recovered by the Communist troops was the 
Auschwitz Death Register — chronologically bound volumes of death 
certificates of those who had died in the camp. For 45 years, these cru- 
cial documents had languished in the secret files of the KGB. Russian 
President Mikhail Gorbachev authorized release of the ones research- 
ers had located: 46 bound volumes. The volumes show that doctors 
and other medical personnel meticulously recorded each death at 
Auschwitz. The records included descriptions of the cause of death, 
which ranged from execution (generally shooting or hanging) to dis- 
ease, heart attack and similar causes. Most of the deaths were from 
disease. The incomplete Death Register volumes contain records that 
add up to approximately 74,000 deaths, of which approximately 
30,000 were Jews. The rest were Poles, Russians, and other nationali- 
ties. 

The Death Register raised immediate questions. If the authorities 
recorded executions by shooting or hanging, then why not those by 
gassing? More importantly, why had the books been kept hidden for 
so many years? Had the Soviets suppressed the books because they 
knew that they did not correlate with their official KGB versions of 
Auschwitz? 

Powerful evidence from Allied sources also conflicts with the 
fantastic alleged murder rate at Auschwitz. In the mid-1970s, the 
U.S. government released wartime aerial photographs of the 
Auschwitz camp. Jewish historian Raul Hilberg, in his article for 



294 A Holocaust Inquiry 

Encarta Encyclopedia, writes, "In 1944 the camp was photographed 
by Allied reconnaissance aircraft in search of industrial targets; its 
factories, but not its gas chambers, were bombed." 

The United States Army Air Corps took the photographs over a 
lengthy period, and they are so remarkable in their clarity that vehi- 
cles and even people can be distinguished in them. Many of the 
photographs had been taken during the supposed height of the al- 
leged killing. The surveillance flights took many at mid-morning on 
typical workdays. Not one of the photos taken over a number of 
days shows huge pits or piles of human bodies; nor are there any 
fires suggesting their burning or smoke billowing from the chim- 
neys of the crematoria. 

Thousands of tons of coke would have been needed to fuel the 
crematoria if the murder and cremation of millions of people had 
been in progress. Yet, the photos show no mountains of coke, and 
there are no long lines of railway cars filled with the fuel. No lines of 
people are assembled outside the doors of the alleged Auschwitz gas 
chamber, and no holes appear on the very roof where allegedly Zyk- 
lon B was supposedly tipped in on top of the victims. 

Another startling piece of evidence surfaced with the release of 
the British "Enigma Secret." Using computers, the British broke the 
supposedly indecipherable ultra-secret code that the Germans had re- 
lied on to send communiques between the battlefront and the high 
command. Cracking the code helped turn the tide of war, for the Brit- 
ish and Allied forces knew the German's military plans and orders — 
sometimes even before the German field commanders themselves. 

Sir Frank H. Hinsley, master of St. lohn's College and professor of 
International Relations at Cambridge University, published a special 
appendix to Volume II of his magisterial British Intelligence in the Sec- 
ond World War: Its Influence on Strategy and Operations. 562 In the section 
titled "German Police Cyphers," Hinsley reveals that during 1942 and 
1943 British intelligence intercepted daily coded communications for 
Dachau, Buchenwald, Auschwitz, and seven other camps. Every day 
each camp reported the number of people brought in, the number 
transferred to other camps, and the numbers who were born and 
those who died. It also reported executions by shooting or hanging. 

"The returns of Auschwitz," states Hinsley, "the largest of the 
camps with 200,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of 
death but included references to shootings and hangings. There were 
no references in the decrypts to gassing." The numbers of dead in the 
decoded messages correlate with the records of the death books and 



Jewish Supremacism 295 

the amount of coke consumed. More importantly, if gassing had been 
taking place, why would they have not been reported, just as shoot- 
ings and hangings were? Since the Germans dutifully reported execu- 
tions or killings to their superiors, and their reports were made in top 
secret transmissions, why would they hide the method of execution 
used? 

Interestingly enough, British Intelligence also intercepted the 
communications of German commando forces called "einstatzgrup- 
pen" that were locked in an horrific partisan war in the east against 
the Communists. In those decrypts are graphic descriptions of mass 
murders of Jewish partisans and groups of civilians. Why would 
those secret messages include grim accounts of the murder of civil- 
ians, but not the decrypts from Auschwitz? 

Scientific Evidence 

In a criminal trial, scientific evidence is usually the most powerful 
because it can be validated in an objective, scientific manner. There is 
no scientific evidence indicating mass gassing at Auschwitz or any 
other German camp. The United States Army had toxicology experts 
do autopsies on hundreds of dead in the Nazi concentration camps. 
Human remains can show signs of cyanide poisoning for years. No 
scientific evidence existed that even one of the victims was gassed to 
death. Nor do records of autopsies by Russian doctors in the Eastern 
European camps show any evidence of gassing. Although autopsies 
had been performed, the results were not presented at Nuremberg. 
Why? Is it because the results would not have served the prosecution 
since none of the deaths could be blamed on poison gas? In every 
murder trial, does not the prosecution attempt to show the cause of 
death? In the most publicized murder trial of all time, the Interna- 
tional Military Tribunal, proof of the cause of death is conspicuously 
absent. If the Nazis had really gassed people by the millions, would 
not the prosecution have produced at least one autopsy proving the 
cause of death to be poisoning by the cyanide gas produced by Zyk- 
lonB? 

Holocaust orthodoxy "experts" claim that one "proof" of the gas- 
sing of human beings is the great quantity of Zyklon B used at 
Auschwitz during the war. Attempting to rebut revisionist question- 
ing of gas chambers, Jean Claude Pressac, a French chemist, in his 
book Auschwitz: Techniques and Operation of the Gas Chambers, supplies 
data showing the large consumption of Zyklon B at Auschwitz. 563 A 
more logical explanation is simply that the Germans used the chemi- 
cal in an effort to control the epidemics that ravaged the camps. 



296 A Holocaust Inquiry 

Additionally, the data published by Pressac himself shows that 
the per capita amount of Zyklon B used in the Auschwitz concentra- 
tion camp was similar to Zyklon B consumption in German camps 
such as Oranienburg, where the experts admit that no human gassing 
took place. If Auschwitz was the great center of extermination, and if 
Zyklon B was the poison used, how could it be that records of the 
chemical's purchase and usage show no greater consumption at 
Auschwitz than at the many concentration camps where Zyklon B 
was used strictly for lice infestation and where there were no alleged 
gassings? Pressac also inadvertently revealed that coke consumption 
was no greater per capita in Auschwitz than the camps in Germany 
where extermination is not alleged. 

In February 1988, the Canadian government charged Holocaust 
questioner Ernst Zundel with violating an archaic law against 
"spreading false news." Defense attorneys in this criminal case com- 
missioned an American engineering consultant on prison gas cham- 
bers, Fred Leuchter, to make a scientific examination of the alleged 
homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. Leuchter, an apolitical person, 
is perhaps the premier authority in the United States on the construc- 
tion and use of execution equipment, and he was actually in charge of 
the design and construction of execution facilities used in a number of 
American prisons. 

In his investigation, Leuchter surveyed the construction of the al- 
leged gas chambers and researched the chemical properties of the 
Zyklon B fumigant. He found that Zyklon B is a compound that, 
when exposed to air, releases deadly hydrogen cyanide gas. It clings 
to surfaces and has a tendency to react chemically with materials con- 
taining iron (ferric compounds), creating a ferricyanide. If Zyklon B is 
used in iron chambers or in red brick structures, it reacts with ferrous 
(iron) material to produce a distinctive blue color. The printing ink 
industry has used these chemical reactions for many decades to pro- 
duce a distinctive color called Prussian Blue. Random House Webster's 
Electronic Dictionary, 1992 edition, defines it as follows: 

Prussian Blue n. 1. a moderate to deep greenish blue. 2. a dark 
blue, crystalline, water-insoluble ferrocyanide pigment, used in 
painting, fabric printing, and laundry bluing. 

Not only did Leuchter find that the supposed homicidal gas 
chambers at Auschwitz were structurally unsuitable for gassing, he 
also took samples from the walls and had them chemically analyzed. 
Independent laboratories in the United States found no evidence of 
the ferricyanide compounds. Yet, when Leuchter examined the rooms 



Jewish Supremacism 297 

used as disinfestation chambers for clothes and luggage, he readily 
observed the distinctive blue coloring associated with ferricyanide. 
After further chemical analysis of the samples, he proved that the dis- 
infection walls had heavy concentrations of the ferricyanide caused 
by exposure to cyanide. 

Leuchter also pointed out that the disinfestation chambers used 
for delousing clothes were well made, airtight, and designed for 
safety. On the other hand, the supposed human gas chambers were 
shoddily constructed. He asked why gas chambers for killing lice 
would be properly engineered, whereas chambers allegedly for kill- 
ing millions of people would be improperly engineered and con- 
structed — and dangerous for operators. 

The Fight Against Revisionism 

When Leuchter published his report, Holocaust authorities re- 
acted predictably — with defamation, suppression, intimidation and 
even imprisonment. Leuchter became the victim of an intense interna- 
tional campaign to discredit him and ruin him financially. Jewish 
groups wrote defamatory letters to all of his state penitentiary clients 
urging them to cancel his contracts. They were able to get authorities 
to prosecute him in his home state of Massachusetts, in spite of his 
obvious expertise and his patents, under an arcane statute of practic- 
ing engineering without a license. 

The German government jailed Leuchter for six weeks simply for 
reporting his technical findings in a lecture in November 1991 at 
Weisshiem. For simply translating and commenting on Leuchter' s 
speech, Mr. Giinter Deckert, a former high-school teacher with a clean 
record, was sentenced to a year's probation. In their verdict, the 
judges, Dr. Orlet and Dr. Muller pointed out that Deckert was a city 
councilor who graduated with distinction in law from Heidelberg 
University and was of high moral character. Because they did not sen- 
tence Deckert harshly enough according to the international press, the 
judges themselves faced intimidation and efforts to overturn the sen- 
tence they imposed. 

Frau Saline Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, the German minister of 
justice, called the verdict a slap in the face for every victim of the 
Holocaust and had the two judges suspended and placed on "sick 
leave." Mannheim prosecutor Hans Klein appealed the verdict with 
the result that Deckert received a two-year jail sentence. Klein also 
promised to go over the wording of the verdict in search of anything 
that might be grounds for prosecuting the two judges. It is obviously 
not a free system if a judge can face termination, or even be criminally 



298 A Holocaust Inquiry 

charged for stating why he is lenient within the bounds of his author- 
ity. " 

It seems that little has changed in Germany during this century. 
In America it is hard to imagine someone going to jail simply for 
translating a scientific lecture, or having judges suspended or threat- 
ened with arrest for rendering a verdict or sentence deemed politi- 
cally incorrect. Nevertheless, such are the methods of protecting the 
Holocaust story. Germany is not the only violator of free speech in 
this matter. Some time later, the frail and spectacled Fred Leuchter 
was also incarcerated and forcibly deported from Great Britain. 

A year after the Leuchter controversy, the Auschwitz Museum 
staffers secretly duplicated Leuchter' s tests and arrived at the same 
scientific results. They do not, however, discuss these scientific facts 
in their guidebooks. Their feeble explanation for the lack of ferricya- 
nide in the human gas chambers is that somehow it dissipated over 
time — a chemical impossibility. They offer no explanation why the 
ferricyanide did not dissipate in the disinfestation chambers. Another 
Holocaust expert argued that it takes less cyanide to kill humans than 
it does to kill lice, therefore there would be less in the human gas 
chambers than in the disinfestation chambers. Yet, it is alleged that 
huge amounts of Zyklon B were used to kill millions of people in a 
veritable "factories of death." 

The Holocaust revisionists, in spite of enduring vicious attacks 
from the press, caused such a stir by the release of the Leuchter Re- 
port and subsequent revelation of the details of Auschwitz's own 
chemical study, that the Auschwitz staff authorized a new investiga- 
tion that purports to refute Leuchter and their own earlier study. 
However, they will still not allow any independent studies by scien- 
tists and engineers, although it would be relatively easy and quick to 
obtain samples and do analyses of the alleged gas chamber walls. Re- 
peatedly, in the study of the Holocaust, those with a personal or po- 
litical stake in maintaining their version of events are opposed to aca- 
demic or scientific inquiry. They endeavor to prevent a physical in- 
spection of records or scientific studies of sites, and they make even 
the public reporting of scientific or historical investigations punish- 
able by imprisonment. 

Even a well-respected lewish historian who believes in the exis- 
tence of the gas chambers offers a somewhat revisionist viewpoint. In 
his 1988 book Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?: The "Final Solution" in 
History, Princeton University professor Arno J. Mayer pointed out 



Jewish Supremacism 299 

that there are many questions about the Holocaust. Mayer, who him- 
self lost close family in the Holocaust, writes: 

Many questions remain open. . . . All in all, how many bodies 
were cremated in Auschwitz? How many died there all told? What 
was the national, religious, and ethnic breakdown in this com- 
monwealth of victims? How many of them were condemned to die 
a "natural" death and how many were deliberately slaughtered. . . ? 
We have simply no answers to these questions at this time. (pg. 
366) 

From 1942 to 1945, certainly at Auschwitz, but probably overall, 
more Jews were killed by so-called "natural" causes than by "un- 
natural" ones. (pg. 365) 

Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and 
unreliable. 564 

I must repeat that Mayer strongly believes that gas chambers did 
exist at Auschwitz, but he points out that "Most of what is known is 
based on the depositions of Nazi officials and executioners at postwar 
trials and on the memory of survivors and bystanders. This testimony 
must be screened carefully, since it can be influenced by subjective 
factors of great complexity." 565 Mayer's statements would be grounds 
for prosecution in France and Germany. 

Witnesses to the Holocaust 

As Mayer points out, much of the Holocaust story is based on 
eyewitness accounts. Revisionists argue that so-called eyewitness tes- 
timony is not always reliable. They give as an example, the John Dem- 
janjuk case. Demjanjuk, a naturalized American autoworker from 
Eastern Europe, was accused of being Ivan the Terrible, a nefarious 
concentration camp guard at Treblinka concentration camp who al- 
legedly murdered hundreds of people. 

Demjanjuk maintained his innocence, but hundreds of Jewish 
eyewitnesses testified that he was Ivan. The witnesses screamed, 
cried, and postured, telling the most incredible stories of cruelty and 
sadism. They swore under oath that they clearly remembered that 
Demjanjuk was Ivan. Ultimately, Demjanjuk was deported to Israel, 
and an Israeli court tried and convicted him, primarily on "eye- 
witnesses" testimony. But new evidence came forward that proved 
that the Soviet KGB had framed Demjanjuk. Documents that suppos- 
edly showed him to be a guard proved to be Soviet forgeries. When 
faced with a world-wide scandal, even the Israeli Supreme Court had 
to agree that the eyewitness accounts were not credible and that Dem- 
janjuk was innocent. 



300 A Holocaust Inquiry 

Those Incredible Numbers 

In examining the Holocaust, I found that sources varied wildly in 
their estimations of the number killed, ranging from 4 to 24 million. 
Reproduced below is the entry under Holocaust in the Compton's Mul- 
timedia Encyclopedia, 1991. 

As Nazi Germany gained control of one country after another in 
World War II, there was much killing of civilians and maltreatment 
of soldiers that can be classified as war crimes. These crimes, 
however, pale in comparison to the massive, deliberate, and well- 
planned extermination of more than 15 million persons in what is 
termed the Holocaust. This genocide of staggering proportions was 
carried out with scrupulous efficiency by a well-coordinated Ger- 
man bureaucracy in which nothing was left to chance. 566 

Elsewhere in the same Compton's Encyclopedia (under the topic 
Concentration Camp) is the following statement: 

The most horrible extension of the concentration camp system 
was the establishment of extermination centers after 1940. They 
were set up primarily to kill Jews. This slaughter is known as the 
Holocaust. It is believed that from 18 to 26 million people were 
killed in them, including 6 million Jews and 400,000 Gypsies. 567 

Holocaust chroniclers assessing German crimes obviously see no 
need for accuracy or even consistency. But regardless of which set of 
numbers is used, the figures are so fantastic that they strain credulity. 
If 18 to 26 million people were murdered and cremated in the "exter- 
mination centers" of Poland (most of them at Auschwitz), the daily 
count would have had to be in the tens of thousands. As cited previ- 
ously, the expert cited by the Holocaust scholars themselves, Pressac, 
now estimates the death toll at Auschwitz of all victims to have been 
between 600,000 and 800,000. How do these figures, which themselves 
could be greatly exaggerated, square with the wild numbers for 
Auschwitz bandied around in the popular encyclopedias? When a na- 
tion is accused of such terrible crimes, shouldn't there be at least a 
demand for accuracy and consistency? If not, then any people could 
be accused of any transgression without fear of reproach. 

About the time I noticed the discrepancies in Holocaust numbers, 
I saw a television interview of a Zionist who attacked Holocaust revi- 
sionism by saying that "Whether it was ten million or one million, 
100,000 or 1000, it does not make the crime any less abhorrent!" The 
truth is that if hundreds of thousands rather than up to 26 million 
were killed, and if most of those deaths were caused by the expected 



Jewish Supremacism 301 

brutalities of war rather than a calculated plan of extermination, then 
the prevalent version of the Holocaust story is grossly inaccurate. 

Other Holocaust Questions 

The main component of the Holocaust story is that the Nazis had 
a plan or program for exterminating the Jews. But even though the 
Allies captured Germany's government and military headquarters 
and most of the concentration camps with their records intact, there 
has never been a single order or instruction found that calls for the 
gassing of Jews or that indicates a plan to exterminate all of European 
Jewry. No blueprint has been found for the construction of a human 
gas chamber, or instructions or orders written for gassing human be- 
ings. 

On this subject, as on others, the Holocaust story has undergone 
revision. No longer do the experts claim the Nazis gave direct orders 
to exterminate the Jews. Raul Hilberg in the 1961, first edition of his 
major work on the Holocaust, The Destruction of the European Jews, 
wrote that in 1941 Hitler had issued two orders for the extermination 
of the Jews. In Hilberg's revised three-volume edition of the book, 
published in 1985, all reference to such orders had been removed. 568 
In a review of Hilberg's revised edition, historian Christopher Brown- 
ing, himself an "exterminationist historian," wrote: 

In the new edition, all references in the text to a Hitler decision or 
Hitler order for the "Final Solution" have been systematically ex- 
cised. Buried at the bottom of a single footnote stands the solitary 
reference: "Chronology and circumstances point to a Hitler deci- 
sion before the summer ended." In the new edition, decisions were 
not made and orders were not given. 569 

A Holocaust under the Nose of the Red Cross? 

Jewish leaders have directed anger toward the International Red 
Cross for not revealing the Holocaust or doing anything to stop it. 
They point out that international teams of Red Cross inspectors vis- 
ited and inspected all the major German concentration camps, includ- 
ing Auschwitz, right up to the end of the war. On one hand, the Holo- 
causters expect us to believe that the Germans were murdering tens of 
thousands of people a day in a super-secret plan that they dared not 
mention even in their top-secret orders. On the other hand, they ex- 
pect us to believe that the Nazis would let the International Red Cross 
inspect those same camps and interview the prisoners during the 
same period they were supposedly killing many thousands each day. 
Here are excerpts from a telling U.S.A. Today article: 

Many Jewish leaders and Holocaust experts long have contended 
that the Red Cross failed spectacularly during World War II — 



302 A Holocaust Inquiry 

mostly by not raising an alarm about Nazi atrocities — and com- 
pounded the failure later by refusing to acknowledge it... 

In fact, in a Nov. 22, 1944, letter to U.S. State Department offi- 
cials about the visit, the Red Cross said: "(We) had not been able 
to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian 
prisoners... 

In this case, the documents show, the Red Cross failed at every 
possible turn. Not only had Red Cross officials neglected to grasp 
the situation, but they then passed along bad information to the Al- 
lies. 

A Tendency To Disbelieve Horror Stories 

Several Red Cross documents suggest that the organization was 
reluctant, at least initially, to put much faith in tales and rumors of 
Nazi brutality. Like the general public, Red Cross officials didn't 
comprehend the true extent of the Nazis' crimes... 

"There is no doubt that the Red Cross let itself be used by the 
Nazis," says Radu Ioanid, director of the Holocaust Survivors Reg- 
istry at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. v "There is no doubt 
they were fooled." 570 

Obviously, if the grievously high death toll was from lack of 
medicine, shortages of insecticide (for killing disease-spreading lice), 
and food — because of the destruction and disruption of the war — 
the Nazis would have had no fear of International Red Cross inspec- 
tors and volunteers in the camps any more than the British would 
have feared them helping in the ruins of East London after an air raid. 
Do the promoters of the Holocaust story believe the members of the 
International Red Cross were part of an anti-Semitic, Nazi, Holocaust 
conspiracy? Or did their members, in spite of visiting the camps dur- 
ing the war and delivering to prisoners 973,000 packages and parcels 
(as their own records show), simply see no evidence at all of mass 
gassings or burnings or "extermination facilities" or for that matter, 
any effort on the part of the Nazis to purposefully exterminate the 
lewish people? 

While helping hundreds of thousands of refugees, Red Cross vol- 
unteers undoubtedly heard stories of Nazi brutality and rumors of 
mass gassings and they noted those rumors and kept an eye out for 
any evidence of them, but they saw nothing to indicate that the ru- 
mors were true. At the end of the war, in camps such as Buchenwald, 
they saw great numbers of bodies, but their own reports laid the hor- 
ror on disease epidemics, which even the British occupiers and the 
Red Cross itself had great difficulty controlling. For instance, the Brit- 



Jewish Supremacism 303 

ish estimated that more people perished after they assumed control of 
Bergen-Belsen than before the camp's liberation. 

Jewish forces condemn revisionists who raise common sense ques- 
tions about the Holocaust, such as "How could there have been a 
Holocaust right under the nose of the International Red Cross?" It's 
no wonder they want such questions quashed and the questioners 
imprisoned. Their version of the Holocaust story cannot withstand 
such inquiries. 

Why No Debate? 

The official keepers of the Holocaust wage an international cam- 
paign to silence the disturbing questions. Most people never even 
hear the revisionist position because Jewish forces dominate the me- 
dia and block mainstream access to material that questions Holocaust 
orthodoxy. 

Among the most potent of such forces is the world-wide "Anti- 
Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith," which has a $37 million an- 
nual budget in the United States devoted to defaming those who criti- 
cize Israel or question parts of the Holocaust tale. The ADL instructs 
its spokesmen never to debate any aspect of the Holocaust. If their 
version of the Holocaust is so overwhelmingly documented, why do 
they fear free and open discussion? 

An honest debate between the high priests of the Holocaust and 
Holocaust questioners would reveal that the latter are not crackpots 
or hatemongers, but people with legitimate questions and arguments 
based on sound evidence. Such a debate would reveal that revision- 
ists do not deny that Jews, like the Japanese in World War II America, 
were incarcerated in concentration camps. Revisionists acknowledge 
that the conditions in the European camps were horrendous near 
war's end, and they maintain that many thousands of Jews died in the 
camps, mostly from malnutrition and disease. Finally, revisionists 
also freely admit that some massacres of innocent civilians took place 
and that such horrors should be condemned. 

Revisionists maintain that while there were certainly Germans 
who committed what is today defined as "war crimes," the Allies 
themselves, which include the Soviets, were guilty of them to at least 
an equal degree. Revisionists point to the Allied intentional firebomb- 
ing of civilian populations as well as to the Soviets' mass rape, expul- 
sion, and murder of millions of Germans and other peoples of Eastern 
Europe (see Willis Carto's Barnes Review). 571 They also point out that 
many of the deaths in the concentration camps in the last years of the 
war were caused by Allied bombing of rail lines vital for transporta- 
tion of food and medicines. They point out that specific targeting and 
destruction of pharmaceutical factories that produced medicines and 



304 A Holocaust Inquiry 

medical supplies increased the death rate among German civilians 
and soldiers as well as increasing deaths in the camps. 

To challenge the popular perception of the Holocaust, obviously, 
is not condoning mass murder. Those who refute the popular concep- 
tion of the Holocaust make it clear that they view atrocities against 
innocent Jews or any other people as crimes against the moral values 
of Western civilization. Revisionists simply contend that the Jews 
were not the only victims of the world's most horrific war. Many revi- 
sionists also argue that the motive for a horrendous Holocaust story is 
the furtherance of the economic and political objectives of Israel and 
the Jewish organizations. 

When I began to learn many of the disturbing facts that chal- 
lenged my perception of the Holocaust, I asked myself how the Holo- 
caust story began and why it so ubiquitous more than 50 years after 
the end of the Second World War. Usually, there is a great deal of bit- 
terness and hatred at the end of any war, but as time passes, the hys- 
teria lessens and cooler heads prevail. Yet there seems to be as much if 
not more frenzy about German war crimes today as there was imme- 
diately after the war. Just months after the war's end, a U. S. Senate 
leader, Robert Taft, condemned the International Military Tribunals 
as a "blot on the American record we will long regret." 572 The Chief 
Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Harlan Fiske Stone, 
said of Justice Jackson, who left the court to lead the tribunal: 

Jackson is away conducting his high grade lynching party in Nur- 
emberg. I don't mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see 
the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to 
the common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet 
my old-fashioned ideas. 573 

Fifty years later, one would be hard-pressed to find even one 
American congressman who would dare condemn the war crimes tri- 
als. Even if he secretly harbored that opinion, he would know that ut- 
tering it would bring upon his head such wrath that his political ca- 
reer would be over. 

What is the motive, then, that keeps Holocausters striving to keep 
the story so ingrained in our minds and hearts? 

Motives for the Holocaust Story 

Pressure was placed on the Allied powers to establish a perma- 
nent haven in Palestine for Jewish survivors. The establishment of 
Israel three years after Germany's defeat was thus an aftereffect of 
the Holocaust. 574 -Encarta Encyclopedia article on Holocaust by Raul 
Hilberg, leading Jewish Holocaust historian 



Jewish Supremacism 305 

During every war, there is war propaganda. In modern warfare, it 
has become a powerful psychological weapon. While propaganda has 
no necessary relation to truth, it can be used on a nation's own forces 
as well as those of the enemy. During the First World War, the British 
War Office issued dispatches saying that the German soldiers would 
enjoy themselves by hoisting up the babies of Belgium on their bayo- 
nets, and, furthermore, that they boiled the babies' bodies to derive 
the phosphates used in munitions. After the war, the British War Of- 
fice confirmed that these stories were blatant falsehoods. 

In the Second World War — in an expanding age of radio, movies, 
and mass-circulation newspapers and magazines — propaganda be- 
came ever more refined and powerful. Jews, who exercised consider- 
able power in the American and British media, began circulating sto- 
ries about German atrocities in the 1930s, and the stories escalated 
with the coming of war. As the revisionist Barnes Review 575 points out, 
just as Germans were accused of boiling babies in the First World 
War, Germans were now accused of making soap from the bodies of 
their murdered victims. However, this time it took almost half a cen- 
tury for the historical truth to vanquish the soap story lie, and the bla- 
tant falsehood is still often repeated. 

As a student, in the basement of the Louisiana State University li- 
brary, I surveyed a great many magazines published between 1945 
and 1950, and I found compelling reasons why the war propaganda 
did not stop after the end of the war. The guns in Europe had scarcely 
been silenced when a new war began that was vital to the world-wide 
Jewish community. A massive Jewish invasion and ensuing war be- 
gan in Palestine for the creation of the Zionist State of Israel. Its suc- 
cess depended to a great degree on the Holocaust story. In his Encarta 
Encyclopedia article, Raul Hilberg accurately depicts the establishment 
of Israel as an "aftereffect of the Holocaust." Actually the establish- 
ment of Israel was not so much an aftereffect of the Holocaust as it 
was an aftereffect of the Holocaust story. The realities of the Holocaust 
were not as important as the perception that there was a Holocaust. 

Today, there are important historical questions concerning the 
sinking of the Maine preceding the Spanish- American War; the Gulf of 
Tonkin incident preceding heavy American involvement in Vietnam; 
and whether the Eusitania, which the Germans sank in the First World 
War, was illegally carrying munitions. The importance of these deci- 
sive incidents lay more in the public's perception of them than in 
whatever their factual basis may have been at the time. The same is 
true of the Holocaust. The Zionist's dream of Israel needed a "Holo- 
caust" — the most monstrous Holocaust imaginable — to further their 
aims. 



306 A Holocaust Inquiry 

Modern Israel could not have been established without the story 
of the "six million." The creation of the lewish state depended on the 
massive influx of lews from all over the world into Palestine and a 
successful war of terror against both the British who administered the 
region under a League of Nations mandate and against the region's 
native inhabitants. The displaced lewish populations of Europe were 
a tremendous source of immigration to Palestine. Without that inva- 
sion, it is doubtful that the relatively small prewar lewish population 
there could have wrested control from the British and the native Pal- 
estinians. 

The Zionist military takeover of Palestine required vast economic, 
military, and political support from around the world. It entailed the 
terrorization of the Palestinian majority, driving them from their 
homes and lands and denying them their civil and political rights. 
Only the perpetuation of the Holocaust story could make these crimes 
tolerated by the world. Sympathy for the lews, deeply stirred by rec- 
ollections of the Holocaust, made whatever grievous offenses commit- 
ted against Palestinians, no matter how unjust, seem trivial. 

The Holocaust story has generated tens of billions of dollars of aid 
from the United States and even greater amounts from Germany in 
reparations. Perhaps most importantly, the Holocaust was the fuel 
that fired the flame of lewish Zionism all over the world. Recital of 
the Holocaust united lews world-wide and elicited the huge mone- 
tary and political support necessary for the establishment and main- 
tenance of Israel. After 50 years of almost unbroken conflict with the 
Palestinians and her Arab neighbors, Israel still relies heavily upon 
American and German support. Israel is America's biggest annual re- 
cipient of foreign aid, just as it has been since her establishment. Con- 
stant harping on the Holocaust keeps the money flowing from both 
lews and non-lews and forms a subtle excuse for every injustice 
committed against the Arabs. 

Nahum Goldmann, president of the World lewish Congress, 
wrote a popular book called The Jewish Paradox, published by Grosset 
& Dunlap in 1978. Goldmann writes dramatically of the impact of 
German reparations for Israel. 

The Germans will have paid out a total of 80 billion... Without the 
German reparations that started coming through during the first 
ten years as a state, Israel would not have half of its present 
infrastructure: All the trains in Israel are German, the ships are 
German, and the same goes for electrical installations and a great 
deal of Israel's industry. . . and that is setting aside the individual 
pensions paid to survivors. Israel today receives hundreds of 
millions of dollars in German currency each year. ... In some years 



Jewish Supremacism 307 

lars in German currency each year. ... In some years the sums of 
money received by Israel from Germany has been as much as dou- 
ble or treble the contribution made by collections from interna- 
tional Jewry. 576 

In this amazing book, Goldmann admits that even during the war 
the Zionists were planning war crimes trials and reparations from 
Germany. 

During the war the WJC (World Jewish Congress) had created an 
Institute of Jewish Affairs in New York (its headquarters are now in 
London). The directors were two great Lithuanian Jewish Jurists, 
Jacob and Nehemiah Robinson. Thanks to them, the Institute 
worked out two completely revolutionary ideas: the Nuremberg tri- 
bunal and German reparations. 

The Institute's . . . idea was that Nazi Germany ought to pay after 
its defeat, ...The German reparations would first have to be paid to 
people who had lost their belongings through the Nazis. Further, if, 
as we hoped, the Jewish state was created, the Germans would pay 
compensation to enable the survivors to settle there. The first time 
this idea was expressed was during the war, in the course of a con- 
ference in Baltimore. 577 

The Nuremberg Trials were presented to the public as an effort by 
the Allies to levy justice on war criminals. In The Jewish Paradox, 
Goldmann admits that the Nuremberg Trials and the idea of German 
reparations were originated not by the Allies but by Zionists before 
any evidence of a Holocaust, and that the compensation would be vi- 
tal to the foundation of Israel. 

Since the Second World War, the Holocaust story has engendered 
tens of billions of dollars from the United States and even greater 
amounts from Germany in reparations. The staggering sum, easily ex- 
ceeding $150 billion, would certainly provide a powerful motive to Is- 
rael and World Zionism to perpetuate the sensationalized Holocaust 
story. 

Another possible motive for keeping the propaganda alive became 
apparent to me as I read the stacks of 1940s magazines in the LSU li- 
brary. I found numerous stories predicting the eminent rebirth of Na- 
zism. Many of them claimed fancifully that secret hordes of gold ex- 
isted that would fund the neo-Nazi movement in Germany and all 
over the world, including North and South America. 

Associating the Holocaust with Nazism was certainly the most ef- 
fective way to rebuke the National Socialist philosophy. Of course, the 
Holocaust not only rebukes the Nazis, it insulates the Jews from prac- 
tically any criticism. It is also a psychological weapon in the hands of 
the Jewish-led egalitarian movement, for the mass media never 
seemed to miss an opportunity to link racial thinking and science to 



308 A Holocaust Inquiry 

the Nazi horrors (except of course for Jewish racial horrors against 
Palestinians). 

In advancing the Holocaust story, the Jewish-dominated media 
had a willing partner in the Allied governments. At the end of the 
war, with Europe in ruins, tens of millions dead, and half of Europe 
under the Communist tyranny, many could be forgiven for asking if 
involvement in the original Polish-German war had been worth it. 
The Holocaust story provided powerful emotional justification. 

I enjoyed reading Raymond Chandler murder mysteries when I 
was in college. When studying the Holocaust, I remembered that in 
making a criminal case, the prosecution shows that the defendant has 
a motive to commit the offense and the opportunity to do so. Power- 
ful Jewish interests certainly had the motive to create and promote the 
Holocaust story in its most extreme version, and with their domina- 
tion of the media they certainly had the opportunity. 

There are literally thousands of books in print focusing on aspects 
of the Holocaust and countless magazine articles, speeches, sermons, 
documentaries, novels, plays and movies tell us of its terror. An 
overwhelming number of the authors of material on the Holocaust are 
themselves Jewish. Is it likely that Jews, who passionately believe in 
the unspeakable horrors of the Holocaust, can write objectively about 
it? Could Elie Wiesel write an unbiased account of Nazi Germany or 
the Holocaust, or could Adolf Hitler, were he alive, write an unbiased 
one of Wiesel and the Second World War? 

Elie Wiesel writes: 

Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of 
hate — healthy, virile hate — for what the German personifies and 
for what persists in the German. To do otherwise would be a be- 
trayal of the dead. 578 

Imagine if a Russian survivor of the murderous Gulags under 
Jewish Bolshevism made a statement saying that, 

Every Russian, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone 
of hate — healthy virile hate — for what the Jew personifies and 
what persists in the Jew. To do otherwise would be a betrayal of 
the dead. 

I don't believe he would have won a Nobel prize. In fact, in the 
Europe of today he would be jailed and called an evil anti-Semite. 

The real power of the Holocaust story has been in the human 
emotion it evokes. It is the tearful remembrances of elderly Jewish 
survivors, the coquettish words of Anne Frank, and the photographs 
and newsreels of emaciated and mangled bodies that are ingrained in 



Jewish Supremacism 309 

the consciousness of us all. It is the pictorial record that is the real 
"proof" of the Holocaust, for we have all seen its victims in their ter- 
rible poses of death. However, similar pictures could be shown from 
many wars. We could see the millions of victims of Communism un- 
der Trotsky's Red Army or Stalin's purges. We could see the women 
and children who died by the thousands in the British-run concentra- 
tion camps of the Boer War. We could see the remains of the tens of 
thousands of men, women, and children who were burned alive at 
Dresden or Hamburg. We could see the dead of the killing fields of 
Cambodia or the blood-drenched jungles of Rwanda. But we do not 
see these victims in photographs and films day after day, year after 
year. These other victims of war have no multimillion-dollar memo- 
rial among the national monuments of Washington, D.C., no political 
lobby, no Hollywood promoters. To remember them doesn't suit the 
agenda of those who decide what the public will view and hear. 

During the coming century, as communications flow with greater 
ease and rapidity, more people will challenge many of the premises 
and allegations of the Holocaust story. Errors and falsehoods will fall 
before vigorous cross-examination and intellectual challenge. Each 
day the story unravels a bit more, becoming increasingly untenable. 
The truth grows incrementally. Terror and suppression will no longer 
suffice to block its advance. It shall prevail someday, triumphant in its 
naked power. 

I cannot say with absolute certainty that some parts of the Holo- 
caust story did not occur just as the leading "exterminationists" al- 
lege. But certainly, there is now enough contrary evidence and rea- 
sonable questions to warrant a full and open inquiry and debate on 
Holocaust dogma. 

We cannot know the full truth until dissenting opinions and free 
inquiries into the Holocaust are allowed. Those historians and schol- 
ars who harbor doubts about aspects of Holocaust orthodoxy must be 
allowed to investigate and analyze; and then to present their findings 
without fear of retaliation of the sort suffered by David Irving. 

After researching and questioning elements of the Holocaust 
story, I came to realize that those who challenge parts of it are no 
more unjustified than those who dispute the establishment's version 
of the Kennedy lone assassin theory. The difference is that there is less 
political, economic, social, or religious repercussion when challenging 
the Warren Commission findings. To simply ask pertinent questions 
about any aspect of the Holocaust story will bring down upon oneself 
the unbridled wrath of those who dominate the media and who sup- 
port Israel. I have already paid dearly for my apostasy, and this book 
will probably exact an even greater personal cost. In America, if a re- 
searcher dares to publish and then publicly discuss the issue, it can 



310 A Holocaust Inquiry 

result in the loss of his livelihood and even physical endangerment. In 
Canada and Europe it has meant revocation of university degrees and 
loss of employment, professional standing, pensions, businesses, and, 
in addition, imprisonment and physical attacks. 

As I write these words, news has come to me that the French na- 
tionalist leader lean-Marie Le Pen has been convicted by a French 
court and fined thousands of dollars for simply saying in a conversa- 
tion with a journalist that the gas chambers were a "footnote" of the 
Second World War. 579 Sir Winston Churchill, in his monumental six- 
volume The Second World War, 5S0 has no mention of gas chambers — 
not even a footnote. The same can be said for Eisenhower's Crusade in 
Europe. 5 * 1 Perhaps the Zionists can arrange for a posthumous trial for 
these two men who did not pay proper homage to the holy Holocaust. 

After Le Pen's comment, the European director of the Wiesenthal 
Center demanded the waiver of Le Pen's European Parliamentary 
immunity to make him liable for prosecution and ineligible to run for 
elective office. 582 

A society that does not allow free discussion, inquiry, and debate 
is not free. The greater the fear of government and media for an idea, 
the more intense the suppression. In the case of politically incorrect 
ideas about the Holocaust, this fear has reached hysterical propor- 
tions. 

A government or media establishment that fears certain ideas — 
suppresses them — not because the ideas are weak, but because they 
are powerful; not because those ideas are refutable, but because they 
are convincing. If it really believes the ideas to be weak, it has no ur- 
gency to suppress them. If we are to know the true story of the Holo- 
caust, there must be freedom of inquiry, freedom to question and 
freedom to doubt. 

If there is one thing I have learned in my political life, it is to ques- 
tion. We must have free speech and press, free inquiry and discus- 
sion. Before we can know what is true or untrue, fact or fiction, we 
must hear all sides. This holds for every issue before us, including the 
phenomenon that produces such incredible hysteria: the Holocaust, 
spelled with a capital "H." 

The Holocaust increasingly assumes the dimensions of a religion. 
It is a sort of death and redemption theme that takes on the image of 
an innocent people being slaughtered but rising in an aura of unas- 
sailable holiness. There are refurbished concentration camps as 
shrines and pilgrimages to them; holy writs full of saints and sinners, 
and temples such as the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. 



Jewish Supremacism 311 

Anyone who questions even the slightest detail of it is a heretic who 
deserves scorn and derision at the least, but more preferably the loss 
of his livelihood and his imprisonment. The writings of the blas- 
phemers must be confiscated and burned. If the heretical works 
somehow, even to a small degree, find their way to the public, the au- 
thors and their works must be systematically demeaned and ridi- 
culed. 

Not only is the holocaust taking on religious dimensions, it has 
become a huge world industry generating billions of dollars. The 
Holocaust story is the source of billions of dollars of reparations from 
Germany, billions more in American support and billions more in 
what can only be defined as a huge and powerful blackmail racket. 
Norman Finkelstein, whose parents were holocaust survivors, wrote a 
book exposing the whole process called, The Holocaust Industry. In a 
recent interview with the magazine Counterpunch he spoke out qite 
courageously even though he has faced vicious attacks from the ADL 
and other powerful Jewish organizations. 

A spokesman for the World Jewish Congress suggested that you 
should be grateful to organisations such as themselves, for the 
compensation that your parents received. Is there not some truth 
in that were it not for the awareness raising campaigns of these 
bodies, holocaust survivors would not have been compensated at 
all? 

These organisations frankly, bring to mind an insight of my late 
mother, that it is no accident that Jews invented the word "chutz- 
pah". They steal, and I do use the word with intent, 95% of the 
monies earmarked for victims of Nazi persecution, and then throw 
you a few crumbs while telling you to be grateful. It is very hard to 
sink much lower than to turn the colossal suffering of the Jewish 
people during World War Two into an extortion racket. I really think 
that not even Julius Streicher (leading anti Semitic publisher in 
1930's Germany) were he editing Der Sturmer today, could have 
conjured up the image of Jews huckstering their dead, but that's 
exactly what this gang of wretched crooks have done. They have 
disgraced the memory of the Jewish people's suffering on the one 
hand by turning it into an extortion racket. If there were any doubt 
left, I would point to the recent London Times article headlined 
'Swiss Holocaust cash revealed to be a myth', that is all the claims 
against the Swiss banks were a fantastic concoction of the Holo- 
caust hustlers. But then after turning Jewish suffering into an ex- 
tortion racket to then deny the actual victims these monies ex- 
torted. It is very difficult to imagine sinking any lower on a moral 
level than that. If they were all put behind bars, it wouldn't be yet, 
in my opinion, be a just punishment. 583 

Finklestein goes on to point out that if he were not Jewish his book 
would not have published at all. 



312 A Holocaust Inquiry 

Do you think The Holocaust Industry would have been published 
were you not the Jewish son of Holocaust survivors? 

(Laughs) No, I have no doubt about that. First of all, it just got 
barely published as the son of Holocaust survivors. If I weren't, 
there would be no chance at all. I would have been buried alive. 
Just the other day I was speaking to someone who I cannot name 
for this interview, who met with a high government official in Ger- 
many who we both know. My friend asked him about the questions 
raised in my book concerning the number of surviving slave la- 
bourers, and whether the German government knew that the num- 
bers had been grossly inflated to justify the extortion of huge 
amounts of money. His response was that 'of course we knew what 
he was saying was true', but a decision was made early on to go on 
with the blackmail because 'we were afraid of a huge anti Semitic 
reaction being unleashed in Germany', 

The Holocaust legend lives on, fueling intense ethnic solidarity 
among Jews and collective hatred toward Gentiles. Among Gentiles, 
the chronic replay of the Holocaust story destroys our most 
elementary psychological defenses against Jewish Supremacism. 

Actually, the greatest holocaust born of ethnocentrism was the 
mass murder of tens of millions of Christians by the Jewish-led Bol- 
sheviks in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. It seems sadly ironic 
so little is focused on that Holocaust of Holocausts. In our age, 
though, events and their significance are defined as supremacist Jews 
choose to define them. Holocaust terminology remains the exclusive 
preserve of the Jewish victims of the Second World War. The Jewish 
Holocaust is sacredly held apart from all other loss of life. There are 
Jews and then there is all the rest of humanity — the small "g" gen- 
tiles of the world. 

The Mother of All Holocausts 

It would be far more appropriate to describe the entire Second 
World War as a Holocaust, rather than simply the sufferings of the 
Jews. The bombing and burning of Europe's most beautiful cities and 
artworks, the death of tens of millions of the bravest and fittest young 
men, and the ruthless uprooting, starvation, rape and murder of tens 
of millions of innocent civilians from all nations and ethnic groups of 
Europe — that was the greatest Holocaust the world has ever known. 
The civilized world will feel the cultural and genetic effects of the 
Second World War for many generations to come. 

The British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, put it succinctly 
when he said the German-Polish border dispute wasn't worth the 
blood of one English grenadier. All of those born during and since the 
conflict grew up with the catechism of parents and press about the 



Jewish Supremacism 313 

"good war." If the death of 50 million human beings is a good war, 
then what exactly is a bad one? Naturally, the same forces that have 
publicized the Holocaust have emphasized the necessity of the war, 
and the Nuremberg Tribunals decreed the ultimate war guilt of the 
Germans. Seeking to end the 20-year Polish subjugation of eastern 
German territory, Germany had invaded Poland. At that point, it was 
a border war, with minimal loss of life and little bombing of cities or 
civilians. The war widened as France and England declared war on 
Germany, and soon it was a World War, ultimately the greatest hu- 
man carnage in history (see Willis Carto's Barnes Review). 584 

In many nations there were those who wanted war. There were 
Germans looking to the east for Lebensraum; Poles, who would rather 
have war than give back their Versailles-expropriated German terri- 
tory. Among the French, there were those jealous of their German ri- 
vals; and among the British, those who were fearful of the economic, 
political, and military power of a united Europe. Those forces and 
others helped create the Holocaust of the Second World War. 

And, let us not forget one 
other group that bears a heavy Jewish 'Declaration Of War 1 

responsibility for this Against Germany 

Holocaust of war: the world- -rr^=- -*, , T &_ aj m*^ 



^H^ 9 a %i?5Pf^§j^ 




wide forces of organized 

Jewry. In 1933, the World JUDKa declare - wa r on germ.' 

Jewish Congress proclaimed kTM t^lsa ISV ***** 2!_ Aw4fr 



war on Germany. 585 For six 
years, in every nation of the jews of ale, tii 
West, they exacerbated every 'S^n^L ■' 
national grievance and ^mmm^™*;.^-^) ■£&• y^L-^.^ri=T=:^^ 
aranoia The ran a '—"■^=^.^ == ^ ^^ -^^rl^-jKil 

inflammatory articles about Germany in the Jewish owned or 
controlled press. They used their great financial power to advantage. 
They used their powerful political and media influence to agitate for 
war and feed the fires of hate, a fire still stoked by the media 55 years 
after the fact. 

We Americans, along with British, Germans, French, Poles, Rus- 
sians, Italians, and others slaughtered millions of European women 
and children, killed and maimed our young men, and burned our 
most sacred works of beauty in our European cradle of culture and 
civilization. When I was very young, I developed a feeling of guilt for 
slavery and Jim Crow. I shed that guilt as I came to realize that our 
race has given far more to the people of the Earth than it has taken. As 
I came to understand the realities of the Second World War, feelings 
of guilt came upon me again, but this time, not for what my race has 



314 A Holocaust Inquiry 

done to others, but for what we have done to ourselves. Ultimately, 
we have no one to blame for that carnage more than ourselves. 

The Second World War was the most destructive and devastating 
occurrence in the long history of European mankind. Communism 
raped half of Europe and was unleashed across the planet, killing and 
enslaving millions more before it burned itself out. With their Pyrrhic 
victory, Jewish Supremacists consolidated their power, with the result 
that the 21st century begins with Zionist hegemony in the highest 
echelons of media and political power. At the end of the Second 
World War, as Supremacist Jews invaded Palestine, their confederates 
in Europe and America planned a different form of invasion for 
European and American homelands: an immigration invasion. In the 
early years of the 21 st Century we can now easily envision the demo- 
graphic and genetic catastrophe that looms ahead. An ancient hatred 
is now being settled by the people who "never forget and never for- 
give." 

And today, although our Jewish antagonists appear on the 
threshold of complete victory as they busily lay the foundations for 
their New World Order, it is still not their power that threatens us. It 
is our own weakness. Our Achilles' heel has proved to be our naivete. 
If we learn the truth of the Holocaust, then such naivete will end, and 
we may yet foil the plans for the eradication of European mankind. 

We men and women of the West must not sacrifice our birthright 
upon the altar of the Holocaust. 



Chapter 13 

The Jewish Led Alien Invasion 

Give me your tired, your huddled masses, 
Yearning to breathe free. 
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. 
— Emma Lazarus 

The influx of Europeans into North America led the Indian 
populations to displacement and eventually to consignation on 
reservations. Similarly, relentless Jewish immigration into Palestine 
was against the interests of the Palestinian people, but it was 
necessary for the Jewish takeover of the region. It laid the foundation 
for the Zionist State. 

Any tribe, race or nation desiring to preserve its culture, group 
interests and sovereignty must preserve its predominant status in the 
geographic region in which it dwells. Most nations have had a 
fundamental understanding of that fact from the time of the earliest 
civilizations, and every modern nation has sought strict control of its 
borders and immigration. 

Most Americans view the Indian historical record of resistance to 
European colonization as morally justifiable, but in the skewed ethics 
of today, some find European-American attempts to preserve our 
unique genes and culture from non-European immigration as morally 
reprehensible. Nevertheless, despite pervasive propaganda 
promoting multiculturalism and the media-touted joys of diversity, 
opinion surveys in America show overwhelming opposition to 
unrestricted immigration. Similar public sentiment holds true in every 
European nation. 

It was not until the 1965 Immigration Act that the U.S. Congress 
ignored the majority's wishes and began a policy that discriminated 
against potential European immigrants, and encouraged massive non- 
European immigration. From that time forward, the federal 
government also showed less willingness to enforce our immigration 
laws and police our borders. These policies resulted in a flood of non- 
White immigrants, legal and illegal. Immigration and higher non- 
White birthrates have transformed the American population from 
almost 90 percent European in the early 1960s to less than 70 percent 
at the end of the century. The U.S. Census Bureau has predicted that 
by the middle of the 21st century, well within the lifetime of many 
reading these words, European Americans will be a minority in the 
United States. We are already a minority in most of America's major 
cities and will soon be outnumbered in California and Texas. Policies 
similar to those enacted in the U.S. have introduced large numbers of 



Jewish Supremacism 317 

non-Europeans into Canada; Negroes into Britain; North Africans and 
Asians into France; Turks into Germany; and a potpourri of alien 
races into Scandinavia, Spain, and Italy. 

As I grew racially aware, it was certainly obvious to me that the 
new immigration policies of the United States and Europe would 
greatly damage Western societies. Only a short time after the change 
in immigration policy, crime problems escalated in all the affected 
nations. The quality of education suffered and social welfare 
problems increased. As this planned racial transformation accelerates, 
these ills will reach catastrophic proportions. 

What groups had anything to gain from this demographic 
Armageddon? The individual foreigners who could benefit from the 
economic opportunities afforded by the Western societies had little 
political or economic clout while outside the Western nations. As I 
looked into the American fight over immigration laws during the last 
100 years, the driving force behind opening America's borders 
became evident: It was organized Jewry, personified by the poet 
Emma Lazarus whose lines I quoted to begin the chapter. 

By the time I was a junior in high school, I had become convinced 
that massive non-European immigration poised the greatest short- 
and long-term threat to the America that I loved. I saw that the 
Immigration Act of 1965, unless repealed, would eventually sound 
the death knell for my country. Much of the material I read pointed to 
a long history of organized Jewish efforts to radically change 
America's immigration laws. I contacted Drew Smith, an elderly New 
Orleans attorney who had authored The Legacy of the Melting Pot, and 
who had already taught me a lot about the immigration issue. 586 

Smith and I met one rainy day after school at the Citizens Council 
offices. He explained the history of American immigration law. After 
quoting the Lazarus lines from the base of the Statue of Liberty, he 
asked me, "Whose interest could have been served in having America 
flooded with 'wretched refuse'?" He quickly answered his own 
question. "It was in the perceived interest of a cohesive people who 
use racial solidarity like a weapon, a weapon they want only for 
themselves. The efforts to change the American immigration law and 
ultimately displace the European majority has been led almost 
exclusively by Jews." 

Smith explained that Emma Lazarus — like many other 
immigration activists — was a Jewish partisan who supported the 
creation of an exclusively Jewish Zionist state in Palestine, but who 
supported "diversity" for America. He pointed out to me how Jews 
such as Lazarus have even changed the modern meaning of the Statue 
of Liberty. The beautiful jade-colored colossus had no original 
connection with immigration and predated the Ellis Island 



318 Jewish Led Invasion 

immigration center. It was a gift from France to commemorate the 
American Revolution, not to honor the arrival of "wretched refuse" 
on America's shores. It is instructive to note that this beautiful statue 
of European Womanhood faces not to Africa, Asia or South America, 
but the land where she was born, France and Europe itself. 

Emma Lazarus had been best known for her fulminations against 
Russia's pogroms following the assassination of Czar Alexander II in 
1881. The irony is rich: A Jewish supremacist dedicated to the creation 
of an elite Jewish State in Palestine was anxious to turn America into a 
refuge for the castoffs of the world. Drew Smith owned many books 
on the immigration issue, including some by Jews, in which he had 
underlined important passages. I borrowed them and passionately 
delved into them. 

Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress led 
(and still lead) the effort to liberalize American immigration and 
defeat restrictionist legislation. In 1921, 1924, and 1952, Congress 
passed legislation that simply attempted to maintain the racial status 
quo in America. Interestingly enough, even though Anglo Americans 
were in a vast majority of the American population as well as in 
Congress, they did not attempt to increase their own percentage of the 
American population, but simply sought to fairly maintain each 
group's status quo. In the early legislative battles, Jews were the 
leading advocates of open immigration and vehemently opposed 
legislation that would maintain America as an ethnically European, 
Christian nation. In the House of Representatives, Adolph Sabath, 
Samuel Dickstein, and Emanuel Celler led the fight for unrestricted 
immigration, while in the Senate, Herbert Lehman and in later years 
Jacob Javits coordinated the effort. 

In the early struggles, Representative Leavitt clearly outlined the 
Jewish involvement in remarks before Congress. 

The instinct for national and race preservation is not one to be 
condemned. . . . No one should be better able to understand the 
desire of Americans to keep America American than the gentleman 
from Illinois [Mr. Sabath], who is leading the attack on this meas- 
ure, or the gentlemen from New York, Mr. Dickstein, Mr. Jacob- 
stein, Mr. Celler, and Mr. Perlman. 

They are of the one great historic people who have maintained 
the identity of their race throughout the centuries because they 
believe sincerely that they are a chosen people, with certain ideals 
to maintain, and knowing that the loss of racial identity means a 
change of ideals. That fact should make it easy for them and the 
majority of the most active opponents of this measure in the 
spoken debate to recognize and sympathize with our viewpoint, 
which is not so extreme as that of their own race, but only 



Jewish Supremacism 319 

demands that the admixture of other peoples shall be only of such 
kind and proportions and in such quantities as will not alter racial 
characteristics more rapidly than there can be assimilation as to 
ideas of government as well as of blood. (Congressional Record, April 
12, 1924.) 587 

Sociologist Edward A. Ross, in his influential 1914 book The Old 
World and the New: The Significance of Past and Present Immigration to the 
American People, quotes the famous pro-immigration leader Israel 
Zangwill as suggesting that America is an ideal place to achieve 
Jewish interests. Ross then bluntly writes about the Jewish influence. 

Jews therefore have a powerful interest in immigration policy: 
Hence the endeavor of the Jews to control the immigration policy 
of the United States. Although theirs is but a seventh of our net 
immigration, they led the fight on the Immigration Commission's 
bill. . . . The systematic campaign in newspapers and magazines to 
break down all arguments for restriction and to calm nativist fears 
is waged by and for one race. Hebrew money is behind the National 
Liberal Immigration League and its numerous publications. 588 

In 1924 Congressman Knud Wefald pointed out the Communist 
ties of many of the Jewish immigrants and stated that many Jews 
"have no sympathy with our old-time American ideals." 

The leadership of our intellectual life in many of its phases has 
come into the hands of these clever newcomers who have no sym- 
pathy with our old-time American ideals . . . who detect our weak- 
nesses and pander to them and get wealthy through the disservices 
they render us. 

Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by men 
who came here on the crest of the south and east European immi- 
gration. They produce our horrible film stories [and] they write 
many of the books we read, and edit our magazines and newspa- 
pers. {Congressional Record, April 12, 1924. 589 

The last important congressional legislation passed to protect the 
status quo of America was the Walter-McCarran act of 1952. 
Congressional opposition was led by the Jewish troika of Celler, 
Javits, and Lehman. Every major Jewish organization (as well as the 
Communist Party USA) also lined up to oppose it, including the 
American Jewish Congress, American Jewish Committee, the ADL, 
National Council of Jewish Women, and dozens of others. During 
congressional debate, Francis Walter noted that the only civic 
organization that opposed the entire bill was the American Jewish 
Congress. Representative Celler noted that Walter "should not have 
overemphasized as he did the people of one particular faith who are 
opposing the bills." {Congressional Record, April 23, 1952.) 590 

When Jewish Judge Simon Rif kind testified against the bill in joint 
hearings, he emphasized that in supporting breaking down U.S. 



320 Jewish Led Invasion 

immigration law, he represented "the entire body of religious and lay 

opinion within the Jewish group, religiously speaking, from the 

extreme right and extreme left." 591 

It thrilled me to read the courageous remarks of Mississippi 

Congressman John Rankin during the debate. Today such truthful 

comments by any elected official would bring a torrent of abuse that 

few could withstand. 

They whine about discrimination. Do you know who is being 
discriminated against? The white Christian people of America, the 
ones who created this nation. ... I am talking about the white 
Christian people of the North as well as the South. . . . 

Communism is racial. A racial minority seized control in Russia 
and in all her satellite countries, such as Poland, Czechoslovakia, 
and many other countries I could name. 

They have been run out of practically every country in Europe in 
the years gone by, and if they keep stirring race trouble in this 
country and trying to force their Communistic program on the 
Christian people of America, there is no telling what will happen to 
them here. {Congressional Record, April 23, 1952.) 592 

Finally, in 1965, the goal first advanced by Jewish organizations in 
the 1880s came to fruition when Congress passed the Immigration 
Act. It has resulted in immigration becoming 90 percent non- 
European. America went from an immigration program meant to be 
proportionately representative to all groups in the United States to 
one that discriminated against Europeans. As with earlier legislation, 
Jewish representatives and senators as well as powerful Jewish 
lobbying organizations led the assault. It succeeded because during 
the 41 years since 1924, Jewish power had increased dramatically in 
virtually all spheres of American life. 

In 1951 Senator Jacob Javits authored an article called "Let's Open 
Our Gates." 593 that called for massive unrestricted immigration. Javits 
and Representative Celler figured prominently in the passage of the 
bill in 1965. Nine years before passage of the 1965 Immigration Act, 
the American Jewish Congress initially proposed the essential 
elements of the bill and praised President Eisenhower for his 
"unequivocal opposition to the national quota system." In a 1956 
editorial they praised him for "courageously taking a stand in 
advance of even many advocates of liberal immigration policy and 
embraced a position which had at first been urged by the American 
Jewish Congress and other Jewish agencies." 594 



Jewish Supremacism 321 
Jewish Motivation Behind Open Immigration 

It would have been stupid and counterproductive for the Jewish 
organizations that pushed for open borders to admit that they were 
motivated by interests that conflicted with those of non-Jewish 
Europeans. They promoted open immigration as "patriotic." From the 
early days of the century, they made public pronouncements that 
multiculturalism and diversity would be beneficial to the United 
States, cleverly masking their strategic motivations. 

After the passage of the open immigration statutes of 1965, Jewish 
authors such as Naomi W. Cohen felt much safer in revealing some of 
the real Jewish reasons for promoting such policies. She wrote that, 
beginning with the persecutions in Russia in the 1880s through the 
Nazi occupation of Europe and into the Cold War tribulations in 
Eastern Europe, open immigration in Western nations served Jewish 
interests because "survival often dictated that Jews seek refuge in 
other lands." 595 Cohen also wrote that a U.S. internationalist foreign 
policy serves Jewish interests because "an internationally minded 
America was likely to be more sensitive to the problems of foreign 
Jewries" 596 Perhaps even more important, Cohen intimated that Jews 
saw open immigration policies as breaking down the homogeneity 
and unity of America, creating a pluralistic society in which Jews 
could thrive. 

In his monumental book A History of Jews in America, Howard 

Sachar notes that pluralism supports "legitimizing the preservation of 

a minority culture in the midst of a majority's host society." 597 So, in 

effect, by breaking down the integrity and cohesion of America, Jews 

could increase their integrity and cohesion. Sachar goes on to 

explicitly show how pluralism intensifies Jewish solidarity: 

But Kallen's influence extended really to all educated Jews: Le- 
gitimizing the preservation of a minority culture in the midst of a 
majority's host society, pluralism functioned as intellectual an- 
chorage for an educated Jewish second generation, sustained its 
cohesiveness and its most tenacious communal endeavors through 
the rigors of the Depression and revived Anti-Semitism, through 
the shock of Nazism and the Holocaust, until the emergence of Zi- 
onism in the post-World War II years swept through American 
Jewry with a climactic redemptionist fervor of its own. 598 

Social psychologist Kevin MacDonald pointed out in A People That 
Shall Dwell Alone that major anti-Semitic movements are usually 
found in ethnically homogeneous nations and that "ethnic and 
religious pluralism serves external Jewish interests because Jews 
become just one of many ethnic groups. . .and it becomes difficult or 
impossible to develop unified, cohesive groups of Gentiles united in 
their opposition of Judaism." 599 600 



322 Jewish Led Invasion 

In his 1985 book A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives 

Today, Charles Silberman writes that 

American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of 
their belief, one firmly rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in 
a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as 
well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, 
for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an over- 
whelming majority of American Jews to endorse "gay rights" and 
to take a liberal stance on most other so-called "social issues." 601 

lohn Higham, in his book Send These to Me: Immigrants in Urban 
America, states in clear terms that lewish-sponsored changes in 
immigration law were a defeat of the political and cultural 
representation of "the common people of the South and West." 602 

During the decades leading up to opening the borders in 1965, 

lewish groups had piously stated that there should be no 

discrimination against any group in immigration and that such could 

only be good for America. But, Richard Arens, staff director of the 

Senate subcommittee that produced the Walter-McCarran Act, 

pointed out that the same lewish forces which were the most avid 

promoters of open immigration, hypocritically opposed ethnic 

immigration they deemed unfavorable to their own interests. 

One of the curious things about those who most loudly claim that 
the 1952 act is "discriminatory" and that it does not make allow- 
ance for a sufficient number of alleged refugees, is that they op- 
pose admission of any of the approximately one million Arab refu- 
gees in camps where they are living in pitiful circumstances after 
having been driven out of Israel. 603 

Organized lewry not only wants to prevent Arab refugees from 
returning to their homes in Israel, they also oppose their coming to 
the United States. Do they see the displaced Palestinians as potential 
political opponents? Jewish groups clearly promote forms of multicul- 
turalism that destroy Gentile cohesion, but not those which could 
threaten their own group power. So clearly, their dedication to multi- 
culturalism is purely a strategic one; they want groups coming into 
the nation which can further pluralize American society and destroy 
its cohesion, but not those groups whom they see as political threat 

Jewish-dominated political and media institutions have long 
promoted the demographic invasion and dissolution of America. 
While the Jewish media demonize as "racists" those who oppose the 
flood of non-White immigration into America, Canada and all the 
European nations, Israel's immigration policy that excludes non-Jews 
is condoned. A million Palestinians fled their homes in the wake of 
the Israeli blitzkrieg takeover of Palestine. They cannot return to their 



Jewish Supremacism 323 

ancestral homeland, and many are forced to live in refugee camps 
that are little more than concentration camps of want and squalor. 

A. M. Rosenthal is the long-time editor of perhaps the most 
influential newspaper in America, the Jewish-owned New York Times. 
A hawkish supporter of Israel, he only complains about the Zionist 
state when it is not Zionist enough for his taste. Yet, in a 1992 editorial 
Rosenthal feels obligated to criticize another country which desires to 
preserve its racial integrity and cultural heritage: 

They would do better to set a quota on immigrants and nurture a 
more pluralist society by adopting a formula for citizenship based 
on residence than blood ties. 

Equally distressing is Bonn's failure to revise an outdated natu- 
ralization law rooted in ethnicity. Under the existing system, a 
Turkish guest worker who has lived in Germany for 30 years and 
speaks German fluently is denied the citizenship automatically 
granted a Russian-speaking immigrant who can prove German an- 
cestry. 604 

Rosenthal likens current German immigration policies to that of 
the Nazis. Yet, is Israeli immigration law so different? 

Not only Germany, but every White nation is a target of 

Rosenthal's open immigration advocacy. Only Israel's immigration 

policy — the most draconian of all — is immune from criticism. In 

America, Rosenthal identifies himself as the offspring of an illegal 

immigrant (his father) and even lauds the immigration of Haitians, 

many of whom are drug users and HIV-positive. 

Almost always now, when I read about Haitians who risk the seas 
to get to this country but wind up behind barbed wire, I think of an 
illegal immigrant I happen to know myself, and of his daughters 
and his son [himself]. . . . 

Even reluctantly recognizing some economic limitations, this 
country should have the moral elegance to accept neighbors who 
flee countries where their life is terror and hunger, and are run by 
murderous gangs. . . . 

If that were a qualification for entry into our Golden land, the Hai- 
tians should be welcomed with song, embrace and memories. 605 

As a chronic reader of The New York Times, I have yet to read a 
Rosenthal editorial calling for the acceptance into Israel of the million 
or more Palestinians who are forced by Israel to live in the dire 
poverty of the refugee camps. Nor has Rosenthal ever called upon 
Jews to welcome Palestinian refugees into Israel with "song and 
embrace." Rosenthal is not stupid, but he is profoundly hypocritical. 
He knows that making full citizens of all the Palestinians currently in 
Israel and all those in refugee camps outside its borders would 
quickly sweep away the Zionist political state in the same way that 
non-European immigration erodes the America of our forefathers. 



324 Jewish Led Invasion 

On the other side of the coin, Rosenthal knows that Israel could 
not have been created but for their emigration-invasion of Palestine. 
Looking at the historical record, should Palestinians have welcomed 
the lewish immigrants with song and embrace? Rosenthal has no 
more regard for traditional Americans anymore than he has for the 
original Palestinian inhabitants of what is now called Israel. He has 
only one overwhelming concern: Jewish Supreamcism. 

Rosenthal is proud of what he and many other Jews are: aliens as 
much as the wetbacks with whom he identifies. He lives here, 
partaking of all the advantages of American citizenship, but he will 
not — and cannot — become a real American who places the interests 
of America above those of the Zionist agenda. 

As the Jews become more brazen in their exercise of power, some 
now boast of their role in dispossessing the European-Gentile 
American. Earl Raab, executive director emeritus of the Perlmutter 
Institute of Jewish Advocacy, an associate of the ADL (Anti- 
Defamation League of B'nai B'rith) and writer for the San Francisco 
Jewish Bulletin, wrote: 

It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically 
changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces 
of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community 
has a leadership role in effecting those changes. 606 

Raab goes on to celebrate the coming minority status of Whites in 
America. Once that has happened, he looks forward to "constitutional 
constraints" (restriction of freedom of speech?): 

The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the 
American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And 
they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point 
where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. 

We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to 
ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet 
been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population 
tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional con- 
straints against bigotry more practical than ever. 607 

As Raab says, Zionist Jewish activists who have supported an 
exclusively Jewish-run national state have been nourishing massive 
nontraditional immigration into America, and they look forward to 
the time when the voting demographics of the United States reflect 
that transformation. 

I wonder if Zionist Israel Zangwill — who coined the term 
"melting pot" — envisioned his Jewish state as a melting pot of Jew 
and Arab; of Islam and Judaism. Given the ethnocentrism of Zionism, 



Jewish Supremacism 325 

I rather doubt it. One American cartoonist wrote that the problem 
with a melting pot is that "The bottom always gets burned, and the 
scum rises to the top." It is true that America has seen a melting of the 
different nationalities of Europe into a traditional American majority, 
but in spite of the pervasive race-mixing propaganda of the Jewish 
media, there has been no great melting of the White and Black, and 
only marginal melting of the Mestizo and Anglo elements. However, 
what these Zionists have not yet been able to accomplish through 
their advocacy of miscegenation, they are in the process of achieving 
through massive immigration and differential birthrates. 

Jews have also promoted, through "zero-population" advocates 
such as Paul Ehrlich, smaller families among the natural leaders of the 
American majority. Jewish promotion of the women's liberation 
movement and abortion on demand has lowered the birthrate of 
America's most productive and educated classes. Their blunt desire is 
the dissolution of the European race in the West by any means 
necessary. Continued massive non-European immigration satisfies 
these aims. 

In summary, massive non- White immigration has been one of the 
most effective weapons of organized Jewry in its cultural and ethnic 
war against the European American. We cannot win this life and 
death struggle until our people realize that we are in the midst of a 
war — and our side is suffering great losses. To lose this war would 
mean the destruction of our American culture, heritage, and 
freedoms. It would mean nothing less than the destruction of the very 
genes that have made possible all the social, cultural and spiritual 
creations that distinguish our civilization. Our voices are muted by 
mass media that are in the hands of our enemies. Too many of us are 
silently witnessing the genocide of our people. The time is late. We 
must speak out now and defend ourselves. We must fight for the 
continuation of the magnificent culture bequeathed to us by our 
forefathers. We must take whatever action necessary to insure the 
future of our children and our generations to come. As is true for all 
living things, we must fight for our right to live. 

America is in many ways already occupied similarly to the Israeli 
occupation of Palestine. Jewish Supremacists control the news, 
publishing and entertainment media, they control our elections and 
politicians, and now they are orchestrating a massive immigration 
into our land that will make us a politically and culturally impotent 
minority in the same way that the people of Palestine have suffered 
that fate. They seek to make our country into a tower of Babel in 
which they will occupy the top floors. 

Not only are Americans on the road to oblivion from immigration, 
but so are our brethren across Europe. Indeed, many nations are 



326 Jewish Led Invasion 

under the Jewish Supremacist drive toward globalization, and the 
destruction of any sort of ethnic or national pride and cohesiveness 
that could pose a threat to their hegemony. They seek to remake the 
world into an unremarkable mass of atomistic, deracinated 
individuals incapable of collective resistance. 

If we remain silent in this critical time in our people's history, our 
people will be extinguished and silent forever. 

This maxim is not only true for Europeans and Americans, but for 
all the peoples of the Earth. 



Chapter 14 

Jewish Evolutionary Strategy and 
Claims of Jewish Superiority 

In the early 1970s, a period of rampant egalitarianism, I read the 
Geography of Intellect 608 by Jewish partisans Nathaniel Weyl and 
Stephan Possony, and also a popular book called The Jewish Mys- 
tique 609 by Ernest Van Den Haag. They claimed outright that Jews 
were genetically, culturally, and morally superior. They said brazenly 
what the mainstream Jewish histories had implied. In 1969 popular 
British scientist-turned-novelist C. P. Snow gave a speech to Hebrew 
Union College in which he claimed that because of "inbreeding" Jews 
were "superior to all other living peoples." 610 

Then as now, in explaining Jewish success, some Jewish authors 
suggest that the structure of Judaism had a positive genetic effect on 
intelligence. Assertions of Jewish genetic superiority enjoy a warm re- 
ception by the same media that caustically condemn as immoral and 
evil what they call "the theory of Caucasian genetic superiority." 

Weyl argued persuasively that Jewish traditions had a eugenic ef- 
fect, citing the fact that the most successful Jewish scholars and thus 
the most intelligent in the Jewish community, the rabbis, were sup- 
ported by their fellow Jews in having the largest families. He com- 
pared the high rabbinic birthrate to the celibacy of the Catholic clergy, 
which he felt had a dysgenic effect among Gentiles. 

I could certainly see how such reproductive patterns would be 
beneficial to Jewish intelligence, and I was certainly willing to ac- 
knowledge that Jews are intelligent. What struck me then was Weyl's 
thesis that Jewish social patterns and practices could affect their intel- 
ligence. I had long believed that both intelligence and behavioral ten- 
dencies have an important genetic component, but for the first time I 
began to think seriously about the underlying differences between 
Jews and Gentiles. Were they cultural-religious or genetic in origin? 
To get to the bottom of it, I looked at applications of evolutionary bi- 
ology to the development of the Jewish people. 

Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species 611 dealt with the effects of 
natural selection on the individual, but even more importantly, on the 
selection process involving species and subspecies (races). He studied 
the origin of groups of genetically related individuals and studied 
their fitness to survive in their respective environments. The subtitle 



328 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

of his masterpiece reads, Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the 
Struggle for Life . 

Few understood the mechanism of group selection in regard to 
human evolution. Perhaps the best early exposition of it was Sir Ar- 
thur Keith's dynamic 1948 book A New Theory of Human Evolution. 612 
Keith explained that just as individuals are subject to evolutionary 
pressures, so are competing groups. In the early 1960s, researcher W. 
D. Hamilton and others began the modern inquiries into the genetic 
basis of social behavior, now referred to as sociobiology. 613 

The principles of sociobiology, first propounded by G. C. Williams 
in the 1960s, became scientifically embedded in the principles of be- 
havioral genetics and in the landmark work of Dr. Edward Wilson in 
his seminal Sociobiology: A New Synthesis. 6U I read Wilson's book just 
a few months after it came out and found it magnificent. Although 
Wilson deftly sidestepped the application of his theories to the human 
races, he offered powerful evidence that behavior in the most elemen- 
tary creatures such as ants had a biological basis driven by the urge to 
preserve the genotype. Genetic kinship turned out to be a powerful 
factor in evolution and behavior. In such a context, group loyalty and 
altruism become understandable from an evolutionary perspective in 
that the individual may sacrifice his life and his individual reproduc- 
tion to ensure the survival of those who are genetically similar to him. 

Richard Alexander, J. Phillippe Rushton, D. S. Wilson, Kevin 
MacDonald, Edward Wilson, Edward Miller, and many others over 
the next two decades pushed the envelope further. They showed that 
human groups differing in their genetic makeup experience similar 
social pressures to those experienced by competing animal species or 
subspecies. The new scientific discipline called Behavioral Genetics 
and Evolutionary Psychology continues to break new ground, show- 
ing the intimate relationship between heredity and human behavior 
on both the individual and the group level. 

The insights of sociobiology and behavioral genetics greatly in- 
creased our understanding of the development of racial differences. It 
is easy to understand the evolutionary impact of the harsh northern 
climate on more than 5,000 generations of Europeans and the effects 
of the milder climate of Africa on the Black race. In addition, the so- 
cial taboos, customs and social organization of human beings since 
the beginnings of civilization can also have an obvious impact on re- 
productive patterns and genetic makeup. 

Since the relatively recent domestication of the dog, mankind has 
produced, through selective breeding, over a 130 breeds of dog that 



Jewish Supremacism 329 

differ as much as the St. Bernard, the hairless Chihuahua, the German 
Shepherd, and the Pug. All come from one original species, and all are 
genetically capable of interbreeding. Here is how Grolier's Encyclopedia 
characterizes the varieties of dog and how selective breeding has 
affected both appearance and temperament: 

Dogs vary more in outward appearance than in anatomical struc- 
ture. An adult dog may weigh 2 to 99 kg (4 to 220 lb.), depending 
on the breed, and range in height from 12.5 to 90 cm (5 to 35 in.) 
at the shoulder. Other differences in conformation include length 
of leg; length of muzzle; size and attitude of ears; length, shape, 
and carriage of tail; and length, density, color, and character of 
hair. Over time, the various breeds were also selectively bred to 
produce temperaments suited to the tasks they performed. 615 

In the same way that people could selectively breed genetically 
different breeds of dogs, certain social structures and policies can af- 
fect human evolution. Social structures, especially those that influ- 
enced marriage patterns, could have a dramatic impact on survival 
and reproduction rates. They could certainly affect human tempera- 
ment and behavior in the same way that dog breeders have created 
breeds as stoic as the St. Bernard or as hyperactive as the Pekinese. 
We all know people who are naturally as aggressive as a Pit Bull, or 
as friendly as a Labrador Retriever. 

Is the Jewish behavioral pattern a product of cultural institutions 
such as Judaism and its secular offspring, Zionism, or is there some- 
thing in their genotype that inclined them to the consistent behaviors 
that they have exhibited across greatly differing cultures over three 
millennia? I wondered how the structure and nature of Judaism 
across the centuries may have affected the genetic characteristics of 
the Jewish people. 

Just as two species of animals occupying a particular geographic 
area naturally develop a group evolutionary strategy to compete for 
resources, so human groups can do the same thing — even in the civi- 
lized societies. They can develop certain behavioral traits that give 
them competitive advantages and greater reproductive success. In 
human societies, when genetically distinct groups interact, they can 
assimilate and lose their genetic distinctions, or they can develop eth- 
nocentric ideologies and behavior that favor the distinct characteris- 
tics of their own gene pool. An ethnocentric group could even de- 
velop a religion that rationalizes its evolutionary response to other 
groups. 

I wondered if the Jews had become genetically distanced from the 
other peoples of Europe and, if so, how deep the divide was. Had 
their supremacist and ethnocentric tendencies become ingrained in 
their genetic code, or were they simply a result of the cultural attitude 



330 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

of their religion and the separate societies they created? Did genetic 
impulses create the ideology of Judaism that reinforced and 
intensified the Jewish genotype? Years later, in the 1990s, the same 
Jewish-dominated anthropology that rejected the importance of 
European racial consciousness and sense of identity has reasserted 
Jewishness and the "Jewish identity." In "Jews, Multiculturalism, and 
Boasian Anthropology," in The American Anthropologist, Jewish writer 
Gelya Frank celebrates American Boasian antiracist anthropology as 
"Jewish history." 616 She points out that the central Jewish role was 
intentionally whitewashed for fear that Gentiles would realize that 
Jews had a radical agenda. 

There has always been a lively, if sometimes hushed, in-house 
discourse about American anthropology's Jewish origins and their 
meaning. The preponderance of Jewish intellectuals in the early 
years of Boasian Anthropology and the Jewish identities of anthro- 
pologists in subsequent generations have been downplayed in 
standard histories of the discipline... 

This essay brings together strands of these various discourses on 
Jews in anthropology for a new generation of American anthro- 
pologists, especially ones concerned with turning multiculturalist 
theories into agendas for activism.... 

There has also been a whitewashing of Jewish ethnicity, reflect- 
ing fears of anti-Semitic reactions that could discredit the disci- 
pline of anthropology and individual anthropologists, either be- 
cause Jews were considered dangerous due to their presumed ra- 
cial differences or because they were associated with radical 
causes. -Gelya Frank 

Now, with the political and cultural dominance of racial pluralism 
over European solidarity, Frank discloses that Jewish anthropologists 
are reasserting their Jewish ethnicity and group identity. 

Any number of scholars are reasserting Jewishness in the acad- 
emy, simultaneously attempting to discover and define what Jew- 
ish identity can mean in that most universalist of institutions. 
Some relevant examples from the long and growing list of sources, 
in addition to several already cited, include: Behar 1996; Boyarian 
1992, 1996; Eilberg-Schwartz 1990, 1992, 1994; H. Goldberg 
1987, 1995; Kleebatt 1996; Nochilin and Garb 1995; Prell 1989, 
1990, 1996; Robin-Dorsky and Fisher Fishkin 1996; and Schneider 
1995. 

The reappearance of Jewish difference(s) raises the stakes for 
Jewish anthropologists engaged in multiculturalist discourses. 617 

The article floored me. The same Jewish-driven anthropology es- 
tablishment that tells Europeans that there is really no such thing as 
race and that racial identity is silly at best and a moral evil at worst, 



Jewish Supremacism 331 

quietly promotes Jewish "differences" and " genetic identity." Frank's 
article goes on with unrestrained praise of the Jewish pride in the 
writing of Barbara Meyerhoff in Number Our Days. 618 When I read 
this, it was for me to believe that it had appeared in the premier 
magazine of Anthropology, a magazine that has (and still does) inces- 
santly ridiculed the idea of race and ethnic pride for Europeans. 

When I first looked into the issue of Jewish genetic relatedness, I 
did not have the benefit of Frank's article. At that time, I thought that 
the best way to investigate the issue was to see how similar the geo- 
graphically separated Jewish populations are to each other and to the 
Gentile populations among whom they live. Do Jews differ from the 
other Europeans the same way that, say, an Englishman differs from a 
Frenchman or a German from a Russian? Or are they altogether dif- 
ferent from all European subraces? 

Substantial work had been done on the issue, much of it from Jew- 
ish researchers who were busily studying their own people's genetic 
makeup. Over the years, they enlightened me on this subject in much 
the same way that I had gained an interesting perspective on Jewish 
history from Jewish chroniclers. 

The first thing I found was information on the set of genetically 
borne diseases that occur almost exclusively in the Jewish community, 
such as Tay-Sachs disease. Their presence certainly indicated a genetic 
variance specific to the Jewish population and illustrated a genetic 
difference from the Gentiles. Soon I found scientific papers dealing 
precisely with the issues I sought. 619 620 

Genetic researchers Sachs and Bat-Miriam discovered amazing 
similarity between the Jewish populations of nine countries of North 
Africa, the Middle East, and Central Europe. Conversely, they found 
sharp differences between Jews and non-Jews from those same coun- 
tries. 621 

In studying blood group data, Mourant, Kopec, and Doma- 
niewska-Sobczak wrote in a book called The Genetics of the Jews that 

it may be said that, in general, blood group data... support the 
relative homogeneity of the main historical Jewish communities. 622 

Now, here we have mainstream Jewish anthropologists and ge- 
neticists — the same groups who chronically preach to us that there 
are no great differences between Blacks and Whites — boldly assert 
that the Jewish people are genetically distinctive and relatively ho- 
mogenous! They argue that some differences exist between the Ash- 
kenazim and the Sephardim (the main ethnic division among Jews), 
but that essentially Jews are a single people with a limited genetic re- 
semblance to the European populations among whom they dwell. 623 



332 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

• In blood group data, two major studies, one in 1977 by Bonne- 
Tamir, Ashbel, and Kenett and one by Karlin, Kenett, and Bonne- 
Tamir in 1979, found when using fourteen polymorphic loci, no 
significant difference in Jewish populations from Iraq, Libya, Ger- 
many, or Poland. They estimated that the genetic distance between 
Gentiles and Jews living in the same area is three to five times 
greater than for Jews living in the different nations studied. In the 
1977 study, the researchers state "not much admixture has taken 
place between Ashkenazi Jews and their Gentile neighbors during 
the last 700 years or so." 624 625 

• Mille and Kobyliansky discovered in studies of derma- 
tologlyphic data that Ashkenazim (Eastern European Jews) are 
much more similar to Shephardim (Middle-Eastern and European 
Jews) than they are to the non- Jewish Eastern Europeans. 626 

• Kobyliansky and Livshits in using cluster analysis on 25 mor- 
phological characteristics, estimated that Jews in Russia were six 
times more distant from Russians than Russians were from Ger- 
mans. They also found the Jews to be completely separate from 
the twenty-four other ethnic groups studied in Russia, Germany, 
and Poland. 627 

• Another study compared modern Jews and those of 3,000-year- 
old Jewish skeletons discovered in the Middle East. Sofaer, Smith, 
and Kaye studied dental morphology from Morocco, Kurdish Iraq, 
and Eastern European countries. They found more likeness be- 
tween the widely scattered Jewish populations than for the Gentile 
groups living near them. The ancient Jewish skeletal group turned 
out to be far more similar to the three Jewish populations than for 
every non-Jewish group studied except for one, an Arab Druse 
group from the 11th century. 628 

One researcher summed up the overall genetic differences by say- 
ing that there was probably at least three times more genetic differ- 
ence between an average Jew in France and his Gentile Frenchman 
neighbor than between an average French Jew and a Jew living in 
Russia or the Middle East. 

The Jewish studies amazed me. I would not have guessed that 
Jews were that genetically different from all Europeans. I knew a few 
Jews who were indistinguishable from the potpourri of other Euro- 
pean-Americans. From their appearance, it seemed impossible that 
there was three times more genetic difference from us than from Jews 
in remote regions of the world. But, the research proved that a wide 
genetic difference existed between Jew and European. I wondered 
why they did not seem that dramatically different in their appearance. 

Fritz Lenz suggested back in the 1930s that Jewish resemblance to 
the European populations did not mean that their genes were 
similar. 629 He suggested that their similar external resemblance could 
have emerged from the natural selection of genes within the Jewish 



Jewish Supremacism 333 

gene pool. These genes could simply be a small cluster of genes that 
lay dormant in the Jewish pool or that were introduced by limited 
genetic mixture with Gentiles, and which then were selectively 
favored by the social environment. Genes that caused a greater 
corporeal resemblance to that of the Gentile host could have favorable 
results in acceptance, accumulation of wealth, and social 
advancement and thus on reproductive success. 

By a somewhat similar process, distinct species of butterflies not 
closely related, come to resemble one another without narrowing 
their genetic distance. A very small set of genes influencing 
appearance within the Jewish population could thus be favored, 
causing a greater similarity of appearance to the Gentile population 
while not narrowing their overall genetic alienation from their host 
population. Over many generations the external resemblance to 
Gentiles could increase while the parts of the brain that affect 
behavioral tendencies and abilities could be unaffected. 

According to evolutionary genetics, it is possible that Jews have 
come to more resemble their hosts in their external appearance while 
at the same time becoming even more distant in their mental and be- 
havioral characteristics. Whatever the questions of physical appear- 
ance, there seemed little doubt that Jews are indeed very different 
from Europeans and that they had maintained that genetic difference 
for a very long time. 

I also ran across a number of popular sources arguing that high 
Jewish-Gentile intermarriage rates would end their genetic distinct- 
iveness from European Gentiles. As in so many other matters dealing 
with the Jews, there is a wealth of information on the issue, an under- 
lying reality that is very different from popular perceptions. 

Will Intermarriage End Jewish Supremacism? 

It is often said that the high rates of intermarriage between Jews 
and Gentiles, especially in the United States, will diminish ethnocen- 
trism and cause assimilation of the Jewish population into the Gentile 
gene pool. That contention is made in the highly publicized and pro- 
moted book The Myth of the Jewish Race by Ralph and Jennifer Patai. 
They suggest that Jewish intermarriage has steadily increased since 
the Enlightenment. 630 

It is true that many Jewish groups and leaders have raised a great 
commotion about the dangers of intermarriage. Major Jewish publica- 
tions often have articles and even ads decrying intermarriage and im- 
ploring Jews to marry only other Jews. Steve M. Cohen writes the fol- 
lowing in The Jewish Tamily: Myths and Reality: 



334 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

Vigorous effort by organized Jewry to try to halt or reverse recent 
demographic changes ... to get large numbers of Jews to change 
their family-related decisions — that is, to marry young, marry 
each other, stay married, and have many children. 631 

Pinches Stolper writes of the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congrega- 
tions of America promoting only strong pure Jewish marriages. In de- 
scribing the threat of a beautiful Gentile girl living just a few houses 
away, he asserts: 

Intermarriage is a tragedy the Jewish people cannot tolerate. The 
person who marries out of the faith has turned his or her back on 
the Jewish people. Our tradition regards such a person as spiritu- 
ally dead, and the family sits shiva [observes a period of mourning] 
for him or her. 

Such marriages rarely work, even when accompanied by a so- 
called conversion to Judaism, and certainly can never work when 
the Jewish partner is seriously concerned with his or her Jewish- 
ness. For the families involved, the result is heartbreak and trag- 
edy, and for the children, a life of frustration, conflict, and strain. 

632 

David Landau shows that Jewish fundamentalism is rapidly in- 
creasing in the Diaspora. He quotes one of the opponents of a mild 
change in Reform law allowing tracing of genealogy through the fa- 
ther rather than the mother as "one of the most evil crimes, almost 
akin to Hitler. It destroyed the integrity of the Jewish People." 633 

Rising fundamentalism has also meant a rise in birthrates among 
the most committed Jews. In an essay in the book The Jewish Family: 
Myths And Reality, Cohen notes that through high birthrates and by 
"using insulating mechanisms, the Hasidim have achieved a high de- 
gree of success in offsetting the assimilative tendencies of the larger 
society." 634 

Therefore, it can be seen that organized Jewry has made a con- 
certed effort to encourage endogamy among Jews. Orthodox groups 
are certainly those most extremely opposed to intermarriage, but even 
the newspapers and magazines published by Reform groups strongly 
discourage it. The Jewish researcher Ellman comments in the journal 
Jewish Social Studies that the only ethnic or religious community in the 
United States that continues to attempt to limit and discourage con- 
versions and intermarriage is the organized Jewish community. But 
Ellman — along with a number of other authors who are strongly op- 
posed to intermarriage — also believe that the seemingly high rates of 
intermarriage are no real threat to the Jewish heritage. He suggests 



Jewish Supremacism 335 

that it strengthens the traditional Jewish culture and genotype by 
eliminating those Jews who have assimilationist tendencies. 635 

Ellman points out that intermarriage has little effect on the core of 
Judaism. He points out that intermarriage is far more frequent for 
second and subsequent marriages in which the couples are unlikely to 
have children. He also cites the much higher rates of divorce in inter- 
marriage. More than 90 percent of intermarriages results in noncon- 
version and thus the intermarried do not become part of the Jewish 
community. Only a small percentage of children of intermarriage are 
raised as Jews, and more than 90 percent of them do not marry Jews. 
Ellman also reports that Jews of higher socioeconomic status are more 
likely to marry other Jews, thus the community will continue to be 
dominated by a pure Jewish elite core while lower-class Jews, who do 
not represent the desired traits of ethnic solidarity, are much more 
likely to marry outside and leave the community. 

Barry Kosmin and other Jewish researchers, in Highlights of the CJF 
1990 National Jewish Population Survey, found that 91 percent of inter- 
marriages were made up of nonconversionary couples, that only 28 
percent of the children of such couples were raised as Jews, and that 
even this small minority's descendants would not be likely to marry 
Jews. 636 

Not only are intermarried Jews far more prone to leave the Jewish 
circle, evidence suggests that they often encounter hostility in Jewish 
society. Jewish authors such as Michael Meyer 637 and C. Waxman 638 
cite "tacit rejection" of the mixed couples. All these factors indicate 
that mixed marriages have little effect on the Jewish gene pool other 
than affecting the overall number of Jews. 

Higher rates of intermarriage will probably have the long-term ef- 
fect of strengthening traditional Jewish genetic characteristics. Jewish 
elements prone to assimilation are being removed while at the same 
time there is resurgence in Jewish orthodoxy and high birthrate 
among the most committed of the Jewish elements such as the Hasi- 
dim. Additionally, religious Jews in Israel are almost all Orthodox, 
and there is almost no intermarriage in the world nexus of Jewry — 
the nation of Israel. 

Perhaps the best way to describe the Jewish community is how the 
distinguished Jewish writer Daniel Elazar does in Community and Pol- 
ity: Organizational Dynamics in American Jewry. 639 He proposes a 
model of concentric circles. The inner circle is a hard core of about 5 to 
8 percent who lead what he calls "fully Jewish lives." Next are 10 to 
12 percent of Jews whom he calls "participants." They are often em- 
ployed in "Jewish civil service," working tirelessly for Jewish causes. 
Third, he identifies 25 to 30 percent of Jews whom he calls "contribu- 
tors and consumers." These make regular contributions to Jewish 



336 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

causes and make use of the Jewish community for things such as 
weddings, bar mitzvahs, and funerals. Elazar calls his last group the 
"peripherals and repudiators." They make no contributions to Jewish 
causes, but sometimes the inner circles pull them in to participation or 
they are peeled off, leaving the Jewish core at the center and the 
whole of Jewry more committed than ever. 640 

Because of copious publicity of high rates of Jewish intermarriage, 
some Gentiles may come to believe that Jews are becoming less eth- 
nocentric. But in reality the opposite is true. Those Jews left at the core 
are even less disposed to assimilate. At the same time, the out- 
marrying Jews who are amenable to Gentile values also serve an im- 
portant role in causing Gentiles to believe the Jewish group is more 
similar to them than it actually is. 

More importantly, some Jewish researchers see a degree of inter- 
marriage as having a functional value in Gentile environments. Mark 
Zborowski and Elizabeth Herzog say that it serves as a bridge to the 
Gentile community, but one that does not threaten the Jewish core. 

The peripheral area which serves as a bridge to the surrounding 
cultures fills several functions. It is an avenue to invasion, a buffer 
and a source of renewed vigor. Each impact that chips at the outer 
edge may serve simultaneously to strengthen the core. 641 

Lieberman and Weinfeld, in their article "Demographic Trends 
and Jewish Survival," view relatively high levels of intermarriage as a 
successful strategy in securing greater support from the Gentile com- 
munity for their political and social goals such as political support for 
Israel. 

The successful exercise of influence is best achieved in a com- 
munity with a large subset of members interacting with politicians 
and opinion leaders. Through intermarried Jews themselves, and 
certainly through their social networks involving Jewish family and 
friends who may be closer to the core of the community, Jewish 
concerns, interests, and sensibilities can be articulated before a 
wider, more influential audience. In a recent interview, Presidential 
aide Robert Lipshutz traced the origin of Jimmy Carter's concern 
for Israel to his close friendship with a first cousin, an Orthodox 
Jew (Carter's aunt married a Jewish man, and their two children 
were raised as Jews). Intermarrying Jews, while perhaps diluting 
the community in one sense, perform compensating strategic func- 
tions in another. 642 

Obviously, if intermarried Jews serve as a "bridge to the Gentile 
community," those who are outside of the Jewish community but are 
conscious of Jewish blood will often have warm feelings toward that 



Jewish Supremacism 337 

heritage and be well disposed to Jewish interests. They will also ex- 
press less solidarity with European issues and interests. 

Far from solving the Jewish-Gentile conflict, intermarriage only 
tends to reinforce the core Jewish genotype and nurture more extreme 
political and cultural solidarity. By sending their allies into our cul- 
ture and body politic, they are better able to secure Jewish interests. 
Among Gentiles intermarriage has the opposite effect. Because they 
are absorbed almost wholly into our society, our own solidarity is 
weakened while giving the appearance that the Jewish community is 
less impenetrable and ethnocentric. There is no real threat to the Jew- 
ish genotype; if anything it becomes more "Jewish" with each new 
generation. 

Once I had learned that Jews had a different genetic heritage than 
Europeans and that this difference was intensifying rather than di- 
minishing, I wanted to better understand the relationship between 
Jewish behavior and evolutionary strategy. 

An Historical Summary 

This book has so far shown that Jewish history, from the earliest 
periods recorded in the Bible up to the present tribal jingoism of Is- 
rael, has been a long story of supremacism and ethnocentrism. Jews 
learned to thrive as a distinct minority in overwhelmingly non-Jewish 
nations, and they learned to preserve both their cultural and genetic 
heritage in the face of often intense pressures toward assimilation 
from the host societies. To avoid the process of assimilation that swal- 
lowed every other people living as a minority in ancient nations, they 
nurtured an ideology of intense inward group loyalty and love, and 
outward ethnocentrism and hatred. 

Through their sojourn as a powerful minority in Egypt early in 
their history, they created a strategy of survival and racial purity. 
Later, in a region composed of many distinct peoples, they refined 
their ethnocentric policy and created the mythology that this policy 
was decreed by God. It is a strategy that finds its purest expression in 
Judaism, a this-worldly religion that promises dominion and power 
for the Jewish people rather than personal reward of an afterlife to de- 
serving individuals. 

To resist assimilation by the much larger societies in which they 
lived, Jews developed a theology that fostered the belief that they 
were a superior people "chosen by God" and made "separate from 
other peoples" with a divinely-ordained right to rule the world, 
accompanied by a sacred obligation to keep both their culture and 
genotype pure. Non-Jews were characterized as unclean inferiors and 
even as murderous foes determined to destroy them either by 



338 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

extermination (as commemorated annually in Passover and Purim) or 
by assimilation (as commemorated in Hanukkah). 

To survive as a minority in other nations — often as newcomers 
with little or no land and a religious-cultural disdain for physical la- 
bor, they needed to develop skills in other areas. They became profi- 
cient at usury, finance and administration, and legal as well as crimi- 
nal forms of enterprise. They discovered that with an altruistic team 
effort they could come to dominate important areas of Gentile social 
structure. It also became apparent that it was in their interest to main- 
tain an ethnocentric "team strategy" and at the same time to weaken 
Gentile solidarity. They also developed complex strategies to hide 
their hostility from their Gentile hosts. 

By the end of their Babylonian captivity, a period of hundreds of 
years during which they flourished as a powerful minority in an alien 
nation, their Judaic strategy had developed to a fine art, which they 
codified in the Tanakh (Old Testament) and ultimately the Talmud. 

Jews developed distinct cultural, dietary, and ritual traditions to 
keep them separate from Gentiles. Distinct from the other two major 
world religions, Judaism sought no converts and, although ostensibly 
permitting conversion, erected barriers making conversion difficult. 
The Jewish community did not fully accept converts or even their de- 
scendants. (Many rabbis in Jewish scripture say it takes ten genera- 
tions or more in the Jewish community to be fully accepted, and Jew- 
ish law refers to offspring of the converted as "bastards.") The vast 
majority of Jews who out-married did so with nonconverted Gentiles, 
and thus were expelled from the Jewish community. 

In other words he was deprived of civil and political rights to 
which every Israelite had claim, even those such as bastards who 
were of seriously blemished descent. 643 

As a cohesive minority in Gentile nations, Jews needed to hide 
their true ethnocentric beliefs. One aid to that process was their main- 
tenance of the Hebrew language among their scholars and their limit- 
ing of translations of their texts into Gentile languages. (As docu- 
mented in my Jewish Supremacism chapter, in modern times they 
even developed code words to disguise the more hateful anti-Gentile 
quotations in their Talmud and rituals — even to the extent of pub- 
lishing companion guides to the Talmud showing Jewish students the 
real anti-Gentile meaning of the disguised terms.) 644 Jews also learned 
to make themselves as politically cryptic as possible, often content to 
direct policies from behind the scenes so as not to awaken Gentile ire. 



Jewish Supremacism 339 

In these endeavors they often failed to restrain their rapaciousness, 
sometimes leading to violent anti-Semitic reactions. 

The Judaic community has historically emphasized education and 
highly praised Jewish scholarship of the Talmud, rewarding such 
scholarship with prestige and economic security. Such policies had a 
profound impact on their genotype. Just as favoring the best scholars 
favored those with high verbal IQs, so a number of other aspects of 
their social structure favored other traditional Jewish characteristics. 

J. Philippe Rushton, in his groundbreaking 1995 book Race, Evolu- 
tion, and Behavior, 645 has shown in studies of data dealing with twin 
research, that even tendencies toward group altruism and ethnocen- 
trism have strong genetic components. Jewish law has for hundreds 
of generations expelled Jews who have assimilated with Gentiles, thus 
removing them from their gene pool. Such policies would certainly 
strengthen any Jewish predisposition to ethnocentrism by removing 
those who had a more conciliatory attitude or even attraction to Gen- 
tile aesthetics or values. 

As the Jews became more proficient at usury, monopolistic busi- 
ness practices, tax collecting, criminal enterprises and acting as op- 
pressive intermediaries or the administrators of occupational gov- 
ernments, Gentile reactionary Anti-Semitism reinforced the siege 
mentality of Jews. Their antipathy toward their Gentile hosts encour- 
aged Jewish communities to support foreign military incursions and 
occupation of the nations in which they lived. Such actions in turn 
spawned greater animosity toward Jews, deepening the vicious cycle 
that continues to the present day. 

Jews reacted to the threat of assimilation by becoming more eth- 
nocentric. In sharp contrast, living in their mostly homogeneous 
communities in the heart of Europe, our ancestors never developed 
the siege mentality of the Jews. As trade, slavery and foreign immi- 
gration increased into Europe, most European communities were ill 
prepared for the introduction of powerful, ethnocentric minorities 
within their borders. Gentile societies of the ancient world often per- 
mitted varied religious expression, including tolerance of the Jewish 
faith, whereas the Jewish people demanded strict adherence to their 
faith within the confines of their society. 

The Jewish community has continued through the centuries as an 
authoritarian society that has continually and consciously promoted 
Jewish cohesion. Even through the Middle Ages, many Jewish 
communities exercised the death penalty for those Jews deemed to 
have betrayed Jewish interests. The execution of Jesus is a perfect 
example of the eradication of one who they felt was a threat to their 
homogeneity. Other historic tools used to maintain their ideological 
and genetic purity were excommunication and expulsion. While 



340 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

Europeans coming from a less competitive, homogenous society 
endorsed a live-and-let-live, more individualistic ethic, Jews 
maintained an intense collectivism. In modern times, Jews have 
strengthened their networks of communication and solidarity, while 
supporting the fragmentation of Gentile values and societies. 

To thrive as a small minority in an alien society also requires a tal- 
ent for deceit. In Christian Spain of the Middle Ages, Jews responded 
to demands for Christian conversion by becoming Marranos, sup- 
posed converts to Christianity who secretly practiced Judaism. They 
developed elaborate schemes of deception that have lasted for centu- 
ries. Many secret Jews successfully deceived their Gentile hosts as to 
their true anti-Christian beliefs. The most convincing Marranos 
thrived and prospered, while those less skilled in such duplicity often 
suffered or perished in the Inquisition and other persecutions. 

Jews developed patterns of dual morality: one morality for them- 
selves and their kin and another for their Gentile hosts. Conversely, 
Gentiles in the homogeneous societies of Europe tended to develop a 
single morality that favored assimilation when alien populations im- 
migrated to their lands or when they conquered other nations. An- 
cient Greece exemplified that tradition by carrying a doctrine of uni- 
versalism to their conquered lands. Some of the same values of 
within-race altruism that Jews revered for themselves also existed 
among European populations. However, because no non-European 
races were present, there was no need to develop intricate competitive 
or deceptive group strategies so characteristic of the Jews. In the day- 
to-day commerce and social interaction of Europe, truthfulness was 
honored as a standard for daily life. In times of war a more dual type 
of morality arose differentiating the interests of one's own people 
from that of the enemy. Yet, the normal course of affairs involved 
interchange and commerce primarily among one's own kind rather 
than among alien people. Thus our people never learned well the art 
of dual morality except in the exigencies of war. The migration and 
presence of alien Jewish elements contributed greatly to the modern 
development of European racial consciousness. 

The Present State of Jewry 

Churchill put it succinctly in 1920 when he described the Jewish 
takeover of Russia as having "gripped the Russian people by the hair 
of their heads and become the masters of this enormous empire." 646 In 
the last decade of the 20th century, they grip America in the same 
way. 



Jewish Supremacism 341 

They thoroughly dominate the news and entertainment media in 
almost every civilized nation; they control the international markets 
and stock exchanges; and no government can resist doing their bid- 
ding on any issue of importance. They can coalesce against any state 
that resists their power, such as they did in the economic extortion of 
a billion dollars from Switzerland or the way they orchestrated vio- 
lent carpet bombing of Iraq. The cohesion of the Jewish people is in- 
deed the context of the New World Order, and under its auspices they 
are attempting to extend their totalitarian denial of free speech from 
Europe and Canada to the nation that was once the most free in the 
world: the United States. 

Those who state the facts of Jewish power are called believers in 
"The Jewish Conspiracy," as if to conjure the ridiculous image of Jews 
in caftans and yarmulkes, peering from behind their earlocks at a 
candle-lit globe as they plot world domination. But it is not the fanci- 
ful Learned Elders of Zion we have to fear. It is those who wield Jew- 
ish power today, ever more brazenly. 

There is no conspiracy, at least not in the usual sense of the term. 
There is not even much secrecy about it. Jewish power is ubiquitous. 
Every politician is so aware of their power that he knows he cannot 
dare mention it! Jewish organizations, Jewish media, and Jewish po- 
litical agents ruthlessly advance their agenda remorselessly and with- 
out introspection. Just as they single-mindedly once orchestrated the 
Russian Revolution, they now coordinate their world power. No Jew- 
ish leader needs to direct his minions to seek political control over 
Gentile nations; they do it as naturally as the blue jay appropriates 
another bird's nest. Jewish media bosses and government bureaucrats 
don't have to be told to destroy Gentile pride, heritage, honor, loyalty, 
tradition, while simultaneously defending their own. There is no ne- 
cessity of a master plan to corrupt Gentile sexual mores, family struc- 
ture and religious beliefs. Freud and his intellectual descendants and 
media purveyors have certainly needed no plan, they just do what 
comes natural to them. No Learned Elder of Zion has to tell the Jew- 
ish bureaucrats to open America's and Europe's borders to the 
wretched refuse of the Third World; they know almost instinctively 
that in a nation of diversity, they can dominate. They also know that if 
they can destroy our genetic integrity and racial solidarity, there will 
be no one with the capacity to challenge their rule. 

No, it is not an intricate conspiracy. It is simply two nations — Jew 
and Gentile — in a state of ethnic war. Of course, most Jews and Gen- 
tiles do not even realize that we are at war. But while we Gentiles are 
unknowingly taught cultural and political suicide, Jews are taught al- 
legiance to their kind and hatred and mistrust of us. Only a small por- 



342 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

tion of Jews are on the cultural and political frontlines, but through 
many Jewish organizations, the homefront supports its storm troops. 

Of course, there have been Jews who have decried the hypocrisies 
of the supremacists. Some have even risked their own lives to warn 
Gentiles about the Zionist danger. Such men include Noam Chomsky, 
Benjamin Freedman and Alfred Lilienthal, three men of Jewish de- 
scent who realize that Zionist extremism can lead them to disaster. 
The peace movement in Israel harbors many such Jews. Some Jews, 
while still desiring preservation of their own genotype, seek a policy 
of peaceful separation and coexistence rather than Zionist absolutism. 
They realize that Jewish Supremacism may eventually destroy them. 

Although we understand the Jewish supremacist character of both 
Judaism and Zionism, we do acknowledge that there are individual 
Jews who embrace neither doctrine and who are not engaged in any 
kind of activity to corrupt or destroy Gentile institutions. A good ex- 
ample is Israel Shahak, a Jewish survivor of Nazi concentration camps 
and a professor in Israel who suffered greatly for daring to speak out 
about Zionism and Talmudic Judaism. He told the world about the 
Jewish misanthropy not only on behalf of justice for Gentiles but also 
to save his people from the consequences of their actions. 

Jews such as Israel Shahak offer hope of a mutually beneficial 
resolution of the Jewish-Gentile conflict. But Shahak and those like 
him remain a despised, tiny minority among their brethren. Fair reso- 
lution of the conflict can surely never come from Jewish hegemony. 
Only after we depose Jewish power in our own nations can we nego- 
tiate with them successfully. At this point in the conflict, although an 
ethnic peace conference would be the best solution for all parties, his- 
tory tells us that it is unlikely to occur. Tyrannies defer only to greater 
power. 

If they truly represented what is noble in man, perhaps it would 
be in the order of Nature to have our people replaced by the Jewish 
prototype. However, history reveals that in the sweep of history Jews 
have far more often been harbingers of darkness than of light. This is 
revealed in the tragic implementation of the doctrines of the three 
most influential Jews of the 19 th and 20th centuries: Marx, Freud and 
Boas. These three Jews came to debase mankind, not to ennoble it. 

Jews have enormous power — power born of talent coupled with 
unscrupulousness. They are strengthened by that which weakens us. 
Our power can reassert itself only from dedication to truth and jus- 
tice, from expressions of courage and nobility. When we violate our 
own morality, we grow weakened and exploitable, as we are now. 



Jewish Supremacism 343 

Somewhere in our genotype stirs our genes for survival, and those 
genes are now expressing themselves in a new awakening. I see this 
awakening wherever our people are. It is especially strong in our 
young. It is a vision that persecution and hatred cannot destroy. 
Somewhere, at this moment, another fair baby sleeps peacefully in his 
cradle, unaware of the great battle now raging for his right to grow up 
and live in his own land and by the values of his own people. 

Are Jews Superior? 

What about intelligence; how do Jews compare to Europeans as a 
whole and to select European groups? 

There has been a fair amount of study on the issue, primarily by 
Jewish researchers. They show a higher general IQ for Jews. But the 
difference comes almost exclusively from the verbal parts of IQ tests. 
Most studies show that Jews have a markedly higher verbal IQ, but 
Europeans often score higher on the more abstract and spatial com- 
ponents of IQ. Brown found Jewish children higher in verbal IQ and 
Scandinavian children higher in visio-spatial IQ. Levinson found the 
same thing among Jewish and Gentile children in a 1960 study, and 
Backman shows significantly higher verbal IQs and significantly 
lower IQs for Jews on visio-spatial reasoning. 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 

That Jews seem to be superior in the verbal mental skills seems 
perfectly consistent with their evolutionary strategy. Verbal skills are 
obviously important for communication, commerce, teamwork, ad- 
ministration, and mediation, all of which were vitally important in the 
societies in which they prospered. 

Werner Mosse, a celebrated historian of European Jewish history, 
has even suggested, citing studies from Germany early in the century, 
that Gentile manufacturers tend to be artisans whereas Jewish manu- 
facturers tend to be from trading or banking families. He argues that 
the character of Jewish involvement in manufacturing in Germany of 
the 19th century was: 

less in outright innovation or invention than in a special aptitude 
for economic "mediation" in the forms of the export of German 
goods, of "secondary innovation," technology transfer through the 
introduction into Germany of processes and methods observed 
abroad, and new techniques for the stimulation of demand. 654 

Richard suggests that visio-spatial abilities and verbal abilities are 
negatively correlated and that more of the cerebral cortex is devoted 
to either one set of abilities or the other. Another researcher, Richard 
Swartzbaugh, in his book The Mediator, 655 suggests that Jews are 
natural mediators in a multiethnic, multireligious, multinational 
environment, that the natural clashes between the antagonistic groups 



344 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

produces a tremendous demand for mediation. Such mediation finds 
expression in law, negotiation, arbitration, stock exchange, and 
government administration — all of which are responsive to Jewish 
verbal skills and intelligence. 656 657 658 

Jews have received a disproportionately large percentage of 
awards for scientific and cultural enterprise. From Academy Awards 
to Pulitzers to Nobel Prizes, the significant Jewish presence is striking. 
Disproportionate Jewish success in winning scientific and cultural 
awards is a reflection of both their abilities and their team strategy. 
Both the Academy Awards and the Pulitzer Prizes have a large con- 
tingent of Jewish voters who have from an early age been taught to 
favor their own. As mentioned in my chapter on ZOG, Jews are espe- 
cially prone to join the governing bodies of any social organization in 
which they participate, and thus would tend to increase their ability 
to recognize and reward their own in their respective professions. 
Additionally, the Jewish-dominated news and entertainment media 
consistently elevate their own for praise and recognition. 

Barbara Streisand may not have been the best pop singer in the 
country, but she certainly remains so in the Jewish press. Schindler's 
List may not have been the best movie made in 1993, but it meshed 
perfectly with Jewish social and political objectives. The appalling 
choice of Jewish terrorist Menachem Begin for a Nobel Peace Prize 
depended on the groundwork laid by the Jewish press around the 
world. Even in the scientific sphere, in an era of tremendous scientific 
advancement and great numbers of deserving researchers, publicity 
and media promotion of a scientist's work is now probably just as 
critical for the earning of a scientific award as the work itself. In this 
arena, Jewish scientists have a built-in promotional advantage. Even 
today, with geneticists and psychologists rapidly proving the crucial 
role of heredity and race in intelligence and behavior, the Jewish 
media continue to tout the behavioral environmentalist viewpoint. 
The media give fringe egalitarians such as Lewontin, Kamin, and 
Gould preference over the quieter but more cogent scientists. 

As I pointed out earlier, the three most influential Jews of the 19th 
and 20th centuries were Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud and Franz Boas. 
All three were intelligent men, yet each had a catastrophic effect on 
European society. Karl Marx laid down the foundations for the most 
destructive and murderous ideology of all time. Sigmund Freud un- 
dermined the foundations of the family and European values. Franz 
Boas was the anthropologist father of the egalitarian movement that 



Jewish Supremacism 345 

now seeks nothing less than the destruction of our genotype and 
every genotype on the planet except that of the Jews. 

The Ultimate Gauge 

Even the so-called moderate wing of Judaism preaches a Jewish 
supremacy of morality and intellect. In an article in Reform Judaism ti- 
tled "Relax. It's Okay to be the Chosen People/' Arthur Hertzberg 
(the editor) and Aron Hirt-Manheimer discuss their victimization as 
youngsters at the hands of Christians. They assert the specialness of 
the Jews, even of those liberal Jews who don't want to admit it. In the 
article they quote the words from the founder of the Israeli state, 
David Ben-Gurion. 

My concept of the messianic ideal and vision is not a metaphysi- 
cal one but a socio-cultural-moral one... I believe in our moral and 
intellectual superiority , in our capacity to serve as a model for the 
redemption of the human race. This belief of mine is based on my 
. knowledge of the Jewish people, and not 

some mystical faith; the glory of the divine 
III tl F]4I iM presence is within us, in our hearts, and 

not outside us. 659 (emphasis mine) 

It would be interesting to see the reac- 
tion if the President of the United States 
made a statement that he believed in the 
moral and intellectual superiority of the 
White race. Not only does the Ben-Gurion 
statement show a supremacist attitude, it 
also shows that his sense of Jewish superi- 
ority is not born out of believing they are 
"chosen by God" but arises simply from a 
self -chosen egotism. 
Before self-proclaimed assertions of Jewish superiority can be 
taken seriously, it is important to remember that the ultimate gauge of 
worthiness is creative achievement and historical performance. The 
European record is magnificent. Caucasians laid the foundations of 
astronomy, physics, mathematics, engineering, biology, geology, and 
Western medicine. It was our Egyptian ancestors who designed the 
pyramids, our forefathers who built the Parthenon and the Pantheon. 
It was our Greek ancestors who wrote the first novel, developed 
drama as an art form, and gave the world the philosophy of Socrates 
and Plato. It was our race that unlocked the secrets of the Copernican 
universe, our folk who built the Roman Republic and who wrote the 
Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution 
of the United States. Our people created the great art of ancient 
Greece and unleashed the beauty of the Renaissance. Michaelangelo 




346 Jewish Evolutionary Strategy 

had our blood in his fingers as he reached out to God on the ceiling of 
the Sistine Chapel; and in Leonardo's hands our blood and unique 
DNA pulsed as he created from cold stone the warm beauty of The 
Madonna and Child. 

From our genes came the compositions of Bach, Mozart, Beetho- 
ven and Wagner. Our people invented the automobile, the airplane, 
the steam engine, the internal combustion engine, the jet engine, the 
electric light, telephones, radios, and cameras — and even the power- 
ful tools now used as weapons against us: the motion picture camera 
and television. Men of our heritage gave us the building blocks of the 
computer age: the semi-conductor, the transistor and the integrated 
circuit. Our people developed the math and physics and the chemical 
propulsion that enabled us to leave our footprints on the moon. 

I could go on and on recounting the great achievements of our 
European heritage. In the greatness of the Egypt of Ramses II, the 
Greece of Pericles, or the Rome of Caesar, or the England of Shake- 
speare there was almost no Jewish influence. Western civilization 
would still have scaled the heights without them. But, would we have 
plumbed the depths of Marxism, Freudianism and Boasian egalitari- 
anism without them? 

The difference between Jews and Gentiles finds expression in the 
kind of films made by Walt Disney and the type made by the current 
Jewish head of Disney Studios, Michael Eisner. While both Disney 
and Eisner made technically proficient films, Disney made films ac- 
centing the beauty and nobility in man and the wonders of Nature. 
Eisner steered Disney away from the Nature-film business and to- 
ward degenerate films such as The Crying Game and The Priest, two 
films wallowing in sexual deviance and depravity, films that Walt 
Disney would not have even watched — much less produced. 

While the Classical Greeks and the Europeans of the Renaissance 
were producing great art and sculpture celebrating the ideal beauty of 
the human form, Jews rejected art as "graven image." Now they 
sponsor and promote degenerate art that prizes the misshapen and 
the weird over the well formed, noble, and heroic. And they dominate 
the pornographic rackets that explore the lowest depths of human 
degradation. While the European's Faustian spirit has penetrated the 
deepest oceans and the highest mountains and even ventured into 
space; the Jews have seldom been pioneers. While we revere the soil, 
the Earth, the very natural world by which most Europeans and the 
rest of the people of the earth have gained their daily bread until very 



Jewish Supremacism 347 

recent times, the Jews have, for two thousand years, sucked their sus- 
tenance from the golden calf of a soulless and parasitic urban life. 

While Freud held up the genital and excretory organs as the keys 
to the meaning of life, the Gentile Carl Jung dismissed Freud and de- 
veloped the concept of the racial soul. While Jews still enshrine the 
dictum of an eye for an eye, the Europeans embrace, perhaps danger- 
ously, the doctrine of "turn the other cheek." 

In terms of intelligence, Jewish supremacists have the verbal dex- 
terity to have earned Jesus Christ's referral to them as the great mas- 
ters of the lie. But in the spatial skills that give us our sense of art and 
farsightedness, that give us balance and wholeness, we excel. They 
are a fast-talking, clever people well versed in the arts of manipula- 
tion and mediation. But they are certainly not superior in the qualities 
of character that have created the greatness and sublimity of our peo- 
ple. The Jewish genotype has certainly been resilient and adaptive, 
and they may yet, if we allow it, inherit our Earth as their dominion. 
The contest, though, is far from over. There is a wealth of wonderful 
genetic material in our people that shall yet prove itself worthy of 
survival. When our people awaken and apply our genius, our ideal- 
ism, and our courage to the struggle for our survival, victory will be 
possible. 

Jews have adapted to the vagaries of their surroundings while 
preserving their own genotype. But while they have adapted, we have 
created. We have created both technology and art. We have found 
great beauty in both the body and the soul. We have embraced both 
God and Nature; science and religion. We have learned how to balance 
both government and freedom. 

The ultimate ethnic clash of these diametrically opposed geno- 
types and cultures fast approaches with the new millennium. Jewish 
will-to-power pushes them on to domination as it has for the last 
2,000 years. Their evolutionary strategy has been perfected to the 
point that Europeans and all other races now suffer under Jewish he- 
gemony on a global scale. We must acknowledge their present politi- 
cal and social power, but we also know that their power has come at 
the cost of the devolution of our civilization. Failure to defy this 
power can only lead to our eventual extinction, and this looming 
genocide gives our task the importance of a life or death struggle — 
one that has urgency for our people and truly all peoples and nations 
upon the earth 

We shall do our duty. We shall not surrender our freedom and 
our very existence to Jewish supremacists or any other power. We 
shall preserve our heritage and our hard-won rights and freedoms. 
We shall guide our people up the evolutionary stairway to the stars. 



1 Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion. Boulder, Colorado. Pluto 

Press. 

2 KJV Deuteronomy 7:6 

3 Jub. 32:18 19 

4 KJV Joshua 6:21; KJV Joshua 10:37; RSV Deuteronomy 20:16 

5 RSV Deuteronomy 20:10-18 

6 KJV Leviticus 25:44-46. 

7 KJV Deuteronomy 7:2-3; Ezra 9:12 

8 RSV John 7:13. 

9 RSV 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16. 

10 Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, "Authority" p. 637. 

11 New Republic. (1992). May. 

12 Simon, M. Trans. (1936). 57a Gittin. London. Soncino Press, p. 261 

13 The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 10A. 

14 The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 8C. 

15 Bermant, C. (1991). Some Carefully And Carelessly Chosen Words, Jewish 

Chronicle. May 17. 

16 Frank, Geyla (1997). 

17 Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). Backgrounder. Center for Immigration Studies. 

October. 

18 Hertzberg, A. & Hirt-Manheimer, A. (1998). Relax. It's Okay to be the Chosen 

People. Reform Judaism. May. 

19 Look Magazine. (1962). January 16. 

20 Begin, M. (1964). The Revolt: The Story OfThelrgun. Tel-Aviv: Hadar Pub. 

p.162. 

21 Badi, J. (1960). Fundamental Laws Of The State Of Israel. New York. p. 156. 

22 Reuters News Service (1998). Israelis Now Hold Worship Services 

at Grave of Their Hero, Baruch Goldstein June 17 

23 New York Journal American (1949). February 3. 

24 Andelman, M.S. (1974). To Eliminate the Opiate. New York-Tel Aviv: Zahavia. 

Ltd. 26 

25 U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American 

Expeditionary Forces, June 9. 

26 G.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American 

Expeditionary Forces, June 9. 

27 Francis, D. R. (1921). Russia From the American Embassy. New York: C. 

Scribner's & Sons, p.214. 

28 Churchill, W. (1920). Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the 

Jewish People. Illustrated Sunday Herald. February 8. 

29 Associated Press Online. (1999). Balfour Author Was a Jew. 

30 Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). Backgrounder. Center for Immigration Studies. 

October. 

31 Rokach, L. (1980). Israel's Sacred Terrorism. Bellmont, Mass: Assoc. Arab 

American University Grads. 

32 Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton's Court. Maariv. 

September 2. 

33 Ford, Henry, (1920-1922). The International Jew: the World's Foremost 

Problem. Dearborn Independent. Dearborn, Michigan. 

34 Irving, David. (1994). Action Report. Special Edition. 

35 Jick Leon A. (1981). The Holocaust: its Use and Abuse within the American 

Public. Yad Vashem Studies, XIV, p. 316. Jerusalem 

36 Goldhagen, D. (1996). Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans And 

The Holocaust. New York: Knopf, Random House. 

37 Who's Who In World Jewry. (1965). New York : Pitman Publishing. Corp. 



Jewish Supremacism 349 

38 Who's Who In American Jewry. (1927-). New York : The Jewish Biographical 

Bureau, Inc. 

39 Goldwater, B. M. (1960). The Conscience Of A Conservative. Shepherdsville, 

Kentucky: Victor Publishing Co. 

40 Stormer, J. (1964). None Dare Call It Treason. Florissant, Missouri: Liberty 

Bell Press. 

41 Schwarz, F. C. (1960). You Can Trust The Communists. Englewood Cliffs, 

New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 

42 Churchill, W. (1920). Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the 

Jewish People. Illustrated Sunday Herald. February 8. 

43 Churchill, W. (1920). Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the 

Jewish People. 

44 U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American 

Expeditionary Forces, June 9. 

45 Wilton, R. (1920). Last Days of the Romanovs. New York: George H. Doran 

Co. p. 148. 

46 U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American 

Expeditionary Forces, June 9. 

47 Francis, D. R. (1921). Russia From the American Embassy . New York: C. 

Scribner's & Sons, p.214. 

48 National Archives, Dept. of State Decimal File, 1910-1929, file 861.00/5067 

49 Nettl, J. P. (1967). The Soviet Achievement. New York: Harcourt, Brace & 

World. 

50 Encyclopedia Judaica. p. 791-792. 

51 Trotsky, L. (1968). Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and His Influence, ed. 

trans. Charles Malamuth. London, MacGibbon & Kee. 

52 Shub, David. (1961). Novyi Zhurnal no. 63. 

53 Shub, D. (1966). Lenin: a Biography. Harmondsworth, Penguin. 

54 Review de Fonds Social Juif. (1970). no. 161. 

55 Ben-Shlomo, B. Z. (1991). Reporting on Lenin's Jewish Roots. Jewish 

Chronicle. July 26. p. 2. 

56 Hoffman, Michael. (1997). Campaign for Radical Truth in History. P.O. Box 

849. Coeur d' Alene, ID 83816. Ehrenburg won the Order of Lenin and the 
Stalin Prize and willed his papers to the Israeli Yad Vashem Holocaust 
Museum. 

57 Goldberg, Anatol. (1984). Ilya Ehrenburg : Revolutionary, novelist, poet, war 

correspondent, propagandist : the extraordinary epic of a Russian 
survivor. New York : Viking. 

58 Solzhenitsyn, A. (1974). The Gulag Archipelago, 1918-1956 : An Experiment 

in Literary investigation, I-II. Tran. Thomas P. Whitney. London : Collins: 
Harvill Press, p. 79. 

59 Aronson, G. (1949). Soviet Russia and the Jews. New York: American Jewish 

League Against Communism. 

60 The Jewish Voice. (1942). New York. January. 

61 The Congress Bulletin. (1940). (New York). American Jewish Congress, January 

5. 

62 George Bernard Shaw, quoted in The Jewish Guardian ( 1931). said: "I have 

seen the statement which Stalin gave recently to the Jewish Telegraphic 
Agency on Anti-Semitism and in which the Soviet leader said that under 
the Soviet laws militant Anti-Semitism is punishable by death." 

63 Joseph Stalin (Note to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency). 12th January 1931, 

Collected Works, vol. 13. 

64 Gregor Aronson. (1949). Soviet Russia and the Jews. New York: American 

Jewish League Against Communism. 



65 Encyclopaedia Britannica. (1947). Vol. 2. p. 76. 

66 Latimer, E.W. (1895). Russia and Turkey in the 19th Century. A. C. McLury & 

Co. p. 332. 

67 Jewish Communal Register of New York City. (1918). p. 1018-1019 

68 New York Journal American (1949). February 3. 

69 Andelman, M.S. (1974). To Eliminate the Opiate. New York-Tel Aviv: Zahavia. 

Ltd. 26 

70 Nedava, J. (1971). Trotsky and the Jews. Philadelphia. Jewish Publication 

Society. 

71 Marx, Karl, (1936). Das Kapital. English. New York: The Modern library 

72 Marx, Karl, (1932). Capital, the Communist manifesto and other writings. 

New York: The Modern library. 

73 Chicago Jewish Sentinel. (1975). Inside Judaica. October 30. 

74 Barnes Review. (1996). The Racism of Marx and Engles. Oct. vol. 2. 10. p. 3. 

75 The Encyclopedia of Zionism in Israel. (1971). New York: Herzl Press/McGraw- 

Hill. p.496-497. 

76 Wilton, R. (1920). Last Days of the Romanovs. New York: George H. Doran 

Co. 148. 

77 Rapoport, Louis. (1990). Stalin's War Against The Jews. Free Press/Simon & 

Schuster. 

78 Curtis, William Elroy. (1907). National Geographic Magazine. The Revolution 

in Russia. May. p.313. 

79 Orwell, George. (1948). 1984. 

80 Exodus (1960). dir. Otto Preminger United Artists. 

81 Kurtzman, Daniel. (1995). Ousted House Historian Seeks Restitution and a 

Straight Record. Jewish Telegraphic Agency. October 3 1 . 

82 Wise (1938). Dr. Wise Urges Jews To Declare Selves As Such. New York 

Herald Tribune. June 13. p. 12. 

83 (Daily Pilot, Newport Beach/ Costa Mesa, Feb. 28, 2000, front page) 

84 in the March 17, 2000, issue 

85 ("Project Reminds Young Jews of Heritage," The Washington Post, Jan. 17, 

2000, p. A19) 

86 Bible King James Version. Ezra chapter 9. 

87 KJV Numbers 33:55 

88 KJV Joshua 6:21 

89 KJV Joshua 10:32-34 

90 KJV Joshua 10:37 

91 KJV Isaiah 34:2-3 

92 RSV Deuteronomy 20: 16 

93 KJV Deuteronomy 7:2-3 

94 KJV Deuteronomy 7:6 

95 KJV Ezra 9:12 

96 Maimonides, Mishneh Tor ah. Laws On Murderers 2,4,1 1. 

97 KJV Galatians 3:26-29 

98 The Winds of War, War and Remembrance, and others. 

99 New York Herald Tribune. (1959). Nov. 17. 

100 Dilling, E. (1980). The Jewish Religion. Los Angeles: CDL Report (Renamed 

From The Plot Against Christianity) 

101 Talmud, Sanhedrin. (1935). Soncino Edition, p. 400. 

102 Simon, M. Trans. (1936). 57a Gittin. London. Soncino Press, p. 261 

103 Jewish Encyclopedia. (1907). Balaam, p.469. 



1 



Jewish Supremacism 351 

104 Talmud, Sanhedrin. (1935). Soncino Edition. 5 th footnote on p. 388. 

105 Funk And Wagnalb Jewish Encyclopedia. (1905). Min. p.594. 

106 Encyclopedia Judaica. (1978). Keter Publishing House, Jerusalem, Vol.7 

p.411 

107 Talmud. (1935). Soncino Edition. 

108 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition, p. 388. 

109 Funk And Wagnalb Jewish Encyclopedia. (1907). Gentile. New York. p. 617. 

110 Talmud. (1935). Baba Mezia. Soncino Edition. 114a-114b. 

1 Funk And Wagnalb Jewish Encyclopedia. (1907). Gentile. New York. p. 621. 

2 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 58b. p. 398. 

3 Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition, p. 211. 

4 Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition, p. 666. 

5 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 76a. p. 470. 

6 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 57a. p. 388. 

7 Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition. 37b. 

8 Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition, p. 664-665. 

9 Talmud, Yebamoth. (1936). Soncino Edition. 98a. 

120 Talmud, Abodah Zarah. (1935). Soncino Edition. 22a-b. 

121 Talmud, Abodah Zarah. (1935). Soncino Edition. 67b. 

122 Funk And Wagnalls Jewish Encyclopedia. (1907). Gentile: Discrimination 

Against Gentiles, p. 617-621. 

123 Funk And Wagnalb Jewish Encyclopedia. (1907). Gentile. New York. p. 617. 

124 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 105a-b. p.717. 

125 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 105a-b. p. 726. 

126 RSVJohn8:13T 

127 Luther, M. L. (1962). The Jews And Their Lies. Chicago. Christian Press 

Translated From The Erlangen And Weimar German Editions. (1483- 
1546). Works. 1883 D. Martin Luthers Werke; Kritische Gesammtausgabe. 
Weimar, H. Bohlau, (1883-1985). 

128 Random House Websters Unabridged Electronic Dictionary. (1996). 

"Purim." 

129 Holiday Observances (1997). Jewish Art In Context. 

130 Goldwasser, Phillip. (1998). Bon Appetit. Hosted by the Jewish 

Communication Network on the Internet. 

131 Hess, Moses, (1958). 1812-1875. Rome And Jerusalem. Translated By 

Maurice J. Bloom. New York: Philosophical Library. 

132 Dubnow, S. (1906). Foundation Of National Judaism. Translated From Die 

Grundlagen Des Nationaljudentums. S.M. Dubnow. Berlin : Judischer 
Verlag. 

133 Menuhin, Moshe. (1965). The Decadence Of Judaism In Our Time. New 

York: Exposition Press 

134 Menuhin, Moshe. (1965). The Decadence Of Judaism In Our Time. 482-483. 

135 Attack. (1976). Goldmann quoted in Zionism I: Theory, no. 42. (Hillsboro. WV. 

www.natvan.com). 

136 Brandeis, L. at a speech before the Menorah Society at Columbia University. 

137 Herzl, T. (1967). The Jewish State: An Attempt At A Modern Solution Of The 

Jewish Question. London, Pordes. 

138 Wyman, David S. (1985). The Abandonment Of The Jews: America And The 

Holocaust, 1941-1945. Pantheon. 

139 Lazare, Bernard. (1967). Antbemitism: lb History And Causes; Translated 

From The French. London, Britons Publishing Co. 

140 Encyclopaedia Judaica. (1994). Decennial Book, 1983-1992 Events Of 1982- 

1992 Jerusalem : Encyclopaedia Judaica. 

141 De Mille, C. B. (1956). The Ten Commandments. Hollywood. Paramount. 



142 Spielberg, S. (1993). Schindler's List. Hollywood. Universal. 

143 Jewish Press. Brooklyn, NY. 

144 The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 10A. 

145 The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 8C. 

146 Bermant, C. (1991). Some Carefully And Carelessly Chosen Words, Jewish 

Chronicle. May 17. 

147 New Republic. (1992). May. 

148 Who's Who In World Jewry. (1965). New York : Pitman Pub. Corp. 

149 Who's Who In American Jewry. (1927-). New York : The Jewish Biographical 

Bureau, 

150 RSV Joshua 6:21 

151 KJV Joshua 10:39 

152 RSV Deuteronomy 20:10-18 

153 KJV Leviticus 19:18 

154 KJV Exodus 20:13, 15, and 17 

155 RSV Leviticus 19:18 

156 TANAKH. (1985). A New Translation of The Holy Scriptures according to the 

Traditional Hebrew Text. Philadelphia. The Jewish Publication Society. 

157 Talmud - Baba Kamma (1935). 113b. p. 666. Soncino Edition. 

158 Funk and Wagnalls Jewish Encyclopedia. (1905). Gentile, p. 620. 

159 Hartung, John. (1995). Love Thy Neighbor: The Evolution of In-Group 

Morality. Skeptic, Vol. 3. No. 4. 

160 KJV Leviticus 25:44-46. 

161 KJV Deuteronomy 7:2-6. 

162 KJV Leviticus 20:24. 

163 KJVNehemiah 13:3. 

164 KJV Deuteronomy 7:4. 

165 RSV Ezra 9:1. 

166 KJV Ezra 9:2. 

167 Schonfield, H. J. (1965). The Passover plot; new light on the history of 

Jesus. New York: B. Geis Associates. Random House. 

168 KJV Hebrews 8:9. 

169 "Judaism." Encyclopedia Judaica, p. 396. 

170 "Conservative Judaism," Enc. Encyclopedia Judaica, p. 906. 

171 Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, "Authority" p. 637. 

172 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 105a-b. p. 717. 

173 Simon, M. Trans. (1936). 57a Gittin. London. Soncino Press, p. 261. 

174 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 105a-b. p. 726. 

175 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 52b. p. 356. 

176 Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 105a-b. p. 726. 

177 Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion. Boulder, Colorado. Pluto 

Press. 

178 Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion. 97-98. 

179 Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21. 

180 Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion. 23 & 93. 

181 "Goy" Talmudic Encyclopedia as quoted by Shahak. 

182 Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion. 87. 

183 Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 23. 

184 Luther, M. L. (1962). The Jews And Their Lies. Chicago. Christian Press 

Translated From The Erlangen And Weimar German Editions. 1483-1546. 



Jewish Supremacism 353 



Works. 1883 D. Martin Luthers Werke; Kritische Gesammtausgabe. 
Weimar, H. Bohlau, 1883-1985. 

185 RSV Deuteronomy 7:6-12. 

186 RSV Romans 9:1-3, 6-8, 24-26. 

187 KJV Hebrews 8:6-7, 9-10, and 13. 

188 KJV Matthew 2 1 :43-45. 

189 KJV John 8:42-48. 

190 KJV John 1:47. 

191 RSV 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16. 

192 RSV Titus 1: 13-14. 

193 BBC News. (2001). Internet transcript. November 26. 

194 Board of Deputies of British Jews. (2001). Press Release. Nov. 29. 

195 Solzhenitsyn, A. (1974). The Gulag archipelago, 1918-1956 : an experiment 

in literary investigation, I-II. Tran. Thomas P. Whitney. London : Collins : 
Harvill Press, p. 79. 

196 RSV John 7:13. 

197 KJV Hebrews 8:9. 

198 Knight Ridder News Services. (2001). He Wants to Rid Bible of Dark Interpreta- 

tion of Jews . August 17. 

199 Koestler, A. (1976). The Thirteenth Tribe. New York: Random House. 

200 Barnes Review. (1997). The Khazars, Non-Semitic Jews. July. Vol.3, p. 9. 

201 Chase, G. A, & V A. McKusick (1972). Founder Effect In Tay-Sachs Disease. 

American Journal Of Human Genetics. 25:p. 339-352. 

202 The Encyclopedia of Zionism in Israel. (1971). New York: Herzl 

Press/McGraw-Hill. 

203 Glazer, Nathan. (1970). Remembering the Answers: Essays on the American 

student revolt. New York: Basic Books 

204 Britton, F. (1979). Behind Communism. Noontide Press. 

205 Cohen, Jacob. (1993). The Rosenberg File. National Review. July 19.: p.48- 

52 

206 Neville, John F. (1997). The Press, the Rosenbergs, and the Cold War. 

London: Praeger. 

207 Strom, Kevin. (1998). We Are All Prejudiced. Internet Article. April 13. 

208 Boas, F. (1911). Rev. Ed., (1938). The Mind of Primitive Man. New York. 
Herskovits, Melville J. (1953). Franz Boas; the science of man in the making. 

Clifton, NJ: A. M. Kelley, p. 65. 

210 Mead, Margaret. (1961). Coming of age in Samoa; a psychological study of 

primitive youth for Western civilization. Foreword by Franz Boas. New 
York: Morrow. 

211 Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The Making and 

Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth. Cambridge University Press. 

212 Freeman, D. (1990). The Samoan Reader: Anthropologists Take Stock. 

Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America. 

213 Freeman, D. (1991). On Franz Boas and the Samoan Researches of Margaret 

Mead. Current Anthropology . p. 32, 322-330. 

214 Montagu, Ashley. (1945). Man's Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race. 

New York: Columbia University press 

215 Pearson, R. (1996). Heredity and Humanity: Race Eugenics and Modern 

Science.. Washington, DC: Scott-Townsend Publishers. 

216 Gelya, F. (1997). Jews, Multiculturalism, And Boasian Anthropology. The 

American Anthropologist. Vol. 99. #4. p.73 1-745. 

217 New York Review of Books. (2000). 13 April, p.61. 

218 Natural History. (1993). Nov. p. 12. 



219 Yerushalmi, Y. H. (1991). Freud's Moses: Judaism Terminable and 

Interminable. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 98. 

220 Gay, P. (1988). Freud: A Life For Our Time. New York: W. W. Norton. 

221 Freud, S. (1939). Moses and Monotheism. New York: Vintage. 

222 Freud, S. (1938). Totem and Taboo; Resemblances Between the Psychic 

Lives of Savages and Neurotics. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin 
Books. 

223 MacDonald, K. (1996). A People That Shall Dwell Apart. Westport, 

Connecticut: Praeger. 

224 Freud, S. (1969). The Interpretation of Dreams. Trans. J. Strachey. New York. 

225 Yerushalmi, Y H. (1991). Freud's Moses: Judaism Terminable and 

Interminable. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 45. 

226 Yerushalmi, Y H. (1991). Freud's Moses: Judaism Terminable and 

Interminable. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 45. 

227 Freud, S. (1939). Moses and Monotheism. Trans, by K. Jones. New York: 

Vintage, .p. 114-1 17. 
228 Mannoni, O. (1971). Freud. Trans. R. Belice. New York. p. 168. 

229 Friedman, Murray. What Went Wrong. (1995). New York: Free Press. 

230 Garrow, David. (1983). The FBI and Martin Luther King. Penguin Books, New 

York. 

231 Strom, Kevin Alfred. (1994). The Beast as Saint. Radio broadcast. Printed 

transcript available from National Vanguard Books, Box 330, Hillsboro, WV 
24946. 

232 Pappas, T. (1992). A Houdini of Time. Chronicles. November 26-30. 

233 Abernathy, R. (1989). And the Walls Came Tumbling Down. New York: 

Harper & Row. 

234 Newsweek. (1998). Books: The Middle of the Journey, Taylor Branch's Grand 

Civil-Rights History Rolls On. Januaryl9. p. 62. Quoting from Pillar of Fire: 
America in the King Years 1963-65. Taylor Branch. Simon and Schuster. 

235 Kaye, Evelyn. (1987). A Hole in the Sheet: a Modern Woman Looks at 

Orthodox and Hasidic Judaism. Secaucus, New Jersey: L. Stuart. 

236 Kaye, Evelyn. (1987). A Hole in the Sheet. 

237 Jewish Encyclopedia. (1905). Talmudic prayer, p. 617. 

238 Talmud. (1936). Kethuboth. Soncino Edition. Kethuboth lib. p.58. 

239 Talmud. (1935). Sanhedrin. 69b. p.469. 

240 Talmud. (1936). Yebamoth. Soncino Edition. 57b. p.386 

241 New York Times. (1992). December 9. 

242 Los Angeles Jewish Times, 'Yes, Virginia, Jews Do Control the Media,' Oct. 

29-Nov. 11, 1999 p. 14 

243 Network. (1976). Director: Sidney Lumet. Producer: Howard Gottfried. 

Screenwriter: Paddy Chayevsky. Editor: Alan Heim. United Artists-MGM. 

244 Thunderbolt. P. O. Box 1211 Marietta, GA 30061. 

245 Schindler's List. (1993). Universal. Director: Steven Spielberg. Producers: 

Gerald R. Molen, Steven Spielberg. Screenwriters: Kurt Luedtke, Steve 
Zaillian. Cinematographer: Janusz Kaminski. Editor: Ewa Braun. 

246 Gabler, N. (1988). An Empire of Their Own : How the Jews Invented 

Hollywood. New York: Crown Publishers. 

247 Stein, B. (1979.). The View From Sunset Boulevard. New York: Basic Books. 

248 Stein, Ben. (1997). Do Jews Run the Media: You Bet they Do — And What of 

it? El online Internet Magazine. 



Jewish Supremacism 355 

249 National Vanguard Books, P. O. Box 330 Hillsboro, WV 24946. Or 

< http ://www. natvan . com > 

250 Time. (1962). The Newspaper Collector. July 27. p. 56. 

251 Robertson, W. (1981). The Dispossessed Majority. Cape Canaveral, Florida. 

Howard Allen Enterprises, Inc. (PO Box 76, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920). 

252 Las Vegas Review-Journal, (1999). Internet version of the "1 st Hundred Men 

Who Shaped Las Vegas". Part. 2. 

253 Birth Of A Nation. (1915). Director, Composer: D.W. Griffith. Screenwriter: 

Frank E. Woods, D.W. Griffith. Producer: Frank E. Woods. 
Cinematographer: Billy Bitzer. Editor: James Smith. 

254 Gone with the Wind. (1939). Editor: Hal Kern. Producer, Screenwriter: David 

O. Selznick 

255 Dixon, T. (1905). The Clansman: An Historical Romance Of The Ku Klux 

Klan. New York: Grosset & Dunlap,. 

256 Barnes Review. (1997). Birth of a Nation. July. vol. 3. n. 7 p. 27. 

257 Shakespeare, W. (1600). The Excellent History Of The Merchant Of Venice: 

With the extreme cruelty of Shylock the Jew towards the saide merchant, in 
cutting a just pound of his flesh and the obtaining of Portia by the choyse 
of three caskets. London: J. Roberts. 

258 Canadian Jewish News. (1991). January 31. p. 33. 

259 Farewell Uncle Tom. [1972] Cannon Releasing Corporation. 

260 Medved, M. (1996). Jews Run Hollywood, So What? Moment. August. 

261 Priest. (1994). Miramax Films. 

262 The Crying Game. (1992). Miramax Films. 

263 Seven Years In Tibet. (1997). Sony Pictures Entertainment, TriStar Pictures, 

Mandalay Entertainment, Reperage & Vanguard Films, Applecross. 

264 Brando, Marlon, [with Robert Lindsey] Brando. (1994). Songs My Mother 

Taught Me. 
Random House of Canada, Toronto. P. 107-1 1 1 

265 Ibid, p.l 11 

266 Ibid, p.231 

267 Ibid, p.388 

268 Larry King Live. (1996). Guest: Marlon Brando. Friday, April 5. 

269 Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton's Court. Maariv. 

September 2. 

270 Curtiss, Richard. (1986). quoted in A Changing Image: Americans' Perceptions 

of the Arab-Israeli Dispute, American Educational Trust, p. 267 

271 Fulbright, Sen. William. (1973). Face the Nation. CBS: New York. April 15. 

272 Buckley, William F. (1970). McCarthy and His Enemies; The Record and Its 

Meaning. NewRochelle, New York: Arlington House. 

273 Wall Street Journal. (1978). American Jews and Jimmy Carter. March 2. 

p.18. 

274 Getler, Michael. (1974). Pentagon Chief Suggests Israel Lobby Has Too Much 

Influence. Los Angeles Times. 

275 San Francisco Chronicle. (1968). November 23. p. 9. 

276 Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton's Court. Maariv. 

277 Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton's Court. Maariv. 

278 Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton's Court. Maariv. 

279 Jonathan Broder. (1997). Salon. February 17. 

280 The New York Times News Service. (1997). Albright Upbraids Stubborn 

Balkan Leaders: Refugees.... June 1. 

281 The Spotlight The leading anti-Zionist newspaper in the United States. Pub- 

lished by Liberty Lobby 300 Independence Ave. SE Washington, D.C. 
20003 



282 Jewish Week. (1997). March 3. 

283 Jewish Week. (1997). January 24 

284 New York Times. (1997). October 4. 

285 Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). Backgrounder. Center for Immigration Studies. 

October. 

286 Ibid. 

287 Ibid. 

288 Ibid 

289 Ibid 

290 The Times-Picayune. (1998). Swiss banks, Holocaust survivors settle war 

claims. August 13. p.A-13. 

291 Findley, Paul. (1989). They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions 

Confront Israel's Lobby. Chicago, Illinois: Lawrence Hill Books. 

292 Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton's Court. Maariv. 

293 Network (1976). Director: Sidney Lumet. Producer: Howard Gottfried. 

Screenwriter: Paddy Chayevsky. Editor: Alan Heim. United Artists-MGM. 

294 Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). Backgrounder. Center for Immigration Studies. 

October. 
295 Kornberg, R. (1993). Theodore Herzl: From Assimilation to Zionism. 

Bloomington: Indiana University Press, inner quote from Herzl diary, 161. 

296 Microsoft Encarta 96 Encyclopedia. (1993-1995). "Anti-Semitism." Microsoft 

Corporation. Funk & Wagnalls Corporation. 

297 Grolier's Encyclopedia. Anti-Semitism. 

298 Heschel, Susannah. (1993). Anti-Semites Against Anti-Semitism. Tikkun, 
November/December, p. 52. 

299 Todd Endelman, (1979). The Jews of Georgian England, 1714-1830. 

Philadelphia, p. 95. 

300 Wisse, Ruth. (1991). The Twentieth Century's Most Successful Ideology. 

Commentary. Vol. 91, #2. February, p. 33. 

301 Jerusalem Post. (1990). Editorial. ). September 15. p.24. 

302 Hertzberg, A. (1993). Is Anti-Semitism Dying Out? New York Review of 

Books, XL (12), p.51-57. 

303 Lewis, N. and Reinhold, M. (1955). Roman Civilization: Sourcebook II: The 

Empire. Harper Torchbooks: New York. 

304 Bishop, John. (1964). Nero: the Man and the Legend. Robert Hale Limited: 

London. 

305 The Times-Picayune. (1998). Study Affirms Genetic Link in Jewish Priestly 

Class. July 9. p.Al 1 

306 Twain, M. (1899). Concerning the Jews. Harper's Monthly Magazine. 

September. 

307 Rose, P. L. (1990). Revolutionary Antisemitism in Germany, from Kant to 

Wagner. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, p. 7. 

308 KJV. Deut. 23:20. 

309 KJV. Deut. 23:21. 

310 The Code of Maimonides, ed. L. Nemoy. (1965). Yale Judaica Series. New 

Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. 

311 Roth, C. (1978). A History of the Jews in England, 3rd edition. Oxford: The 

Clarendon Press. 

312 Chazan, R. (1973). Medieval Jewry in Northern France: A Political and 

Social History. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 



Jewish Supremacism 357 



313 Weinryb, B. D. (1972). The Jews of Poland: A Social and Economic History 

of the Jewish Community in Poland from 1100 to 1800. Philadelphia: 
The Jewish Publication Society of America. 

314 Neuman, A. A. (1969). The Jews in Spain: Their Political and Cultural Life 

During the Middle Ages; Vols. I & II. New York: Octagon Books. (Originally 
published in 1942.) 

315 Baldwin, J. W. (1986). The Government of Philip Augustus: Foundations of 

French Royal Power in the Middle Ages. Berkeley: University of California 
Press. 

316 Rabinowitz, L. (1938). The Social Life of the Jews of Northern France in the 

XII-XIV Centuries as Reflected in the Rabbinical Literature of the Period. 
London: Edward Goldston Ltd. 

317 Luchaire, A. (1912). Social France at the Time of Philip Augustus. New York: 

Frederick Ungar. 

318 Encyclopedia Britannica (1952). Vol. 13. Jews. p. 57. 

319 Davidson, N. (1987). The Inquisition and the Italian Jews. Inquisition and 

Society in Early Modern Europe. Totowa, New Jersey: Barnes & Noble. 

320 Haliczer, S. (1987). Inquisition and Society in Early Modern Europe Trans. S. 

Haliczer. Totowa, New Jersey: Barnes & Noble. 

321 Pullan, B. (1983). The Jews of Europe and the Inquisition of Venice, 1550- 

1670. London: Basil Blackwell. p. 159. 

322 Kornberg, R. (1993). Theodore Herzl: From Assimilation to Zionism. Inner 

quote from Herzl diary. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. 
p.183. 

323 Kornberg, R. (1993). Theodore Herzl: From Assimilation to Zionism, p. 161- 

162. 

324 Kornberg, R. (1993). Theodore Herzl: From Assimilation to Zionism, p. 183. 

325 Aquinas, Thomas. On the Governance of the Jews. 

326 Finkelstein, L. (1924). Jewish Self-Government in the Middle Ages. Westport, 

Connecticut: Greenwood Press, p. 280. 

327 Katz, J. (1961). Tradition and Crisis: Jewish Society at the End of the Middle 

Ages. New York. The Free Press of Glencoe. p. 24. 

328 KJV Lev. 25:14. 

329 The Code of Maimonides. (1965). ed. L. Nemoy. Yale Judaica Series, New 

Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. Ch. XII: 1. p. 47. 

330 Katz, J. (1961). Tradition and Crisis: Jewish Society at the End of the Middle 

Ages. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe. p. 61. 

331 Kaufman, Debbie. (2001). Why American CEOs of Israeli Firms Fail. Ha'aretz. 

Dec. 6. 

332 Ibid. 

333 Roth, C. (1974). A History oftheMarranos, 4th ed. New York: Schocken 

Books. 

334 Random House Unabridged Webster's Electronic Dictionary. Marrano. 

335 Shaw, S. J. (1991). The Jews of the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish 

Republic. New York: New York University Press. 

336 Hundert, G. D. (1992). The Jews in a Polish Private Town: The Case of 

Opatow in the Eighteenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University 
Press.. 

337 Hundert, G. D. (1992). p.54. 

338 Hundert, G. D. (1992). p.57. 

339 Liebman, A. (1979). Jews and the Left. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p.267- 

268. 

340 Encyclopaedia Britannica. (1947). Vol. 2. p.76. 



341 Mosse, W. E. (1987). Jews in the German Economy: The German-Jewish 

Economic Elite 1820-1935. Oxford, O.K.: The Clarendon Press. 

342 Gordon, S. (1984). Hitler, Germans, and the "Jewish Question." Princeton, 

New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 

343 Birmingham, Stephen (1967). Our Crowd: The Great Jewish Families of 

New York. New York: Harper & Row. 

344 Ehrlich, J. and Rehfeld B. (1989). New Crowd: Changing of the Jewish 

Guard on Wall Street. Boston: Little, Brown & Company. 

345 Schwartz, M. (1987). Irangate and Boesky Affair Worrisome to Jews. Palm 

Beach Jewish World. January 30. 

346 Newsweek. (1971). November 17. 

347 Anderson, J. ( 1971). Israel is Crooks Promised Land. Washington Post. 

December 19. 

348 Messick, H. (1971). Lansky. New York: Putnam, p.276-277. 

349 Bugsy. (1991). Director: Levinson, B. Screenwriter: Toback,J. Tristar. 

350 Messick, H. (1971). Lansky. New York: Putnam, p.8-10. 

351 Brokhin, Y. (1975). Hustling on Gorky Street. Dial Press. 

352 Simis, K. (1982). USSR: The Corrupt Society. Simon and Schuster. 

353 Friedman, R.R. (1998). The Most Dangerous Mobster in the World. Village 

Voice. May 26. 

354 Ibid. 

355 Luther, M. (1974). Quoted by Leon Poliakov. The History of Anti-Semitism. 

New York, p.233, note 10. 

356 Higgins, James V. and Hoover, Barbara. (2001). Work, Play Are All One to 

Taubman. The Detroit News, May 3. p.l, 4A 

357 Michaels, James. (1996). Keeping the Old KGB Busy. Forbes. Dec. 30. p. 10 

358 Forbes. (1996). Godfather of the Kremlin? Dec. 30.1996. p. 90-96 

359 Mellow, Craig. (1997). Russia's Robber Barons. Fortune. March 3. p. 120-126 

360 RSV. Lev. 25:44. 

361 Marcus, J. (1952). Jews. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Vol. 13. p. 57. 

362 Grayzel, S. (1948). A History of the Jew: From Babylonian Exile to the End 

of World War II. Philadelphia Jewish Publication Society of America, p.312. 

363 White, W. (1966). Who Brought the Slaves to America? White Publishing. 

364 Barnes Review. (1997). Who Really Engaged in the African Slave Trade. Sept. 

92. 

365 Raphael, Marc. (1983). Jews and Judaism in the United States: A 

Documentary History. New York: Behrman House, Inc. Vol. 14. Raphael is 
the editor of American Jewish History, the journal of the American Jewish 
Historical Society at Brandeis University in Massachusetts. 

366 Piatt, Virginia B. (1975). And Don't Forget the Guinea Voyage: The Slave 

Trade of Aaron Lopez of Newport. William and Mary Quarterly. Vol. 32, # 
4. 

367 Marcus, J. (1970). The Colonial American Jew: 1492-1776. Detroit, 

Michigan: Wayne State University Press. 

368 Marcus, J. (1974). The Jew and the American Revolution. Cincinnati, 

American Jewish Archives. 3 [3 

369 Liebman S. B. (1982). New World Jewry 1493-1825: Requiem for the 

Forgotten. KTAV, New York, p. 170, 183. [Liebman is an attorney; LL.B., 
St. Lawrence University, 1929; M.A (Latin American history), Mexico City 
College, 1963; Florida chapter American Jewish Historical Society, 1956- 



Jewish Supremacism 359 

58; Friends of Hebrew University, 1958-59; American Historical Society 
Contributor to scholarly journals on Jewish history. 

370 Wiznitzer, A. (1960). Jews in Colonial Brazil .p. 72-3 [Note: Wiznitzer, Arnold 

Aharon, educator; Born in Austria, December 20, 1899; Ph.D., University 
of Vienna, 1920; Doctor of Hebrew Literature, Jewish Theological 
Seminary of America; Emeritus research professor, University of Judaism, 
Los Angeles; Contributor to historical journals in the United States and 
Brazil including the Journal of Jewish Social Studies and the Publications 
of the American Jewish Historical Society. Former president, Brazilian- 
Jewish Institute of Historical Research.] 

371 Marcus, J. (1989 United States Jewry). 1776-1985. Detroit: Wayne State 

University Press, p. 586. 

372 The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews. (1991). Prepared by the 

Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam. Chicago, Illinois: 
Latimer Associates. 

373 Spielberg, S. (1997). Amistad. Los Angeles: Dreamworks. 

374 Raphael, Marc. (1983). Jews and Judaism in the United States: A 

Documentary History. New York: Behrman House, 

375 Bristow, E. J. (1983). Prostitution and Prejudice. New York: Shocken books. 

376 Bristow, E. (1986). Studies in Contemporary Jewry, II. Bloomington, 

Indiana: Indiana University Press, p. 3 10. 

377 Specter, M (1998). Slave traders Lure Slavic Women. Times-Picayune. New 

York Times News Service. January 1 1 . 

378 Specter, M (1998).[or]Ibid 

379 Specter, M (1998). [or] Ibid 

380 Katz, Samuel M. (1998). Hookers in the Holy Land. Moment. April, p.45-78. 

381 Katz, Samuel M. (1998). Hookers in the Holy Land. p.47. 

382 Katz, Samuel M. (1998). Hookers in the Holy Land. p.48. 

383 Katz, Samuel M. (1998). Hookers in the Holy Land. p.49. 

384 Josephus, F. (1989). The Works of Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews. 

Complete and unabridged, trans., W. Whiston. Peabody, Massachusetts: 
Hendrickson Publishers. (12:224). 

385 Josephus, F. (1989). The Works of Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews. 

(12:224) 

386 Alon, G. (1989). The Jews on Their Land in the Talmudic Age (70-640 C. E.). 

Trans. G. Levi from Hebrew. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 
(Originally published in 1980, 1984 by the Magnes Press, Hebrew 
University, Jerusalem) p. 16. 

387 Avi-Yonah, M. (1976). The Jews under Roman and Byzantine Rule: A 

Political History of Palestine from the Bar Kokhba War to the Arab 
Conquest. Jerusalem: The Magnes Press, reprinted 1984. p. 261. 

388 Parkes, J. (1934). The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue: A Study of 

the Origins of Antisemitism. London: The Soncino Press, p. 263, 257- 
258. 

389 Grant, M. (1973). The Jews in the Roman World. New York: Charles 

Scribner's Sons, p.288. 

390 Ibid, p.289. 

391 Jones, A. H. M. (1964). The Later Roman Empire 284-602: A Social 

Economic and Administrative Survey, 2 vols. Norman, Oklahoma: 
University of Oklahoma Press, p. 950. 

392 Shaw, S. J. (1991). The Jews of the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish 

Republic. New York: New York University Press, p. 25. 

393 Ibid. p.26. 



394 Shaw, S. J. (1991). The Jews of the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish 

Republic. New York: New York University Press, p. 77. 

395 Amador de los Rios, R. (1875-1876). Historia Social, Politica y Religiousa de 

Los Judios de Espana y Portugal. Madrid. Vol. I. 

396 Ballesteros y Beretta, A. (1918-1936). Historia de Espana y Su Influencia en 

la Historia Universal. Barcelona. Vol. II. 

397 Castro, A. (1954). The Structure of Spanish history . Trans. E. L. King. 

Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 

398 Stillman, N. A. (1979). The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book. 

Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America. 

399 Irving, D. (1981). Uprising! London: Hodder and Stoughton. 

400 RSV Genesis 37:6,7. 

401 RSV. Genesis 37:26 

402 RSV. Genesis 39:7-23 

403 RSV. Genesis 41:33. 

404 RSV. Genesis 47:14. 

405 RJV for all of above quotes. 

406 Weizmann, C. (1949). Trial and Error: The Autobiography of Chaim 

Weizmann. New York: Harper and Brothers, p. 90. 

407 KJV Genesis 25:23-33 

408 KJV. Genesis: 27: 19-39 

409 Patai, R. (1977). The Jewish Mind. New York: Scribners. p.234. 

410 Aleichem, S. (1937). Funem Yarid. New York. 

411 Hook, S. (1989). On Being a Jew. Commentary. Vol. 88, # 4. October 29. 

412 Spitz, L. (1946). Sermon by rabbi Leon Spitz. American Hebrew. March 1. 

413 Truman, Harry S. (1945). As quoted from the diaries of Henry A. Wallace from 

his papers at the University of Iowa. Included in Victory Lasky's book, It 
Didn't Start Watergate. 

414 Halkin, Hillel. (1998). Here to stay: An Unrepentant Zionist Reflects on his 

Aliyah. Moment, p. 5. 

415 Menuhin, Moshe. (1965). The Decadence of Judaism in Our Time. New York: 

Exposition Press, Inc. p. 159. 

416 Menuhin, Moshe. (1965). The Decadence of Judaism in Our Time. New York: 

Exposition Press, Inc. p. 397. 

417 Encarta Encyclopedia. (1996). Funk and Wagnalls. 

418 Brenner, Lenni. (1984). The Iron Wall : Zionist Revisionism from Jabotinsky 

to Shamir. Totowa, New Jersey. : Biblio Distribution Center 

419 Jabotinsky, V (1923). The Iron Wall: We And The Arabs. 

420 Look Magazine. (1962). January 16. 

421 

422 Barnes Review. (1997). The Balfour Declaration. Jan. vol. 3. 

423 Encarta. Balfour Declaration. 

424 George, D. L. Memoirs Of The Peace Conference, p. 726. 

425 Landman, S. (1936). Great Britain, Great Britain:] The Jews And Palestine. 

London: New Zionist Press, p. 3-6. 

426 Grose, P. (1984). Israel In The Mind Of America. New York: Knopf, p.64. 

427 Associated Press Online. (1999). Balfour Author Was a Jew. 

428 Encarta. Balfour Declaration. 

429 Trial Of The Major War Criminals Before The International Military Court. 

Nuremberg : November 14th 1945 Oct. 1 1946. Official French Text. 
26th April 1946. Debates, Tome XII. D 321. 



Jewish Supremacism 361 

430 Daily Express. (1933). Judea Declares War on Germany. March 24. p. 1. 

431 Dawidowicz, L. (1976). Memo Of June 21, 1933, In: A Holocaust Reader. 

New York: Behrman. p. 150-155. 

432 Nicosia, F. R. (1985). The Third Reich And The Palestine Question. Austin: 

University Of Texas, p. 42. 

433 Niewyk, D. L. (1980). The Jews In Weimar Germany. Baton Rouge, p. 94- 

95,126-131,140-143. 

434 Nicosia, F. (1985). Third Reich, p. 1-15. 

435 Prinz, J. (1934). We Jews. [WirJuden.] Berlin: Erich Reiss. 

436 Hohne, H. (1971). The Order Of The Death's Head. Ballantine. p.376. 

437 Herzl, T. (1970). Jewish State. New York: Herzl Press, p.33, 35, 36. 

438 Weckert, I. (1981). Feuerzeichen: Die Reichskristallnacht. TuBingen: 

Grabert. p. 212. 

439 Black, E. (1984). The Transfer Agreement. New York: MacMillan. p.73. 

440 Herzl, T. (1897). DerKongress. Welt. June 4. Reprinted In: Theodor Herzl's 

Zionistische Schriften (Leon Kellner, Ed.), ErsterTeil, Berlin: Jiidisher 
Verlag, 1920, p. 190 (And p. 139). 

441 Rundschau. (1935). September 17. Quoted In: Yitzhak Arad, With Y. Gutman 

and A. Margaliot, Eds. Documents On The Holocaust (Jerusalem: Yad 
Vashem. (1981). p.82-83. 

442 Kern, E. (1935). Verheimlichte Dokumente. Der Angriff Munich. (1988). 

December 23. p. 148. 

443 Nicosia, F. (1985). Third Reich, p.56. 

444 Brenner, L. (1983). Zionism In The Age Of The Dictators, p. 138. 

445 Margaliot, A. (1977). The Reaction.... Yad Vashem Studies Jerusalem. Vol. 

12. p.90-91. 

446 Levine, H. (1975). A Jewish Collaborator In Nazi Germany. Central European 

History. Atlanta. September, p. 25 1-281. 

447 Wise (1938). Dr. Wise Urges Jews To Declare Selves As Such. New York 

Herald Tribune. June 13. p. 12. 

448 Nicosia, F. (1935). Das Schwarze Korps. September 26. Quoted In: The 

Third Reich And The Palestine Question (1985), p.56-57. 

449 Nicosia, F. (1985). Third Reich, p.63-64, 105, 219-220. 

450 Nicosia, F. (1985). Third Reich, p. 141-144. 

451 Wistrich, R. (1985). On Hitler's Critical View Of Zionism In Mein Kampl See 

Vol. 1, Chap. 11. Quoted In: Hitler's Apocalypse, p. 155. 

452 Nicosia, F. (1985). Third Reich, p.26-28. 

453 Kotze, H. V (1974). Heeresadjutant Bei Hitler. Stuttgart, p.65, 95. 

454 Arad, Y (1981). Documents On The Holocaust, p. 155. 

455 Barnes Review. (1995). Secrets of the Mossad. Sept. p. 11. 

456 Feilchenfeld, W. (1972). Haauara-Transfer Nach Palustina. Tubingen: 

Mohr/Siebeck. 

457 Yisraeli, David (1971). The Third Reich And The Transfer Agreement, Journal 

Of Contemporary History. London. No. 2. p. 129-148. 

458 Encyclopaedia Judaica. (1971). Haavara. Vol. 7. p. 1012-1013. 

459 Nicosia, F. (1985). The Third Reich, p.44-49. [consistency!] 

460 Hilberg, R. (1985). The Destruction Of The European Jews. New York: 

Holmes & Meier, p. 140-141. 

461 Levy, R. S. (1984). Commentary, Sept. 68-71.32. 

462 Original Document In German Auswurtiges Amt Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E 

224152 And E 234155-58. 

463 Yisraeli, D. (1974). The Palestine Problem In German Politics 1889-1945. 

Israel, p.315-317. 



464 Polkhen, K. (1976). The Secret Contacts. Journal Of Palestine Studies. 

Spring-Summer, p.78-80. 

465 Yoar-Gelber. (1939-1942).Zionist Policy And The Fate Of European Jewry. 

Yad Vashem Studies. Vol. XII. p. 199. 

466 Rosenblum, H. (1958). Yediot Aahronot. Jewish Newsletter. New York. 

November. 

467 Bar Zohar. (1966). Le PropheteArme — : Ben Gourion. Fayard. Paris, p. 146. 

468 United Nations General Assembly. (1965). The International Convention on 

the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. 

469 Shahak, I.. The Racism Of The State Of Israel, p.57. 

470 Badi, J. (1960). Fundamental Laws Of The State Of Israel. New York. p. 156. 

471 U.N. Archives. (1948). A. 648. September 16. p. 14. 

472 U.N. Archives. (1948). A. 648. September 16. p. 14. 

473 KJV. Joshua 23:12-13. 

474 Exodus (1960). Director & Producer: Otto Preminger. United Artists. 

475 De Reynier, J. (1950). Chief Representative Of The International Committee 

Of The Red Cross In Jerusalem. (A Jerusalem Un Drapeau Flottait Sur La 
Ligne De Feu', Geneva. 

476 Yediot Ahronot. (1972). April 4. 

477 Ankori, Zvi (1982). Davar. April 9. 

478 Begin, M. (1964). The Revolt: The Story OfThelrgun. Tel-Aviv: Hadar Pub. 

p.162. 

479 Haber, E. (1979). Menachem Begin, The Man And The Legend. New York: 

Delle Book. p385. 

480 Erlich, G. (1992). Not Only Deir Yassin. Hebrew Daily Ha'ir. May 6. 

481 Rokach, L. (1980). Israel's Sacred Terrorism. Bellmont, Mass: Assoc. Arab 

American University Grads. 

482 Ibid. 

483 Ibid. 

484 Israel Kahan Commission. 

485 United Press International. (2001) Sharon fears to visit Belgium. Sept. 7. 

486 Ha'aretz. (2001). As long as he doesn't hurt us again. Feb. 16, 2001 

487 Los Angeles Times. (1998). Mossad's Checkered Past. Home Edition, pp A- 

16. Feb. 27. 

488 Fisk, R. (1996). Massacre In Sanctuary: Eyewitness. The Independent. April 

19. p.l. 

489 Le Monde. (1993). September 12. p. 118. 

490 Phil Reeves. (2001) War On Terrorism: Israel - Assassins kill general. Inde- 

pendent. Oct. 18. 

491 Phil Reeves. (2001) War On Terrorism: Israel - Assassins kill general. Inde- 

pendent. Oct. 18. 

492 The Independent. (2001) BBC staff are told not to call Israeli killings 

'assassination'. August 4. 

493 Sami Sockol, Moshe Reinfeld (1998) May 20. the Israeli daily, Ha'aretz 

494 Joel Greenberg (1993). Israel Rethinks Interrogation of Arabs. New York 

Times Aug. 14 

495 Weizman, Steve. (2001). Rights Groups Cite Israel Torture. AP Online. Nov. 11 

496 Jonathan Alter. (2001). Time To Think About Torture; It's a new world, and 

survival may well require old techniques that seemed out of the question. 
Newsweek, Nov. 5. 



Jewish Supremacism 363 



497 St. Louis Post-Dispatch (2001). U.S. Now might have to consider what once 

was unthinkable, Dershowitz says. 
Nov. 5. 

498 Ostrovsky, V. The Other Side Of Deception(confess\ons of a former Jewish 

MOSSAD agent for Israel) p. 188 

499 Stahl, Leslie. (1996). Interview on CBS. May 11. 

500 Mahnaimi, Gzi and Colvin, Marie. (1998). Israel planning 'ethnic' bomb as 

Saddam caves in. The Sunday Times in the UK. Nov. 15. 

501 Ennes, J. (1979). Assault On The Liberty. New York: Random House. 

502 Bernard Reich. (2001). Encarta Encyclopedia. Ben Gurion. 

503 Katz, Samuel M. (1998). Israel's covert crisis Moment. Oct.l. 

504 Weiner, Tim. (1999) U.S. Now Tells of Much Deeper Damage by Pollard. New 

York Times, 1 1 Jan. 

505 Hersh, Seymour. (1999) The Traitor: The Case Against Jonathan Pollard. The 

New Yorker Magazine. January 18. 

506 Margolis, Eric. (1999). Jonathan Pollard: No Jewish Patriot. Toronto Sun. Jan. 

14. 

Description: From the Toronto Sun, 1999. 

507 Los Angeles Times. (1997). Engineer Admits Divulging Secrets to Israel. Feb. 

20. 

508 Fox Network News. (2001). Top Stories. Dec. 12 

509 Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton's Court. Maariv. 

510 PIA (2001). From a monitored news broadcast of Yid Israel radio. Oct. 3. and 

also reported in Pravda. 

511 Amotz Asa-El and Dan Williams. (2001). Trading places. Jerusalem Post. 

Sept. 28. 

512 Statement of former Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu before the G.S. Govern- 

ment Reform Committee. (2001). Sept. 20. 

513 Jerusalem Post. (2001). Thousands of Israelis missing near WTC, Pentagon. 

Sept. 12. 

514 Lipton, Eric. (2001). Estimates of toll may be too high. New York Times. Sept. 

22. 

515 McWilliams, Brian. (2001) Instant Messages To Israel Warned Of WTC attack. 

Newsbytes. Sept. 27. 

516 Dror, Yuval. (2001). Odigo says workers were warned of attack. Ha'aretz. Sept 

29. 

517 Ibid. 

518 Melman, Yossi. (2001). 5 Israelis detained for v puzzling behavior' after WTC 

tragedy. Ha'aretz. Oct. 14 

519 Bennet, James. (2001). Spilled Blood Is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations 

Closer. NY Times. International section. Sept. 12. 

520 Look Magazine. (1962). January 16. 

521 Gross, F. B. (1975). Faces of Death. MPI Home. 

522 Irving, D. (1964). Destruction of Dresden. New York: Holt, Rinehart and 

Winston. 

523 Barnes Review. (1966). Aerial Bombing of German Cities. March/April Vol. 4. 

p. 2. 

524 Barnes Review. (1996). The Mass Expulsion of Ethnic Germans. Oct. 96 Vol. 

2. 10 

525 Bacque, J. (1989). Other Losses. Canada: Stoddart Publishing. 

526 Kaufman, Theodore N. (1941). Germany must Perishl New York: Gordon 

Press. 



527 Frank, Anne. (1952). Diary of a Young Girl. Translated from the Dutch by B. 

M. Mooyaart-Doubleday, with an introduction by Eleanor Roosevelt. 
Garden City, New York: Doubleday. 

528 Ibid. 

529 Wiesel, E. (1969). Night. New York: Avon Books, p.41-44, 79, 93. 

530 D. Calder. (1987). The Sunday Sun. [Toronto, Canada. May 31. p.C4. 

531 Wiesenthal, S. (1967). The Murderers Among Us. New York: McGraw-Hill 

532 Encyclopaedia Britannica (1952). 

533 Encyclopaedia Britannica (1947),(1952). & (1956). 

534 Encyclopaedia Britannica. (1967). 

535 Paroles d'etranger (1982). Editions du Seuil. 86. 

536 Kennedy, J. F. (1963). Profiles in Courage. New York: Pocket Books. 

537 Ibid. 

538 Ibid. 

539 Ibid. 

540 Washington Daily News. (1949). January 9. 

541 Sunday Pictorial. (1949). January 23. London. 

542 Chicago Daily Tribune. (1948). February 23. 

543 Blumenson, M. (1972). The Patton Papers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 

544 Sack, J. (1993). An Eye For An Eye. New York: Basic Books. 

545 Bacque, James (1997). Crimes and Mercies : The Fate of German Civilians 

Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950. Toronto: Little, Brown and 
Company, Canada. 

546 Barnes Review. (1997). Anderson File: The Movie and the Truth, vol. 3. p. 17. 

547 Holocaust Revisionism Source Book. (1994). Quote from Vanity Fair. pg.l. 

548 Butler, R. (1983). Legions of Death. England, p.235-237. 

549 Nuremberg exhibit, G.S.S.R. p. 197. 

550 Porter, Carlos. (1988). Made in Russia. Facsimile reprint from (IMT (Blue 

Series) vol.1, p. 252.). p. 159. 

551 Wiesenthal, S. (1946). Die Neue Weg. 17/18 p.4-5 

552 Shirer, W. L. (1960). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich : A History of Nazi 

Germany. New York. p. 971 

553 Laqueur, W. (1981). The Terrible Secret : Suppression of the Truth About 

Hitler's "Final Solution." Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 

554 Sereny, Gitta. (1974). Into That Darkness: From Mercy Killing to Mass 

Murder. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 1 4 1 . 

555 Los Angeles Times. (1981). Nazi Soap Rumor During World War II. May 16. 

p.II/2. 

556 Toronto Globe & Mail. (1990). April 25. 

557 Weber, Mark. (1991). Jewish Soap. Journal for Historical Review. Vol. 2. 

p.224. 

558 Barnes Review. (1998). The Myth that Refuses to Die. Mar/Apr. Vol. 4. P. 63. 

559 Hugo, R. (1983). The Hitler Diaries. New York: Morrow. 

560 After much intimidation Cole later repudiated his revisionist viewpoints, but 

the tape of Francizek Piper remains. 

561 Van Pelt, R. J. & Dwork, D. (1996). Auschwitz: 1270 to Present. New Haven 

and London: W.W. Norton & Company, p. 363-364. 

562 Hinsley, F. H. (1984). British Intelligence in the Second World War: Its 

Influence on Strategy and Operations. New York: Cambridge University 
Press. 



Jewish Supremacism 365 



563 Pressac, J. C. (1989). Auschwitz: Techniques and Operation of the Gas 

Chambers. New York: Beate Klarsfeld Foundation. 

564 Mayer, A. J. (1988). Why Did The Heavens Not Darken?: The "Final Solution" 

In History. New York: Pantheon Books, p. 365 

565 Ibid.]p.362. 

566 Compton's Multimedia Encyclopedia. (1991). Miriam Webster. 

567 Ibid. 

568 Hilberg, R. (1961). The Destruction of the European Jews. New York: Harper 

&Row. 

569 The Revised Hilberg. (1986). Simon Wiesenthal Annual. Vol. 3. 294. 

570 Kelley, J., Eisler, P., Kelly K. (1997). Silent Witness. USA Today. May 2. FINAL 

Page 13A 

571 Barnes Review. (1997). Red Rampage 1945. April, vol. 3. 

572 Kennedy, J.F. Profiles in Courage. 

573 Mason, A. T. (1956). Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law. Viking Press. 

p.746. 

574 Hilberg, R. (1996). Holocaust. Encarta Encyclopedia. 

575 Barnes Review 

576 Goldmann, N. (1978). The Jewish Paradox. New York: Grosset & Dunlap. 

577 Ibid. p. 122-123. 

578 Wiesel, E. (1982). Legends of Our Time, (chapter 12: Appointment with Hate.) 

New York: Shocken Books, p. 142. 

579 Dina Kyriakidou. (1996). Le Pen Fights Fine. Reuters Wire Service. June 21. 

580 Churchill, Winston, Sir. (1989). The Second World War. Norwalk, 

Connecticut: Easton Press. Indexes: 1. Gathering storm — 2. Their finest 
hour — 3. Grand Alliance — 4. Hinge of fate — 5. Closing the ring — 6. 
Triumph and tragedy. 

581 Eisenhower, Dwight D. (1997). Crusade in Europe. Baltimore, London: 

Johns Hopkins University Press. 

582 Wiesenthal Center Press Release (1997). December 8. 

583 Counterpunch . (2001). A Conversation with Norman Finklestein. Dec. 3. 

584 Barnes Review. (1997). Truth for Germany: The Guilt Question of the Second 

World War. December. Vol. 3. 12. 

585 Daily Express. (1933). Judea Declares War on Germany. March 24. p.l. 

586 Smith, DrewL. (1971). The Legacy Of The Melting Pot. North Quincy, 

Massachusetts. Christopher Publishing House 

587 Congressional Record, April 12, 1924. 6,265-6,266. 

588 Ross, E. A. (1914). The Old World And The New: The Significance Of Past 

And Present Immigration To The American People. New York: The 
Century Co. p. 144.. 

589 Congressional Record, April 12, 1924. 6,272. 

590 Congressional Record, April 23, 1952. 2,285. 

591 Joint Hearings Before The Subcommittees Of The Committees On The 

Judiciary, 82nd Congress, First Session, On S. 716, H. R. 2379, And H. R. 
2816. March 6-April 9, 1 95 1 . 563 

592 Congressional Record, April 23, 1952. 4,320. 

593 Javits, J. (1951). Let's Open Our Gates. New York Times Magazine. July 8. 

p.8, 33. 

594 Congress Weekly. (1956). Editorial of February 20. p. 3 

595 Cohen, N. W. (1972). Not Free To Desist: The American Jewish Committee 

1906-1966. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society Of America. 

596 Ibid, p.342. 

597 Sachar, H. (1992). A History Of Jews In America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 

598 Ibid, p.427. 



599 MacDonald, K. B. (1994). A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism As A 

Group Evolutionary Strategy. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. 

600 MacDonald, K. B. (1998). Separation And Its Discontents: Toward An 

Evolutionary Theory Of Anti-Semitism. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. 

601 Silberman, C. E. (1985). A Certain people: American Jews and Their Lives 

Today. New York: Summit Books. 

602 Higham , J. (1984). Send These To Me: Immigrants In Urban America. 

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 

603 Bennett, M. T. (1963). American Immigration Policies: A History. Washington, 

DC: Public Affairs Press, p. 1 8 1 . 

604 A. M. Rosenthal. (1992). New York Times. December 9. 

605 A. M. Rosenthal. (1992). .New York Times. December 9. 

606 Jewish Bulletin. (1993). July. 23. 

607 Jewish Bulletin. (1993). Feb. 19. 

608 Weyl, N. & Possony, S. (1963). Geography Of Intellect. Chicago: H. Regnery 

Co. 

609 Van den Haag, E. The Jewish Mystique. New York, Stein and Day. 

610 Pittsburgh Post Gazette. (1969). Apr. 1. p.26. 

611 Darwin, C. (1892). The Origin Of Species By Means Of Natural Selection, Or 

The Preservation Of Favored Races In The Struggle For Life. New York, D. 
Appleton And Company. 

612 Keith, Arthur, Sir, (1949). A New Theory of Human Evolution. New York. 

Philosophical Library 

613 Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The Genetical Theory Of Social Behaviour .Vols. I, 

II. Journal Of Theoretical Biology. 7:p. 1-52. 

614 Wilson, E. (1975). Sociobio logy: A New Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard 0. 

Press. 

615 Grolier's Electronic Encyclopedia. (1994). "Dog" 

616 Frank, Gelya. (1997). Jews, Multiculturalism, And Boasian Anthropology. The 

American Anthropologist. (99 (4) 731-745. 

617 Frank, Geyla (1997). 

618 Meyerhoff, B. (1978). Number Our Days. E. P. Hutton. 

619 Chase, G. A., & V. A. McKusick (1972). Founder Effect In Tay-Sachs Disease. 

American Journal Of Human Genetics. 25:339-352. 

620 Fraikor, A. L. (1977). Tay-Sachs Disease: Genetic Drift Among The Ashkenazi 

Jews. Social Biology. 24: 1 1 7-1 34. 

621 Sachs, L., & M. Bat-Miriam (1957). The Genetics Of Jewish Populations. 

American Journal Of Human Genetics. 9:1 17-126. 

622 Mourant, A. E., A. C. Kopec, & K. Domaniewska-Sobczak (1978). The 

Genetics of the Jews. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. 

623 Mourant, A. E., Kopec, A. C. & Domaniewska-Sobczak D. (1978). The 

Genetics Of The Jews. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. 

624 Bonne-Tamir, B., Ashbel, S., & Kenett, R. (1977). Genetic Markers: Benign 

And Normal Traits Of Ashkenazi Jews In Genetic Diseases Among 
Ashkenazi Jews. Ed. R. M. Goodman & A. G. Motulsky. New York: Raven 
Press. 

625 Karlin, S., R. Kenett & Bonne-Tamir, B. (1979). Analysis Of Biochemical 

Genetic Data On Jewish Populations II. Results And Interpretations Of 
Heterogeneity Indices And Distance Measures With Respect To Standards. 
American Journal Of Human Genetics. 31:341-365. 



Jewish Supremacism 367 



626 Mille, S. & Kobyliansky, E. (1985). Dermatoglyphic Distances Between Israeli 

Jewish Population Groups Of Different Geographic Extraction. Human 
Biology. 57: 97 -111. 

627 Kobyliansky, E. & Livshits, G. A. (1985). Morphological Approach To The 

Problem Of The Biological Similarity Of Jewish And Non-Jewish 
Populations. Annals Of Human Biology. 12:203-212. 

628 Sofaer, J. A, Smith, P. & Kaye, E. (1986). Affinities Between Contemporary 

And Skeletal Jewish And Non-Jewish Groups Based On Tooth 
Morphology. American Journal Of Physical Anthropology . 70:265-275. 

629 Lenz, F. (1931). The Inheritance Of Intellectual Gifts In Human Heredity, 

Trans. E. Paul & C. Paul, Ed. E. Baur, E. Fischer, & F. Lenz. New York: 
Macmillan. 

630 Patai, R., & Patai, J. (1989). The Myth Of The Jewish Race. Detroit, Wayne 

State University Press. 

631 Cohen, Steven M. (1986). Vitality And Resilience In The American Jewish 

Family. In S. M. Cohen & P. E. Hyman (Eds.), The Jewish Family: Myths 
And Reality. New York Holmes & Meier. 228. 

632 Stolper, P. (1984). Jewish Alternatives In Love, Dating, And Marriage. 

NCSY/Orthodox Union/University Press Of America. 64. 

633 Landau, D. (1993). Piety And Power: The World Of Jewish Fundamentalism. 

New York: Hill And Wang. 300. 

634 Shaffir, W. (1986). Persistence And Change In The Hasidic Family. In The 

Jewish Family: Myths And Reality. Ed. S. M. Cohen & P. E. Hyman. New 
York: Holmes & Meier, p. 190. 

635 Ellman, Y (1987). Intermarriage In The United States: A Comparative Study 

Of Jews And Other Ethnic And Religious Groups. Jewish Social Studies. 
Vol. 49. p. 1-26. 

636 Kosmin, B. A, Goldstein, S., Waksberg, J., Lerer, N., Keysar, A, & 

Scheckner, J. (1991). Highlights Of The CJF 1990 National Jewish 
Population Survey . New York: Council Of Jewish Federations. 

637 Meyer, M. A. (1988). Response To Modernity: A History Of The Reform 

Movement In Judaism. New York: Oxford University Press. 

638 Waxman, C. (1989). The Emancipation, The Enlightenment, And The 

Demography Of American Jewry . Judaism. Vol. 38. p. 488-501. 

639 Elazar, D. J. (1980). Community And Polity: Organizational Dynamics Of 

American Jewry , First Published In 1976. Philadelphia: The Jewish 
Publication Society Of America. 

640 Ibid 

641 Zborowski, M., & Herzog, E. (1952). Life Is With People: The Jewish Little- 

Town Of Eastern Europe. New York: International Universities Press. 

642 Lieberman, S. & Weinfeld. (1978). Demographic Trends And Jewish Survival. 

Midstream. November. 

643 Jeremias, J. (1969). Jerusalem In The Time Of Jesus: An Investigation Into 

Economic And Social Conditions During The New Testament Period. 
Trans. F. H. Cave & C. H. Cave (Based On An Earlier Draft Of A 
Translation ByM. E. Dahl). Philadelphia: Fortress Press, p.311. 

644 Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion. 

645 Rushton, J. Philippe. (1995). Race, Evolution, and Behavior : A Life History 

Perspective. New Brunswick, New Jersey. Transaction Publishers. 

646 Churchill, W.I. (1920). Illustrated Sunday Herald. February 8. 

647 Levinson, B.M. (1960). A Comparative Study Of The Verbal And Performance 

Ability Of Monolingual And Bilingual Native Born Jewish Preschool 
Children Of Traditional Parentage. Journal Of Genetic Psychology. Vol. 
97. p.93-112. 



648 Brown, F. (1944). A Comparative Study Of The Intelligence Of Jewish And 

Scandinavian Kindergarten Children. Vol. 64.p. 67-92. 

649 Backman, M. E. (1972). Patterns Of Mental Abilities: Ethnic, Socio-Economic, 

And Sex Differences. American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 9. p. 1- 
12. 

650 Levinson, B. M. (1957). The Intelligence Of Applicants For Admission To 

Jewish Day Schools. Jewish Social Studies. Vol. 19 p.29-140. 

651 Journal Of Genetic Psychology (1958). Cultural Pressure And WAIS Scatter In 

A Traditional Jewish Setting. Vol. 93. p. 277-286. 

652 Journal Of Genetic Psychology. (1960). A Comparative Study Of The Verbal 

And Performance Ability Of Monolingual And Bilingual Native Born Jewish 
Preschool Children Of Traditional Parentage. Vol. 97. p. 93-1 12. 

653 Journal Of Genetic Psychology. (1962). Jewish Subculture And WAIS 

Performance Among Jewish Aged. Vol. 100. p. 55-68. 

654 Mosse, W. E. (1987). Jews In The German Economy: The German-Jewish 

Economic Elite 1820-1935. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, p. 166. 

655 Swartzbaugh, Richard. (1973). The Mediator; His Strategy for Power. Cape 

Canaveral, Florida: Howard Allen. 

656 Lynn, R. (1987). The Intelligence Of The Mongoloids: A Psychometric, 

Evolutionary And Neurological Theory. Personality And Individual 
Differences. Vol. 8.p.8 13-844. 

657 Rushton, J. P. (1991). Race Differences In Intelligence: A Global Perspective. 

Mankind Quarterly. Vol. 3 1 . p.255-296. 

658 J. Lynch, C Ed. (1992). Intelligence: Ethnicity And Culture. In Cultural 

Diversity And The Schools. Ed.. S. Modgil. London and Washington, D.C.: 
Falmer Press. 

659 Hertzberg, A. & Hirt-Manheimer, A. (1998). Relax. It's Okay to be the Chosen 

People. Reform Judaism. May.